Steve Herschbach

My First Impression Of The Minelab Gold Monster 1000

54 posts in this topic

Thanks Steve, I just found 3.5mm male headphone jack to micro usb cable online for audio so should work with the Pro Sonic to make it wireless. 

1 person likes this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Nice review Steve, and I've always appreciated your open-minded approach.

Thanks, and all the best,

Lanny

1 person likes this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Your forum only review is even better than your Minelab review!!  Definitely waiting for a few months to hear reviews from Oz but you are making it harder to say no. 

I suppose if anyone really wanted wireless they can add the pro-sonic to the package. 

Thanks again Steve  :wink:

1 person likes this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Power and simplicity!!

I believe that this is a combination will soon be a THING.  A while back Dave Johnson posted somewhere something like "I will design the perfect metal detector....and everybody will hate it!"

Full marks to Minelab for dispensing with complication and knobs - focusing on "..the job to be done".

Simplicity and fierce focus! Quite splendid!

3 people like this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Steve

Being the GM1000 has two coils and you said the 5" coil would or did hit on a sub grain gold. With the 10X6 did you find it would detect small gold but maybe not to the point of the 5" did? What coil did you find yourself swinging most ?

Looking forward to your reply.

Chuck

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The 10" coil will hit gold nearly as small as the 5" coil. My personal take on the GM1000 is that I will use it almost exclusively with the 10" coil as a highly sensitive reconnaissance detector. If I wanted to pound a 10 square foot patch of ground for an entire day trying to get every last tiny bit out of it then I see no advantage using a GM1000 over a Gold Bug 2. The big advantage in my opinion comes in leveraging the 10" coil and superb ground tracking to cover highly mineralized variable ground. The kind of ground where a Gold Bug 2 would require constant ground adjustments, and yet at the same time having more sensitivity than something like a Gold Bug Pro. Imagine a Tesoro Lobo that is as hot as a Gold Bug 2 and you sort of get the picture.

No doubt there will be people who specialize in using the GM1000 almost exclusively with the 5" coil to chase the tiniest bits but I prefer these days to cover more ground in the search for the ones that add up faster. I really hope that Minelab considers a 14" elliptical for the GM1000 in the future for this very reason.

7 people like this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi steve, any feelings on the monster discrimination? If I wanted to block out some super hot iron stones would I be able to? 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, Steve Herschbach said:

The 10" coil will hit gold nearly as small as the 5" coil. My personal take on the GM1000 is that I will use it almost exclusively with the 10" coil as a highly sensitive reconnaissance detector.

Thanks for that answer Steve re 5" vs 10".  After using the 14"  coil for over 2 years I don`t think I could ever go to a 5".  I`ve got a mate that has orderd the 1000 and I`m pretty sure he will only ever use the 5".  Hopefully I will get out for a detect with him not long after the detector comes out, but I`ll be looking at it wth the idea of using the 10".  Dave

1 person likes this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

As usual, you do a terrific review, and thereby pose an interesting question that has plagued me for a coming trip to Alaska where I'm torn about bringing a second detector.  you stated:

"The big advantage in my opinion comes in leveraging the 10" coil and superb ground tracking to cover highly mineralized variable ground. The kind of ground where a Gold Bug 2 would require constant ground adjustments, and yet at the same time having more sensitivity than something like a Gold Bug Pro."

Alaska vs the 7000 (particularly the Nome inland area) - where "variable ground" conditions rule....  Do you think the the GM1000 might work as effectively, or possibly better than the GPZ7000?   You have far more knowledge of the ground conditions in AK than I, so i lean on that experience in this question. Thanks Steve, for the excellent job you do with this site!

1 person likes this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
7 hours ago, Swifty said:

Hi steve, any feelings on the monster discrimination? If I wanted to block out some super hot iron stones would I be able to? 

The Minelab Gold Monster 1000 actually has two distinct discrimination methods. The first is reminiscent of the White's GMT "Probability Meter". This is an LCD display that operates in parallel with the all metal mode, and is by far my preferred way of operating the GM1000 while having discrimination. You operate as normal in all metal mode, with no loss of depth or any other changes in operating parameters. The meter is doing its thing at the same time, with a very easy "right = non-ferrous and left = ferrous" indicator as seen below. The farther to the left, the greater the chance you are dealing with a ferrous object or an iron based hot rock.

