Jump to content
davsgold

Making A Patch Lead For Gpz7000

Recommended Posts

53 minutes ago, strick said:

Strange that the designer of these coils was able to engineer the many different sizes of X coils that we have seen....which must have took forever to design, tool, mold and then make....but when it came to simplicity of the coil cable which would have been exactly the same for every coil he would have made....... and all he had to do was copy the original  minelab coil cable...he failed...right now I'm glad I did not get one of these and after seeing JW's coil cable in the above pics as compared to the original minelab coil cable...this is unacceptable...those spirals need to be tightly wound. 

strick 

Looking at my x-coil cables it seems the cable is different than the original Minelab cable. The Minelab one is much more flexible. The x-coil is more rigid.

I think because of this it would be a lot harder to make the curls smaller and closer together. The other thing i noticed was ripples on the inside of the cable curls which the Minelab cable doesn't have. Maybe the manufacturer put something over the cable (like heat shrink wrap) for some reason and this is the reason the cable is more rigid. 

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

34 minutes ago, Jin said:

Looking at my x-coil cables it seems the cable is different than the original Minelab cable. The Minelab one is much more flexible. The x-coil is more rigid.

I think because of this it would be a lot harder to make the curls smaller and closer together. The other thing i noticed was ripples on the inside of the cable curls which the Minelab cable doesn't have. Maybe the manufacturer put something over the cable (like heat shrink wrap) for some reason and this is the reason the cable is more rigid. 

They have stiffer wire, my GPX X-coil could virtually be shaped and it's obviously not a curly cord

I could do this out of it

3734454.jpg

The famous Aussie coat hanger car antenna ?

 

  • Like 1
  • Haha 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
23 hours ago, Malleeboy said:

I think the metal plugs  might be getting a bit to close to the coil if you put them down there. The slightest bump of the coil against a rock etc could send it off.

 Mike. 

Years ago JP did a video clip of a gold nugget taped to a coil to show that the detector did not register a signal (you can do this for yourself to prove the point) due to the metal of the nugget moving with the coil motion. Not stationary & the coil moving independant to the nugget which of course will register a signal & is how we detect for gold with a detector & get signals. So the coils field does not see the gold because the metal is moving in sequence with the metal windings & field of the coil. But maybe the the detector does know the gold nugget, or something, is there on the coil but as it is in motion with the field it doesn't register a signal but maybe the detector compensates for it some other way internally which may impact a bit on max performance. Maybe the metal connectors on the curly cord could behave in a similar way if they are not allowed to move inside the coil shaft. If this may be the case then the connectors are probably better to be as close to the coil as possible.:unsure: One way to find out. ?? Who's game? I am more than happy with my set up & getting gold all over again from old patches, so it won't be me.

Good luck out there

JW ?   

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The connection would need to be both stabilized absolutely rock solid, yet also needs to be easy to remove and open so coils could be changed quickly. Building such a stabilizer would require precision. It's probably easier for the manufacturer to just pay for a professional cable to be made, get them from the US or Europe if need be - at over $1k per coil it should be doable even if the cables cost $50 each.

That far down the shaft I think the connectors might need to be encased inside a ferrite too otherwise the solder joints (or the outside of the metal connector itself if they are sufficiently shielded) could act like coils and cause interference even if they were immobile, same as with the solder joints inside the coil. Not sure if that would be enough distance or not.

Might be worth trying for the manufacturer, I already cut my only coil though. I've lost my enthusiasm for messing with this stuff personally.

If these coils plugged in directly and had a good cable I bet there'd be 1000 of them sold in the US alone over the course of a couple years. That's like over a million bucks in coils. The performance on the 12" and 17" spirals is worth the money IMO for people that can make the performance pay for itself. I mean, I wonder if a company came up to ML with $250,000 cash for a shipment of 2000 chipped cables, would ML turn them away still? That's the real solution there to make these a finished commercial product. And money always talks in business. The question is, how much?

  • Like 4

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I still believe It will have an effect.  If I remember correctly in one of the videos posted recently about the steps of a coil manufacturer, one of the things tha manufacturer has to do is to tune out the metal in the detector.  Also, If metal did not make a difference, you would not be pulling wire in a straight line away from the coil as quckly as possible. in our vlf detectors.  This is a common practice preached by most dealers.  Anyways, I am not sure of any of this, but it is reason enough for me not to be adding any other metal close to that coil, attached or not.

