Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Guest AussieDigs

From my mostly uneducated view, you could have a threshold just detectable or quiet producing the same hit hum. Putting it another way, you will have identical notifications, just one with a threshold hum, the other without. Just keep the no threshold right at that line of no hum. You shouldnt loose anything compared with a little threshold hum.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 77
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Posts

Well, after reading JP's review on the QED followed by Reg and Northeasts review and the occasional QED user popping up I decided it's time to get one.  I didn't need the full package and was on a bud

So I took the QED out today with the X-coil 12x6". I first went to a spot I've been to a number of times and only ever found 2 bits there, one a long time ago with my Gold Bug Pro, the other a fe

Yup, all further talk of sycophants, knockers, etc. just expect the post will be deleted. I am well and truly done with past history elsewhere and want none of it here. Just let it go folks. Make your

Posted Images

Guest AussieDigs

Simon, i wouldnt be concerned about any negativity directed at you or your posts/vids you may make. Ignore it if it may happen. Remember, their issues are just that...their issues, not yours. Ignore it like a trash target.

Hopefully i can get reasonable at using the PL2 to justify posting my findings. Theres not alot out there.

Link to post
Share on other sites
56 minutes ago, AU_Solitude said:

Since a few people have breached the subject: 

I talked to a gentleman earlier in the year that was running the QED in Cal-Nevada grounds - he stated that in low mineral ground he thought the detector easily kept pace with the GPX for depth and SDC for sensitivity, with a bonus being the lightweight where he could cover ground quickly. He also said that the more mineralized the ground became, the less this was true, with high mineralization making it no more effective than the SD series, and some severe ground crippling it beyond use.

That's one users review stateside so take it for what you feel it's worth. I know if I were in an area with mild to fair ground, like Simon, I would certainly take a look at simply from a weight and ground coverage perspective. Everyone wants an easy-to-swing pulse machine instead of the existing tanks.

And the bolded section was also my findings, and those of at least 4 others, in Western Australia, when I tried to use the QED for patch hunting in heavily mineralised and variable ground. 

It needed to be re-ground balanced every two feet or so, making it unusable for the job ! Hot rocks also gave it hell.

Not that the QED sycophants will listen to these people about these problems, they would rather attack and denigrate the user, than admit that there is a problem !

Rick

Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest AussieDigs
1 hour ago, AU_Solitude said:

Since a few people have breached the subject: 

I talked to a gentleman earlier in the year that was running the QED in Cal-Nevada grounds - he stated that in low mineral ground he thought the detector easily kept pace with the GPX for depth and SDC for sensitivity, with a bonus being the lightweight where he could cover ground quickly. He also said that the more mineralized the ground became, the less this was true, with high mineralization making it no more effective than the SD series, and some severe ground crippling it beyond use.

That's one users review stateside so take it for what you feel it's worth. I know if I were in an area with mild to fair ground, like Simon, I would certainly take a look at simply from a weight and ground coverage perspective. Everyone wants an easy-to-swing pulse machine instead of the existing tanks.

Any idea of model? Updates?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Au_solitude, did the user mention if it tended to struggle just on ferrous type mineralization or also on salt (conductive) type hot ground too? The GPX is a lot better on salt than my GPZ and that's one reason I keep it around still.

Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest AussieDigs
22 minutes ago, araratgold said:

And the bolded section was also my findings, and those of at least 4 others, in Western Australia, when I tried to use the QED for patch hunting in heavily mineralised and variable ground. 

It needed to be re-ground balanced every two feet or so, making it unusable for the job ! Hot rocks also gave it hell.

Not that the QED sycophants will listen to these people about these problems, they would rather attack and denigrate the user, than admit that there is a problem !

Rick

“Sycophants”? Geez Rick, classifying people as such will start a squable in its own right!

Link to post
Share on other sites
24 minutes ago, AussieDigs said:

“Sycophants”? Geez Rick, classifying people as such will start a squable in its own right!

