Jump to content

Search the Community

Showing results for tags 'xp deus'.

More search options

  • Search By Tags

    Type tags separated by commas.
  • Search By Author

Content Type


  • Metal Detecting & Gold Prospecting Forums
    • Detector Prospector Forum
    • Metal Detecting For Coins & Relics
    • Metal Detecting For Jewelry
    • Metal Detecting For Meteorites
    • Gold Panning, Sluicing, Dredging, Drywashing, Etc
    • Rocks, Minerals, Gems & Geology
    • Metal Detector Advice & Comparisons
    • Metal Detecting & Prospecting Classifieds
    • First Texas - Bounty Hunter, Fisher & Teknetics
    • Garrett Metal Detectors
    • Makro / Nokta Metal Detectors
    • Minelab Metal Detectors
    • Tesoro Metal Detectors
    • White's Metal Detectors
    • XP Metal Detectors


  • Catalogs & Brochures
  • Owners Manuals
  • Minelab CTX 3030 Programs
  • Spreadsheets


  • Calendar




Website URL






Gear Used:

Found 119 results

  1. hello I wanted to know if it is possible to improve this result with the Equinox :
  2. Looking at the classified section of another forum and on the first page there are 8 Deus for sale, for trade or marked as sold. Must be quite a few comparisons being made out there.
  3. Hi! Help determine whether it is worth buying this metal detector? It is difficult to determine because it is not cheap. Previously, I wanted to buy an XP Deus 22 or another new cool metal detector Makro Multi Kruzer. Found on the Internet comparison Minelab Equinox 800 vs Makro Multi Kruzer. Now I do not know which of the three detectors to choose :) Does someone already have experience of using them?
  4. This will be where I will share info. Head to head test. This pic here, look closely towards end of little screwdriver looking magnet. At the end of it lays a #9 shot pellet out of the cartridge in pic. Equinox hits this small item well, even going out to 1-1.25" coil height (air test). Using settings park 2 Mulit freq, speed setting 6, 0 iron bias. I did notice though reducing speed setting seemed to make performance worse (distance wise). What about Deus using 11" LF coil? Deus could hear, have to be real close coil though, tonal signature not as evident nonferrous exist vs Equinox. Equinox is clear winner here with this test. Forgot to say.Sensitivty setting used on Equinox 23. Sensitivity setting used with Deus 93.
  5. Hello. for the moment we dont have the equinox in France . So i cant do the comparison. Anybody have do some comparison beetween the 2 in iron trash ?
  6. in version 4 and 4.1 there are stock programs that were built using older versions. Why? Why not all built on V4? And when we are building out own programs why would we want to use those older versions? Would not the latest version have the newest technology and thereby being better? I think the Deep program is on the 2.0 version and Hot on 3.2 What is better on these versions that we would want to build on them? Doing so could make a big difference in the type of detecting that we are doing. Let's do it! Thanks
  7. Alright, Thought I would share a few experiences I had today while detecting in the wild. A 3 hour hunt with split time between round and elliptical HF coils. Made a few finds using both coils. I ran the hot program while actually hunting. But used gold field program to check some targets. Glad I did too. Payed off. Here is pic. Notice the bracelet with the name on it. Gent is still a kicking and in his 80s now, bracelet likely lost back in late50s early 60s. I showed it to his sister actually. What about this bracelet portion? I hope folks don't laugh here, what I am going to say, but it is true. I was when I found this, in the same area where cut Spanish bit and half dime came from back in the summer. I'll bet I have swung a Deus detector, others too over this bracelet buried over 300 times. And I heard it likely every time but didn't dig. Why? Probably the same reason why is the same reason I wouldn't have dug again today except for the mighty gold field program. I swept this bracelet (not knowing) with hot program and the signal I got, I would have bet the farm it was relic iron. A very tight super high short blaring signal. I actually remember getting this