The GM1000 ground tracking is going to handle all the hot rocks a ground balance system can handle, but it can't get them all. The remainders will normally bang left on the meter as ferrous targets. Be aware however there is such a thing as a non-ferrous hot rock (graphite, copper ore) that can read solid non-ferrous. The bane of all prospectors except those prospecting for graphite and copper!

For ferrous trash in my opinion most people approach discrimination incorrectly. All ferrous discrimination systems can be fooled. So when you use a ferrous discrimination system, look for reasons to dig instead of reasons to not dig. Some people say dig everything, and this is wise except when totally impractical. If you are in a trash pit, use the discrimination to avoid digging 1000 worthless holes.

But still look for reasons to dig. Don't get lazy. If the ferrous meter bangs full left pass after pass after pass of the coil - you can be fairly safe in ignoring that target. But if it goes non-ferrous on even just one pass of the coil, or is only repeatedly one bar ferrous, dig it up. Another way to look at it, try to get the meter to give you a reason to dig by trying to massage the signal with the coil to get a non-ferrous reading. Don't try to turn a non-ferrous reading into a ferrous reading because you do not feel like digging. When in doubt, dig it out!

Finally, there is a "iron reject" mode that is preprogrammed to silently reject ferrous targets. This is similar to the "iron disc" mode on a Gold Bug 2. Just put it in disc mode and ferrous targets, including ferrous hot rocks, will go silent or break up. There is an attendant loss in depth and sensitivity just as occurs with all silent reject discrimination systems. Not only do you lose depth, but if the system makes a bad call as you pass over a target you will never know it was there. Better to use all metal and hear every target, then analyze before making a dig or no-dig decision.

However, a silent reject disc system does provide you with a system of the last resort for dealing with crazy thick trash or hot rocks. You just want to shut the darn thing up, go to disc mode. Again, you really should dig broken and "iffy" targets, but you can go into a simple "dig them only if they sound good" mode for the worst places.

The options: 1. Use all metal and dig everything. 2. Use all metal and dig everything but 100% ferrous meter readings. 3. Use all metal but only dig targets that read on the meter as 100% non-ferrous (cherry pick mode). 4. Activate disc mode and dig all good sounding and iffy targets. And last resort 5. Activate disc mode and only dig them if they sound great.

I am counting at least five different levels of possible discrimination options there.

minelab-gold-monster-1000-gold-chance-indicator-display.jpg

4 people like this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!


Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.


Sign In Now

  • Similar Content

    • By strick
      Ok here's a youtube link..looks like Mexico is gettin them before us lol
       
    • By Steve Herschbach
      New Treasure Talk entry...
      http://www.minelab.com/anz/go-minelabbing/treasure-talk/understanding-the-sensitivity-control-on-the-gold-monster-1000
      What the Automatic Signal Processing is actually doing (advanced description)
      Another performance advantage of the two Auto settings (hidden from the user) is that both the sensitivity resolution and adjustment range actually go way beyond what can be displayed via the LCD segments:
      Where there are ten Manual settings to choose from, the GOLD MONSTER signal processing will automatically make the optimum choice from well over 10,000 incremental steps. Where Manual 10 is the maximum level that can be user selected, the auto level selected may range above 10 if the ambient and ground conditions allow, giving a greater sensitivity than manual will ever be able to achieve. 

    • By Steve Herschbach
      Here it is! http://www.minelab.com/usa/go-minelabbing/treasure-talk/mastering-the-gold-monster-1000
      "Savvy operators will be able to work the GM 1000 in surprisingly noisy ground once they come to terms with the methods I’ve described above. It takes practice but the effort is well worth it because these two Auto functions in combination with Zero threshold really does allow this detector to work in ground a VLF has no business working in - areas that I would consider to be MPS and MPF territory. In the quieter soils, Auto+ lifts the sensitivity to levels that surprised me, behaving like a much higher frequency machine Although not a ‘deep-punching’ machine like an SDC 2300, the GM 1000 still ‘holds its own’ on the shallow surface gold crumbs missed by the more powerful Minelab detectors."
    • By Lunk
      I recently had the very fortunate opportunity to use the Minelab Gold Monster 1000 for 30 days. During that time, I was able to discover the nuances of the machine that, like any metal detector, can only be fully realized by logging lots of hours behind the control box and investigating lots of targets. 

