Jump to content
  • Announcements

    • Steve Herschbach

      Archives Closed - New Forums   10/16/2017

      The old archive system has been closed and the threads moved to new forums. See the full forum listing here. Detailed explanation here.

Recommended Posts

Isn't trying to communicate by typing words fun! In my case while in the road banging out quick replies at a rest stop. None taken nor given JP, I ALWAYS appreciate your presence on the forum, as do many others I am sure.

Sorry to say I just have low odds hopes of finding a nugget over an ounce in any given year so tuning specifically for larger nuggets is pretty much wishful thinking. I think I really score if I get a 1/4 oz nugget!

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

JP, IIRC I read another post a month or so ago where you said something similar to the effect that the benefits of General will become much more apparent with the release of the larger coil.

Can you elaborate a bit? Is there a reason a larger coil compliments General more than High Yield?

Also, if a smaller coil is released do you have any thoughts about potential ground issues? As sensitive as the machine already is I've been wondering if a smaller coil might be "too" sensitive and end up with a lot of ground noise issues.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Not trying to butt in on JP!

My expectation for small coils runs the opposite. Small coils are not more sensitive per se. They see less ground and so the signal (target) to noise (ground) ratio is superior to that of large coils. A small coil should work better with High Yield.

Large coils see more ground and so the longer time constants employed in General and Extra Deep allow big coils to punch deeper on big nuggets without being swamped with ground noise, as would no doubt happen in High Yield.

Again, Eureka Gold comparison. Three frequencies, 60 kHz (High Yield), 20 kHz (General), 6.4 kHz (Extra Deep). If you get the 15" Coiltek coil for the Eureka you will find it is only recommended for the 6.4 kHz setting for all the same reasons. Small coils get the most bang at 60 kHz.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I actually tried this bogene setting on the 5000 yesterday. I didnt find any gold trying the setting out. But I did find lots of deep sharpnel junk. I turned the threshold off after gb. Then had it in general, sens. Xtra. Turned up the gain to 18 and stab. Up to 14. The ground I was at is mild mineralization with little patches of hot iron dirt concentrations in the native red dirt. This setting would hit on ground noise from them a little more. But even the vlfs hit these too. I did find that the tail end of the signals drop off rather quick. Not sure if I would run this setting all the time. Just seems different with no threshold. I did find a piece of gold earlier in the day running my regular settings with new coiltek mono elite.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Well she who has to be obeyed let me go out for the day to try the Bogenes settings on little broken down reef from last weekend. Turned sensitivity full, threshold 10, high yield difficult. Wow 4 small scraps 3 at 3-4" other on surface all positive solid definite signals much easier to centre and retrieve, only 1.22 grams weight in the 4 but enough to know, many thanks Sandy. Certainly I had my doubts after a threshold always just audible for 30 years plus, but no more. Tried in deeper ground down a bit below reef, nothing so maybe nothing detectable there or Bogenes settings are for shallow ground.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Sunday we were using Bogene's settings as it was noisy yet again. The EMI dropped considerably close to noon, but as we were on a roll we persisted and ended up with 31 bits for 14 grams. It is amazing how small some of these bits are and the depth they come from, especially considering we have been hammering this spot since 2008 with all the Minelabs since then. There are 2 little bits in the 0's of the GPZ7000 logo that will be about 0.05 in weight.

 

IMG_0446.jpg

  • Like 8

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Sandy,

Such a pleasure to see you posting here. 

This forum continues to attract some of the most experienced detectorist's in the world.

Your picture shows once again that the 7000 shines at finding porous and/or rough pieces.

From fiddling with Bogene's settings on a 5000, it is pretty conclusive that in the right situation, they work.

Hope all is well with you, maybe PM at some point.

Flak

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Norvic,

You and Paul need to give all of us an update on your Bogene's and the 19.

JW might like it.

I know I will.

