Jump to content
  • Announcements

    • Steve Herschbach

      Archives Closed - New Forums   10/16/2017

      The old archive system has been closed and the threads moved to new forums. See the full forum listing here. Detailed explanation here.
Nokta Detectors

Pre-release - Brace For Impact :-)

Recommended Posts

nokta-impact-3-frequency-metal-detector.jpg

Dear Valued Members:

We are proud to announce the new IMPACT, that has been tested in 5 continents by more than 30 engineers, experts and users!

IMPACT is a 3-frequency device (5kHz/14kHz/20kHz) combining  multiple detectors  and enabling a unique yet easy-to-use detector experience for new to experienced detectorists.

Impact Features:
12 Search Modes (2 non-motion, 2 all metal, 8 discrimination modes)
Advanced Discrimination & Unmasking Ability
Online Firmware Updates
Optional 2.4 GHz Wireless Headphones
Vibration
LED Flashlight

  • Operating Frequency: 5kHz - 14kHz - 20kHz
  • Warranty: 2 years
  • Weight: 1.8 kg (4 lbs.) including search coil and batteries
  • 12 Search Modes:
  • 2 Non-motion Modes (with audio discrimination)
  • 2 All Metal Modes (with audio discrimination)
  • 8 Discrimination Modes - 2 Tone / 3 Tone / 4 Tones / 99 Tones / Deep / Conductive Ground / VLX1 and VLX
  • Ground Balance with 3 Options: Automatic, Manual, Tracking
  • Notch Filter: Discriminates single or multiple Target IDs of unwanted metals by silencing them or giving an iron tone.
  • Tone Break: Adjusts the break points of the target response tones on the Target ID range.
  • Iron Audio (Fe Vol): Turns off or adjusts the volume of the low iron tone
  • Audio Tone: Changes the frequency of target and threshold tones (150Hz - 700Hz).
  • iSAT: Allows for a stable operation of the device by eliminating false signals caused by high mineralization and hot rocks in the all metal and discrimination modes as well as eliminating threshold drifts caused by ground and temperature changes in the static modes.
  • Magnetic Mineralization Indicator: Shows mineralization intensity of the ground.
  • Extra features at the push of a button: Audio Boost, ID Normalization, Target ID Depth Level.
  • Backlight (Bright)
  • FD / Save: Easily saves your settings or restores factory defaults.

PRICING AND AVAILABILITY 
11000701 IMPACT STANDARD PACKAGE  MSRP: $849 USD
Includes: Waterproof IM28 - DD Search Coil  28 cm x 18 cm (11'' x 7''), Headphones, 4 x AA Alkaline Batteries, USB Cable

11000702 IMPACT PRO PACKAGE  MSRP: $999 USD
Includes: Waterproof IM28 - DD Search Coil  28 cm x 18 cm (11'' x 7''), Waterproof IM19 - DD Search Coil  19 cm x 10 cm (7.5'' x 4''), Headphones, Carrying Bag, Protective Covers, Stand, Extra Lower Shaft, AC & Car Charger, 4 x AA Rechargeable Batteries, USB Cable

Optional Search Coils:
Waterproof IM40 - DD Search Coil  40 cm x 35 cm (15.5'' x 14'') 
Waterproof IM24 - DD Search Coil 24cm x 13cm (9.5'' x 5")

We are now taking the pre-orders from dealers and product will start shipping to dealers the 3rd week of March.  We will ship the orders to dealers in the order they are received. 

Should you have any questions regarding the product, please do not hesitate to contact me.

Regards,

nokta-impact-specifications-packages.jpg

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

As a rule going forward threads about the Nokta Impact will be moved to the Metal Detecting For Coins & Relics forum unless they are specific to gold prospecting. There are several threads going there already on the subject, in particular this one that provides a very detailed inside look at the prototype testing process. Worth a read by anyone interested in how this stuff gets done.

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Nokta Impact (with optional 7" x 4" DD coil) next to Makro Gold Racer

nokta-impact-makro-gold-racer.jpg

I would not characterize myself as a true tester of the Nokta Impact on the level of Tom Dankowski or others. I did however receive a late version prototype about 30 days ago to do a last minute check of the system. Unfortunately weather has been at record bad levels in my area and it has been difficult to put in the time on the unit it deserves. It is a relatively complex detector compared to most, with many different settings to experiment with. It has several unique features, one of the most important perhaps to potential early buyers being the ability to update the firmware over the internet. This does remove much of the risk inherent in buying early and holds out the promise of possible tweaks and improvements to come.

