Jump to content
Steve Herschbach

Things Metal Detector Manufacturers Could Do Better

Recommended Posts

The  S-shaft is fine as long as the detector is 3lbs or less. The Teknetics Omega and F75 had a great pistol grip rod setup.   Once you start getting over 3lbs the S-rod setup becomes increasingly unergonomic and heavy.  Balance it all you want, but it's still heavy.  Any detector that comes with a pistol grip/straight shaft design should have the ability to tilt the handle back/forward to suit the users ergonomics (I like the posters comment that said they should make optional custom grips like they do for guns and bows, tap tap tap, is this thing on...great niche business opp for someone....have 3D printer, will travel).  What works for one person, may suck for another (Impact comes to mind). 

I think one of the biggest things manufacturers could change is transparency and customer communications.  I used to be brand loyal, but after shoddy customer service, lack of transparency, and apparent lack of innovation, combined with almost zero communications, I moved on and haven't looked back. 

I'll never buy a detector that doesn't offer wireless zero-lag headphones again. After using them on the Racer, Impact and now Multi Kruzer, it would be akin to going back to a rotary telephone.   Oh and detector manufacturers please provide a website with usable content, and modern utilization of available web technologies that doesn't look like a teenager made it on MS Frontpage 95.... I won't mention any names, you know who you are...just sayin'

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

15 hours ago, Steve Herschbach said:

Agree on all points Mike and smart of you to just stick with the engineering side. That’s where all the real fun is anyway. You know it can be very frustrating, but if just one thing ends up better as a result it’s worth it.

It has shifted now I think from command of the written word being important to command of a YouTube channel being paramount for who is chosen to be early recipients of machines for marketing purposes. The big emphasis now is social media. These are the new faces and names of metal detecting....

Aquachigger, Relic Recoverist and Nugget Noggin

A6B8B194-47F0-4B5D-89A4-A668DFE134B4.jpeg

I enjoy Youtube vids from regular forum posters but seldom if ever watch these types of promo vids ^  Hoover boys is about the only exception and that's mainly because I can appreciate the excitement they feel making finds.  I think I did own a Garret once. LOL

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
8 hours ago, Jackpine said:

I enjoy Youtube vids from regular forum posters but seldom if ever watch these types of promo vids ^  Hoover boys is about the only exception and that's mainly because I can appreciate the excitement they feel making finds.  I think I did own a Garret once. LOL

Nugget got religion and uses his vids as a platform for such, no problem, but I now longer watch his stuff.  Relic Recoverist I watched for a few episodes, but got tired of watching her dig up hot wheels and squealing at everything. Aquachigger had great vids in the beginning (likely before he was sponsored by Garrett), I mean come on, that early silver cache he found at the river crossing, that's epic, I dream of hunts like that, but I kind of feel his sites have played out, so we get a ton of filler material to keep the sponsorship going.  Hooverboys I do enjoy, although it's a bummer that Brad dumped his F75 and went to that lowly ATM... and he used to kick their butts regularly with the F75 too. 

I agree, I'd rather watch regular joes out there on a good site, making some cool finds, it feels less staged (not sure that's quite the right descriptor).  

BTW who would want an autograph from these guys, seriously?

If Garrett put as much effort into designing a new flagship detector as they did their marketing machine,  I bet they'd take the V3i to an entirely new level!!

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Steve, I for one appreciate your early information. I trust it more than others. That's one of the main reasons I come here. You're always going to deal with mistrust from people who are brand loyal and do not want to hear good things about other machines or bad things about a manufacturer they like. It has little or nothing to do with you. The people who are hardcore and just want the truth or the more technical aspects come here and to the Dankowski forum. Even some people who are brand loyal or buy USA types like me, still are willing to acknowledge that other companies are doing a better job these days. I wouldn't stop based on some people who are never going to be happy if it isn't their machine or brand that is getting the attention etc. It wasn't long ago I was having it out with Makro tester about those machines being a little late on the scene at their particular price points now that the Equinox is coming. I tied him up in knots to where he went back and erased the whole thing out of embarrassment. I was able to do that partly based on info I got here about the Equinox and just invoking your name when I was asked how I would know anything about a machine I haven't touched evoked an acknowledgment that you're one of few that can be trusted. I continue to believe that at least where you are concerned, more people here than not appreciate and trust what you do. 