Anyone who pointed out anything negative about the QED was labelled a Minelab sycophant by the QED crew.

As I said, they would rather attack the individuals than admit there was a problem. Most people were too afraid to publicly say anything negative, because of the public denigration they then received !

BTW, Howard has recently made an admission of sorts in regards to the problems I highlighted, by stating things he is trying to add to or fix on the QED. From AEGP forum :  " 1: Better GB ie ability to handle higher intensity ground variability without constant re Ground Balancing. " " 2: Ground Tracking. "

Rick

Link to post
Share on other sites
5 hours ago, phrunt said:

I didn't even realise there was some crazy history of it until very recently, but that's none of my business, I'm just a consumer buying a detector to look for gold ?  I know people seem to have arguments over the QED all the time, I haven't looked into why and frankly I don't care, if it works for me that's all I care about.

Likewise Simon. Came as a shock to me - and even got me banned from one forum.  Just ignore the knockers and reach your own conclusions. The QED is Howard's constantly evolving work in progress and most critics have not used the latest variants.

For me (as you probably know from reading my posts) it's the ideal cheap, lightweight, battery efficient, multi coil adaptable PI  prospecting machine - and has found many ozs at all depths and all soil conditions to prove it, ranging from over 2 oz to flys-it.

Look forward to reading more of your results - 

  • Like 3
Link to post
Share on other sites

Boys, all I care about is any QED user’s experience and observations. I don’t think I need to hear about the mud slinging so common on other forums ... I certainly don’t care!

fred

  • Like 8
  • Thanks 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
25 minutes ago, fredmason said:

Boys, all I care about is any QED user’s experience and observations. I don’t think I need to hear about the mud slinging so common on other forums ... I certainly don’t care!

fred

Fred, that's exactly what I and a few others did, but we were labelled " knockers " ( per jrbeatty above ), and far worse  ! All we did was point out it's shortcomings in WA, and copped a whole lot of sh#t for our troubles !

Simon, I don't think you will have many problems at all in NZ with your crazily mild mineralisation, but I can assure you that that is not the " experience and observations " of a number of us who were trying to use it in WA, and at least one user from NSW !

Rick

  • Thanks 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Similar Content

    • By auminesweeper
      I have been watching a thread over on PA and it seems there are a few problems, But some of the replies from those pro qed folks seem a little daunting when you consider that the main issue is the ground balance and threshold, which brings to mind JP's review.
      I find the TDI's a bit worrisome as in when to deploy each of the conductivity settings and find it is much easier to run the SL set to ALL, the QED would drive me nuts when you take the latest reply in to account having to do a Math equation to set the GB/Threshold,
      anyway here is the link maybe one of you wiser people can translate it all in to common English.
        https://www.prospectingaustralia.com.au/forum/viewtopic.php?id=23399
    • By phrunt
      I've been wanting to take the QED to the beach for a while now, it has a Mode 11 beach mode which is very deep, its essentially just a mode that has ground balance disabled at 7.5uS pulse delay.
      The beach I went to was only just over an hour and a half from home.  I live about as far from a beach possible in NZ.  I also wanted to try out my new Fisher F-Pulse pinpointer as it's meant to handle salt water beaches, my Garrett Carrot AT doesn't, last time I tried to use it on the beach the wet sand was setting it off like mad and it would not balance to the wet sand.
      The good news is the F-pulse worked fine, handled the wet sand well.
      I took a photo of my QED all geared up ready to detect.