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Theres a reason why the bolt that attaches the coil to the shaft on every metal detector I've ever seen are plastic and not metal lol I think you will loose lots of depth as you start placing stationary metal objects near the coil...but I'm no expert :smile:

strick  

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Strick, long ago Garret and others always had brass screws/nuts and an aluminum bracket to attach the coil to the lower rod. as long as everything was tight the detector worked fine. After some years everyone switched to plastic/nylon screws and nuts....

just a little history from 40 years ago...

fred

  • Like 3

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
15 hours ago, jasong said:

If these coils plugged in directly and had a good cable I bet there'd be 1000 of them sold in the US alone over the course of a couple years. That's like over a million bucks in coils. The performance on the 12" and 17" spirals is worth the money IMO for people that can make the performance pay for itself. 

Jason - I can understand your reasoning for thinking the 10" coil is not worth  the money.  It is expensive and best for the small gold.  But I gotta tell you, even this size coil, will get you even 1+ grammers and much larger simply because it will fit better between the river rock.  If I were to choose the perfect size coil for this, it would be the 8x6.  I LOVED this coil for getting in the cracks.  And it found a lot of gold on my GPX5K.  Most of the gold I find is no deeper than 6 or 7 inches.  I guess it all comes down to the purpose you want to use the coil for.  If it is to replace the 14" coil, then I am in 100% agreement.  I would use the other coils you mentioned.  But for those river rock areas where the 12 and 14" coils don't fit, it is good to have another option. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Andy, that's all true. But, I didn't say the 10" is not worth the money. It definitely might be for some people, as you and JW are showing. The kind of gold it excels on is stuff that you and him spend way more time on than I do, so I'm not really commenting much there since you guys can speak more to it than I can.

Don't forget that when I go prospecting I have a 2000 mile round trip, it's a significant expenditure for me and requires a lot of time off which means I'm not getting a paycheck at work during that time either. The only way I can go detecting is if I make it pay for me. So, I might approach prospecting differently than a lot of other people here. The 12" and 17" coils are coils I can see paying for me or a person with an approach like mine.

Here's why: I look at each coil I use relative to another coil. If I plot depths vs weights for the same nuggets on different coils, I end up with something (very roughly) like the following graph. Units are arbitrary.

coilcrossover.jpg.93e1021648a897d53d6feb208af9b83c.jpg

Generally there is a crossover point where one coil starts getting less or more depth on similar nuggets than the other does, and this is the point where one coil becomes more or less useful than the other coil to me. You saw, as I did too, that the crossover point between the Z14 and X10 is somewhere around 1/2 gram on typical gold. This changes with nugget geometry and composition.

So, any nuggets falling in the white (unshaded) portion of the graph represents nuggets missed by both coils. Nuggets in the red shaded portion represent nuggets found only by Coil 2. Nuggets in the gray shaded portion represent nuggets found by Coil 1, and in the gray shaded portion under the red line are nuggets found by Coils 1 and 2.

This is a rough approximation of how I observed the X10 performing relative to the Z14. So, it's easy to see all the nuggets in the red shaded area that the Z14 is missing entirely. 

However, the X12S comapred to the Z14 is different, the X12S line would be almost all above the Z14 at all points in the graph, and only misses a very small number of nuggets that the X10 gets ("missed" on the graph), mostly at the very smallest end of the scale (stuff that is much harder to get to pay as it take a lot of them to add up). This number is somewhere around 0.12-0.15 grams if I were to take a guess, emphasis on guess since I don't have enough tiny stuff in that range to actually test it. It takes a ton of that stuff to add up to a paying trip.

Think of the X12S as "Coil 3" here, and that small bit of black as the missed nuggets. Yet, it also seems to get a lot of stuff deeper than the Z14, I never found a true cross over yet, though it starts to perform quite similar around 5 grams and 16" deep, I didn't test deeper or bigger gold. 

coilcrossover2.jpg.0a0e9a32f7aa03b3ca1f0a90548db728.jpg

That's why the 12" and 17" spirals, to me anyways, seem like coils that will pay. I could easily find 2 or 3 ounces of stuff with them that the Z14 missed and use them every single day during regular exploration. With the X10 I think I'll struggle to get a half oz of stuff I missed and they'd only go on in specific instances of very rocky washes or very dense brush or potentially salt. Again, just relevant to the places I detect personally and the type of prospecting I do.

Other thing for me is that it's not a whole lot smaller than the 12" so those applications find limits for the 10" too.. Better, IMO, is to go with a 6x10. or 6x8. If a coil is going to be small, might as well be really small and manueverable. 10" is just too close to 12" while losing too much performance on deeper stuff to interest me personally. Especially since they can put the spiral windings in the 12" and above. The spiral windings seem to make an observable difference to me.

Lastly, on that segment of missed nuggets where the X10 excel over all other coils, my GB2 excels even better than the X10. And the GB2 costs $350 used. This is obviously not a solution in hot ground like yours, but I am very rarely in ground I can't run a VLF in.

