Johnnysalami1957 Posted January 27, 2022 Share Posted January 27, 2022 On 9/13/2020 at 8:00 PM, JohnnyRox said: Is there no one on here that has a hook at Minelab and could maybe get someone there to do a video or come on here and give us the lowdown on this? You just got the lowdown. 😉 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Johnnysalami1957 Posted January 27, 2022 Share Posted January 27, 2022 Maybe FE2 is the second attempt to get FE right! Should have made FE with 20 segments of adjustments all equal.... 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mcjtom Posted January 30, 2022 Share Posted January 30, 2022 On 9/7/2020 at 2:21 AM, Steve Herschbach said: is Iron Bias reducing the non-ferrous false signals, or increasing the ferrous signal? Was that resolved? I have no idea, but something tells me that at high iron-bias the the non-ferrous signal is replaced by the ferrous one, if below threshold... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Steve Herschbach Posted January 30, 2022 Author Share Posted January 30, 2022 6 minutes ago, mcjtom said: Was that resolved? I have no idea, but something tells me that at high iron-bias the the non-ferrous signal is replaced by the ferrous one, if below threshold... Don't know, could just be semantical. I'll have to fiddle with it some more someday. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LukeJMG1986 Posted February 20, 2022 Share Posted February 20, 2022 I noticed something one day, while metal detecting the river here in Northern California. I was getting a reading of 11-12, and in-between it would drop to -1 or lower. I decided to dig it anyways, and it was a orange nickel. I was curious as to why it gave a ferrous response that made me question whether to dig it or not. I buried the nickel again, and started investigating which setting, if any, was causing the nickel to give a ferrous response, and I found that I had been running the F2 iron bias at 4. When I reduced it to 2, it gave ALMOST no ferrous response, and when I cut it to 0 the nickel read clean 11-12. I honestly haven't hunted with it on since. I don't think this would effect gold jewelry, which is what I'm after. I think the corrosion on the nickel was causing the iron bias to help it give the ferrous response. I'm still pretty new at this, and so I could be way off. The ground I hunt in is also very mineralized, and I wonder how much that can also contribute to a good item, giving an occasional ferrous response coupled in with the non-ferrous. 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now