My focus being gold prospecting I can say that while the Nokta Impact is a very capable machine for gold prospecting it will not match the Makro Gold Racer for sensitivity to smaller gold. It is closer to the Nokta Fors Gold+ in that regard. Performance on gram plus gold is on par with other machines in the 13 - 20 kHz class, though the ability to drop to 5 kHz may provide some benefits in the worst ground on large nuggets, much like is seen with the 6.4 kHz mode on the Eureka Gold.

The Nokta Impact is a very intriguing metal detector, much like owning several different machines in one. The 99 tone mode has a VCO response more like one might expect of the DEUS than other full tone models, like my DFX. The Gen mode is quite unique being a threshold based all metal mode with a dual tone disc mode layered over it, what is referred to as a mixed mode. Wireless headphone capability (2.4 Ghz lag free) is built-in but headphones will be optional. Physically the unit is a well balanced 4.26 pounds with a straight shaft, molded post style grip. The cable is enclosed in the rod assembly for snag free operation and a clean look. The 7" x 4" DD coil is a real sweet option for trashy locations.

There is a more that I will comment on later when I have time. For now rest assured this is a true flagship detector that can run head to head with the best that any other manufacturer has to offer. In my opinion it signals Nokta/Makro arrival as a true top-tier contender. Look at two of the so-called Big 5, Tesoro and Garrett, and show me anything remotely like this machine.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi all,

Just a quick observation, the Impact does has some familiar features that lean toward a more user friendly and possibly a better weight balanced machine.  I am curious about the Impact vs the Notka Gold in weight, as right now I am in a bit of a rush to get some pre-rain home landscaping done, and can't take the time for a look see on the Notka gold weight comparison...  At first blush, the machine is a reasonably priced machine for the features it has, is a nicely streamlined machine that could avoid brush hangup issues, but as Steve indicates, it does fall a bit short on the kHx and really small gold detecting ability.  That being said, the early Whites Goldmasters ran at a 19 kHz, and did a fair job in finding some reasonably small gold bits...   I often desire to have the newest of the new, just to satisfy my detecting curiosity, and would not be opposed to give one of the Impacts a go...  That is, when my brand new metal knee allows me to hit the goldfields...

Got to go...it will be interesting to see just what this new little gem will do...

Gary Long:  LARGO

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Gary,

The published weights of the Nokta FORS detectors are understated at 3.9 lbs in their brochures, etc. I have weighed the FORS units with stock 11" x 7" coils and rechargeable batteries installed on my postal scales and they weigh 4.3 lbs. I have also weighed the Nokta Impact with batteries and 11" x 7" DD coil and they also weigh 4.3 lbs.

I usually round up however and on reviewing my notes the Nokta Impact weighs exactly 4 lbs 4.2 ounces  and the Nokta FORS CoRe and FORS Gold weigh 4 lbs 6 ounces, so the Impact is slightly lighter.

I find the angle and grip on the Impact to be superior to the FORS models. The FORS handles are canted forward more and the position of the trigger under your index finger makes it hard to get a full grip on the handle. No problem on the Impact.

All the black box Goldmasters ran at 50 kHz or 48 kHz on the GMT. You must be thinking of the original Fisher Gold Bug at 19 kHz.

I never actually indicated the Impact "falls short" on the kHz. Gold Bug Pro 19 kHz. White's MXT 14 kHz. Garrett AT Gold 18 kHz. Nokta FORS Gold + 19 kHz. Nokta Impact - 20 kHz max with 14 kHz and 5 kHz options. It simply cannot be expected to match the GMT at 48 kHz, Gold Racer at 56 kHz, or GB2 at 71 kHz. What I was trying to express is that the Impact "falls in line" with all the other mid-frequency "do-it-all" detectors and is not a true dedicated prospecting detector like the GMT or Gold Bug 2 or the new Minelab GM1000 at 45 kHz. That said I see no problem finding gold as small as a grain in the field with the Impact employing the small coil at 20 kHz. Gold less than a grain, not so much.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Steve, Thanks for the correction on the original Gold Bug being run at 19 kHz...   I knew that, but got in a rush trying to beat the expected rains in our area...  In the last day or so I saw the Bruneau river, just out of Jordan Valley, Idaho, was running across the southbound highway 51.   Lots of water to go around this year, I suspect the reservoir at Rye Patch will be full as well...

