Jump to content

Recommended Posts

3 hours ago, GB_Amateur said:

If I understand the new comparison correctly it could be that FE could help better ID'ing the targets I recovered under those in-field conditions.

I am missing how you are concluding that. Can you elaborate?

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 38
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Posts

Jeff and I had a couple PM messages back and forth about Iron Bias, and what it does. Jeff made mention he thought it took items with mixed ferrous and non-ferrous responses and reduced or eliminated

I tested the differences between Iron Bias FE and Iron Bias F2 last year right after upgrading equinox to soft 2.0. The tests included a field depth test + signal repeatability in 10 sweeps with

I run FE2/0 as unmasking is my primary goal.  Interestingly large iron tools (axe heads, chisels, large spikes, etc) TID at a solid 13, right at nickle.  I know this will sound odd, but a nickle

Posted Images

8 hours ago, GB_Amateur said:

I do appreciate this -- please don't take this the wrong way.  But it has my head spinning.  The diagram (possibly wrong) is easier for me to understand.  So let me ask this (specifically my understanding/interpretation of what you said) and please tell me if I got it right:

Start with the diagram as shown above.  Move the top scale (original FE Iron Bias) all the way to the left.  This means the left edges of both zero bins line up.  Then scrunch the FE (top) scale down so that the right edge of the FE (top) scale is just inside the 0-->1 border of the F2 (lower) scale.

Is that consistent with what you've said?

Could be. :smile: Trying to integrate/correlate the old FE settings and new FE2 settings may be a waste of time. They could be using two different methodologies and are therefore just two different things. I'm sold on FE2, especially after EL NINO77s comments on separation effects. Assuming one is going to use Iron Bias, is there any reason at all to use the old original version? In theory it has a finer gradation of adjustment, but is that of any actual value?

minelab-equinox-iron-bias-fe-fe2-old-new.jpg

  • Like 2
  • Thanks 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
13 hours ago, Steve Herschbach said:

Trying to integrate/correlate the old FE settings and new FE2 settings may be a waste of time. They could be using two different methodologies and are therefore just two different things. I'm sold on FE2, especially after EL NINO77s comments on separation effects. Assuming one is going to use Iron Bias, is there any reason at all to use the old original version?

Agree.  We are now probably talking about two completely different approaches to iron bias.  EL NINO77's results tend give FE worse separation and Steve's results tend to give FE less "effectiveness" vs. F2.  If EL NINO77's results hold, then that is a real eye opener regarding FE.  Almost as if ML's first attempt at iron bias was severely flawed.  The other thing that is flawed and as recently mentioned above, is why not a detailed Treasure Talk article on how to properly apply iron bias (both types) and when one might be preferred over the other and the plusses and minuses of cranking the magnitude of the IB setting.  They obviously put some effort into refining IB, it would be great if they explained it better and in more detail..  Also, to emphasize the implied preference of F2 they should have implemented it in a manner such that it could be cranked to "go to 11".  That would make F2 "two better" than FE. :smile:

Edited by Chase Goldman
Steve's quote got cut off, fixed that.
  • Like 5
Link to post
Share on other sites

When I hunted a lake thinking I was in f2 but was in fe I dug over 50 caps even in fe-9.I  corrected my mistake after by putting it in f2 -7 and the caps sounded bad an I could tell they were     caps to a high  degree.I  don't use the fe setting   anymore.I hope  they come up with a new FI setting that would rival the Deus in very thick  iron.We would have fe,f2,and  fi for iron bias.

  • Like 2
Link to post
Share on other sites
14 hours ago, Chase Goldman said:

I am missing how you are concluding that. Can you elaborate?

I probably got this backward.  I did say in the earlier post (asking Steve about the new matching of the scales) that I was having trouble correlating the two.  I guess I felt I needed to confirm that further!

13 hours ago, Steve Herschbach said:

Trying to integrate/correlate the old FE settings and new FE2 settings may be a waste of time. They could be using two different methodologies and are therefore just two different things. I'm sold on FE2, especially after EL NINO77s comments on separation effects. Assuming one is going to use Iron Bias, is there any reason at all to use the old original version?

(Rereading El Nino77's excellent study, I likely will just be confirming what he found regarding crown cap identification.  I don't have a nail board so no retesting that part.)

Good points and good question.  I think I'll play a little bit in the backyard teststand.  Maybe I can get even more confused (but hopefully not drag you along with me).  I'll just use crown cap(s) since those seem to be among the most impacted, and in general most common/prevalent targets.

  • Like 2
Link to post
Share on other sites

I run FE2/0 as unmasking is my primary goal. 

Interestingly large iron tools (axe heads, chisels, large spikes, etc) TID at a solid 13, right at nickle.  I know this will sound odd, but a nickle that TIDs @ 13 sounds different, more tinkley vs iron tools which have a flat/dull sound. 

I still dig them because (1) I want to remove them and who knows maybe you'll find a gun part or something interesting, and (2) it's a 13 and I'm typically hunting old sites, so it could, in theory, be a gold coin or something else interesting.

