Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0
Tnsharpshooter

Minelab Service Rep Seems Is Watching At Least Some Forums

22 posts in this topic

Minelab - as far as I can determine - don't assemble their detectors.  They are built by a subcontractor in Malayasia  There is no pile of parts and sub-assemblies lying around in Australia or anywhere else.  This is a problem for them.  Quick repairs require that  commectors, mechanical and electronic parts, circuit boards are readily available at service centers.  For their modern machines, that seems to be a problem for them. This is a problem which is not easy, cheap or quick to fix. 

Glad to hear that they have realized that this is a problem which can and will impact brand loualty.  Hope they move fast and effectively.

1 person likes this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Another thing.. I read on another  forum that kellyco will put people ahead of the line on repairs if they pay a expedition fee. I don't know if that is true or not I'll try and find where I saw that...Looking at the Orville Dam news right now... Not good calling for evacuations down stream. 

strick

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for the link Steve.

I wonder from a unit sales number standpoint worldwide,,,,how does the USA stack up here???

I would think we would be at or near the top.

Would have expected they would sure not have slighted the USA for repair support overall.

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The big picture is that Minelab benefitted immensely from the big African gold rush a few years back. The GPX 4500 could not be built fast enough to supply demand. Like all gold rushes the bubble popped, and Minelab sales plunged as a result. It is very hard for any company to deal with seriously declining revenues, and Minelab cut expenses everywhere they could. Service is often the first thing to suffer under those circumstances at any company. A smart company cuts deep and fast, but usually goes too far. Minelab did execute a significant turn around, and sales are once again climbing. Now there is some damage to repair also going forward.

This is all fairly public knowledge. Minelab is owned by Codan, a publicly traded company. Much can be learned reading Codan company reports. The U.S. is a very large market, but most growth is occurring elsewhere. Africa has actually been the big growth market as of late, which is why all the focus by companies to make detectors for the Africa market.

Here you think in terms of owning a detector for decades, and why won't they service that 20 year old detector. In Africa, they wore the darn thing out after a year, threw it away, and got another one!

2 people like this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, Reno Chris said:

Tnsharpshooter - some problems occur with part availability. If your detector needs a new XYZ17 transistor, and the manufacturer stopped making them a year ago, the truth is that it can be near impossible to get additional obsolete parts like that. This situation affects all detector manufacturers.

This excuse is greatly overused by companies. Custom & semi-custom parts (keypad, display, etc) and sole-source parts, yes. But most electronic parts are either multi-sourced, or easily substituted with something close enough.

The actual reality is, most companies (and not just detector companies) don't repair at the component level, they repair at the board level. That is, they swap out a whole board. When a product is discontinued, they normally set aside a stock of replacement boards sufficient for x-years of repair. Once those boards are gone, no more repair.

1 person likes this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I am aware of how expensive logistics,,,repair facilities,,,parts storage can be.

Learned a lot about this in AF.

I think detector manufacturers should be looking hard at designing their detectors for easier maintenance/repairs.

Consider modular design,,,and being such,,,imagine a detector owner could possibly exchange out their module with a module of off someone else's detector,,,,troubleshooting.

Could save loads of $$ and time with shipping and repairs.

Or if not the swapping,,,at least a manufacturer based on malfunction can get a replacement module out to customer.

Now saying this,,,is obviously easier than doing,,,detector strength,,looks,,feel,,and durability can't be compromised,,,weight too probably.

And must be user friendly with parts exchange-- not complicated.

Xp in a way enjoys this in a way with Deus.

Detector companies,,,,need to think lean and mean.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

They generally do think that way. First Texas for instance and Garrett certainly, just swap out a board and you are done. There is not much in a F75 or AT Pro.

This is an issue but honestly, I have owned a lot of detectors and they rarely fail.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Detector companies are cursed with customers who want to use their products for 20 years.  OK for L.L. Bean, but for electronic devices it's a problem. Like Carl said, once the supply of set aside replacement boards is gone, it's all over.

whites is famous for having rat-holed bits and pieces of detectors.  More than once I have been offered a repair on an obselete detector by ising a "servicable" used part.  I happily said OK, but frankly, that's not a very rational way to run a business.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm presuming for example all the detector electronics in F75 are in the head of detector.

If this is so,,,,wonder if the head could be screwed off by a user and replaced.

Even looking at non USB capable detectors,,,a firmware upgrade,,,,just buy the updated head.  Or just send in the head for upgrade.

I wonder for example,,,just how much shipping $$$ were spent on F75 units upgraded to DST,,,,and the MX Sport with its firmware updates and screen cracks??

Shipping entire detectors back and forth.

