Jump to content
phrunt

Gold Bug Pro Coil Options For Gold Prospecting

Recommended Posts

Thanks, I shall contact him and introduce myself,  I had a read of what he's been up to, seems to be very knowledgable on to the local area.

 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, phrunt said:

I have purchased 2 Gold Bug Pro's and an original T2 which I want to use for Gold Prospecting, ....

I have the 5" coil for the T2 and a Mars Tiger along with the standard 11" coil, so which of those coils do you think will be best to find small gold nuggets?

For the Gold Bug Pro's I have a Nel Snake, a Cors Fortune and the 10" Fisher coil, 5" standard coil and 11" standard coil.  Which coils should I put on the Gold Bugs? 

I also have a Gold Bug Pro and a Fisher F75 (which is a close cousin of the T2).  I've mostly done coin/relic/jewelry hunting but have used the GBP for native gold searching.  Since there are only two of you, three detectors, and your goal is finding gold I would concentrate your efforts with the two Gold Bug Pros.  First off, they are higher frequency (19 kHz vs. 13 kHz), are lighter in weight, and were designed specifically for gold hunting.  The T2 is very capable (as Steve notes) as a gold detector, but it was designed as an all-around detector, meaning it's a "jack-of-all-trades and master at none".  Secondly, the GBP's are very easy to operate, having few adjustments to make.  Set the ground balance, the threshold, the gain and you're off to the fields!  One thing to note:  'simple' doesn't mean 'inferior'.  There's a reason 'gold' and 'pro' are in the detector's name.  The T2 has more options as far as settings, and takes longer to master.

As far as coils, I would put the 5 in. X 10 in. on one and the 5 in. round on the other.  Keep the 7 in. X 11 in. in reserve for if/when you find a spot with larger pieces.  The small (especially) and medium coils are well balanced on the Pro.  The larger coil on the GBP is toe heavy and will lead to fatigue on long hunts.

Good fortune in both your finds and especially your enjoyment!

 

  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for the tips! I feel much more confident now as I have been given a wealth of useful information

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

well I found a tiny nugget the other day with my sluice, .26 of a gram, the T2 with 5" coil signals off on it just over 1.3", the Gold Bug Pro with the 10" elliptical coil sounds off nicely with it at 2.2 inches and the Gold Bug Pro with Nel Snake coil gets it nicely at 2.8 inches.  I guess I've found the best coil to use for my tiny nugget hunting.   The 10" would cover more ground but I feel i'd find it easier with the Nel Snake.

Obviously I did a very amateur test but kept the settings the same on both Gold Bug Pro's

Inside my house has a lot of interference but it messes with the T2 more than the Gold Bugs.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
13 minutes ago, phrunt said:

Inside my house has a lot of interference but it messes with the T2 more than the Gold Bugs.

That sounds like what I've heard -- 13 kHz to 15 kHz detectors can be more sensitive than 19 kHz regarding EMI.  Of course detecting inside your house? :wacko:  Probably crawling with EMI.  And the T2 gives you the option of tweaking the frequency (I think; the Fisher F75 does).

Time to find a nugget with a detector.  :biggrin:

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

that's the plan, only problem is all the gold i've found is more than 2 inches underground

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I have noticed with my sub gram nugget that unless it's within a couple of inches of the coil on the Gold Bug Pro it won't show on the bar across the top where it's telling you the numbers of what metal it is, at more than 2 or so inches it makes a zip zip sort of noise when I go over it but nothing on the top bar.  I do notice the ground phase numbers (the big ones in the center of the screen) change from what the ground balance numbers are to numbers in the 40's to 50's as I wave over it.  Is this what I'm looking for out in gold country when I am searching for tiny nuggets? I assume they won't show up on the top bar either, they will just change the ground phase and perhaps make a zipish noise, would I be right in thinking this way?

If this is so, I think i've passed over many nuggets and ignored them as I thought they would show up on the top bar in between say 35 and 60, I totally ignored signals when they just showed on the big numbers in the middle.