      The weather was shocking, About 3 degrees with snow on the forecast for later tonight, strong wind and showers was what I was dealing with.  I was going to be near the beach which is why I took my detector, the purpose of the trip wasn't to go detecting, the detecting was just a bonus.  I decided I'd put the X-Coils 15" spiral coil on it as it's my biggest GPX coil, it's also very sensitive and deep so seemed a good fit.  This beach is just huge and people spread out all along it as you're allowed to drive your cars on it, so there is no "good busy spot" like on normal beaches. 
      On the dry sand Mode 11 (Disabled Ground Balance) worked well, it was perfect actually and I was digging deep bottle caps.  I'm more of a discrimination type person so was getting pretty annoyed digging junk.  I was however surprised how deep I was digging these bottle caps.  It felt like I was regularly digging junk at 12".  I got sick of that real quick so I jumped back in my car and drove down closer to the water, I was using my car as a bit of a wind break the weather was that bad.
      As I was closer to the water I was no longer able to use Mode 11, the no GB mode, it's my first time using the QED where I've had a response from the ground raising and lowering my coil.  I'm not used to bad ground 🙂  The beach has a fair bit of black sand, not terrible like some of NZ's beaches that are virtually pure black sand.
      I ended up having to go to Mode 5 with a gain of 6, settings I've never used before, I always run things flat out but I didn't like the ground response I was getting, If I kept the coil level to the ground the No GB mode worked OK, although I wasn't sure if that would mean depth would be affected so I wanted to be balanced,  I was able to ground balance now after a bit of fiddling around with manual ground balance.  I'm not good at dealing with bad ground, it's something I'm not used to at all.
      My first target as I got down near the water was an old NZ 2 cent coin, then a rusty old beer bottle cap and a few pull tabs and an old rusty weird looking bit of scrap metal and a few more bottle caps and then....... to my surprise a coin I've only found two of in my entire time detecting, a NZ silver florin!!!! from 1933 too, the first year NZ made a Florin and a harder to get date.  I went to take a photo and my damn phone was flat!  It was deep too, I tilted my coil sideways in the big hole I dug with my scoop and it was almost the depth of my coil, and the coil is a 15" coil.  I took these photos of it when I got home.


      It's not all nice and shiny silver like the coins I find in the grass, I will try clean it up a bit somehow.  My silvers from the sports fields always come up looking new.
      I decided to leave after that, the weather was getting to me and the wind was freezing.  I had achieved what I wanted to do, test the QED out on the beach.  It worked well enough, certainly deep and good ground coverage with such a big coil, I'd rather use a detector with discrimination and Target ID's for beach hunts though.
    • By phrunt
      It's been announced the QED is now going to have a dealer in New Zealand, the first step of the QED becoming a real International detector.    The good bit for me is it's a local dealer so that's nice and handy.   I hope the dealer will be able to do the software updates to make that easier.  That would be the key to opening up worldwide dealers having them capable of doing updates I think.  The updates are free but I'd rather pay the dealer a bit of coin for their time to update mine than send it back to Australia.
      Here is their information for the Kiwi's


       
    • By Dave63
      Been a lot of chat about x coil for ML. I would like to see or read a good comparison on the X coil vs the rest on a QED. I am going on a trip to Western Australia in June, so I need a larger mid range coil. I have received advice that the 14" Coiltek is the coil  of choice. All the talk is about x coil, but there hasn't been any real comparison posted. I was thinking 15"x10" x coil could be a contender, but lack of comparison or direct info makes it hard to make a choice.
      Correct me if I am wrong
      8" Sadie = Small targets at shallow depth Low ground coverage
      11" Detech Ultra = Small targets a little more depth bit better ground coverage
      14" Coiltek = More depth start to loose smaller targets better ground coverage
      15" x 10" = ??
       
    • By phrunt
      Today I had to drop my wife and daughter at the airport in Queenstown near JW's house, they're off to Australia for a week to see family.  It's too hot for me this time of year over there so I decided I'd stay home.  JW had the day off work today due to the weather so we decided we'd go for a detect, it's been wild weather lately.. so much for summer, fresh snow on all the mountains this morning and during the day the snow kept coming down.  By the end of the day the mountains had a good coating.  My wife's flight ended up being delayed over six hours due to the weather so they had a boring time at the airport waiting while JW and I were out detecting.