Gary Long:  LARGO

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Do I understand this correctly... The Impact will operate on 3 frequencies but only 1 frequency at a time unlike the V3i which will operate all 3 simultaneously.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The Impact will operate at any one of three different frequencies (selectable frequency), not all three at once (multi frequency). Unfortunately the ad copy is referring to the machine as a multi frequency machine, which is going to cause confusion. Sadly, there is no exact agreement on the use of these terms and how they are applied.

The V3i can operate at any one of three frequencies OR all three at once. It along with the White's VX3 are fairly unique in having that capability.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Never seen or even used a Nokta , if they worked then I would see them being used in the goldfields of Western Australia and I would be the first person to run out and buy one , unfortunately when it comes to nugget detecting in Aust. There is only one.... Minelab. I'm not a supporter of minelab and I wish there was anyone else out there with a detector that comes even close to the 4000 let alone the 5 or 7..... Please I'm all ears if anyone knows a brand that works better out here ?

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

This thread is not about Minelab versus Nokta and nobody is claiming this detector is intended for use in the Australia goldfields. The Nokta Impact is aimed primarily at the coin and relic market. Keep using your Minelab. I personally do not think there is a brand that will work better for what you do.

All future posts I am making about the Nokta Impact will be at http://www.detectorprospector.com/forum/topic/3066-official-nokta-impact-announcement/ on the Coin & Relic Forum unless specifically related to gold prospecting.

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

    • By Steve Herschbach
      On his forum at http://www.dankowskidetectors.com/discussions/read.php?2,121626
      This gives a very rare, in fact as far as I know, never before seen inside look at the prototyping process and field test reporting. Thomas Dankowski is a true "engineer nerd" (I say that as a compliment) and so goes to extreme lengths and detail beyond what would normally be seen. His extremely lengthy and copious notes also provide many insights about what to possibly expect from the new Nokta Impact. Keep in mind things changed from the early reports to the final product so things Tom talks about early on change at later dates. Quoting from his thread out of context could cause a lot of misperceptions to arise.
      The thread well illustrates something I have observed for some time. When it comes to max depth, standard single frequency induction balance detecting technology is tapped out. Look at the struggle to obtain not another inch but even just another 0.1 inch of depth. The main advantages have come as of late in recovery speed and the ability to separate closely spaced targets. Max depth however is at a standstill. Tom's testing just confirms what I have been seeing for years. It is near impossible to discern more than hair splitting differences for max depth between most top of the line VLF detectors these days.
      And now a Report on the Nokta Impact from Keith Southern
      And a Report From Ziggy
      Report from Lawrenzo - Low-Boy/LCPM
      Report from tnsharpshooter
      Report from goodmore
      Report from Sven1


    • By Road Dog
      I just won a Nokta impact and don't know if I should sell it and buy the minelab equinox or not. Any suggestions? Which detector do you think performs better?
    • By Steve Herschbach
      Some random notes, and if you don't know what I am talking about as regards some detail of this machine or that I apologize. 
      Well, I finally updated my XP Deus with 11" coil to the version 4 update. Then I hauled it and the Nokta Impact with 11" and Teknetics G2 with 11" out for several hours of cross checking coin type targets. The G2 is a Gold Bug Pro variant running at 19 kHz and I put it up against the Deus at 18 kHz and Impact at 20 kHz. I acquired the G2 new recently to use specifically as a benchmark unit because I am very familiar with it and because in my opinion it does 19 kHz as well as it can be done. I spent hours swapping machines as the hunt machine, then cross checking the undug targets with the other two. Lots of settings tried, with the main goal to try and find some deep fringe type target or target in trash where any machine can get a clear and definable edge.
      Well good luck with that. All I mainly did was impress myself again with what a little powerhouse the Gold Bug Pro/G2 is for the price. It is fairly mineralized ground but not the worst, 5 bars out of 7 on the G2 Fe3O4 meter, ground balance about 86. The only real "aha" moment was in learning the Impact really likes to upscale shallow small foil when in 5 kHz mode, but shoves the id back down to where it should be at 14 kHz or 20 kHz. All the machines like to upscale deeper aluminum in this ground.

