Jump to content
Steve Herschbach

Tin, Bolts, Washers, And Other Ferrous Items That Read As Non-Ferrous

Recommended Posts


not to mention the old square nails were apparently a much better grade of iron...I have found many that appeared to be just-made...

Thanks for your unending pursuit of knowledge and for sharing the same.

fred

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks Steve, you have just confirmed several of my suspicions. The amount of rust and the location of the rust on nails and flat iron sheets also seems to add to the signal problems.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I have no idea why this has popped up as a recent thread but I like it - maybe you thought it was pertinent Steve and brought it to the top of the forum?

The first paragraph at the bottom of the Q & A page describes how high frequency detectors are perhaps not the best at discrimination.  Is this perhaps why the discrimination on my Gold Monster has not been as accurate as I was hoping?  I was expecting miracles of course :laugh:

Due to the fact that high frequency is not as good at discrimination is that perhaps just one of the reasons that the multi-frequency Equinox is going to be better at discriminating targets - it has the lower frequency range to assist.  Obviously Multi IQ, processing speed, etc is probably having a greater influence but...? 

And the second paragraph at the top of the page where it is talking about positive and negative signals.  So non-ferrous can ONLY give positive signals whereas ferrous are mostly negative but can be positive.   So that made me think that if something is giving a negative signal at all it can simply be dismissed as rubbish - yippee.        But then I imagined a beautiful big chunk of gold that had a heap of ironstone attached and assume that it might give positive and negative signal responses??  

When responding please take into account that I have never used a VLF with TID numbers or visual displays other than the Monster with its simple Ferrous/Non Ferrous read out  :wink:

Thanks.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I bump old threads now and then if they seem like they got overlooked. Lots of new forum members did not see the old stuff and don’t look back that far.

The part that is missing here is the ground. A detector sees everything under the coil. The ground is a massive ferrous target. Therefore, ALL targets are a mix of ferrous and non-ferrous signals. Almost any non-ferrous target will read ferrous if the ground iron mineral content is high enough.

The assumption is that if a target gives a ferrous signal it might be bad, so skip it. The way it should be done properly is that if a target gives any non-ferrous response at all, then dig it.

The problem as this article notes is lots of ferrous will read as a very high non-ferrous signal. The trick there is the false signal will typically come in around the silver dollar range on a detector with target id. Gold will read lower. Unless your detector does not have target id (like the Gold Monster, just ferrous/non-ferrous) in which case the false signal just reads non-ferrous.

Which is why having actual target id numbers is helpful when dealing with trash.

 

  • Like 5
  • Thanks 3

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Discrimination...... whats that????? I just dig EVERYTHING......regardless, & it pays off. :biggrin: Talking gold detecting only. Cheers.

Good luck out there

JW :smile:  

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I've quickly learnt with my GM 1000 to dig everything, its telling me its junk and I spin the coil around 90 degrees and it's saying its not junk on some passes and junk on other passes so I dig the area and find a little speck of gold and no junk at all.  I just can't trust the discrimination on it, if i did I'd be missing a lot of gold.  My Gold Bug pro's discrimination seemed more reliable, but in saying that, it didn't find these tiny specks at all the GM is finding, they have to touch the coil to make any response at all on the GBP...

The more I use and understand the GM1000 the more I like it.  

 

 

  • Like 3

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Similar Content

    • By phrunt
      Has anyone had any experience with these things? 