      The snow was building throughout the day.  This was not long after we arrived, much more by the time we left.
      This area is known as my nemesis, I've only ever found gold here twice, once was with my Gold Bug Pro when I first started prospecting and another time was when I first got my 12x6" X-Coil also using the QED, both tiny bits of gold.  I've struggled to use my GPX at this location as it's right next to power lines and the area is riddled with hot rocks, really annoying hot rocks, the QED handles the power lines fine.  The hot rocks combined with millions of shot gun pellets make this area a nightmare for VLF's too.  I consider it the hardest place for me to find gold out of my known prospecting areas.  It does however have gold, and the gold is often very small stuff, it's a real challenge for me here.
      I wanted to try the new 15x10" GPX X-Coil this time as last time with the 12x6" X-Coil I spent a lot of time digging shotgun pellets, I was hoping the bigger coil may just be big enough to ignore the pellets but still be sensitive enough to find some of the tiny gold.
      The hot rocks aren't all big either, a lot of them are tiny

      This is from dragging my pick magnet across the ground for a few seconds.
      The area is quite the challenge to swing a coil too, very bushy and rocky.


      The growth of the plant life has gotten a lot worse since I was last here a month or so ago

      The rocky areas are often old tailings piles, a majority of them aren't worth detecting though as they're just rocks, no soils involved.  This one above wasn't too bad but had no gold unfortunately.

      There was plenty of the hot rocks in this area giving me grief.  I couldn't run at this location in Mode 11 (No ground balance) as it made the hot rocks so much worse, nutting off all over the place so I stuck with Mode 1, the most sensitive of the ground balanced modes and it mostly handled the tiny hot rocks fine but the bigger ones still set it off.  You can't just kick them away unfortunately as a lot of them are buried.
      I did managed to find one bit of gold, at first I dug a hot rock but after removing it the signal continued, there was actually two signals after I removed the hot rock however whatever the second signal was it dropped down further into the rock pile to be lost forever.

      I'm up quite high on a cliff edge here, you'll see the flooded river below, it's usually a really nice blue water but during flood it goes brown.  You'll see the area I dug out to get my little nugget, I have no idea of the depth of it as I may have initially been tricked by the hot rock.

      It's a tiny little thing, It had a nice target signal though.  I didn't expect at the time for it to be gold as I thought the signal was too good, I was expecting another hot rock.

      0.072 of a gram.
      The afternoon was getting pretty wet, we were at it rain, hail and shine, the weather kept changing.  At one point the hail hurt, got me right in the eyeball!

      I just put a plastic bag over the QED to keep it dry, same with the speaker and rear control box.  Someone needs to make waterproof covers for it 🙂
      That was it for me, I was too wet, I went to see how JW was doing, he of course did better than me with his GPZ / 10" X-Coil combination, I truly believe that combination should be illegal, it makes it unfair on the rest of us   I'm sure he'll let you folks know how he did, one of his bits gave me a shock.
      There has been a bit of talk with people asking if the X-coils are bump sensitive, seeing my gain and sensitivity settings are on maximum I figure if anyone is going to get bump sensitivity it's going to be me and I get absolutely none so I recorded a video showing it, the video also shows me testing the response on my little nugget after I found it.
      I really like the 15x10" X-Coil, it's such a sensitive coil with good ground coverage.
       
    • By phrunt
      It's been announced the QED dealers are having a Christmas Special for any QED purchased in December,  It's a pretty damn good deal with two coils included.
      QED XMAS SPECIAL
      The QED Dealers are pleased to announce a fantastic XMAS special that is only available during December 2019. For anybody wishing to purchase a QED during December, then you can choose a package with a Nugget Finder 17” x 13” (closed) EVO and get a free Nugget Finder 8” x 6” Sadie.   December Package Prices with the above coils   Whites “S” bend handle: $2100 AUD Whites Tower handle : $2150 AUD Detech handle: $2150 AUD (+ postage if applicable)   Of course the existing packages are still available at the standard prices.   http://www.qedmetaldetectors.com.au/dealers

×
×
  • Create New...