Jump to content
Sign in to follow this  
mh9162013

Using A Garrett Pro-Pointer AT ( Carrot ) Without A 9v Battery

Recommended Posts

A while ago, I posted about a using a Minelab Pro-Find 35 without a 9V battery. You can read more about it here: 

But I wanted to run the modification with NiMH batteries. However, due to space constraints in the Pro-Find, this was not possible without modifying the internal battery compartment (which I didn't want to do b/c it would void the warranty, I'm sure). So instead, the Pro-Find runs off of a LiPo cell.

Well, I got a hold of a Garrett Carrot (Pro-Pointer AT) and given the extra space for the battery, I was able to run the 9V booster off of 3 LSD NiMH AAA cells. Works like a charm! The advantage is that I don't have to worry about "babying" the LiPo cell and worry about storing it with too little charge or anything like that.

Not much else to say, except show you the pictures.

 

 

 

20191016_133006.jpg

20191016_133018.jpg

20191016_133021.jpg

20191016_133033.jpg

  • Like 3

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Interesting mission, and you did follow through with what you said you wanted to do, that's dedication 🙂

What's the battery life like and is it comparable to the 9v? Have you compared the difference in performance between the 1.5 volt mod and the original 9v battery with depth on targets and so on?  It should be similar but I've found using a 9.6v Powerex battery appears to give my Carrot better performance than using a standard 9v rechargeable, maybe it's a placebo but I feel it goes deeper using them.

Did you use a boost regulator like this in it? https://www.pololu.com/product/791

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I think you'll find it's the Placebo effect, Simon. The beeper and vibe motor are likely to be driven 'directly' from the 9 volt supply, and not from a regulated 5 volt rail, so it's going to beep louder and shake more with one of those batteries, maybe fooling you. I've not seen any reverse-engineering on the 'carrot', only the original model. But in that, nearly everything is powered from a 5 volt linear regulated supply. So you would be better off with a 7-cell "8.4V" NiMH battery, as they have a greater capacity than the 8-cell "9.6V" type.

I'm also curious as to which specific boost regulator was used. Pointers take a hefty current draw when vibe-motor / beeper activate, eg. the turn-on routine. I imagine many of these modules would keel over as soon as you switched on the pointer.
It seems odd that you have no power switch between the NiMH cells and the boost regulator. Isn't this going to flatten the battery, even with the pointer turned off ?

I've played around with similar modules for driving high-power LED's. I have some GU10 5 watt lights, that are 5 x 1 Watt LED's in series, so would need about 16 volts to drive them. I used a boost regulator module, modified for current feedback, so it regulates the output at 280mA. Input power is likely to be two 18650 Li cells in series ( laptop battery salvages ).
I had some similar cunning plans to re-use some LED backlight strips from a defunct LCD television.

  • Thanks 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Phrunt,

This is the voltage booster I'm using: https://www.pololu.com/product/2116

As for battery life, I haven't done real world testing, because there's no point given how I'm not able to metal detect as often as I'd like and how inconsistent and qualitative the observations would be. I could create some sort of "lab" set up to measure how long the pinpointer beeps and vibrates or something, but I'm not going to waste my time with that because using simple math should give a good enough ballpark estimate, which I predict will be about 50-60% of the run time you would get with an alkaline battery. I discuss how I get this number in my blog post concerning this set up in a Minelab Pro-Find 35. That LiPo cell has roughly the same capacity as these AAA NiMH cells. In that blog post I also mentioned a very slight performance increase in sensitivity (about 1-3 mm of extra range).

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, PimentoUK said:

...

I'm also curious as to which specific boost regulator was used. Pointers take a hefty current draw when vibe-motor / beeper activate, eg. the turn-on routine. I imagine many of these modules would keel over as soon as you switched on the pointer.
It seems odd that you have no power switch between the NiMH cells and the boost regulator. Isn't this going to flatten the battery, even with the pointer turned off ?

...

I'm not worried about current draw; the voltage booster I'm using can provide up to 1.4 amps, well in excess of what a standard 9V alkaline can reasonably provide.

And no, I have no power switch between the NiMH cells and the booster. Do I need one? Maybe. I'm letting my setup sit in my Garrett Carrot right now and I'll test it every few days to see how long it "lasts" in storage before I need to recharge the battery pack. Assuming the booster draws noticeable current, a switch would be useful, but I doubt it'll be worth the trouble as it would just be easier to unplug the battery pack from the booster if I was going to store my pinpointer for an extended period of time. I may also look for some smaller high efficiency battery plugs, too...