  • Like 2
  • Thanks 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 9/26/2015 at 4:10 PM, Steve Herschbach said:

Just to get you going here are some new metal detector bumper stickers for you....

First Texas - Even we don't know how many we make or what they're for!

Garrett - We already made a flagship detector so quit asking for one.

Minelab - The most hated name in detecting!

Tesoro - Search for the past with detectors from the past.

White's - Anything happen while we were sleeping?

These are definitely funny and accurate still to this day. As far as First Texas goes, they do continue to market way too many machines, and I believe that is partly what killed the reputation of Bounty Hunter brand. How do you take Bounty Hunter seriously with a ridiculous number of machines with often whimsical names. Don't take me wrong, I disagree with the common notion that they're all toys, but I see where that comes from. Other than that, I think they've focused on single frequency VLF too long. I'm thankful for the F75 LTD. what a machine. But it's time to make a more current version of machines like the CZ-21 etc. At this point, I trust that they realize this and now have the talent and facility to pull off an upset a lot of people in this hobby won't see coming. I believe that in the future of this hobby it will be First Texas, more than XP or Minelab we will be talking about. Time will tell if my intuition is correct. 

Garret and Tesoro to me seem to be the companies that are the most in trouble of fading into obscurity and irrelevance. Garrett too has focused on single frequency VLF for too long. Their saving grace has been new comers with the Ace 250, and satisfying the appetite for waterproof machines. They now face a dilemma where more waterproof options are surfacing rapidly now and they are machines that offer more at the same price point. Loyalty only goes so far when the gap keeps widening. The GTI 2500 seems to be a great machine. I like the idea of being able to use it as a two box or an upright. It's a great concept if they would take it and develop it with more modern options and abilities in a lighter package. 

I have had good luck in my efforts to communicate with Whites. They always read my messages or respond to my questions, listen to my ideas. But I do worry about their future. They do seem stuck in some of their ways, believing there's still a future developing single frequency VLF. They are banking too much on brand loyalty and rallying Made in the USA patriotism, something FT has recently exploited in their Ameritek rebranding. In any event, I don't get the feeling they are interested in developing any further Multifrequency units and want to jump from the single frequency machines they've been developing to messing with PI. That would be fine if they are ready to put something on the market that works, but I think the PI game is First Texas' to lose. 

What can I say about Minelab. They are on top of their game. The Equinox and the ProFind 35 are hits. The Equinox was a rock star before it ever hit the market, and the CTX-3030 has been considered king of the hill since it came out. 

Going forward these companies need to think outside the box. Take Whites, why not take a setup like the VX3 and make it a VX3/MXT hybrid. They can use the same coils etc, why not house them in the same control box with the ability to switch back and forth, and waterproof it. That would be a huge hit! I'd buy it in a second. It would wet some appetites while they develop their version of a new PI. Still would love to see a BT pinpointer that can adapt the machines discrimination ability. I'd like to see further development of "target trace" type features. I'd like to see a dual concentric coil where you could select the inner loops for trashy sites and outer loops for depth in fields etc. I'd like to see more custom parts like arm rests and shafts etc to personalize machines. People love to customize their cell phones with different cases and accessories, wallpapers etc. And I'm sure people would love to personalize a machine they feel passionate about. Someone should make nicer arm rests and shafts of all different shapes and designs. I'd actually like to see more cell phone integration as well. Minelab began exploring that with the go-find series, and there may be some ways to take advantage of the state of the art hardware these cell phones are running these days. 