If I could choose any sizes and shapes I would choose a 6x10, 17x12, and 18" round. That provides the least overlap when thinking in terms of graphs, and the largest amount of versatility to me as far as being able to detect all conditions and terrain. I don't personally find much use for round coils below 18" if I have a choice in the matter. 17" is close enough though, I'm pretty happy with the performance of that coil, it's hitting stuff smaller than the Z14 and hitting 5 grammers 2-4 inches deeper. That's performance that I can make pay - I need to average 2 grams a day when I'm out. That means I occasionally need 1/2 oz days to make up for the skunk days, and I can't do that with the 10".

So, there is more than you ever wanted to read about me explaining the meaning behind one sentence I wrote. :laugh:

  • Like 7
  • Thanks 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

That’s exactly what the taskmaster told me out in the bush a couple of days ago. 

2.5gm/day was a minimum goal

This average will  keep you working and hopefully the big one will show up a few times a season.

cheers

  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Similar Content

    • By Norvic
      I have just come out of a magic winter season with the 10,12,15 X coils, I have not used my ML14 or 19 since putting them on. The X coils have made the Magic GPZ7000 a super magic detector. No teething problems, make patch lead, fit and dig gold. How good is that??? Can only say it doesn`t get any better...……...or does it. What will the X coils evolve into ????????? 
      I have no connection to X coil, or to Davsgold except as a customer, top coils, top service and express freight.
    • By phrunt
      A package I've been very much looking forward to arrived in the mail today, I call them the twins.  It made sense to package them both in one package for postage reasons and fortunately JW was working doing some renovations at his house around the corner from mine today so he had his a few minutes after the courier arrived at my place with the package as I shot straight over to give it to him. 
      I tore the box open to find them extremely well packaged


      And now the twins

      15x10 spiral wound X-coils, one for the GPZ, one for the GPX.  The GPZ's coils curly cord seems good to me.

      They came with a spare coil cover.  This is obviously the GPZ coil.