And don't forget, even if my setup has plenty of drawbacks, it still has a HUGE advantage: NO MORE 9V BATTERIES!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

It's a shame it's pretty tricky to modify the pointer so the power switch controls the boost regulator input. You would have to remove the switch from the PCB, then re-fit it on its own isolated board. This would then require the button shaft to be trimmed in length, due to the height increase. It would be easier to do on the original black propointer.

I don't share your dislike of 9V batteries in quite the same way. I don't like NiMH 9V's in high-drain applications, like pinpointers. The cells are rather small, and the heavy current draw causes problems, usually high internal resistance failure. And with 7 cells in series, they have poor reliability and life, as when one cell fails, so does the whole battery, of course.

I'm looking at Lithium 9V batteries at the moment ( for pinpointer use ), the EBL ones specifically. They only have two cells, and they are pretty large cells, so they can easily handle the power requirements.

What is intriguing is how they are charged. Only the two main terminals are brought out, there's no obvious 'hidden' third terminal ( for the internal connection of the cells ). Yet they can be charged at 600 mA in the dedicated charger. There must be some 'clever electronics' inside the battery, to take care of charge-balancing somehow.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Would you recommend this over my 9.6v batteries?

521282732.jpg

I do like this brand, they're solid performers and what they say they are is what they are.  I've been using them for a couple of years now and my original battery seems to work as well now as it did when I first got it.  I've only got the 9.6v versions though.

You may well be right the performance difference might be a placebo and the difference I'm noticing is with volume/more vibration which would make the Carrot feel more powerful. 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

It's not so much 'recommend', you already have the 9.6V ones, so there's no point changing or buying more. It's just that the 9.6V ones don't offer any obvious advantage in a pinpointer. You probably take the battery out and recharge it after nearly every session anyway, so it never gets near flat, and so the lower capacity is not relevant.
I usually carry a spare 9V with me, in case the one in the pointer dies [or I leave it at home in the charger ..]. My spare is typically an alkaline non-rechargeable, due to the shelf life.

( and I recharge my non-rechargeable 9V batteries too. If you do it with a low current, it seems to work )

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
11 hours ago, PimentoUK said:

...
I don't share your dislike of 9V batteries in quite the same way. I don't like NiMH 9V's in high-drain applications, like pinpointers. The cells are rather small, and the heavy current draw causes problems, usually high internal resistance failure. And with 7 cells in series, they have poor reliability and life, as when one cell fails, so does the whole battery, of course.

...

A NiMH 9V battery? No thank you. The solution to getting rid of heavy duty or alkaline 9V batteries isn't to replace it with a NiMH 9V battery. It's to get rid of the 9V battery.

 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
10 hours ago, PimentoUK said:

...
( and I recharge my non-rechargeable 9V batteries too. If you do it with a low current, it seems to work )

What?!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  

  • Similar Content

    • By rockhound
      Found some clubmates discussing who (and when) invented the first pinpointer. Google just found some hints. Feel free to discuss...
       
    • By mh9162013
      I just finished the next iteration of my 9V to AAA battery adapter for my Pro-Pointer AT (Carrot). You can read about it in my blog post that will be uploaded soon (see my profile for the link, if you're that curious), but most of the "juice" is in the pictures.
      In case you're wondering (or you don't recall my prior blog posts about this building process😞
      1. Yes, waterproof integrity is maintained.
      2. Yes, the performance when using this adapter is identical to using a regular 9V battery.
      3. Yes, this can still use a regular 9V battery.
      4. Yes, runtime is less than with a regular 9V battery, but should be enough to get you at least a full day (8+ hours) of run time. I estimate this will get you about 1/3 of whatever an alkaline 9V battery will get you.
      5. Yes, this can run on other types of AAA cells, including NiCd, NiMH, lithium (primary; think Energizer Ultimate Lithiums) and alkaline.
      6. I did this modification because I like tinkering and because I really hate 9V batteries.
      Background info of prior builds: 
       
       