      All three seemed to get tricked in much the same way on certain targets, like a deep pull tab reading like a dime. For gold hunting purposes I do not mind machines upscaling low conductive targets, and in fact the Impact 5khz mode may have a benefit in nugget detecting because it does want to push light foil (and therefore small gold) higher. But for coin detecting upscaling aluminum is annoying. Pretty much par for the course however for mid to higher single frequency machines.
      I found running the Impact in VLX1 was nice as I could flip over just one click to the Gen(D) mixed mode program for a dramatically different read and better target definition. Target id numbers in my ground are slightly higher in the "expanded ferrous" modes like VLX1 and VLX2 compared to DI3 and DI4.
      The Deus V4 Gold Field program does seem to pack some extra punch now, be fun to get it out nugget hunting once the elliptical coil hits the streets. The new Deep mode really seems great while the new Hot mode is, shall I say it, interesting. First time I have used the X-Y screens also. 
      The G2 is what it is, almost no controls but it gets the job done with what it has, and good solid id. Deus and Impact in the other hand have countless options and programs to try, but by and large there is no magic bullet. Three great machines, I can hunt with any of them. It will take a lot more hours to sort it all out.

      I find when running machines that are all hitting the VLF Wall that it is the "other things" that get my notice. The Impact is obviously the heavier of the three (4 lbs 4.7 oz / 1946 grams), although very well balanced, so I give the feel on my arm award to the G2 (3 lbs 1.5 oz / 1404 grams) and the Deus (2 lbs 4.0 oz / 1020 grams with 11" coil and control box). The G2 and Deus are neck and neck in the comfort department FOR ME* but the G2 feels ever so slightly better to me, I am guessing because the coil is lighter on the G2. The G2 slays both the Impact and Deus for speaker volume if run without headphones, but on the other hand it has no volume control so would be too loud for some situations.
      Been awhile since I ran a Gold Bug Pro / G2 unit and caught myself when switching from disc mode to all metal when cross checking at one point and forgetting that the "big number" changes from target id in disc mode to ground phase in all metal mode, so I was looking at the ground phase instead of the little speedometer thinking it was target id for a couple goes. That one quirk always had me liking the F75 versus the Bug in all metal. I wish Fisher made a 19 kHz F75!

      *On arm comfort is a very subjective subject. In particular it has a great deal to do with the size of a persons hands plus length and thickness of their forearm, and their height. You really can't take any one persons word on this subject as it is like buying hiking boots. What fits one person does not fit another. It is not all about detector weight by a long shot. Balance is very important as is the all important hand grip. I am 5' 11" with forearms on the thinner side and smallish hands. For instance, my forearm really bounces around in the large Impact armrest area. The Deus armrest which may be too small for some fits me better. For me personally, the 3.5 lb Teknetics T2 / Fisher F75 is the most comfortable detector I have ever used. It is superbly balanced and something about the hand grip that narrows to the top as it cants forward really makes my hand happy. I can squeeze the armrest shut to fit my arm. So if you find the F75 to be a great fit for you, my comments apply to you. If you hate the T2/F75 setup then what I have to say is less important.

    • By auminesweeper
      Over on PA a new Impact user is asking for help because they can't get it to go deeper than a few inches and the only thing that I could come up with was to use a concentric coil, because I have not used one out in the field/beach,
      And a dealer was really trying to sell me one today but not without making ***hole comments about my machine and the CTX when I asked him how it compared to mine,
      anyways here is that link to PA if anyone has word of wisdom to help out,
      John.
      https://www.prospectingaustralia.com.au/forum/viewtopic.php?id=23481
    • By Rajat
      Sure impact is allrounder but not depper than at max impact does well on hot grounds as well as garret at max operating frequency give nokta high end but on the other hand it fail in dapth test against garret at max but both achine are good in every point of view the biggest point of both machine is nokta runs on three frequncy 7khz 14khz 20 khz so its all rounder but nokta enginear forgot what garret just make an all terrain waterproof metal detector with 13.6 khz submersible upto 10 feet at last my thaught is sure nokta is used for gold prospective but at max with all terrain can be also allrounder i dnt know y nokta made a great product but did a small mistake that is waterproof i am sure in future they also gonna make impact waterproof then the sell of their product will be higher no other detector can  compare with it then
×