  • Like 5
Link to post
Share on other sites

I should not laugh but the thought of Minelab responding directly to information requests and explanations, not to mention requests for accessory coils, seems to be a fantasy many of us have these days. Ever since the new marketing crew in Chicago took over a couple years ago, the engineering videos and Treasure Talk blogs all came to a halt. There was a email survey Minelab sent out this spring asking people what kind of information and videos people want to see, but so far nothing has come of it.

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Similar Content

    • By Steve Herschbach
      “I have seen some confusion on the internet regarding the differences between the Minelab EQUINOX 600 and EQUINOX 800. I think that the EQUINOX 600 is being somewhat overlooked because it’s not the “top model” but, in my opinion, it is incredible value for a remarkably low price. I hope this blog will clear up any confusion and, in the process, show why I think the EQUINOX 600 deserves a second look by some people…”
      https://www.minelab.com/anz/go-minelabbing/treasure-talk/equinox-600-vs-equinox-800
    • By CliveHamy
      I would like to understand more about what All-Metal Mode does. All the manual basically says is "this disables the current discrimination pattern so that all metal objects will be detected" I normally detect in Orchards using Park2 and Fields using Field2. My main interest is to find artifacts, Jewelry and Coins. My biggest challenge is the amount of farm-related trash such as horseshoes, odd bits of iron, etc. Often I will get a good steady signal in the teens in F2, or P2, only to find it is trash, so NOW my technique is to check it out with All-Metal as well and if I get the deep tones and minus signals I generally decide not to dig. Is this a sound technique? Ok I appreciate that if a coin is right above or below the iron then I may miss it, but I'm happy with that call.
      Specifically, I wonder if All-metal mode in Park2 gives different output compared to All-Metal in Field2, i.e. are the different algorithm weightings of the different Search Profiles (P1.P2,F1,F2...) still operating or does All-metal override all these search profiles and it does not matter which Search profile you are in?
      PS this is my first post. This is a great blog for the Equinox, I've been following it for months, well done Steve H.
    • By CliveHamy
      Hi, I'm looking for tips about how to tackle high trash areas specifically when you get multiple varying signals in an area. Often I'm detecting in Orchards or pastures right next to farms that would have seen activity going back hundreds, maybe a thousand years. Or my back garden an ex-orchard in a rural village which over the years has been cultivated, had bonfires, lots of activity. In these areas I get many different signals all within a few inches of each other. Generally using P2 or F2, (I like 50 tones) and I prefer not to change any other settings, I dig out any stable solid figures/tones from say 7 onwards if they have no low tones/numbers when I test with All-metal mode. Having done that the remaining signals often are a mix of good signals, some good bouncing around, and negative signals. I'm trying to detect the "shape" of the signals, aiming to identify good positive signals that should be dug, but not sure about the rest. If I see a good solid signal say in the teens say with a -negative number when tested in all metal, should I dig in the hope of say a coin sitting over/next to ferrous, or should I leave alone? Often in the past, I've had a dig it all mentality to gain experience, but frankly in these areas that is not practical as I may just as dig randomly and see what's there with a pinpointer and not use a detector at all!
    • By PG-Prospecting
      So i got my Nox and have messed around a little bit with it.  
      Main question i have is that if i am hunting for relics and coins, but the soil is highly mineralized (there is a gold prospect on the property and I pan gold from the soil, and there are tons of magnitite crystals free and in the rock matrix) what is the best mode to use, Field since target are spread out or Gold since the soil is so mineralized?  There is an old road that cuts right past the old prospect pits.  Most the ground i will hunt has the possibility of gold as well as relics lol.  
      The ground here gives the monster issues with hot rocks, the gpx does fine.  While there is fine gold in the overburden i have yet to find anything big enough for a detector to locate.  
      Another question:  a few of the hits i got with the 800 jump between negative numbers and 11 to 15.  Ive attempted to dig these and cannot locate anything, and when i bring the gpx over it has no hits.  So i understand  negative numbers are generally hot rocks.  But ive played around with some of my gold and most of the medium sized nuggets 1 to 4 gram ring up right around 11 to 15.  So i keep chasing what?  Hot ground??
       
      Any insight is appreciated.   
    • By Bhogg
      Hi Everyone just wondering about Gold Nugget Settings?.
      I haven’t seen or heard  much about Settings for hunting small nuggets and also hunting them in highly mineralised soils?.
      Very interested to see how it’s going to compare against the Gold Monster, as it’s very sensitive on very Tiny bits.
      So if anyone’s been having some great success with it I’d love it if you could please share some settings and tips.
      Thanks Everyone for your time and help it’s greatly appreciated!!.
       Cheers All
    • By Dubious
      Has anyone used this method of avoiding iron? Any success?
      "If you get a signal and you are not sure if it is iron or not, drop the frequency to 10kHz and swing over the target again, if the TDI numbers jump about, then it is probably iron, if it stays locked on the same number as in Multi, then it is worth a dig."
      (reported by Bargeman in an overseas forum)
       

×
×
  • Create New...