Sorry if my question seems silly, I'm very new to this.

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Not silly at all.  The dial ID reading (some call it a 'speedometer') on the Gold Bug family of detectors uses the discrimination circuitry.  As such it's not as sensitive as the all-metal (first derivate) ciruitry.  So weak signals won't give a reading on the dial.

Typcically the ground phase will drop on a conductive target (including iron but also including positive hot rocks).  So this is a good sign in general but specifics (especially in widely varying ground) can complicate things.  I have used the lowering of the ground phase for weak signals as an indication to dig.

Gold detectors (I think it's every one) are meant to signal when the threshold sound changes.  (Obviously this requires you to set up a low volume threshold.  Kevin Hoagland says "you want the threshold to sound like a mosquito buzzing around your ear.")  Even with strong enough signals to get a dial reading on the Gold Bug, gold can be all over the map, including in the upper iron range (i.e. 30's).  From what I've read and heard, most successful gold hunters (fossikers?) hunt by ear most of the time.  Others here can give you better instruction on that.

Bottom line is your detector is working and you are working to try and understand what it's telling you.  Keep it up!

  • Thanks 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

That was explained well, now I understand it. thanks so much

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

If you haven't read the following, It comes highly recommended.  Written by one of the design engineers of the Gold Bug, and in fact a design engineer for many gold detectors over his 35+ year career.

http://www.fisherlab.com/hobby/davejohnson/DavesGoldbook-reders.pdf

  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Similar Content

    • By beatup
      Had to go over to Monterey the end of March to help my relations move some things back to Wyoming and since the weather was just great at the time on the way home i made time for a day trip to do some detecting with the GB pro and managed a few small ones,all found detecting bedrock cracks and crevices.

    • By phrunt
      I was wondering about the Gold Bug Pro sensitivity to small nuggets, In my testing which is mainly air testing (which is naughty I know) and in ground testing where I've buried nuggets myself (also not ideal) It seems reasonably sensitive but I don't believe as good as my Gold Monster 1000 which I know is a higher frequency which should make it more sensitive to small nuggets.
      It's just I read this today by TrinityAU who has a lot of experience on the GBP which has now got me a bit confused as hes indicating its as good as the GB2 in finding tiny gold.
      ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
      You guys still using the GBII, it is a great detector, I have literally found pounds of gold with my three over the years. It was hard for me to change from the GBII to the GB Pro. In my opinion the GB Pro just does so much more when you learn how to use it. It goes far deeper on big and little. It works in soils that the GBII had to fight. It stays balanced better. It is waterproof. It has a far easier learning curve for beginners. The GB Pro is far cheaper, less batteries, longer battery life and the discrimination on anything over half a gram is fantastic. For those not wanting people to know their business it breaks down into a pack better. As stated above I know the GB Pro will find the same tiny sub-grainers as the GBII can, only difference is it does it with more ease as far as I am concerned. These are all my opinions, TRINITYAU/RAYMILLS
      ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
      And this one here is a quote from our very own Steve H.
      So down to two models, the Fisher Gold Bug Pro and Minelab X-Terra 705 Gold. Both under the magic 3 pound mark! Both with extremely powerful all metal modes. So powerful that in all metal mode these detectors give the PI units a run for depth in most ground on most gold in the US. 
      I haven't yet had the opportunity to find a tiny nugget with it although it has found me one single bit of gold some time ago and I will find it hard to pick up and use now that I have a GM1000 and an Equinox 800 but I do want to use it, especially seeing I bought two of them and lots of coils for them.  I have the 10" elliptical coil and also a Nel Snake and Nel Sharpshooter for it so I have a decent array of coils.
      I have found in my basic testing it feels almost as good as the other detectors I own and it feels in some instances better.
      I was wondering what peoples opinions are on the GBP vs these really high frequency VLFS and if it's even worth me using it when I have the Equinox 800 and the GM1000 if they're much better than it.  If they're a lot better I obviously wouldn't want to waste my time on the GBP.
      My main reason for asking is I'm thinking of offloading them as I'm unlikely to ever use them if they're redundant by my other detectors.  I was intending to keep them for my wife to use but shes made it clear she has no intentions of ever gold detecting, I probably put her off with all the shotgun pellets I come home with 
      Thanks
       