  • Like 3

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I agree with your assessment Steve about the companies. As you stated Nokta/Makro do an outstanding job communicating with their customers light years ahead of the rest. I've tried top end detectors from most current manufactors and I'm left with the Etrac and Deus. I'm no fan of Garrett. I tried to like the At pro and at max... but they lacked depth and didn't perform well in iron.... and the At Max iron audio?? Wholly Molly it will drive you crazy!

So I'm left longing to use the equinox, and my hopes are high for it!

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Steve, there are very few people with your knowledge, experience, capacity for diligent testing and ability to articulately give evaluations and insights into new and existing detectors. Please continue to do what you love. Most  of us on the forum hold your opinions and inputs in high regard. Your posts help us make better decisions and help us become better at detecting. Thank you!

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 2/8/2018 at 9:01 AM, Steve Herschbach said:

Don’t worry Mike.... Equinox is the last time you will hear anything in advance from this “factory team member”. So that’s one less at least.

I fell into the trap of thinking people liked and appreciated getting early information about things from the only people who have access to such things. However, comments like yours are very common these days, and have convinced me that is no longer the case. When the day comes that I am seen as part of some kind of hype machine, it’s time for me to stop. It will free up lots of time! :smile:

I apologize to you and others that I offended. I should have elaborated on this a bit. First I would like to say I have nothing but respect for you and this is the only forum I visit. I actually haven't been to any forums for some time, came across yours and love what you're doing.

Second - I am sure you know what I mean Steve. There are some great people out there like you who are giving great feedback and putting good information out there but there are others who are not. Being part of the "manufacturer team" they will say and do whatever the manufacturer wants. In the last year alone I have had the opportunity to have conversations with a few testers and was shocked to find out what they really thought about detectors they had tested.

 Just like reviews, so many people doing them will tell you each new detector is the best ever. Some have been doing this for years and for many it is about making sure they get more detectors to review, not about giving real reviews to their readers. For this reason, after roughly 10 years of submitting articles to metal detecting magazines and having over 40 (every one I submitted) published, I decided to start my own blog and do REAL reviews. It hasn't been easy! Often I am asked to sign contracts stating I won't say anything negative which I refuse to do and therefore do not get to test their product but in the end, I sleep good at night knowing what I have reviewed is my honest opinion.

  • Thanks 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I have another suggestion.  Good quality performing detectors designed and engineered.

Imo I think it smart to have at least one button on detector's control, reachable while holding detector when using.  This button (could be 2) should offer an accepting of what I call a hot setting.  Be able to be programmed with many of the detectors settings.

For example disc level, frequency, speed setting- anything really where a detectorist using in the field  may find helpful as far as direct application when detecting.  Manufacturers should be relying on actual detector use by individuals to come up with these settings to be made " hot application" through programming.  There are a few detectors that come close here but still don't do what I am recommending here.

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Mike,

My take on all this is that I am a little burned out and being a whiner, which I detest. So I apologize in turn.

I have been offered many opportunities to “test” and “report” on various detectors and other items over the years, and if I can’t get behind the product I simply decline to get involved. I have never in my life signed anything that required me to be anything other than honest about what I say, and to the manufacturers credit I am surprised at times what I get away with.

The whole issue of detector testing and reporting has however weighed heavily on my mind as of late and so my response had far less to do with your post than my overall feeling that I have no desire to be part of or come across as somebody hyping anything. My real interest is in helping advance the technology somehow, and so I do enjoy working with the engineers to act as best I can as a user advocate. Due to the way non-disclosure agreements work I will never reveal what tiny parts I have played, but I am proud that I have helped make something perhaps a little better than it might have been without my help.

I do know I really have little interest anymore in run of the mill metal detectors and it really is that more than anything else that has me thinking it would take something pretty special going forward to get me interested enough to bother with.