Mitchel

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Mn, no haven`t had any success with Bogenes on the 19, but then again I`ve mainly been with sensitivity around 20, threshold 27,  General, no audio smoothing and in normal if the ground allows it, which is so in most of the ground I do. But could at any time change, tis what  puts the weight in the pocket that counts. I feel Bogenes is more for the 14" where one is on a noisy patch, that is superheated with a blazing hot sun and you`ve flogged it with all settings, coils etc. It reinforces the old Irish saying "never leave a patch til you`ve dug another piece" and I reckon that`s exactly what JWs doing, a good test for the 19".

Heh if he doesn`t hurry up how about we nick over the ponds and do a bit of moonlighting...........:wink:

  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Norvic....you are more than welcome.....I will even give you a bed. :smile:

JW :smile:

  • Like 3

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

    • By jasong
      Does anyone have a vid link to a nugget going low-high (filmed after the update only) that shows how deep it was and how big the nugget was?
      On nuggets up to 40 grams I still cannot get a low-high signal with just one exception and that is squirrly little wiry or thin flaky pieces that flip between high-low and low-high, and with some regular pieces when they get really close to the coil they will flip between the two as well. 
      I had a 65 gram slug of solid smelted gold and it was going high-low on the GPZ. It was low-high on my 45 though.
      What I'd really like to see are the types of gold that are low-high from beginning to end, no matter how far from the coil. If anyone has some links or has such a nugget and could toss it on the ground and film it I would be very grateful.
      One reason I'm wondering (ok, don your tinfoil hats) is low-high is so often iron now that I can't help but wonder if discrim might be possible with ZVT tech and there may be some kind of "discrimination update" coming in the future.
      Also, bonus question: can anyone show me a case where General is outperforming High Yield in depth and sensitivity and what exactly the type of gold (weight/sponginess/etc) is that causes such a thing to occur? Or ground type if that is causing the difference. We see it on the ML chart (or it would appear that way but we don't know for certain due to omission of actual sample defintion), but I haven't found a case with my gold where it happens yet so I'm curious what to look out for or if I should just give up on going back with General after HY unless I have gold past a certain size threshold.
    • By Steve Herschbach
      Hopefully this clarifies things for people!
      http://www.minelab.com/__files/f/274444/KBA_26-1%20GPZ%207000%20Tips%20for%20Better%20Ground%20Balance.pdf
    • By kiwijw
      Hi guys, I have done a goggle search on this & have come up with nothing. I thought I saw an article on here about it but a search showed nothing here either.  I thought there might have been something printed on the box to help out.....but no.  Is there any thing I need to know or is it all pretty easy really? Thanks for any help or advise. 
      JW  
    • By russ
      I've been back to 5 old patches with the new detector but I'm limited with a health condition as to how long I can swing the detector but It might be up to 40% less   I've got about 20 more old patches to re-hunt that will take many more days.
       
      So far I've picked up 6.2 dwt's that were missed by several other Minelabs and a gold bug II and different operators over several years of hitting the same patches.
       
      I don't think I need to say much about the detector because the testers Steve, Chris, and JP have well written reviews about the GPZ . The biggest nugget so far is a .8 dwt and a .9 dwt nugget. I'm still waiting for the bigger gold....   but in all fairness to the GPZ the ground is mostly deep where the big gold was found and I used big round mono's up to a 25" nuggetfinder and a 24" Coiltek to find the big gold. 

    • By Rob Allison
      Hello All,
         Just a FYI, make sure you understand the settings and what is working best.  I just realized the first day out, even though I found 8 nuggets, I was running settings that were no better than the GPX 5000 after some further testing.  What I would consider a large nugget, the GPZ considers it a "small" nugget, which is best for High Yield over General.  
      I also realized "Difficult" soil really makes the unit purr, but takes a lot of performance away on the ground I was hunting.  I was trying to find a happy medium from a noisy Normal to a Difficult soil setting with a higher gain.  
      Experiment is the key.  What I originally thought was good, wasnt ..... 
    • By russ

       
      Posted by gullyhunter.
       
      That's very strange... unless he tracked out the target by pumping the coil?
×