      And the GPX one.
      Hopefully I can find some gold soon with it, I've on a dry spell at the moment, although the football field of coins has kept me busy.  It's been about a month since I've attempted to find gold as my weekends are filled with skiing as my daughter is addicted to it and my week days have been busy doing the local coin hunting, now this coil has arrived I best get out there soon.  It snowed yesterday and today there is a freezing wind blowing off the snow, if it wasn't for that I'd be shooting off now to test it out.  Only about 2 weeks left of ski season.
      JW's been doing pretty well lately with his 10x9" X-coil and he rarely takes it off he loves it so much so it will be interesting to see how he goes with this new one being spiral (flat wound) when his 10x9" is bundle wound. 
    • By Condor
      I got my GPZ back from Minelab last month, which included a new 14" coil and lower rod.  Only $3600.00 AUD lighter in my wallet.  As you may recall, I bricked the detector after the Patch Lead was defective.  It's still crazy hot here in Sunny Yuma, but I was bored and still curious about the X-Coil, so I shook off my concerns and cut the connector off my brand new coil and built the Patch Lead myself.  I was extra careful with the heat from the soldering iron and did a respectable job of putting together the connection.  I did a few practice runs on scrap wire and connectors so I was a little more confident of my skill. 
      I got out 5 mornings last week for a total of about 12 hrs run time.  At sunup the morning temps were still in the high 80's and jumping to 100 by 9:00am.  Unbearable in the desert washes with no breeze.  The one thing that saved me was the synthetic chamois cooling cloths, one around my neck and one under my cap hanging down my neck. 
      The first morning I did a complete set-up with the detector since it was, for all practical purposes, a brand new machine with all new printed circuits etc.  I waved the 17" X-Coil over the ferrite and got the machine nearly silent, though still reacting some to the ferrite.  I started in the area where I found the 28 gram rippa last May.  This area has a fairly hot layer of clay about 12" under the overburden.  Last May we were able to run this zone using HY, Normal, Sens 12,  (Threshold 27) with the Patch Search mode to quiet down the machine.  The 17" X-Coil in those same settings was way too sensitive, so I had to switch to Difficult to quiet it down.  Because I knew I could only be out for a couple hrs, I focused on trying to get that coil over gold hoping to then play with the settings.  No joy the first morning.
      The next morning I went out to an area that had produced half a dozen 1 grammers when the GPZ first came out.  I knew it was deeper and a little quieter ground.  We tried Paul's 19" GPZ here when it first came out to no avail.  This time I was able to zero out the Ferrite and switch back to Normal from the Difficult setting.  The machine was still a little twitchy so I backed off the Threshold to 22 and got it humming along nicely.  I gridded the area pretty good and came up with a few deep trash targets and then, right as it started to get unbearable hot, I got a faint, sweet rising tone. A lot of digging and sweating produced a sweet 4 grammer right on the hardpack, about 14 inches down.  Now a 4 grammer at 14 inches should be well within the range of the GPZ and standard 14" coil, but I've been over that zone at least 6 times over the past 3 years.  The only significant difference is the ground is bone dry this year.  Last year there were still pools of water from late season rains.  
      The next morning I was back to the area of the 28 grammer.  I found that the machine was more stable and I could run in Gen, Normal, Sens 14.  I got a couple deep trash targets and chased a number of hot ground seams and hot rocks.  The settings were really sensitive to hot ground, but in my mind that's the only way to find good missed targets.  Right at the end of the morning I got what sounded like another bit of hot ground.  I switched to High Yield from General and it brightened up the target, but still hadn't convinced me that it was gold.  The target was in the sidewall of a drywasher's hole, so the 17" coil was pretty awkward.  I dug out the ground so that I could get the coil level and the target brightened up a little more.  By then I had hit the hardpack which tends to hide these small, reddish hotrocks.  I dug dozens in this same area, but I needed to check this coil's capabilities.  The hardpack was brutal in the morning sun so I had to go back to the truck and get my handy Aussie (DavesGold) made pick.  I'm not going out without it now.  About 8 inches into the hardpack out popped a nice 1.5 grammer.  I can guarantee I  stuck the GPZ standard coil in the hole a half a dozen times over the past 2 years.  
      Thur morning I got out in the same area.  I chose a wash that a produced 5 small nuggets, in the sub-sub gram range, in May.  I concentrated on the deepest gravels thinking deeper nuggets must be in there, just beyond the reach of the 14" coil.  I gridded the zone where a bench had formed on the inside bend of the wash.  I went at it from every angle and was about to surrender to the heat when I got the faintest of faint tones.  Again I switched to High Yield and it brightened up some.  I switched to Difficult, nothing.  I started pulling down the bank so that I could get a good level swing with the 17" coil.  Slightly improved tone, still unconvincing.  I pulled down another few inches and got a much improved tone.  I switched to Difficult and got a dull growl, more convincing yet.  After much digging into the hardpack out came a nice 1.8 grammer.   I even photographed the hole for this one.  The Aussie pick is 28" long.
      I'm really starting to like this coil.  It's light enough for all day use with the addition of my homemade hipstick.    I run the hipstick to the bottom of the frame in my lightweight framepack, which moves the weight to the back of the hipbelt and off my shoulder.  I'm also running the SteelPhase amp plugged directly into the GPZ, no wireless connection between.  As per some of JP's guidance, I'm running the GPZ volume at 2, adjusting loudness at the amp.  I'm running the Threshold between 20 and 22 depending on how twitchy the ground is.  For the most part I'm running General instead of High Yield trying to reach those deeper targets.   The first 2 targets were well within the reach of the standard 14" coil, but somehow I didn't find them over the past 2 years.   The last one, doubtful for the standard coil.  As the weather cools I'll start doing a quick change to the 14" coil over new targets for a comparison.   Right now, it's still to friggin hot to bother. 
       
       




    • By phrunt
      I always wondered if there was even gold around where the X-coil manufacturer lives, I didn't know much about Russian gold or if Russia even had much gold.
      Here is a video broken into parts of the Russian manufacturer showing the different capabilities of the 17x12" X-Coil between the Standard GPZ14” Minelab coil being used near high voltage power lines in Russia.
      It's good to see he is a prospector.
      Sorry about the quality of some of the parts. 
      It's a deep hole he has to dig to get it, nice soft soil though... that'd make life easier than using a jackhammer 🙂
       
    • By IronDigger
      A lot  been said about these x coils when it comes to the zed...but in the beginning there was mention of new improved depth with x coils for the gpx users. As  a gpx user and I am probably speaking for many...any news on the performance and availability of these coils. I know I am not letting go of my 4500 anytime soon...
    • By Jin
      The x-coils aren't water proof? Is that right?
      Was heading away for 4 days of nugget hunting in the caravan this week but it looks like it's going to rain??️
      Any thoughts on whether the rain may cause any problems to these coils?
      I know i used to detect in the poring rain with the coiltek elites and the 11" and 18" were fine but my 14" used to false when pressed against the ground. This only ever happened when it rained and i think moisture was getting in where the cable entered the coil.. I was thinking maybe taping some plastic over where the cable inters the coil on the x-coils just to be safe. 
      Any other time id just cancel and go the following week but this is the last opportunity according to my wife to go for sometime. (new puppy that will need toilet training etc)
       Im keen to try out the new x-coils and hit a spot that may soon be exempt from prospecting in a few months time.  
       
×
×
  • Create New...