Anyway, no more whining from me. Thanks for the comeback response!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Similar Content

    • By Steve Herschbach
      Our cup runneth over!
      Just a few years ago the market for "over 30 kHz nugget detectors" was quite limited. For a long time there were only a few options:
      Fisher Gold Bug 2 (71 kHz) $764 with one coil
      Minelab Eureka Gold (6.4, 20, & 60 kHz) Discontinued $1049 when new with one coil
      White's GMZ (50 kHz) Discontinued $499 when new with one coil
      White's GMT (48 khz) $729 with one coil
      Things were that way for over a decade. Then in 2015 Makro introduced the Gold Racer (56 kHz) $599 with one coil. Sister company Nokta released the AU Gold Finder (56 kHz) $799 with two coils
      Then in 2017 we see the Minelab Gold Monster 1000 (45 khz) at $799 with two coils. And although not a dedicated nugget detector, the Deus high frequency coil options (up to 80 kHz) were also released, $1520 for complete detector with one HF coil.
      Now in 2018 we get another general purpose machine, the Equinox 800, that can hit 40 khz, $899 with one coil. And just announced...
      the Makro Gold Kruzer (61 kHz) $749 with two coils and
      the White's Goldmaster 24K (48 khz) $749 with two coils
      These last two announcements have made barely a ripple in the prospecting world, or at least going by other forums that seems to be the case. There are various reason for that (forums not being prospecting oriented or being Minelab centric) but still the lack of buzz is interesting. I do believe people are both burned out by all the new introductions and that the market is saturated with high frequency models. Leaving out the general purpose machines to sum up the current options it looks like the current "sweet spot" for pricing is a high frequency model at $749 with two coils.
      Makro Gold Racer 56 kHz - $599 one coil
      White's Goldmaster 24K 48 kHz - $649 one coil
      White's GMT 48 khz - $729 one coil
      White's Goldmaster 24K 48 kHz - $749 two coils
      Makro Gold Kruzer 61 kHz - $749 two coils
      Fisher Gold Bug 2 71 kHz - $764 one coil
      Minelab Gold Monster 1000 45 kHz - $799 two coils
      Nokta AU Gold Finder 56 kHz - $799 two coils
      High Frequency Gold Nugget Detector Roundup

    • By MikeM
      Hi, I am looking to purchase a gold finding metal detector that can handle mineralized soil well, but also locates smaller gold.   I live in southern Nevada and it seems that the more I read, the more confused I am getting.  I guess I'm looking for a detector that does well with tiny and larger gold.  I had the Gold Bug 2 for a while and it was way too sensitive for me and not rain-proof.  The Makro Gold Kruzer,  The Gold Monster and others on that level are all within my price range, so I am having trouble making a decision.  I understand that the right detector for someone may not be the right detector for someone else, but I do believe the right input is valuable.   I haven't seen any head to head videos using the Gold Kruzer yet (still too new) but it looks promising so far.  The reviews of these detectors are great, but nothing beats real world testing under various conditions and soil types.   I am not one for air testing due to it's controlled nature,  so the confusion grows.   I know many of these detectors can locate tiny gold due to their higher kHz, but there is a trade off.   I appreciate any suggestions.  Thank you, Mike  
    • By phrunt
      I don't know if I'm right on this but I've found my Teknetics T2 to be a good guide to mineralisation at an area, I use its Fe3O4 meter as a guide.
       Would I be right in using that as a guide?
    • By Steve Herschbach
      I have used many metal detectors over the years, and right now I have to say that the new Makro Racer 2 has perhaps the easiest to understand, best laid out, most practical display and menu system I have ever seen in a top end detector. Now, you can sure say you hunt by ear and do not need a screen and I get that, but if we are going to put a screen on a detector, then let's do it right.
      Simple detectors with few functions are easy to make screens for - there is not much you need. But even then just the basics are often wrong. Machines that feature target id numbers, what is the thing you will most look at on screen? The target id numbers! Yet these are often way too small or off to the side as if an afterthought.
      The Makro Racer 2 id numbers are huge, much larger than on the original Racer and Gold Racer, which are already good sized. The number 88 display in the diagram above is fully 1.5" x 1.5" in size in real life. Other machines have some pretty big numbers but I think this sets a record as I can't think of any machine with larger id numbers on screen though some are close.

