Jump to content
phrunt

I Bought A Detect Ed Shaft And Like It

Recommended Posts

49 minutes ago, phrunt said:

Thanks, I did look into that one but the US is about the only country in the world I won't buy from, crazy shipping costs.  It'd be would cheaper to get a shaft from the Congo, Sahara Desert or a small village in the Amazon.

 

hosey,  thanks for your interest, and I'd be happy to build a shaft for you!

Phrunt is right, though, shipping costs from the US are high.  It's very frustrating.  The only "affordable" option (and I say that in quotes because it's still steep) is to ship through the United States Postal Service, via USPS Priority International.  It's about $60 USD to ship internationally, using USPS, for a package of this size and weight.  I just sent a shaft with counterweight to a gentleman in South Africa, via USPS Priority International, and it was $59.95 USD.  It took awhile, too; it got hung up in South Africa customs, for some reason, for two weeks.  But, Priority International is supposed to be "6 to 10 days" delivery.  

With that said, I'm happy to send you a shaft, with counterweight, if you'd like me to build you one; I'll do the best I can for you, as an international customer, to try and reduce a bit of the "pain" of the shipping costs.

I might also note here that the washers I use as "standard" on my lower rod design are similar to the new washers now being offered from Detect-Ed -- in that they are designed to allow more space between the coil ears and the lower rod (they stick out farther from the lower rod, than Minelab's washers do).  This was a part of my initial design, for the same reason that Detect-Ed came out with these washers -- to reduce the chance for rubbing of the coil ears on the lower rod, thus preventing "wear" over time.

Thanks!


Steve

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi guys and thank you so much Phrunt for the awesome review, I very much appreciate it mate, glad to hear you are happy!

As the maker of the Detect-Ed shaft I just want to be clear that the lower shaft we make already has a spacer built in for washers so that even the standard Minelab washers will stick out 0.5mm further on each side than on the stock lower shaft.  I always found that that the stock lower shaft would grind my coil ears down!

The “coil-saver” washers were mainly designed for use with the stock lower shaft however, it became apparent that not all coils are equal and that some are tighter/looser than others so it seems to me that it’s improtant to be able to shim your washers for the preferred fitment 👍

Ed

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 hours ago, Edsped said:

Hi guys and thank you so much Phrunt for the awesome review, I very much appreciate it mate, glad to hear you are happy!

As the maker of the Detect-Ed shaft I just want to be clear that the lower shaft we make already has a spacer built in for washers so that even the standard Minelab washers will stick out 0.5mm further on each side than on the stock lower shaft.  I always found that that the stock lower shaft would grind my coil ears down!

The “coil-saver” washers were mainly designed for use with the stock lower shaft however, it became apparent that not all coils are equal and that some are tighter/looser than others so it seems to me that it’s improtant to be able to shim your washers for the preferred fitment 👍

Ed

Ed,

Indeed, some of the coils' ears do seem to be "looser" or "tighter" than others, which can at times require slightly different washer sizes to  achieve "perfect" fit.

My apologies, as I misunderstood; I didn't understand that your coil saver washers were primarily intended for MINELAB's lower rod, not YOUR lower rod.  Thanks for clarifying.  I'm not sure why Minelab doesn't seem to be aware of that, as it's not only the Equinox...the CTX 3030 is the same way (very little space between the coil ears, and the lower rod "head.")

Steve

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks guys this site is great thanks / 2 steveg /    can anyone tell me why we are not using fractcal tech in the makeing  of are coils / 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

hosey -- I think your question is directed to me; I'm not familiar with fractal tech, or coil design; not enough electrical engineering background on my part!  Maybe someone else can chime in...

Thanks!

Steve

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I just think so much work has gone into the design of the new machines in the last years not much with the coil it self has changed/ see fractal antennas/

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

hosey -- 

I'll have a look, at "fractal antennas."  

Thanks!

Steve

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 9/3/2019 at 11:04 AM, steveg said:

Ed,

Indeed, some of the coils' ears do seem to be "looser" or "tighter" than others, which can at times require slightly different washer sizes to  achieve "perfect" fit.

My apologies, as I misunderstood; I didn't understand that your coil saver washers were primarily intended for MINELAB's lower rod, not YOUR lower rod.  Thanks for clarifying.  I'm not sure why Minelab doesn't seem to be aware of that, as it's not only the Equinox...the CTX 3030 is the same way (very little space between the coil ears, and the lower rod "head.")

Steve

No worries mate, It's not a well advertised feature haha.

Agreed, it seems like a primitive way to make something as these ears wear out quite quickly and this kind of wear is common across many many detectors!

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

As long as it lasts the warranty period I guess...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Does anybody know if the Minelab lower coil shaft can be used with the Ed's upper shaft?  The reason why I ask is because I have a 6" coil that's already attached to a Minelab lower shaft.  As it is now, I remove the lower shaft and coil as a unit, and install the second coil and lower shaft the Equinox.  Otherwise I could buy an additional Ed's lower shaft in addition to the Classic 3K Tweel set.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Similar Content

    • By sandiwilliams717
      1) Anyone have any advice and Best settings for the Minelab Equinox 600 for relic hunting like civil war relics buttons stuff like that? 2) Also when coin shooting for silver coins and gold coins anyone have suggestions or find there conventional or unconventional ways and programs better to locate Silver and gold coins? Like notching out vdis, or running it in beach in a field similar to Neil Jones program? 3) Also best settings on the beach for jewelry?
    • By Mike Buck
      Afternoon all!  I know that there have been many programs out there for the 800, but are there any well known programs for the 600?  Mainly coin and relic hunting!  I like the preset park and field modes but wanted to possibly branch out and try something different.  Thanks! HH. 
    • By midalake
      MY UNIT IS FRIED!  Evidently the Equinox can not even be rinsed off in the shower after use. What a piece of JUNK.  Two months to go in Mexico and I have a boat anchor. 😡   Minelab engineers should all be fired.
      Dave    
    • By Tometusns
      Here's some of the 2019 finds... still loving the nox. 

    • By 2Valen
      The other day GB-Amateur said something that caught my interest about EMI problems with the 800.
      So I could not help myself on trying to figure out why. I first rolled back to my original software 1.75 and went outside to look in my yard like i normally would.
      Every time I had gotten within 50 feet of the power lines the unit would give false ID's of what was on the ground, and it just got worse from there.
      I went further away from the lines and it would clear up until I got near the front of my home where my wifi router is located. When I looked at the display the display numbers were bouncing once again.
      When I went to the back yard away from everything the 800 was as always working like it should and I even found a 1951 quarter.
      I went back into the house to do the upgrade once again and retraced my steps with the new update.
      I had no problems under the power lines no mater how close I got to them, I did find some really good targets that I will go back and dig up when it gets warmer.
      I went to the front of my house and once again the 800 worked as it should without any interference at all. That is until I walked up to the front porch window and then I had a little bit of bouncing numbers.
      I believe that the new update has solved most if not all of the EMI problems that I have had in the past, which is a good thing for me.
      Under the power lines is where the used to tie up the horse carriages at the original church and that is where I have found some coins from the 1800's. Now with this new update I feel more confident that I will be able to find some really nice items there, and in my front yard.
      Thanks for reading and tell me what you think about your update and EMI problems since the update.
    • By Steve Herschbach
      From Link deleted since Findmall update broke old links
      “We will be offering a few different shaft options for the Equinox including the 36" carbon fiber regular shaft with lower rod, a one piece carbon fiber shallow water scuba shaft, and Zero Flex fiberglass shafts in custom Anderson colors”
      http://andersondetectorshafts.com/

×
×
  • Create New...