    • By phrunt
      I have 2 Gold Bug Pro DP's, I have Nel Sharpshooter, Nel Snake and also the 10" Elliptical coil for them, along with the stock coils which are 5" and 11".
      Both my Gold Bug Pro's run at maximum sensitivity with the Nel's and the 10" and 11" Fisher coils perfectly, if I put the stock 5" coils on and try run maximum sensitivity even holding them up in the air they're finding targets all over the place in the air,  this only happens with the 5" hockey puck coils.  They quiet down and run fine about 75% sensitivity. 
      I'm asking all the current and former GBP owners if they had the same experience.
      I found this review saying he can't turn it past the 12 o'clock position and keep it stable and he seems happy with that, for me that's odd as its only half way, I can crank it all the way up on all coils except the 5" and it be perfectly stable.
      http://raregoldnuggets.com/?p=2420
      So I was wondering if my 2 x 5" coils both have issues (unlikely to be 2 faulty ones), or they're just like that.  They're still under warranty so I want to find out while they're covered.
      I checked and both my GBP's run the version 4 firmware.
      I am fond of my GBP's, they've been taken over now by my GM1000 and Equinox but I still want to use them once I get better at prospecting and see how they do.  They were my first Gold Prospecting machines, and they're under a year old so it would be a shame to not use them ever again and retire them.  In my amateur attempts at testing them on small gold nuggets I've found with my other detectors they do seem to pick them up to an acceptable degree, especially the larger nuggets.
       Steve H maybe able to weigh in on this as I know he was once quite the fan of the GBP.
       
    • By phrunt
      For a bit of a test of my VLF's I put the bits of gold I found on this prospecting trip into small plastic bags and put one at a time in a big bucket of gravel I got from one of the two creeks we found the gold at, I threw a handful of my daughters black sand collection into the bucket and mixed it around to make it a bit more realistic of a test. I also added a 2 gram test nugget I purchased on a local auction site some time ago for the test, in the hope one day I find one , it is smaller than the nugget John found on this trip but it must be thicker.  I buried the nuggets down at around the 5cm mark, the same sort of depth we found them at as they were mostly in bedrock, one at a time and run each of my detectors over it, excluding the Go-Find as I knew it had no hope, started at the smallest nugget and worked my way up.  I put the most suitable coils for Gold prospecting on each detector that I had and put them in all metal mode when available.


      Starting left to right
      Equinox 800, GM1000 with 5" coil, Gold Bug Pro with Nel Snake Coil, Gold Bug Pro with Cors Fortune Coil (Nel Sharpshooter), I also used the GBP 10" elliptical on this one,  T2 with 5" Coil, Garrett Euroace with Nel Tornado Coil. 
      I wanted to know which detectors I own would have found the nuggets I found with John to work out which are suitable to do the same job as my GM1000 in that situation with the size gold we found.  All were in default settings, sensitivity at max and the Equinox in Gold 1 and all were ground balanced to the buckets gravel.
      Knocked out of the competition immediately was the Garrett Euroace. Nothing at all from it on all 8 nuggets.  All other detectors picked up all the nuggets except the T2 missed the smallest nugget of the 8 but got all the others fine. 
      Moved down to 10cm and had the same results.
      Moved down 15cm and the T2 lost the smaller nuggets and struggled on the bigger ones, the GM1000 got a erratic on its gold probability meter on the smaller ones and the bigger ones were getting harder to to get a stable probability,  The GBP lost the smaller ones on all coils and was getting faint on the bigger ones and the Equinox was really struggling and only signalled on them as the center of the coil past them, the edges of the coil got nothing at all on all nuggets.
      Moved down 20cm, T2 was out, GM1000 lost the smaller ones completely, erratic on the bigger ones, GBP signal was getting faint but still a dig on all coils only on the biggest ones, smaller were still gone, Equinox lost all but the biggest ones. 
      Down to 25cm, GM1000 was out, GBP still faint on the biggest ones on all coils, Equinox was faint but still there on the biggest ones.
      At 30cm all were out except the most faint signals on the GBP with Cors Fortune and the 10" Elliptical which I wouldn't dig as sounded too much like normal ground noise, and the Equinox was the same but giving a slightly better signal than the GBP and maybe I would dig it.
      These were the winners for me!  GM1000, then Equinox followed closely by the Gold Bug Pro's with various coil options.

