Jump to content

Question For Mike Hillis - How Do You Like Your Gold Kruzer?

Recommended Posts

I am considering a Gold Kruzer for jewelry hunting. Mike, I know you were on the search for the ultimate "micro machine". How do you like your Gold Kruzer now that you got all of the issues worked out? Is it hitting the stud earrings and chains? Input from other would be appreciated as well.

Thank you!

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I would like to know that too. I have a Gold Kruzer on the way with 3 coil. The extra coil is the 9.5x5 dd  coil. Will be hunting freshwater lakes and micro jewelry in other areas. 

I had one before. Don't know why I got rid of it. I like the Micro mode best as it was deepest. Noisy but no problem  hearing targets. It's a nice detector.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Sorry guys....Been meaning to write about it but its been busy here

I personally think its a keeper and a great companion to my primary jewelry units.   

You need to understand....61kHz is NOT hot on nickels.   61 kHz is hot on low conductors below the nickel range.  If you have that clear in your mind and use it accordingly I think you will like it as much as I do.  If your expectations are based around it being a nickel killer, then you will be disappointed.

I'll have to come back later and add more....



  • Like 5
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Continuing....Note I am almost always in the Micro operating mode.

Regards Micro Jewelry:   

Per Tom Dankowski, I found a little 10K White Gold 3MM 4-prong stud earring to use as a test target.  Note that 3MM is probably smaller than he would recommend as 3MM isn't a big enough stone to make micro jewelry hunting worthwhile, but..if you can you can pick up  this particular target you can pick up anything as at this point that alloy and size is more like a mineral target than a metal target.

The Gold Kruzer with the little 4x7 coil will pick up my test target at about 3/8" to 1/2" deep in Micro mode.    Note that you CAN NOT test small gold with your hand.  You have to put it on a wooden stick or something.  The Gold Kruzer will respond to your fingers and give a false reading.  The 10" concentric and the 10" DD will not respond to this target.  So if you are really into true "Micro gold Jewelry" hunting the Gold Kruzer will limit you to the 4x7" concentric coil.  Well....you can focus on small yellow gold and do ok with the larger coils but the micro white gold will be out of reach.

I typically use the GK61 (my reference) as a clean up detector.   For example if I have a good hot spot that I have been pulling good gold jewelry out of, then once I get the trash level down I'll come in and progressively hunt it down with the GK61.  First either the 10" concentric or the 10" DD, and if I think it has promise for more, then I'll come in with the 4x7.   

I use the tone break to focus.

The best number for me is 41.    41 has been good targets...open rings, lobster clasps....stuff like that.   43 through 46/47 has been thin/paper foil.   Above 47 has been more dense targets..    I normally set my disc to around 30 and my tone break at 44 and hunt the low tone.   A good VCO will get my attention now and again but mostly I've been focused on stuff that hits near the 41 TID.   Reference...Nickels are around 62/63.   

This detector begs for a Notch upgrade.    DIsc goes all the way to 99 so some sort of Notch feature needs to be developed and deployed for those of us who don't care to hunt high conductors.  Say...when you put the Disc on 99, cancel out everything above 65 or something.   Or give  me some way to cancel out those 44, 45, 46, TID numbers.  

Anyway...that is the way I hunt it.  Hope it helps



  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Wouldn't the Multi Kruzer at 19khz be better for small jewelry and coin shooting? I had my eye on one for a while and like the handle, big display and frequency choices as well as coil choices on it. Looks like a good performer.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Similar Content

    • By Coinboy
      Hi everyone, I’m thinking of picking up a used multi kruzer. I have a Nox but don’t want to put that thing in the water. I have heard the kruzers are pretty chattery. This would be a backup machine and a water machine and maybe for dense iron trash with a small coil. Is the kruzer still a viable good machine or should I save up a bit and get a used Anfibio? Thanks in advance.
    • By kac
      As many users of the Kruzer series may find the 4 tone mode really limited because it is so noisy and hard to follow. I personally rarely notch out targets and even keep my iron audio low but always audible but there are some really tough spots. In particular spots like camp sites or where there were bonfires and lots of burned up can slag, bottle caps etc.
      I took the 4 tone mode and notched out everything except known or metal ranges of known target id types. I then use under the iron audio the N# values. This allows you to still get an audio response on the notched targets but much softer. N1 or N2 seem more than enough. Known targets will be reveled very quickly because they will be louder and clearer. Base setting below and needs a bit tweaking but happy so far.

    • By kac
      Finally got a Superfly for my Multi Kruzer. It weighs just .01 lbs more than the stock 7x11. Overall it is less chattery and I can kick the gain up much more. Depth wise on a silver dime it at same gain settings it will go between 2"-3" deeper with steadier numbers. Target separation seems to be about the same and in the field I gave it a go for about an hour or so and it was really nice to swing. Though I only found a bit of clad I plan on giving this one some serious hours.
      Not sure if it is a worthy upgrade for anyone with an Amphibio but if you have one of the Kruzers I highly recommend it.
    • By Mike Hillis
      What is wrong with the Gold Kruzer?   
      Why doesn't NEL or CORS or Magic or Detech make any coils for the Gold Kruzer?    
      They make full lineups of coils of for the Gold Racer, but not a one for the Gold Kruzer.   
      You can't say its because of the water proof connector, as they make coils for the Kruzer and Anfibio.
      You can't say its because of the frequency as they make coils for the Gold Racer and the Gold Kruzer is basically a waterproof Gold Racer.
      So what gives?  Why do the aftermarket coil mfg's treat the Gold Kruzer like an ugly step-child?   
    • By kac
      So I have the Green headphones and have them currently paired to the Multi Kruzer but it seem that if I pair the pin pointer to the same headphones then the headphones won't be paired to the detector? Either or and not both? If that is the case it is kind of a bummer but not that big a deal. Audio on it isn't super loud with the waterproof cover on.
    • By Rick N. MI
      I used the:
      Equinox 800 w/ 6" coil Park 2, Sensitivity 23, 2 tone, Iron Bias f2 0, Recovery 4
      Xp Orx w/ 9" hf coil, 4 tone, Sensitivity 96, recovery 2
      Gold Kruzer 4x7.5 coil, Deep mode, Sensitivity 80
      I wanted to see how well these detectors did in no emi area at a low mineral sandy beach with a 0.89 gram 14k gold ring buried at a measured 9". I was very impressed with the results.
      The Equinox 800 w/ 6" coil and the XP Opx w/ 9" hf coil hit all the way around with the coil lifted 3"-4".
      The Gold Kruzer w/ 4x7.5 coil hit it one way w/ coil raised 2"-3". The other was a weak signal harder to get. I was happy with that. I didn't bring the 5x9.5 coil. I'm sure it would have done better.
      Over all I was happy with the results. The Equinox 800 w/ 6" coil did really good. Equal with the Xp Orx w/ 9" hf coil. The Xp Orx hit the ring very well at 31 khz and 54 khz.
  • Create New...