Jump to content

Recommended Posts

4 hours ago, phrunt said:

...

I hope this helps you understand why for me in my soil conditions not wanting to dig a lot of holes in public land I prefer the Multi-IQ detectors.  The $1 coin is a pretty easy coin to ID, small silvers then things heat up even more with the Vanquish really shining over the other detectors in ID capability at depth for me.  The Bug is still a respectable detector for ID of coins.   The Equinox performs similar to the Vanquish although at times I feel the Vanquish gives a more stable ID than the Nox.  I am hiding the EMI issues with the T2 by discriminating out up to near 40 on the ID's, the EMI seems to mostly be below 40, in an area with little to no EMI the T2's ID's improve so even though It's mostly blocked out by discrimination it's still there messing with the ID's in the background.  Once when we had a power outage in the entire area I went out and tested this same deep coin with the T2 and the difference in it's ID capability was very obvious.

...

I id not pay attention up to now to this MulitIQ ID accuracy at depth feature  . Clearly it can help in a lot of situations when you look for a very specific kind of target , for example big buckles of the 1st WW whose IDs are very different from cartridges , bullets and so on ... . Up to now I was only relying on the audio but the screen ID is much more accurate . Will use this with my Vanquish and will look more at its screen now 🙂… Thanks  a lot 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 66
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Posts

For me Multi-IQ is sort of beside the point. I like the Equinox because of the total package value it offers me. I have always needed two detectors to hunt saltwater or to nugget detect. The Equinox i

Yes, you actually have to learn your detector. That’s not a catch, that’s reality with all detectors. I don’t worry about why, I worry about what works. I drag multiple detectors into the field a

Better?  Well that's all relative. The main advantage of Multi IQ (Equinox/Vanquish) or other simultaneous multi frequency detector schemes (e.g., BBS, FBS) in general is that it enables salt bal

Posted Images

8 hours ago, phrunt said:

I hope this helps you understand why for me in my soil conditions not wanting to dig a lot of holes in public land I prefer the Multi-IQ detectors.

It does very much, and thank you for the video!

So it seems like it's not just the stable ID numbers that the Multi-IQ provides, but also the ability to get those stable numbers with almost no (or at least a lot less) adjusting of settings compared to a non-Mult-IQ machine.

Thanks again, you've been very helpful in helping me understand the benefits of Miulti-IQ.

  • Like 2
Link to post
Share on other sites

In which is better Multi -IQ? .... mainly allows to meet the "one detector setup" and very contradictory detection requirements:

1. excellent sensitivity and ... but at the same time excellent reach for very small, medium, but also larger objects in the field ... On one detection program.

And don't forget the exact ID up to 90% of the maximum Detection depth .. that's based on a certain algorithm to calculate the ID from the different frequency response signals -in the Multy IQ ...

2 ... Excellent separation ,, -.... that cannot be achieved when using low-frequency 5-12 Khz ... detectors ... Because excellent separation requires at least 13-15 KHz .... detector ... and the KHZ will be higher ... it will separate the better detector in the iron.
Multi-IQ can do it on 1 detection program ...- because it works in wide frequency range 7.8hz-39 Khz ...

3. ..Very good work Multi-IQ on various mineralized terrains .. ,,

Why is it essential? .. here's the natural sensitivity of a detectable object to a certain frequency-at which it gives the strongest signal response.

In order to understand why it is necessary to know each conductive low, medium and high conductive object has its best signal response (even 4-7X thing) only within its certain frequency range ...

While on lightly mineralized terrain the detector sees even very weak signals ... and has on those weak signals excellent range .. So ... in difficult mineralized terrain detector sees only those objects that still give a strong enough signal, even though the detection range here will also be lower ..

 So ... All objects that give already weak signals .. I will be very weakly detectable in mineralization ,,, in the worst case their detector cannot detect ...

So here multi I-IQ represents a high quality compromise for balanced signal response for detecting various conductive objects ...

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

 Equinox goes well with my "4x4" field test ... for a wide range of object sizes ... that are buried at boundary depths ..... The test detector has to do it on one program setting ...
And it proves only a few Top detectors ..

IMG_20200329_181024.jpg

IMG_20200329_181036.jpg

IMG_20200329_181054.jpg

IMG_20200329_181103.jpg

 

 

  • Like 3
Link to post
Share on other sites

 

First coin found with my Vanquish 540 V12 , it is a hammered coin of the 15th century probably charles VII . I have found it on one of my favorite testing areas .  I have been there dozens of times with several other  detectors so difficult to find new targets here . Actually this is a highly iron trashed area and the Vanquish 540 is not always easy to use there , it a little ( too ) noisy ...