      Makro Racer 2 LCD display and controls

      Makro Racer 2 screen layout

      Makro Racer 2 screen and control descriptions
      The number can be the ground balance number, target id, or depth reading. You get a text display just above the number confirming which it is. Below the numbers are three zone references, Fe, Gold/Non-FE, and Non-Fe, that are used to set tone breaks and audio for the three main zones or bins as they are sometimes called.
      Another basic feature lacking on a lot of machines - the meter backlight. With the Racer 2 you get off, intermittent, or full time backlighting, and it includes the translucent red control buttons. The control ranges between 0-5 and C1-C5. At 0 level, the keypad and display backlight are off. When set between 1-5, they light up only for a short period of time when a target is detected or while navigating the menu and then it goes off. At C1-C5 levels, the keypad and display will light up constantly. I do not know of anyone doing a better backlight.
      The right side of the meter is informational - ground phase (ground balance number), mineral % (ground magnetite content), coil warning notices, and a six segment battery meter.
      Across the top below the 0 - 99 reference sticker, is a series of 50 "bullets" each of which covers 2 target id numbers. Open bullets (which appear gray in the diagram but are invisible in real life - see top photo) indicate accepted target id numbers. Blacked out segments show what discrimination and notch setting you have programmed in a single quick glance. When a target is detected, the big number on the display will be mirrored by one or more of the bullets flashing dark.
      The four control buttons are simple as can be - up and down takes you through the left hand menu area. Right or left lets you set each function selected by going up and down. The menu is basically the entire feature list just laid out right there for you to see. You want to know what this machine can do, just look at the screen. Most other machines you have no clue without reading the owners manual or at least pushing buttons to see what functions appear.
      Some settings like the backlight are system wide for all modes. All other settings like Gain are independent in each mode, and can be saved independently in each mode. This means you can play neat tricks like setting up a couple modes with dramatically different settings and then flip back and forth easily between two modes for target checking.
      You even get to decide what mode is the default start up mode. The Racer 2 starts up in the last mode where the save function was performed. If you always want to start in Beach mode, just modify and save something in Beach mode. Next time you start the detector, you will be in Beach mode.
      It is simple. It makes sense. No cryptic abbreviations or acronyms. No sub menus. It is, in metal detector terms, a work of art. Whoever designed this should sign it so I can frame it and hang it on my wall.
    • By Steve Herschbach
      First Texas (Bounty Hunter, Fisher, Teknetics) - last new models Fisher F75+ and Teknetics T2+. Next up a new pulse induction (PI) beach detector. A new digital multifrequency to replace the Fisher CZ3D is long overdue but at this rate we will be lucky to just see the PI before the end of the year.

      Garrett - last new model the AT Max. Hard to believe the flagship GTI 2500 has been around since 1999 with no updates. Garrett so far has shown no interest in multifrequency. The most I was hoping for was a lightweight dry land version of the ATX, but so far no sign of that happening either. I doubt we will see anything else from Garrett this year but they could surprise.
      Makro - last new models the Multi Kruzer and Gold Kruzer. Makro has mastered single frequency so everyone would like to see what they can do with multifrequency or pulse induction. I expect Makro is done with new models for the year.
      Minelab - last new models Equinox 600 and 800. I have no idea what’s up next for detectors but I sure would like to see that small coil for my GPZ 7000. I really don’t expect anything new for the rest of the year besides Equinox accessories.
      Nokta - sister company to Makro. Last new detector the Nokta Impact. I actually bet on a PI under the Nokta brand rather than Makro brand simply because the Nokta housings like the new Impact housing would better contain a high power PI.
      Tesoro - Who? What?
      White’s - last new models the MX7 and TDI SL Special Edition plus the just announced Goldmaster 24K. Hopefully that new tech will eventually see the light. Right now just getting the 24K out the door is job one.
      XP - last new products the HF coils for the Deus, with X35 coils due by end of year.
    • By ☠ Cipher
      Here's another, a second interesting product I've run into recently. This one has a bit of a giggle factor for me, but I could be wrong. See what you think.
       
×