Jump to content

Recommended Posts


Looks like a little lead and zinc there, smidgen of copper, some manganese. Nothing jumping out. These numbers from https://opentextbc.ca/geology/chapter/20-1-metal-deposits/ give you an idea of what kind of ppm numbers you are looking for....

Table 20.1 Typical background and ore levels of some important metals [SE]
Metal Typical Background Level Typical Economic Grade* Concentration Factor
Copper 40 ppm 10,000 ppm (1%) 250 times
Gold 0.003 ppm 6 ppm (0.006%) 2,000 times
Lead 10 ppm 50,000 ppm (5%) 5,000 times
Molybdenum 1 ppm 1,000 ppm (0.1%) 1,000 times
Nickel 25 ppm 20,000 ppm (2%) 800 times
Silver 0.1 ppm 1,000 ppm (0.1%) 10,000 times
Uranium 2 ppm 10,000 ppm (1%) 5,000 times
Zinc 50 ppm 50,000 ppm (5%) 1,000 times
 
*It’s important to note that the economic viability of any deposit depends on a wide range of factors including its grade, size, shape, depth below the surface, and proximity to infrastructure, the current price of the metal, the labour and environmental regulations in the area, and many other factors. Source: https://opentextbc.ca/geology/chapter/20-1-metal-deposits/

How To Calculate Ore Grade

  • Like 6
Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you I didn’t see anything of value just wondering if this particular array of metals and minerals would rule out a certain size of ground, say so many miles or feet. I’m trying to find out where I bounce to in terms of distance if that makes sense

Link to post
Share on other sites

You could move ten feet and find the Mother Lode. An out of context assay like that is meaningless to people like us on the internet. An assay only tells you about the exact spot assayed, and has to be put into the larger context of geology and far more samples than just one.

  • Like 3
Link to post
Share on other sites

I work in an assay lab and I’m familiar with the reference material on your report (OREAS45p). The values for this reference are consistent with the values for the first sample, labeled as “blank.” It appears that there is a sequence error which would lead me to question the data set.

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Similar Content

    • By jasong
      Are there any such labs that cater to smaller companies and prospectors? The bigger labs all seem swamped, I can barely get them to respond to small fry like me. I'd like to get results in 2-3 weeks if possible, but still be affordable.
      Need both fire assay and ICP-AES or similar spectrometry for other elements. Not XRF.
    • By osbod007
      I may be missing something here but I'm inquiring to see if someone might clear up my question?  I believe mining reports of gold recovered are quoted in ounces per ton processed. My question is 'what is the physical dimension of a ton'?  I've done some research and came up with the general consensus that one cubic (3'X3'X3') yard of dry dirt is approximately  2000 lbs. However one cubic yard of dry sand is quoted as approximately 2800 lbs. and a cubic yard of mixed gravel is quoted as approximately 2600 lbs.  Do these figures seem correct?  I would think quoting ounces per cubic yard more meaningful.   If drywashing I guess the weight for dry dirt would be close enough to figure the approximate recovery rate per yard?
    • By Steve D
      Hello all!  I am looking for a recommendation for a fair, honest assay place, preferably in the Reno/Sparks area.  I found some ore pieces that I have crushed and extracted about 70 grams of electrum, with an unknown silver content.  I attached a picture for reference and I figure someone out there likes looking at the gold pictures as much as I do!

    • By madtuna
      Spotted a jar half sticking out of the ground yesterday...….

      Between 10 and 15 kg of Mercury. 👍 Will break it down into 1kg lots and process it through my retort as it appears quite gritty so could be holding a bit of gold.
      Sure beats the 3 grams I found too😃
    • By Bash
      Wasn't quite sure what forum to post this in, but i found this today at an old park.  The split in it makes me think fishing weight, but, could it possibly be a prill?  I found it in an area close to the placer fields, and the old mines above Helena, MT.
      ~Bash




    • By AUddicted
      A friend of mine showed me what he believes is a small grinding device used for gold ore sampling.
      Anyone have any info on this?
      Thanks


×
×
  • Create New...