But it works this is the most important , the signal on this little coin ( 0,8grams ) was perfectly clear and I have missed this coin with the other detectors , so good news the 540 can locate very small targets even with the big V12 coil … 🙂  

Sorry the picture quality is not very good because it has been taken at the end of the day ... 

DSC02367.JPG

  • Like 3
Link to post
Share on other sites
  • 6 months later...
On 4/12/2020 at 10:10 PM, phrunt said:

The Equinox is a pretty safe bet being an all rounder that has proven itself as a good detector in most scenarios.  Very few VLF detectors hold that title, In fact I can't think of another one.  It's up there with the best gold prospecting VLF's, works exceptionally well in a park scenario and of course one of the few VLF's that work well at the beach in the wet sand, and if you feel like going for a swim you can take it along, it's just so versatile.  Until another manufacturer comes out with a competitive product that's where it stands.  I'd be happy if another manufacturer did come out with something in the near future or even beyond as we need competition if anything to keep pricing reasonable. 

Nokta is working on a multi frequency machine which may come out next year.... I can't wait to see what that will be, I think it'd be great, at least we know so far in features and build quality it will be good, now it's just waiting to see how they do the multi frequency side of it and how competitive that will be.

Minelab have already said they're not releasing anymore single frequency detectors, multi is where the world of detecting is heading, if the other manufacturers are going to stick with single frequency over the coming years I fear they'll be left behind and gradually forgotten about.  Remember Multi-IQ is Minelab's first generation of Multi-IQ technology, I can't wait to see what they come up with in the future based off that technology, I know if a multi-IQ v2 detector hits the market to replace the Nox I'll be buying it, I'd pay for it before even knowing anything about it. 

They've proven they're not going to sit there rehashing old models, they're being innovative, releasing new technologies, possibly some early next year too with 5 new unknown products announced already.  This post may sound very pro Minelab, unfortunately that's reality, as you know I have no bias towards any of these metal detector manufacturers for political reasons, patriotic reasons or any other, I like what works best for me.

I wish Minelab would bring back the Sovereign GT.

   Awesome Machine.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Similar Content

    • By Gerry in Idaho
      Was swinging the EQ-800 the other day and hit this nice specimen.  
      I realize all the love is for the new GPX-6000, but come on, the reality is most folks can't afford it.
      There is still plenty people having fun with the VLF's.




    • By Rick N. MI
      I really like the coil. It has a sharp detecting edge and is fast. It was nice out. Was 55F. I went to field next to an old school house where I've gotten old coins before. I went to a different area. There was emi and used 15 khz and it ran smooth with sensitivity 24, 2 tone, recovery 4 (should have used 6, lots of iron), Iron bias F2 0. The single tones run so smooth. 
      Only one keeper, maybe drawer pull?
       


    • By Gerry in Idaho
      I like detecting for a variety of gold and really enjoy finding the stuff many higher end detectors can't see.  I don't know yet, but feel the extra capabilities of the GPX-6000 will open up some of these areas I hunt with the VLF's to get even more of the gold and at greater depths or in worse soil conditions.  As long as I am getting more gold, I'm happy.  Will the new GPX-6000 see this kind of gold or act like all other PI's and the ZED and not see at all?
      I recently recovered this 4.2 gram speci with the EQ-800 while running the new CoilTek NOX 15" round.  My goal was to find a piece of gold with the 15" and I met that goal.
      Part of some other testing back at base proved why I still like to take 2 detector technologies in the field.  This particular beauty was found right in the middle of a GPZ-7000 grid area, along with 4 others while using different coils on the EQ-800.  All 5 pieces specimens have visible gold and a couple how quite a bit, but to the point.
      The reason I found them in that gridded area, is because the GPZ-7000 does not respond or on a couple right near 1" and that's it.  I teach folks this in my classes, as well as try to educate others on the goods and the bads of different detectors and technologies.  Sometimes I get detectorists who are good hunters with their detectors and have success, tell me I'm full of BS and their detector will find it.
      I made a post on my FB (Gerry McMullen) and shared a pic of the find along with the true comments of, the GPZ will not see it.  Between the private messages and or public posts, I was immediately informed by a few of BS and even told how I must not know the GPZ-7000.  One well known GP-3500 hunter even said he guaranteed his 3500 would hear it.  
      I know gold detectors and I know how to find gold with a variety of gold machines.  No I am not the best, but I most certainly can hold my own and I learn to adapt really fast to a new area.  Traveling to different states and countries to hunt for and find many different kinds of gold has helped elevate my detector knowledge and skill of many models of detectors and the differing Au rocks I have collected. 
      So here is hoping the GPX-6000 with it's GeoSensing can respond to this little beauty.  If it does, I know of some areas I'll be swinging the 6000.  If it is like the GP-3500, the GPX-5000 and the GPZ-7000 and misses it, that fine too, I know what they can't see and realize it,  I will also know where not to use the 6000.
      Bottom line for everyone.  Please learn the kinds of gold your detector is good at finding and what it is not, so you aren't wasting time  in those areas.  Or be sure you have at least 2 different detector technologies.

