Jackpine Posted April 1, 2018 Share Posted April 1, 2018 A friend sent me this image he made showing the Equinox coils to scale. Good job Rick! 7 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chase Goldman Posted April 2, 2018 Share Posted April 2, 2018 My comments on the pics: I want, I have, I want. 1 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Judy Posted April 2, 2018 Share Posted April 2, 2018 I am getting the bigger one first . Don't think hubby is going to like it though . I will be the good wife and buy him a longer handled shovel the same day 4 4 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GKman Posted April 2, 2018 Share Posted April 2, 2018 I can't wait for the 15 incher. I used the 17 on the CTX for years with great results. I already have been missing the lack of coverage with the stock Equinox coil. Hopefully within a couple months the 15 will be out. 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ridge Runner Posted April 2, 2018 Share Posted April 2, 2018 I thank you for posting the picture but I wish you had the price to post with it too. Chuck Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SittingElf Posted April 2, 2018 Share Posted April 2, 2018 After the shortage debacle on the Nox's, I made sure I was #1 on my dealers wait list for any and ALL Equinox accessories and coils as they become available. THIS time, I'm first in line! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MPL Posted April 2, 2018 Share Posted April 2, 2018 The look like the CTX coils, my figures are crossed that they are priced much less. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Steve Herschbach Posted April 2, 2018 Share Posted April 2, 2018 I am anxious to get my hands on the larger coil. Not for depth, but for ground coverage. Normally I would never use an oversized coil in parks because of the increased risk of target masking. Currently I use a 3” x 17” Bigfoot coil to cover huge sports fields while minimizing masking with the narrow coil width. However, the Equinox 12” x 15” combined with lower sensitivity and faster recovery may make a decent coil for jewelry hunting in sports fields. I will be giving it a good go for that use whenever I can lay hands on one. EQX 06 Double-D Smart Coil The waterproof 6-inch round Double-D coil is very sensitive to small targets, and perfect for finding treasure in high trash areas. It is also ideal for detecting in difficult terrain. A protective skidplate is included. Part No. 3011-0333 EQX 11 Double-D Smart Coil The waterproof 11-inch elliptical Double-D coil provides good all-round performance for general detecting. It provides a good balance between sensitivity, weight, and ground coverage. A protective skidplate is included. Part No. 3011-0334 EQX 15 Double-D Smart Coil The waterproof 15 x 12-inch elliptical Double-D coil provides maximum depth for specialised treasure hunting. It is also great for wide ground coverage in open spaces. A protective skidplate is included. Part No. 3011-0335 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mn90403 Posted April 2, 2018 Share Posted April 2, 2018 5 hours ago, GKman said: I can't wait for the 15 incher. I used the 17 on the CTX for years with great results. I already have been missing the lack of coverage with the stock Equinox coil. Hopefully within a couple months the 15 will be out. I am waiting for the larger coil also. I feel like CTX/17 is the only setup that can compete with the standard 800 right now. It has coverage and a depth advantage over a normal CTX that made me take off that coil and not put it back on. One thing I dislike about all these coils has been the ears. They have broken off and I've had to purchase aftermarket fixes. Mitchel Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Andy2640 Posted July 6, 2018 Share Posted July 6, 2018 Hi Steve, good to talk with you, long time reader. May i ask, what depth difference do you think the larger coil will provide? and im interested in your comment regarding you not wanting the larger coil for depth? Its my own logical fallacy perhaps that is motivating my question, because in my noob mind, im thinking depth - or lack of, is the reason for less roman finds. Thanks in advance. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now