    • By devilsrenegade
      Seeing how Whites is out of business now , I decided I should get a replacement shell for my trx before they are unavailable and I wear mine out like my old Garrett pro pointer. I ordered from Serious Detecting  LLC . $34.93 with free shipping. Not trying to advertise for them, I have just made purchases from them before so thought I'd get it there. Also seen some available from others on E-bay. Sure hated to see White's close their doors.
    • By phrunt
      I am in a pickle, I wanted a new TRX but now White's is gonners and international shipping is terribly unreliable due to the virus I need to buy local. 
      My preference was a pin pointer that would be better than the Garrett Pro Pointer AT on small gold, the TRX seemed the best for this purpose although I own a TRX already and was disappointed as I felt my Carrot AT was just as good as it on small gold so I've questioned it's authenticity seeing I bought it off Ebay.  I still don't know if it's fake, it doesn't look fake, but that does not mean much these days.
      Anyway, my options are a Nokta Pulse Dive which I know will suck for small gold being designed as a beach pin pointer and the Fisher F-Pulse.
      Now seeing I'm not going to get my wish for a more sensitive to small gold pin pointer than my Carrot AT, which pin pointer is going to be best for coins, especially when it comes to depth in MILD soils.
      Both are PI, and both are available at my local dealer.
      I want to hear from owners of both which they think is best for coins.  I will eventually use it as a beach pin pointer too as I am going to take up beach detecting sometime over winter while the beaches are empty.
      I like the Pulse Dive has a coil option as I'd probably use that beach detecting while swimming in OZ on my next trip but it's not important, depth is the most important attribute I guess seeing small gold sensitivity isn't going to be a factor, unless either is better than the Carrot At.
      Also does the F-Pulse save settings as in all honestly, after reading the manual it's an absolute butt hole at changing settings, 9 presses of a button to get the setting I would want.  If I had to do this every time I turn it on I'd throw it in the bin.  Reading the comments here didn't really excite me and sounds like the TRX is better, didn't give me a lot of confidence, sounded like a VLF would be better but harder to make..... took the easy way out?...... https://md-hunter.com/fisher-f-pulse-review-in-practice-opinions/
      Although those who know me well will know I appreciate this was written in the manual..... I appreciate honesty, especially when it comes to this sort of thing

      That was an image from the manual here http://www.fisherlab.com/hobby/manuals/MPPFXP-FPulse.pdf
      Thanks for any help. 
    • By Edsped
      Hey guys!
      I was lucky enough to test one of the first sample 8” coil units For the  Pulse Dive and what I found was very pleasing! 
      From the beginning I was hoping that Nokta|Makro would make a larger coil for the PulseDive so I was very excited when I heard from Dilek that they were doing exactly that!   I was given an 8” coil to test and although I admit that it was essentially a finished product already!
      My first concern was that the larger coil would be too easy to twist off accidentally due to being larger and having more leverage but upon receiving I found they had already thought of this and actually provide the coil with a harder gasket/o-ring so the friction is high making it harder to twist off and very unlikely to come off underwater! 😃
      My next concern was that the coil would be overly sensitive causing it to false excessively in mineralised areas or just from salt water but once again my concerns had already been addressed and the machine was stable in salt water however it is important to note that the machine must be turned on or retuned in the salt water because turning it on in air and entering salt water can cause it to false but of course this is a non-issue just important to note for new players.
      The depth on this coil in air tests is consistently in the range of 30% more than the standard coil and from the hours I’ve put on it I’d have to say this is reflected underwater also.  The coverage is also greater so at a guess I’d have to say the 8” coil scans double the volume of sand in a single sweep than the smaller coil does 👌
      Pinpointing on the larger coil is more difficult and I would recommend for low/no visibility conditions using the smaller coil for the speed of recovery however with enough practice and the right techniques it is certainly possibly to hone in your pinpointing skills with this coil.  One trick I’ve learnt and seen used with other detectors is to turn the coil on its edge once the target is close to narrow down your search even further and it’s definitely applicable to the 8” coil.
      I’ve had some questions about battery life with the larger coil and I haven’t noticed a difference so I’m not sure if there really is a difference in current draw from this coil or not but I can still get 8 hours from it which Is enough for one day! 😂
      Overall the coil is more effected by mineralisation and EMI which is standard for larger coils and pinpointing is a bit more difficult HOWEVER the depth and coverage in underwater scenarios is comparable to other water detectors costing literally 10X what the PulseDive costs.
      I have now switched to using this detector/coil combo almost exclusively over my other water detectors (whites Dualfield and Garrett Seahunter mk2) mainly for convenience, low/no maintenance, no cables or knobs to fail and no need to wear headphones however I will still use these machines where there are a lot of hot rocks so I can remove them or reduce their signal by adding pulse delay 👌
      Cheers, Ed
      *photo of gold (and palladium) found so far with the big coil*

    • By ragebot
      I know the carrot is highly thought of but I have seen some heavy users say the tip can wear and expose things.  I am looking at the Pulse Two in One and like what I see including what seems to be a better protected tip.  Another option is the Quest Scuba Tector again with additional tip protection.  Problem is both are kinda new and I have seen some bashing, especially on the Quest.  The thing is no matter how many whistles and bells something has it's basic function has to work or nothing else matters.  I am not wed to any of these three choices; just the ones that my research has turned up so far.  Any advice welcome.
×
×
  • Create New...