      Electromagnetic and magnetic interferences could be extremely annoying when you are looking for that hard to find gold nugget. Most of the noise is picked up by the search coil but a significant level of noise is being picked up as well by the sensitive electronics inside the control box.
      The control box is made of aluminium therefore the magnetic field easily penetrates it.
      To prove that, approach a magnet to the right side of your detector when switched on. 
      Millions of less obvious noise signals are interfering with your detector.  
      We have developed this Shield from the best quality material primarily used in sensitive 
      medical and scientific electronics. After years of studying and testing different materials we have found this one ticks all the boxes. 
      I have revisited the places where I've previously cleaned up and found more gold after installing the shield.
      It is 0.35 mm thick, held firmly around your control box by the armrest and  the new improved version with dual layer shielding on the right side is only 175 g!
      We have tested it on the GPX 5000 with amazing results such as quieter threshold, better GB, resulting in slightly increased depth.
      The shield allows you to increase the Rx gain by a notch or two without compromising the threshold. Use Inverted Response when hunting for big deep nuggets. 
      https://www.ebay.com.au/itm/MAGNETIC-INTERFERENCE-REDUCER-SHIELD-FOR-MINELAB-GOLD-DETECTORS/232594646908?hash=item3627b8a77c:g:8lEAAOSwYGFU0bvu
      I noticed it on Ebay today while I was looking for a cover for my GPX.
      I have noticed I've been able to quieten down my GPX by opening the control box up and scraping some paint away where the shielding touches the casing, on one end they had scraped away paint from one screw point during production, and the other end had no paint scraped away at all by the factory so it's sheilding was basically useless.  By scraping paint away from a few areas on each end of the detector I was able to give the GPX a bit of a noticable quieten down.  I am sure on later models Minelab would of scraped away more paint but as mine is a very early model made in Australia version this wasn't done.
       
       
       
       
    • By Steve Herschbach
      We just went through a few years on constant releases of new prospecting detectors. And now the flood has subsided, with almost nothing on the horizon.
      There is the “any moment now” Makro Gold Kruzer, running at 61 kHz and waterproof to 15 feet. After that however it gets pretty thin.
      First Texas has new detectors in the works, but nothing rumored that is aimed specifically at prospecting this year, but maybe later. Right now a PI beach detector appears to be up next. Garrett - maybe they are working on it but personally I have given up waiting on a lighter weight ATX. Tesoro - nothing going to happen there obviously.
      Minelab still “owes” us GPZ owners a smaller coil but with Equinox occupying all their efforts....?
      Nok/Mak outside of the Gold Kruzer has been working on a PI for years, but absolutely no hints on it getting any closer to market.
      XP I thought might bring a version of the low cost DPR 600 to first world markets but no sign of it happening.
      And White’s? Who knows. Maybe we will see a repackaged GMT but the shine has worn off of repackaged detectors these days.
      Long story short is it often takes new detectors to stir up activity on forums. For now at least the future is looking pretty quiet. The good news is we can just focus on using what we already have to best effect without being tempted or distracted by new shiny toys! 
    • By oldmancoyote1
      Hi Steve:
      Just re-read your "Steve's Guide to Threshold, Autotune..."  It helped a lot.  Thanks.  
      I do have a question though.  I understand V/SAT.  It's about how fast autotune re-adjusts the threshold after encountering some disturbance like a target.  However, I'm unclear on how that relates to Ground Balancing and Tracking.  It sounds like they are the same.  Would you please explain that?
      Thanks
    • By wanderer
      What are some of the least expensive pi machines? Can used ones be found?
    • By vive equinox
      Hello , 
      It would be great if the youtubers like calabash and others  who have lot of followers make a video of that to share at maximum .
      - Take 12-15 differents coins of your country ( the coins you use all the day ) 
      -Make a pile (heap ?) with that coins ,like a little tower 
      -Keep this pile beetween your thumb and other finger .
      -Swing that in front of the coil , at 3-4 inches , the side of the coins ! 
      -Now try that with all the detect mode , not need to change factory presets ( maybe only the accept to 0,1,2 in field 2 ) , you are free to try differents settings later .
      -The only and important setting for the moment is to change frequency , try 5,10,15,20,40 and multi in each detect mode . Of course multi in the two beach and 20,40,mutli in gold .
      What is happening ?
      I know the results , but i want to know the result of the coins of USA,England, australia ,canada .... So please share your results in comments or video
      Make that with different detectors , if you have impact or deus or other who have various frequency , try to switch all frequency . 
      You can try that with HF white coil if you have , but ....
       
      The conclusion is multi IQ obsolete the others single freq .   It is more or less to say what calabash said in his video .
       
      We can debate of that .
×