Granted MX sport being waterproof,,,an easily removable head might not be feasible.

But I think the point here is still a good one.

This would be a departure from the norm,,,but I think a manufacturer could benefit.

Where there is a will, there is a way.

A lot of this here,,,I could label as a CYA concept for a manufacturer.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, Geotech said:

The actual reality is, most companies (and not just detector companies) don't repair at the component level,

I've had a single diode that went bad on a Minelab detector I owned replaced in the past. I agree with you that this is not the norm but it does happen.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!


Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.


Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0

  • Similar Content

    • By Tnsharpshooter
      For their looking out for folks with problems.
      https://metaldetectingforum.com/showthread.php?p=2784032#post2784032
       
       
    • By tboykin
      Something I've been thinking about is "growing the hobby." It's kind of a tricky thing.
      For detector manufacturers to survive, there is a need to expand the reach and interest in metal detecting as a hobby. But, the catch 21 is that there are less and less relics and old coins to dig each year. The more people get into detecting, the less old stuff we find. And the finds are what get people into detecting in my experience. It's a lot harder to get excited about finding 37 cents at a park than it is to find a trime or a colonial buckle.
      In talking to old timers, the "good ole days" seemed to be the 70's, 80's and early 90's - when silver was easier to find and every site wasn't pounded to death. That's why making detectors that out-perform current machines is so important. A deeper, better discriminating machine can breathe new life into old spots, which is what most manufacturers should be working on.
      What do you think about introducing the hobby to new generations? Would you prefer it stay an "old guy hobby," or would you like to see the younger crowd pick up where you leave off? How do we deal with the fact that each day, there is less treasure (including nuggets) to find?
    • By Steve Herschbach
      This is just me following a random coffee inspired thought. It sure seems to me there is a disconnect between what customers expect by way of communications from Minelab and what Minelab perhaps thinks they are delivering by way of customer communications. The current example of course being the Gold Monster 1000 and customer and even dealer questions about what's up with the where and when.
      Minelab overall probably thinks they do a pretty good job with communications. Lots of customers and dealers probably feel otherwise. Where is the disconnect?
      Having rubbed shoulders with some Minelab folks for awhile I can offer this. They are a very engineering driven company. Literally a whole bunch of engineers, all engineering away doing engineer things. And truthfully, just a generally nice bunch of people, fascinating to chat with. Most of you would really enjoy having the opportunity to meet and talk with them, and I am quite lucky in that regard.
      There is this however. How many of you know engineers? Have you spent a lot of time talking to engineers? They are not really famous for communication skills. They might think they are communicating, but they are speaking a different language. Their brains are often wired differently than "regular folks". Yeah, it is a cliche, but cliches are often based on a certain reality.
      Think of Minelab as a large box full of engineers. Maybe really nice engineers, but engineers nonetheless. Then you might understand the communication thing.
      It is not just Minelab either. Minelab comes off as Suzy Socialite compared to Tesoro for instance. The industry as a whole has been remarkably slow at embracing the internet for what are after all technology companies. Garrett probably has it figured out the most but even they have been weirdly silent on the AT Max since the initial intro blurb - no other sign of it on the website yet.
      If this all seems far fetched consider this. I just Googled engineer communication skills and got 42,900,000 results! I love this quote from this article "According to Weisman, engineers take a 67% risk of damaging important relationships with people every time they speak." There are some good tips in that article for the companies.

    • By jjm861
      I will start be saying is has been a pretty good year already with the release of several detectors.  With out sounding too impatient, I would love to see Fisher release a new muti-frequency or PI type detector soon.  What are your thoughts of this happening with the next couple of months?? 
    • By Ridge Runner
      I woke up this morning hearing bells ringing and birds singing but no New Garrett Detector. This month of May is going to be exciting with all the new toys coming out.
      I guess we need to just sit back and wait. My trouble is that's one thing I'm not good at.
      Chuck
    • By Steve Herschbach
      Discover Magazine

      Some of you might remember a publication called "Discover" that White's Electronics used to publish. It featured customer finds, treasure stories, and all-around good info on metal detecting. Back in the 90's we stopped making it, much to the disappointment of some of our long-time customers.
      Well... we realized missed it too! So we're proud to announce the re-introduction of Discover magazine. As a part of our mailing list you have exclusive access to a free digital copy, which you can read online, print out, and share as you see fit. Get your free copy here. We'll try and send one out every 2 months.
      Thanks for supporting an American brand, and know that we will always have your back as a valued customer. This publication is just one small thing we can do to show our appreciation!
      Discover Magazine May/June 2017
      Discover Magazine March/April 2017
      Discover Magazine January/February 2017

      Sincerely,
      White's Electronics