Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0
Ridge Runner

How Much Money You Got For A Wireless

3 posts in this topic

I was looking over on Chris Gholson forum and he's got the new Garrett Z-Lynk for 127.46 with free shipping. He is also putting your name in the pot if would like the new Minelab Pro Sonic for 269.00 plus free shipping.

I'm just wondering if the one that has a higher price that much better than the other ? I know Minelab puts out a great product and as far as I know always has. But is the added 141.54 better than the American made one.

I can't go out and buy both to find the answer to my question so I hope over time you can.

Chuck

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Sooner or later we will get comparison reports. Both units are just too new yet to expect that - but soon. I just a got a Z-Lynk yesterday and will be reporting on it this week.

The main difference is the Pro-Sonic has a built in speaker and volume control on the receiver. The Z-Lynk receiver has just the volume control. This does however make the Z-Lynk smaller. Nearly all my detectors have a built in speaker and so if I want to use an external speaker I can just go without headphones.

The Pro-Sonic is aimed a bit more at Minelab models, like the SDC 2300 which has a very weak external speaker. That is why an SDC adapter comes with the Pro-Sonic. That drives the price up for people who do not need that adapter. There are also people who try and use a GPX without the harness and bungee by adding small aftermarket batteries. Since the GPX has no speaker, the Pro-Sonic again is possibly a better option there.

If all you want is to run wireless headphones however the Garrett unit does it for you and for less money. In Australia the Garrett no doubt sells for more and so there is less price difference. I suppose if you had a Z-Lynk and really wanted to you could just plug a speaker into the receiver. I may try that with my B&Z booster.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Steve

Thanks for the reply.

I've had SDC 2300 and like said I wish I too had the Pro Sonic to go with it. Then I  got bye but with age my hearing just not as good.

I would never put down Minelab in any way because I've had so many products from them and never been disappointed. 

I'd say it's about 10 Minelab to Garrett 2 on buying from both. Whatever it would add up too it's more than I want my wife to know.haha

Chuck 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!


Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.


Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0

  • Similar Content

    • By rob baum
      i was at the pleasonton gpaa gold show yesterday and got my hands on a pro-sonic.  there price is $269 and they said they shipped them out to all the vendors on friday so everyone that wants one should be able to get one shortly.

    • By Steve Herschbach
      New Product - PRO-SONIC Universal Wireless Audio System - Coming Soon!
      Minelab is pleased to announce that our newest accessory, the PRO-SONIC Universal Wireless Audio System will be available soon. PRO‑SONIC generates clear and fast audio responses using advanced wireless technology. It's easy to set up and go detecting, with no messy cables to get tangled in!
      The PRO‑SONIC Receive Module features an internal loudspeaker and a 6.35mm (¼") headphone socket for use with your choice of headphones. It can be attached to your harness or clothing using the metal belt clip.

      Features:
      Use headphones or built-in speaker Adjustable volume setting 10 m / 32-feet operating range SDC 2300 adapter cable included Charge from your car, AC power or USB charger Compatible with most Minelab and other brand detectors! Download the color brochure



    • By cabelafella
      I seen they are available now on the Garrett website . I ordered one from Metaldetectors.com . Im looking forward to trying this one out and cuttin the cord.
    • By Steve Herschbach
      A new Treasure Talk blog from JP http://www.minelab.com/anz/go-minelabbing/treasure-talk/using-the-new-pro-sonic-from-minelab

       
    • By Rege-PA
      I have often wondered if the detector itself is more sensitive than the speakers that it has and even though the signal is there we don`t hear it.
      Perhaps a speaker with some kind of a meter that would indicate we are passing over a target even though the speaker is silent
      I`m sure there are meters that could  indicate the presence of such signals, perhaps big gold at more depth?
    • By Chet
          I couldn’t find a wireless delay specification for the GPZ 7000 WM 12.  So I tested it.  The attached oscilloscope display is the audio waveform envelopes from a US nickel passing over the GPZ-19 coil at approximately 40 inches per/sec.
          The upper yellow waveform is from the earphone jack on the back of the GPZ 7000.  The lower green waveform is from the earphone jack of the wireless WM 12 receiver.
           The waveforms are sweeping in time from the left side to the right side.  The entire display is divided into 10 horizontal increments of 50 milliseconds (0.050 sec.) each.  The audio (wah-wee sound) created by the nickel is spread across 9 divisions (450 milliseconds) with the nickel crossing the center of the coil at approximately 4.5 divisions (225 milliseconds).  Close measurement of the green trace displacement to the right indicates that the wireless WM 12 receiver audio is delayed by 20 milliseconds.
           The nickel speed of 40 inches per second is equal to 1 second divided by 40 = 0.025 sec. = 25 milliseconds to move 1 inch.  So a delay of 20 milliseconds is less than a 1 inch position error which would be imperceptible during normal searching.  When slowed down to pinpointing speed it would be a minuscule error.
           A 50 ms delay would result in an approximate 2 inch position error which at sweep speed is probably not that noticeable to most of us. Again at pinpointing speed it should not be a problem.   
            For information; the scattered positive and negative spikes are noise spikes from the GPZ 7000 transmitter pulses. The wide bandwidth / fidelity of the oscilloscope allow it to capture these spikes. The spikes are too high in frequency for the human ear to hear.  Electromagnetic Interference (EMI) that we randomly hear resembles the waveform envelopes shown in this display.
       
      This is somewhat technical so I hope I have made it understandable to some.
      Have a good day,
      Chet