      With any of these combinations I could find the same size nuggets in the same ground, except the Equinox's big coil would let me down.
      The T2 did surprisingly well and I see why it was a popular prospecting detector but prefers bigger nuggets, however it's still the most comfortable detector I own.  The GBP's are really good machines, I take back everytime I doubted their ability, it was my ability that was the problem, not the GBP, I was just in ground that didn't have big enough nuggets for them.  As for tiny nuggets the GM1000 and Equinox are the only suitable machines I own.
      I really want Minelab to bring out that 6" for the Equinox now as I think it will do very well.
      This was by no means an accurate test, I was just working out what detectors I have that can find these nuggets so if my wife or anyone wanted to use one I wouldn't be wasting their time using one as the Monster is firmly in my hands when I go detecting from now on until perhaps the Equinox gets a smaller coil.
      The other reason I wanted to do this test was because I liked John's 6" GB2 coil so much for the task, and my Nel Snake 6.5 x 3.5 for the Gold Bug Pro is the same sort of size and shape.  I will try out my GBP at the same creek sometime with that Nel Snake and see how it performs in the real world.


       
      Seeing his GB2 in action made me want a GB2  but my next and possibly final detector for some time is going to be a GPX 4500.
       
    • By GB_Amateur
      An acquaintance has asked if I'd help him find some shotguns he buried several years ago.  They are wrapped in oilcloths, sealed in PVC pipes (~3 in = 7.5 cm diameter) and buried about 20 inches (half meter) deep according to him.  He says he can show me the approximate location within about 10 m.  If all this is accurate it seems like an easy task....  Then again, he also said someone in his family (without him being present) tried to find them with a detector and couldn't.  That could be due to a lot of reasons as I'm sure you are already thinking, but my concern is that they may be buried more deeply than he remembers.
      Which of the following would be your first choice?
      1) TDI/SPP with 12 in round mono and 16 V battery pack.
      2) X-Terra 705 w/15 in Coiltek 3kHz.
      3) Gold Bug Pro (19 kHz) w/15 in Nel Attack.
      4) F75 black (13 kHz) w/11x7 in^2 coil operating in cache process.
      Assuming he has the time and patience I'm going to have all four with me to do a comparison, but I'd like to start with the one that gives me the best chance.  Your advice is appreciated.
       
       
    • By phrunt
      I found a .026 gram nugget the other day with the GM1000 in manual 10, if you could call it a nugget? a flake perhaps? I don't know what defines a nugget over a flake.  I used the 10" coil and it banged hard on it with a nice sound, nothing on the gold chance indicator, it was about 10cm down in fine gravel.  I had my GBP with Nel Sharpshooter with me so I ran it over the target before digging to see what it would do, its ground phase dropped right down to around 10 to 12 and made a nice loud sound, nothing showed on the discrimination scale up the top.  I wasn't sure at this point what I had found and didn't understand the ground phase drop on the GBP? I thought it should be 35 to 50 for gold?  Does anyone know why a genuine gold find on the GBP reported a ground phase of 10 or so? Is that normal, should I be hunting looking for ground phase that low? if this is the case I've probably missed a lot of gold as I always ignored signals that were below a ground phase 35 or so, keep in mind where I am hunting there is only tiny gold, all well under a gram.
       
×