same tone here previously many times before. Remember this place does infact have old relic iron smaller, medium sized and bigger all over. So in the past I was writing this target off as iron. Today after I hit the target, I toggled over to gold field same freq run as my hot program Reactivty 2.5. When Iistened to this target using gold field, a nice sounding signal smooth on the edges, usually a good giveaway it is infact nonferrous. And sure enough it was. One more target I dug today I will discuss, and again using gold field gave me some additional Intel to actually recover find. The old button in the pic. I located it with round HF coil but the tone signature was crippled big time, with multiple tones being had as I swept. I repeated sweep several times and I would have gave < 15 % chance of nonferrous even existing beneath my coil. But checking target with gold field even even running 1 level lower (slower) Reactivty (level 2.5) I got more to go on vs the disc mode hot program, meaning now my odds went up to >50 % chance of being nonferous based on what I heard. To conclude here. I won't BS folks here. Using the HF coils running 28.8khz they can be sharper in iron vs the LF coils. A person will get used to if they apply themselves. One thing I will mention here and this too is a good weapon (using gold field to check suspect targets) is using disc program sometimes Deus audio will get caught, trying to sound off extremely close to iron range, and a user may be thinking is what I hear nonferrous or is it iron. When you get these, if you hit them with gold field and you hear nothing, or you hear a signal more corrupt vs what you heard using disc mode program, you can almost bet the farm what you are hearing is iron. Now this applies moreso to shallow and middepth targets. Cheers.
  8. Version 3.0 http://www.xpmetaldetectorsamericas.com/blog/xp-deus-update-version-3-0-announcement/ Version 3.1 http://www.xpmetaldetectorsamericas.com/blog/deus-version-3-1-update-now-available/ Version 3.2 http://www.xpmetaldetectorsamericas.com/blog/xp-deus-metal-detector-software-update-version-3-2-released/ Version 4.0 http://www.xpmetaldetectorsamericas.com/blog/xp-deus-v4-0-software-and-the-high-frequency-coil/ http://www.xpmetaldetectors.com/blog-detection/en/update-deus/deus-product-information-and-news/ Version 4.1 http://www.xpmetaldetectorsamericas.com/xp-deus-version-4-features This link here very helpful. http://www.xpmetaldetectors.com/telechargement/Instruction_manual/ Select 3rd file from the bottom -Summary manual Deus. For some reason XP has merged the version 4.0 and 4.1 changes/improvements on some of their postings. The link with file identified directly above here points out these differences between versions 4.0 and 4.1.
  9. Hey XP, why is the TX power locked at 2 for the HF coils? I am sure that you have a reason for doing so but how about clueing us in on the reason. also, why is it locked at 2 and not let us be able to change it? You could "recommend" setting it at 2 but allow us to change it as needed. The other day i was in heavy iron with the 9" round HF coil and it was just too hot at 2 TX and if I were using a LF coil in this situation i would have dropped the TX to 1 to lower the coil power as I believe that TX 2 was "reflecting" back so strongly that I couldn't get better separation even at reactivity of 3. How about changing that with the next update?
  10. This change really bugs me. Seems like now we have a setting that can really screw up performance if it is not set properly and really have not been provided with the tools to properly determine the optimal setting. Its kind of like saying manually set ground balance based on the height of a bargraph without any units shown. Any scientific method at setting this parameter consistently and optimally?
  11. If like mine, after 5 years of neglect & general ware & tare ,, your remote is suffering from scratches on the screen...... here's a quick tip to restore your remote screen back to new! gently rub over the screen with a " Brasso pad wadding" cleaner,,, it takes about 15-20 minutes, after which your screen will be as new!! hope this helps! regards Dave
  12. XP Deus Version 4.1 Users Manual