    • By dogodog
      My day started by taking my wife to breakfast and a trip to a local greenhouse. On our way back we drove by a place I have wanted to hunt for a while and couldn't because the owners were just not to friendly. But low and behold I noticed some new house development signs. I did a quick title search and found out it was sold and being developed very soon. So I grabbed my stuff and headed back to this 1830's house. Today was the first day since I got the 800 I could spend more than an hour and a half detecting. My first two hours were a pretty much a bust except a cool silver plate spoon and my wife texting me to see if I found anymore jewelry? (NO) I was getting a little frustrated and decided to focus on a small strip of grass (three feet wide) next to the driveway and an overgrown pasture. After five feet  I got an OK 28-29 signal that was kind of bouncy. First good coin popped out a 1905 barber quarter (yes) Things were looking up. I jumped across the driveway and hunted near a rather young pine tree. Two swings and boom a 24-26 and out comes a 1919 mercury. Things are getting interesting. I stood up after digging the merc, swung again got 23-24 at 9 inches out comes a coin that had me wondering what the hell is that. after a little quick cleaning I realized I had a 1832 classic head 1/2 cent. But this was no ordinary 1832 this has an over stamp with a cross and the initials FZ. It seems that it was stamped early in its life. I'm wanting to know if anyone has ever found a coin with stampings? I have found a lot of good coins, but this has now become my favorite. The day came to an end and I had to go and enjoy some burgers on the grill. 
      Almost forgot the spoon, Its an american airlines made in the 1930's with the shape of a dc-3 and the words flagship on it.








    • By dogodog
      Went to a local park today after work. Only had a couple of hours to detect and test out my new home made arm cuff. I wasn't a big fan of the plastic, and it was a little too wide and flexy for me. At this point I only have about 5 hours on the 800. The first hour today netted me a handful of clad and some misc. corroded zinc. The next hour was the same thing clad and junk. With only 15 minutes to chicken parm, I got a really nice 28-29, not expecting anything great, I proceeded to find out what it was. For a split second I thought it was another odd piece of stainless, But I quickly saw Tiffany and co. Wooooo Hoooooo. Now I had a good excuse for being a little late for dinner. My wife would never get mad for a Tiffany ring. It is about 6.16 grams and polished to like new. Oh and the cuff was a winner too. fits my arm and no slop. I made it out of an old no parking sign and the factory bottom section. It took me a few hours to create, but I'm happy with it. Have to give a shout out to Kac for the hand digger, Still works great and hasn't failed me yet.






    • By dogodog
      Well after a long frustrating wait for Nokta's  multi frequency machine, I could no longer wait or hold out. I received my new equinox 800 on the 19th and did some air tests and made a list of the VDI's and played with flipping the tones for my liking. After thinking the machine was just OK with some of my basic testing, It was time to run across the street to give it a run. I will tell you all that I have hunted this area to death with my MK. ( or so I thought) I only had 90 minutes to give its first test.  I decided to dig every target with an 18 or higher VDI.  Just trying to decifer my new sounds. First 5 min. netted some clad, but the next 85 broke all my records. first 3 coins after the clad were large cents, the next was a draped bust 1/2 cent (bucket 1) The next was a paper thin copper with a shield, could it be? Yes it was a New Jersey copper. I have been chasing this coin for years (bucket 2). Then a single button and an Israeli 1/2 shekel (not sure how that got there). I only had a few minutes left to hunt when I got a faint 18 on the nox and hit a button at 10 inches, But that wasn't all this hole had to give. It was like a button slot machine, 12 in all and total of 15 inches down. My wonderful wife called and I had to leave for dinner. I have to say the most impressive feature on the nox is the noise cancel, It made the site come back to life. As for settings, Park 1, sensitivity 17, and custom tone breaks and t1 - 1  t2- 25  t3 - 15  t4 - 10  t5 - 5  Tone sounds, I run them to get low tones on copper targets. Sounds odd I know, but it works for me. Have to say I'm impressed with the first 90 minutes I've run the 800.









×
×
  • Create New...