      In Steve's excellent review, he has covered most of what the GM 1000 is capable of doing, as well as the features and functions of the machine, so I will not rehash those here. Instead, I will relate my experiences with the detector and its unadvertised abilities that have come to light during my sojourn with it in hand. 

      I first powered up the Monster at Rye Patch, Nevada, and after a very brief automatic frequency scan, the unit emitted two short beeps, signaling that it was ready to start swinging with no pumping of the coil or ground balancing necessary...nice! The first thing I did was to bury a small 3 or 4 grain test nugget a couple of inches into the damp alkali soil, so as to fiddle with the manual and automatic sensitivity settings in order to find the most  distinct target response. Right off the bat I noticed there was no audible threshold...a little unnerving, but I decided to just roll with it and trust that the engineers at Minelab know what they are doing.  In all-metal search mode at low sensitivity settings there was no response from the conductive damp alkali ground, and very little to no response from the tiny test nugget.  Increasing the sensitivity to 6 or 7 made the nugget start popping much better, but some slight feedback from the ground was also noticeable. At a manual sensitivity setting of 10, the conductive alkali response was overwhelming, but as soon as I increased it to 11 - which is the first automatic sensitivity setting - the screaming ground response completely disappeared and in it's place was a crisp, clear target response from the test nugget...very impressive. Advancing the automatic  sensitivity to 12 (auto+), the signal response from the test nugget was even louder and more intense, but there was also some ground response as well. I decided why listen to ground noise when the test nugget is plenty audible at a setting of 11, and went with that. 
      With any new detector, I dig every target, even if reads 100% ferrous, just to familiarize myself with how the machine responds to various different targets. The few hot rocks that signaled on the Monster, both positive and negative, completely pegged the gold chance indicator all the way left into the ferrous zone. Soon I was finding extremely small bits of foil, lead and iron. Then I started to notice something quite amazing to me; the iron targets - even the tiniest ones - were making a subtle "boing" type of a response like a negative hot rock, whereas the nonferrous targets were more zippy and lacked that subtle boing quality. After a while, I found that I no longer needed to look at the gold chance indicator to determine whether a target was ferrous or not, just by relying on the sounds; I was really starting to like this detector. Then it happened: a fairly strong response that was pegging the gold chance indicator all the way right, into the non-ferrous zone. After digging a couple of inches, out popped a beautiful little crystalline nugget weighing a mere 2.4 grains - the first Monster nugget!


      With the northern Nevada weather being uncooperative and still quite wintery, I headed for the sunny warm deserts of Arizona.  First stop...the Yucca Dense Collection Area north of Lake Havasu City, formerly known as the Franconia meteorite strewn field. VLF machines make the best meteorite hunters, and the Gold Monster 1000 did not disappoint. I took it to an area that is carpeted with basalt hot rocks that make it extremely difficult to operate a VLF while retaining any shred of sanity. The Monster was incredibly noisy in auto sensitivity, but adjusting it manually to a setting of 4 mellowed it right out and within 5 minutes the detector nailed its first space rock!


      and then another a while later...

      Although finding meteorites is fun, the GM 1000 is a gold nugget detector after all, so it was on to the famed gold fields of Quartzsite, Arizona to see what the Monster could do in beat up old patches that have litterally been detected by hundreds, if not thousands of detector operators. Well, suffice it to say it didn't take long to find the first sub-grain speck of gold.


      And another...

      The ground in Quartzsite is much milder than the alkali rich soils of Rye Patch, but has lots more hot rocks including magnetite, which is super hot and very magnetic. As I was detecting an old nugget patch littered with these super strong  magnetite hot rocks, I decided to see how the Monster responded to them; waving  the coil over one resulted in a very sharp and intense zip-zip. Slowing my sweep speed to see if the signal would broaden, I slowly raised the coil an inch or two above the magnetite to see if the signal would drastically decrease in strength (an old VLF hot rock identification trick). Slowly lowering the coil back down above the rock, I was suddenly incredulous at what I was now hearing...absolutely nothing! The Gold Monster had completely tracked out a magnetite hot rock!  I placed my test nugget right up against the magnetite and was stunned to hear the nugget respond loud and clear, with absolutely no interference from the hot rock. Even this guy couldn't hear that hot rock:

      I also found more meteorites in Quartzsite with the Gold Monster...the full story here:
      In my limited time swinging the new Minelab Gold Monster 1000, I can definitely say that it is unique and can do things that I haven't seen from any other single frequency VLF gold nugget detector, all in a light weight simple to operate and competitively priced package...kudos to Minelab!