    Enjoy http://www.xpmetaldetectorsamericas.com/local/Xpmda/Frontend/assets/docs/DEUS_V4_Manual.pdf ATTN: For those updating and possessing HF coils note bottom of last page in this link. http://www.xpmetaldetectors.com/telechargement/Instruction manual/SUMMARY_MANUAL_DEUS_V4_V4.1_UK.pdf
  13. In case you read here XP. I have been using the gold field program using both HF coils locating relics in old sites. The program as it is, is very useable but I think an improvement if feasible would make the program even better. The gold nugget hunters using Deus detector I think would welcome this change if it can be done. My recommendation is allow tone pitch change in gold field program much like you currently offer in the Pitch selection for tones option.
  14. For anyone interested. I haven't seen any packages yet for round 9" HF coil though, unless I missed. http://www.xpmetaldetectorsamericas.com/xp-deus
  15. Not English but the video says it all....
  16. This will be the first fall and winter season for using these 2 coils. I have put quite a few hours on both coils this past summer and very early fall timeframe. I do note difference as of late since the temps are cooler and ground wetter with shorter daytime period existing. Elliptical HF coil seems to (using equal settings back in the summer) hit better more often on vertically positioned nails in the ground. Round HF coil back in the summer, this hitting on vertically suspended buried nails practically nonexistent, but with wetter ground seems happens sometimes, but not near as often as with using HF elliptical coil on Deus. This data above is reflective of using Deus with both coils in the same site(s) as I did back in the summer/early fall. Don't take this info wrong, I love both coils, are deadly in iron and higher mineral soil. Not all nonferrous when swept with either coil will yield textbook tone/ signal either. Just this afternoon late back in the area where I recovered old Spanish coin, I get a signal using round HF coil, a signal that would only high tone half the time when sweeping what I considered (perfect to near perfect) position and speed. Digging suspect target yielded a very thin piece of lead. This area remember busted countless times with Deus and LF coils. I will go on the record here now, based on my testing and use of the round HF coil, comparing and testing against 9" LF coil, from a providing a nonferrous tone/signal on buried objects perspective it is my opinion the 9" round HF coil has made the 9" LF coil obsolete. Remember how I conditionalized my comment here. Using the 9" LF coil does give some advantage depending on the target scenario for ID (give better odds of IDing higher conductive target) since the LF coil can be run at lower freqs than hf coil with NO Vdi normalization selected. So it is my opinion XP might should consider at least for the relic Hunter a Deus package already packaged with either of the HF coils in lieu of LF coils. This would obviously save relic hunters interested in Deus some bucks.
  17. Looks like there has been a $40 reduction in MAP for the XP MI-6 Pinpointer... It was $199 and is now $159. This makes the XP closer in price to the competition. Many manufacturers dropping prices recently and that's good for the consumer!
  18. Here is a link talking about the version. Still unofficial, but I think we can see at least some improvements users will get when version is officially released. http://www.findmall.com/read.php?83,2406075
  19. At one time before its release I had been interested in the Nokta Impact. Speculation ran rampant and I got sucked into the vortex. I already owned a Red Racer and a Gold Racer so I knew that Nokta/Makro made good detectors. As so often happens life intrudes on our metal detecting plans. In the last year I have not detected near as much as in years previous so I had shelved my interest in the Impact. Yet recently I have been able to detect more so I went ahead and acquired one. As usual, I first read the manual(what a geek). While the Impact is a more complex detector than either the Red or Gold Racer, the excellent menu tree and my perusal of the manual had me up and running in short order. At my first opportunity I took the Impact to a location that has had a serious pounding with the Deus, CTX, and who knows how many other detectors. I started detecting with the stock elliptical affixed to the stick. Although the Impact weighs about 4 Lbs. I thought it was nicely balanced so swinging it did not overly fatigue me. This machine has a mode for about any type of detecting you would want to do but on my 1st day I only tried 4 of them. GEN D, DI99, DI4, and VLX2. After a couple hours trying the different modes and learning the tones on the Impact I had found some non-ferrous items that were missed by all other machines but nothing that was a keeper, mainly miscellaneous bits of brass and copper. I thought it was time to switch gears so I threw on the 7" elliptical. I had previously been running mainly factory presets in the various modes but with this coil I wanted to gain back some of the depth I knew I would lose with the smaller coil so I bumped the sensitivity up. I worried about increased EMI but with this coil running hotter, EMI did not cause me any problems. I really like this tiny elliptical. It's the perfect size for working in the iron while still getting more coverage than a 5" or 6" round. I took this little football coil into the heaviest iron at the site and once again while I was able to pluck some non-ferrous targets out of that mess I found nothing to write home about(story of my life, LOL). I did try out the 15" coil. Honestly I am not a big coil guy unless I am swinging a PI and going for max depth. I love working in the iron with VLF's so usually a small coil is welded to the dirt end of whatever machine I am swinging at the time.This 15" is a coil I would use for very specific circumstances only as I would need to wear a harness if I was going to swing it very long. With the 15" mounted up to this machine it was very nose heavy and my arm hurt in no time at all. The wireless headphones seemed to work well. I did not notice any lag that would affect target recovery. A few times I thought I detected the slightest lag in heavy iron, but it was near the end of the day and honestly I was getting tired and probably a little cranky. Likely my imagination. At the end of my first day with the Nokta Impact I was favorably impressed with most aspects of the machine. My main gripes were 1) while well balanced it is still 4 Lbs. I am used to a Deus so when you grab this detector you wonder why it can't be lighter. 