Jump to content
Sign in to follow this  
Steve Herschbach

Equinox, Gold Monster, & Arizona Gold

Recommended Posts

Equinox 800 in the Desert, Gold Monster 1000, and Nuggets.... Part 1
Published on Jun 11, 2018 Nugget Shooter (Bill Southern)

Took the EQX 800 out to the goldfields for a run, impressed so far...

  • Like 6
  • Thanks 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

He ain't seen nothing yet, it can find gold so small it's a mission to even recover it from the scoop, the amount of times I've lost it in the process and had to recover it again ūüôā¬†Straight down the middle of the coil is definitely the sweet spot, front or back doesn't matter, but very much the middle is where all the power is.

Stuff that you'd think you would only ever find with a sluice or pan.  I guess we are indeed very lucky here as I can normally run my sensitivity at 25 and be stable in our gold areas, even in an area with high voltage power lines not too far away.

  • Like 4

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi guys, While Bill's footage shows just how sensitive the EQ 800 is on pretty small gold with that 11" coil, & I thank him for the effort on doing the footage, but I just can't get excited on planted nugget testing as it is not the real world of natural in ground detected nuggets. If those were natural in ground undug gold nuggets I believe the Nox would get them even deeper than those air tests & buried in ground tests. It is a shame his girlfriend didn't call him over when she got a signal with the GM & before digging it & disturbing it let him sweep over it with the Nox. That would have been a far better realistic test. Cheers.

Good luck out there.

JW :smile: 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

JW

Like you said if left in the ground would have been a true test of the Equinox on gold . The trouble is that little word if .

What I really want to see is that 6‚ÄĚ coil in action like Bill was talking about.

Being we live in a in perfect world how can I expect Bill’s video to be any different.

i’m Looking forward to his next video he makes.

Bill I thank you for your hard work and just seeing that pretty face is a pleasure to behold .

That’s the way it is Bill and that is some got it others got to go get it.

Chuck

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I am sure that the urge to dig her target was far stronger than any desire to test the 800...even after all these years  and good intentions I just start digging! I want to see the gold-right now!!!

fred

  • Like 3
  • Haha 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Here's part II: 

 

  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 hours ago, fredmason said:

I am sure that the urge to dig her target was far stronger than any desire to test the 800...even after all these years  and good intentions I just start digging! I want to see the gold-right now!!!

fred

I have to agree with that too Fred. The urge to know straight away what a signal is is usually paramount to anything else.¬†ūüĎć

Good luck to you out there

JW :smile:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I certainly know the feeling his girlfriend has, my trash to nugget ratio is about 100 to 1 ūüôā

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Great videos. Tells the truths of nugget hunting.

strick

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I've worked the Little San Domingo many times and often get skunked like Bill did this time. His advice to find a small area and work it is so true!!! I'm sure he thought he was getting the 800's coil over gold too just like his friend. Those targets sounded great. The lead and small tin targets are everywhere in that area. My Makro Gold Racer can get pretty noisy on that ground. The 800 was very quiet. It was great to see the 800 giving accurate target ID numbers and good depth. That is another big plus for the Equinox since most other VLF detectors have to run in low to mid sensitivity All Metal at this site because using high sensitivity will drive you nuts with all of the hot rocks and using disc kills depth there. Most of the gold VLFs running All Metal prospecting mode don't have target ID and neither do the PIs .  Gold 2 might have been a better choice for that area since most of the gold is smaller stuff.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  

  • Similar Content

    • By MCH2
      Streamlining
      At the moment I am a quantity clad hunter. Just looking for more efficient ways of operating. Currently I am using the Equinox 600 with wireless low latency headphones.  I use park mode 1 with 50 tones and leave open VDI numbers 13, and 24 to 38.   My method: I mostly bend at the waist with a little knee flex to dig (no kneeling); most coins are less than 5" deep. I use a Lesche 10" hand trowel and a smaller wider trowel for popping near surface coins. I only bend over once per target. I use a pinpointer after initial coil pinpointing leaving the pinpointer on facing away from the target while digging, dig target, pinpoint again as needed, recover target, turn pinpointer off, fill in hole, pick up tools, then straighten back up, pocket finds, holster tools and give the hole a final step on and start sweeping again. I have gone from using the pinpointer holster to using my back pants pocket as this is faster to draw and replace without having to stop and look to holster. Also started using a quicker holster for my larger trowel and keep my small wider trowel in my other back pocket. I use a small tie on hardware apron with a pocket for finds and a pocket for trash.  My 600 is tethered to my belt with an elastic bungee cord so it hangs and moves with me when I bend and straighten up; it never gets laid on the ground.
      Anyone like to share their method of streamlining to increase efficiency and cut down on redundancy.
      „ÄÄMalcolm
    • By Belgy1972
      Now that we've all had a bit of time to enjoy the Nox whether that be the 600 or 800.
      Which mode do you think is the best and why, more to the point what do you think the benefits are over the other modes. I prefer park 2 as i find with the right sweep speed there is very little falsing compared to the others especially field 2.
    • By midalake
      Can someone tell me how long the coil wire is? Coil through connector,
       
      Thanks Dave
    • By Nuke em
      On Youtube i saw from another forum link that a bloke has found another way to check for bad targets on his 600 . I assume its the same for the 800 .
      The Minelab Equinox 'Hack' - Target ID Trick.
      Starts at 1.49 minutes
       
    • By PG-Prospecting
      Finally found my fist Virginia picker with the GM 1000 on the private land that i have access too!  This is my first piece of detected gold from here.  Ive found lots of nuggets dredging the creek but nuggets have eluded my detecting efforts.  
      I found this one in a small feeder creek.  I have since detected most of the feeder and found nothing else.  I still have yet to find any pickers or nuggets outside the creek at this location which is frustrating to say the least.  I also run a GPX4800 outside the creek but no dice still.  Up to 12 gram nuggets found dredging in the creek but nothing outside of it.  One of these days lol.  





    • By foreverteachable
      I took Dean's advice about using higher recovery speeds in trashy area to separate signals betters. Two wheaties I found yesterday were in the same very trashy areas I had detected previously with a sweep speed of 1. I believe the higher sweep speed on the 600 of 2-3 did help unmask them. If you go from Park settings to Field settings you will notice the difference as well in how the signals stand out more in trashy areas. There seems to be sort of a lag time/longer signal in Park 1 than in Field 2. I have also been checking signals found with a sweep speed of 1 with different recovery speeds to see if depth is affected and haven't seen a major difference. I have been keeping the sweep speed settings low because I watched an air test video on Youtube showing a major difference in depth during air testing. I am not convinced that lowering recovery speed gives one more depth but I did notice more falsing on cut nails and bigger iron when I raised the sweep speed. Has anyone else noticed it and has anyone seen a difference in depth at higher recovery speeds on actual targets in the ground?
×