       
       
    • By Shasta gold hunter
      I just called Minelab customer service for the Americas and they confirmed there is a delay.  They said the detectors are made in Malaysia and  they did confirm they have been shipped from there.  No estimated arrival for west coast dealers was offered. 
    • By Steve Herschbach
      I received this question via email, edited to remove any tips as to the source:
      "Steve-  been reading your reviews of detectors from way, way back.  Now I'm looking for a bit of advice. I've got a claim where I've pulled nice gold, but the biggest single nugget has been just about a gram, pretty small stuff (but it's pretty plentiful). My GB-2 has really shined in this environment - shallow bedrock, low mineralization, and plenty of small gold. The issue is that my son doesn't want to let me use the GB-2, as he wants to use it all the time. That puts me in the market for another VLF  machine. I've tried the GB-Pro, and didn't really care for it. Your review of the Nokta AU Gold Finder, and the Makro Gold Racer, both look pretty good. Other than the display and control box itself, are these machines really the same, or would one do better (coil size being equal) than another on small gold with low mineralization? The reason why I just don't go get another GB-2 is that it would be a nice bonus to use the new detector close by my son, while still hopefully having it excel and finding small gold.  Any insights would be greatly appreciated. If there really isn't anything else that comes close, then I'll certainly go for another GB-2, even at it being as old as it is, but if there is another one that would excel in the above environment, I'd certainly appreciate your opinion on it."
      Well, in my opinion the 71 kHz Gold Bug 2 with 6" coil has been and continues to be the top of the heap when it comes to finding the tiniest bits of gold. So the real question is whether you feel like giving up that little edge the unit has over all the rest in order to run a machine right next to your son without the two machines interfering. You also have the advantage of being very well versed in the use of the Bug.
      Let's assume you do want to get something else however. You have mentioned the 56 kHz AU Gold Finder and Gold Racer, and they are indeed the same circuit in two very different packages. Coils from one will work just as well on the other. Other current new model alternatives would be the 48 khz White's GMT and probably the very soon to be available 45 kHz Minelab GM1000. Finally, I should mention the XP Deus V4 high frequency coil options hitting the market now in case you might consider a more exotic option. There also have been hints of a dedicated gold machine from XP this year.
      I would assume a small coil as being a must have, and an advantage with the Gold Bug 2 is you can get it with the small coil as a stock variation. So let's compare internet prices.
      Fisher Gold Bug 2 with 3.25" x 6.5" coil = $764
      Makro Gold Racer with 5.5" x 10" coil $699 plus 4" x 7.5" coil $119 = $818 or Pro Pack $899
      Nokta AU Gold Finder with 5.5" x 10" and 5.5" round coils = $999
      White's GMT with 6" x 10" coil $729 plus 4" x 6" coil $127 = $856
      Minelab GM1000 with 6" x 10" coil and 5" round coil = $799
      A Deus runs $1250 plus the 4.7" x 9.5" elliptical HF coil at $425 = $1675 so not a good fit here for price and no smaller coil option than the elliptical. The only hope of that improving is if the dedicated gold machine shows up with the HF coil as stock.
      I have to admit that the reports of warranty issues with early Gold Racer models have me concerned. This despite the fact I have what must be the oldest Gold Racer and AU Gold Finder units in the country, and both are going strong. I have to assume the issues, whatever they were, have been ironed out. I don't know that for a fact however. If you got one and still had a problem, Nokta/Makro is famous for resolving issues with customer satisfaction. The units carry a two year transferable warranty.
      The GMT is the safe tried and true made in the U.S. option, and as far as performance the 56 kHz Gold Racers and 48 kHz GMT run neck and neck.
      The big unknown at an attractive price is the 45 kHz Minelab Gold Monster 1000.
      My best advice - wait! The flood gates are just now opening as regards reports on the GM1000 and at $799 with two coils it looks on paper at least to be an option worth waiting to find out more about. If you have to do something this minute, the GMT is the safe option if the reports of problems with the Gold Racers worry you. Personally, I have been very happy with my Gold Racer and would not trade it for a GMT. I have to note I finally did get another Gold Bug 2 with 6" coil however. If you are the sort of person who can't live without having that last small edge of performance, it is still the machine to beat for tiny gold performance in milder ground like you are describing.
      Click picture for larger version.