2) The tones are very digitized sounding. Some people may love these tones, me not so much. 3) The wireless headphones do not have a long enough adjustment band for me to wear them comfortably with a baseball cap. They rode up on my ears and irritated me. A few days later I decided to do a shoot out between the Impact and some other detectors I have to see how they performed with iron masking. This test was not done to rigorous scientific standards. LOL. Just a test I did for my own information. I can't post all the individual settings and results. I had to come to work on a tugboat and I forgot and left all my notes at home. I will give a quick synopsis of my findings. I hope some one finds it useful but it is just my own opinion. Others are likely to have different results. My friend Chuck(Strick) will post photos of the test for me because he is a good guy and has that down pat. The machines tested were; CTX 3030 with 6"R coil. Red Racer with OOR coil. Deus with 9" LF coil. Deus with Elliptical HF coil. Impact with 4x7" coil. I made sure the dirt was clean of targets befor flipping over a rubber welcome mat and inserting a 1926 SLQ and a 1855 seated dime into holes in the backing. I did this so the square nails I placed near the coins were slightly elevated over the coins. I manual GBed all the machines except the CTX. The dirt under the mat is kinda hot. It lights up most of the bars on the Deus FE meter. The results of the test were surprising to me. First that the CTX did so well in comparison to most of the other detectors. On the first scenario( quarter with one small square nail and one big square nail), all the detectors except the Deus with HF coil could generate a diggable signal on 25% +/- of angles swung on the target. The Deus with HF coil could get a diggable signal 360 degrees around the target. On the second scenario(dime with 3 nails), all the detectors except the Deus with HF coil could not generate a diggable signal from any angle swung. The Deus with HF coil could generate a signal 360 degrees around the target. As I said before I was a little shocked the CTX did so well in the quarter test scenario compared to most of the other detectors because I have seen the Red Racer, and Deus HF and LF coils eat it alive when comparing signals on live relic digs on un-dug targets in heavy iron. I thought the Red Racer would do better as I have also seen situations in which the little OOR coil on the Red Racer seemed almost magical on targets the Deus LF and other detectors have failed on. As far as the Impact is concerned I felt its performance in these two scenarios on that day in that dirt was was nothing to write home about but to be fair it did as well as any detector besides the Deus with HF coil. I was hoping for more as far as separation/unmasking ability from this detector with the 7" coil onboard. But I must say that a detectorist that I respect very much and I believe is a straight shooter tells me the Impact with 7" coil does beat the Deus with HF coil in some scenarios. Anyway, on that day in those two scenarios the Deus with HF coil spanked all the others. I am sure other detectorists will have different opinions or results and that is fine by me. I don't own stock in any of the companies manufacturing these machines. In summation I would say I do like the Impact. It has many fine features and I know I need way more hours on it to leverage all of its capabilities to my advantage. In my world the CTX is my park and lawn machine. The Deus with the HF coil has become my main relic machine for heavy iron. I love the Deus for its light weight, speed, and versatility. But now there is a new kid in town- the Impact. LOL . When I get time I know I will enjoy learning the nuances of this machine. I am looking forward to spending more time in the all-metal modes and some of the other modes I haven't explored yet, like Deep mode.
  20. Some folks may be interested in either of these 2 coils, or both actually. How do they compare? As far as relic hunting and yes coin hunting. Today I did some careful testing and thought I would share with folks here. I don't have gobs of time yet on round HF coil like I do the smaller HF elliptical. Anyway with the HF coil being deemed high frequency some folks when they see or hear about this round coil may be thinking hunting gold nuggets only. Well, to make a long story short here, the round HF coil based on my testing is the odds on favorite to sneak higher conductors out of iron and nails vs using LF coil. The use of the lower freq band on the round HF coil centered btw at 14.4khz yields some awfully good results for such a big coil. If folks thought the 9" LF coil was/is grand here for finding coins in iron and nails, the HF coil here yields significant advantage. Higher conductors can be had too using the middle band of frequency centered at 28.8 kHz, but it is my opinion based on testing if a Deus user hunting a site hard using 28.8khz and tried to find all higher conductive coins, I think the site could be hunted again using 14.4 kHz and the possibility of additional high conducive coins be had. One very noticeable thing with the round HF coil, Reactivty 4 yields a depth advantage (distance measurement between the planes (where coin and nail) for example lay vs 9" LF coil. Many instances where use of Reactivty 4 on LF coil yield no signal on clad dime. Also using round HF coil hunting in lots of iron, Reactivty 2.5 IMO yields poor results, better to use 3 or 4. The thinking with original LF Deus coils were better unmasking to be had as highest freq approx 18khz, and this was/is still true. Using 54khz (upper freq band) IMO based on testing, user looking for high conductors don't expect much detection on higher conductors as far as they existing beneath ferrous object plane. Now I did do similar test with US nickel, and IMO strangely I think the differences (advantage noted) for round HF coil are less significant vs 9" LF coil. Still though a depth advantage using Reactivty level 4. Now the testing above was done on a set of sterile concrete steps, with GB dialed on all testing to 84. So these test don't really account for soil mineralization effects, but still I think these results do tell me some thing. I sure wouldn't expect to see better results than I got if my test rigging was buried in say medium or higher level minerlized soil. Now none of this above, it should be necessarily related to gold nugget performance. A side note here. Thus far using the round HF coil for me, in a couple sites pounded with Deus both 9 and 11" LF coils, not much has surfaced. I should point out these few sites have really never given up any high conductors like coins and all of my use of round HF coil has been using 28.8khz freq in these sites. After testing today I can understand the Why behind maybe why my nonferrous finds were lacking. Just thought I would share. Cheers.