Jump to content
Sign in to follow this  
vanursepaul

Tow Coils / Detector Sleds

Recommended Posts


Paul, I've messed about with sledding (tow coils) since the GT16000 came on the market, which made the concept a possibility because the detector could ground balance as you progressed over varying soil conditions. With the introduction of the 2200d it was possible to step up to pulse induction which meant more mineralised ground could be sledded than with VLF. Experimentation led to the conclusion that mono was the way to go as target response with a dd was way too slow. The best detector so far has been the GPX4000 for this type of detection, although I am yet to try the QED.

Trial and error has taught me that the best setup has been a coil on a section of rubber conveyor belt. It proves the old 'KISS' principle. Keep it simple stupid.

  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for the reply Reg,

I may have a go at building one to pull behind my Jimny... (as soon as I can get one :wink:)

The idea fascinates me... always has ... but i never had an open area to use one in.  Im coming to WA this spring so it might be something i could put in the trick bag...

First,

Could you share your results and if you think it was feasible in the right places.

And do you have any plans, or was this something you made on the go? Do you still have one?

How did you 'tune' the coil to the 4000?

I dont know if anyone else is interested in this or not.....

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Paul, if you get the opportunity I would be happy to loan you my setup and show you the basics. It should be fine with any GPX. All you need is auto ground balance and a tow vehicle that won't interfere with the electronics. (diesel with alternator isolated) 

 

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Are you kidding??? I would love to meet you and hear some stories---the sled would be a bonus--- !

I will be there sometime after the first of the year--I haven't figured out yet what route to take ---where to start and where to end it up????

I cant get a grip on the weather patterns there... If i come in January i need to figure out the most pleasant place to detect---if i can figure that out then maybe i can chart the course for this Aussie Adventure 2018!!!! :biggrin:

By the way, where are you located Reg?

Sorry to the rest of you I didnt mean to hijack this thread it is GREAT---but i cant miss this opportunity....:wink:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hijack is fine Paul. I see it's now a separate thread anyway. Here's Reg's early model detecting sled again:

ibyxyf.jpg

He now uses a sheet of conveyer belting - much simpler! The streamers are thrown out when a signal is heard and followed up with a hand detector.

  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

- -  plus you can have some juvenile fun when not detecting   :smile:

11j9jbp.jpg

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Oh good god Paul on the loose with a 4 wheeler and detector sled i can already imagine the the various out comes both good and bad :laugh:

  • Like 1
  • Haha 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

January - hot. February - hot. March - getting better.  

WA, NT, SA and Queensland would be pretty unbearable during Jan, Feb (I think).  

Victoria has its moments.  Last summer was reasonably mild but still plenty of days mid 30's and a few in the 40's (Celsius obviously).  

Reg is in Victoria.  6 weeks in the famous Golden Triangle, a week in South Australia to drop in on minelab and Nenad and then 5 weeks in WA as the weather cools a little :biggrin:

You'd get to cross the Nullabor Plain and the longest dead straight section of road in Australia - 150 kms or thereabouts.  Most people find the drive to WA boring.  I've done it 3 times now - heaps to see if you go looking.  

Whatever you do, if you end up in Victoria it would be good to catch up and have a beer :wink:

 

 

 

  • Thanks 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 

 

 

 

 

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  

  • Similar Content

    • By Nuke em
      Anyone out there know any information on this machine ? It supposed to be being tested and could be really interesting when released .
      May be able to discriminate Iron out .
      You Tube this .  AQUAMANTA A1 TESTS HARDELOT . All in capitals . 
      It is compared to the Sovereign and CTX , the Aqua is the last one tested . Unfortunately LIKE the Equinox most of the time before release , its in a foreign language .
    • By wanderer
      Maybe this is a dumb question  wit regard to PI machines  why is that one machine will excel at small nuggets but can't do so well on bigger nuggets.,  Doesn't make sense to me.  It would seem logical that iit can find small stuff  big stuff should be easy?
    • By Ridge Runner
      The ads came from mags dating back to 66. I can say I remember them all. Just maybe you remember some if not all.
      Chuck




    • By riden2low
      Any one know if the ctx coils interchange with the equinox beside the mounting on the shaft?
       
       
    • By Steelheader
      Does anyone here know what the weight is for the new slimmed down D2 coil.  I know the old one was really heavy.  Is the new one much lighter?
    • By phrunt
      Has anyone had any experience with these things? 

      Electromagnetic and magnetic interferences could be extremely annoying when you are looking for that hard to find gold nugget. Most of the noise is picked up by the search coil but a significant level of noise is being picked up as well by the sensitive electronics inside the control box.
      The control box is made of aluminium therefore the magnetic field easily penetrates it.
      To prove that, approach a magnet to the right side of your detector when switched on. 
      Millions of less obvious noise signals are interfering with your detector.  
      We have developed this Shield from the best quality material primarily used in sensitive 
      medical and scientific electronics. After years of studying and testing different materials we have found this one ticks all the boxes. 
      I have revisited the places where I've previously cleaned up and found more gold after installing the shield.
      It is 0.35 mm thick, held firmly around your control box by the armrest and  the new improved version with dual layer shielding on the right side is only 175 g!
      We have tested it on the GPX 5000 with amazing results such as quieter threshold, better GB, resulting in slightly increased depth.
      The shield allows you to increase the Rx gain by a notch or two without compromising the threshold. Use Inverted Response when hunting for big deep nuggets. 
      https://www.ebay.com.au/itm/MAGNETIC-INTERFERENCE-REDUCER-SHIELD-FOR-MINELAB-GOLD-DETECTORS/232594646908?hash=item3627b8a77c:g:8lEAAOSwYGFU0bvu
      I noticed it on Ebay today while I was looking for a cover for my GPX.
      I have noticed I've been able to quieten down my GPX by opening the control box up and scraping some paint away where the shielding touches the casing, on one end they had scraped away paint from one screw point during production, and the other end had no paint scraped away at all by the factory so it's sheilding was basically useless.  By scraping paint away from a few areas on each end of the detector I was able to give the GPX a bit of a noticable quieten down.  I am sure on later models Minelab would of scraped away more paint but as mine is a very early model made in Australia version this wasn't done.
       
       
       
       
×