Jump to content

XP Metal Detectors Go Detect App For Smartphones


Recommended Posts

I started checking more into a mention of XP DEUS Version 4 updates, especially this badly translated information from a French website:

xp-deus-phone-app.jpg

So I started Googling and there is a Facebook page for the app at https://www.facebook.com/godetect/

Right now it is mainly just a finds recording and track mapping app much like the Minelab XChange system, but phone based. One photo really caught my eye however. It apparently can use the phone location services plus orientation features in combination with the app to superimpose past finds onto a view of the terrain. The prospecting applications for this alone are obvious.

xp-metal-detectors-go-find-app-superimpose.jpg

After my pretty much blowing them off last year XP is really getting my interest now.

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Wow, oh no!! not more toys. but that sure seems to be the right direction they are heading. Makes that detector in a coil seem more logical,  XP has probably had this in the pipeline even before the Deus. I just hope they steer a bit away from proprietary software and let us use the mapping of our choice, leaving it open for faster development, must be a way of doing this without threatening patent security.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I was thinking about doing the same sort of thing with something like Google Glass where you can see all your previous GPS tracks and nugget finds overlayed onto the actual ground and terrain as you walk around and prospect, let you quickly and easily fill in the blanks you've missed.

 

It's crazy expensive still though, and quite a few unique challenges to even try to make it possible involving a lot of linear algebra that I've mostly forgotten, but I think it's doable with DEM's from the USGS and a fairly accurate GPS and a good smart phone as the brain. Just not sure how useful it'd be after all that work and money.  :lol:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Jason, doesn't the Microsoft Hololens look like an even better solution? https://www.microsoft.com/microsoft-hololens/en-us I saw that and had thoughts of looking at terrain with geologic maps superimposed. Going to be some really crazy stuff happening the next few years with virtual and augmented reality.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Crazy, first time I've seen the Hololens, looks pretty cool.

The stumbling block to developing FPV gps tracks that made me stop...is...hard to describe. Like, there seems to be 2 ways to go about it. You could essentially use glasses like that to walk around entirely in virtual reality via something like Google Earth (or similar) where you already have your tracks and finds stored and an entirely virtual terrain created. Problem is that now you are walking in reality but looking at virtual reality...how accurate are they? How accurate is your GPS? How up to date is the imagery? Not accurate enough I think...that bush in front of you grew last year and its not in the imagery so you trip on it, that GPS is accurate to within a few feet or 10 feet, so you keep tripping on rocks. That 4 inch tall rock is too small to show up on imagery so you trip on it too.

The other way would be more with the Google Glass type setup where you are actually viewing reality, the same reality you are walking in. But it overlays the data of interest over your actual sight and thus it needn't be as accurate, you just look at your GPS tracks in front of you to get a "general idea" where you walked before. Now I just browsed the Hololens quickly so it's entirely possible you could do this with those as well. But here was what made me stop thinking about making something like this - I thought about it when I was in Nevada and walking these wide flat praries or gently sloping mountains. But what about complex topography? Well we can use DEM's (digital elevation models) from the USGS and create an invisible mesh to overlay the tracks on. But there is a ton of data there. You'd essentually need to build the landscape on the fly, or have a ton of memory to store prebuilt landscapes. But with every turn of the head you are rotating that landscape and the aspect with which you view the updated landscape and track also changes. So there is a ton of translational mathematics to do to render those landscapes correctly, and honestly I sucked at linear algebra and I don't think I could build a project myself like that just on the mathematics aspect alone.

But it would be an awesome tool to have! And I still think about it when I walk around in the zone swinging the detector, wondering if there is a simpler way to do it.

*Come to think, there is a 3rd option, a simpler way. Just forget absolute accuracy and get "good enough", and I think there are some pretty sharp shortcuts you could take to produce something that is "sufficient" or a proof of concept...hmm.

Oh I see now that I look closer, yeah those Hololenses are awesome, you can still view reality too, I thought at first it was entirely virtual.

Link to post
Share on other sites

The organized surveys which clubs in Denmark been organizing for years involve recording every find and all participants carry garmin GPS units. At the end of each day, you turn in your GPS and the tracks are posted to the chart of the hunt. The missing bit in all this, if I as recall correctly, was plotting the individual finds. This integrated smartphone app will solve that problem.

This is MAJOR for the European market where most detectorists see themselves as historians and their hobby as a comtribution to their regional and national history. This is XP's by far biggest market - where they already dominate.

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

For any app to be of full use in our environment, the phone`s screen will have to be able to handle direct sunlight, such as screens used in the rugged notebook market, transflective or better. While I have been using a smartphone with Oziexplorer app for a number of years, the screen is a problem but my Portege notebook with its transflective screen this problem is solved to a certain degree. There are phones available with such screens but they are priced way out of the mass consumers reach.

 

Steve Oziexplorer  & Ozi 3D you`ll find will compete with the glossy market driven apps, even outdo them by allowing you to use a map of your choice such as geo maps downloaded digitally or simply scanned in and georeferenced.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Steve Oziexplorer  & Ozi 3D you`ll find will compete with the glossy market driven apps, even outdo them by allowing you to use a map of your choice such as geo maps downloaded digitally or simply scanned in and georeferenced.

No doubt, but as you may be figuring out I like learning about and using ALL the toys! It is not about what works for me but what might work for anybody under some circumstances in some place.

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Similar Content

    • By Timmysys
      ⁉️ Which one is better? Has anyone done a comparison test between the two coils for a jewelry hunt in the water? (freshwater or land)
        Both are able to use the same frequency. 28 kHz is very good for detecting gold. When I hunt in the water it is a very useful feature of target ID normalization. On the of LF coil, this was a big advantage. I set the gold range, so I only dug out the signals that belong to it. The HF 9" coil is great, but when I increase the frequency the VDI changes, getting higher and higher. The upper range will become narrower. This makes it difficult to decide whether to dig or not.
      Let's look at an example. A 1.5 g 14K wedding ring is the test object. HF 9 "coil at 14 kHz = ID 50, 28 kHz = ID 65, 56 kHz = ID 79. X35 11 "coil 11.3 kHz = ID 54, 16.4 kHz = ID 54, 25.4 kHz = ID 54! If I use frequency offset these numbers will change a bit.

      The general opinion of many people is that the HF coil is the best. I'm not so sure about that. I looked at this idea in terms of the gold jewelry hunt.
    • By ColonelDan
      I thought I’d try using a pedometer just to see how far I stroll along the beach on my hunts.
      The reviews I’ve read on many are not very complimentary.  It seems the common complaint centers on accuracy and battery life.
      I’d appreciate your thoughts and recommendations.
      Thanks
       
    • By Tometusns
      I was showing my orx and deus lite to a friend and he wanted to buy the orx so I sold it and bought the deus controller. He loves the orx (so did I) and now I'm really liking the deus. 
       I've been using 5-G-MAXX and checking each target with 6-DEEP (xy screen)to see the correlation between the two on targets. It takes very little effort to switch back and forth and I think I'm starting to see the difference between good targets and bad ones.(after a LOT of digging) I say lot of digging but I've only been out with it twice.
      Anyways,  after hitting the signal I knew it wasn't a coin but the XY screen said better investigate...glad I did. My first Civil War spur. I think the extra info you get really helps with the dig or not dig decisions we all have to make. Just some thoughts so far using my Deus. Any advice appreciated! Thanks! Tom

    • By calabash digger
      I have a suggestion for Deus. Come out with a update that allows you to cut down the iron volume to lower volume than what is on the machine now. To me it is to loud even on low in a carpet of nails for long periods of detecting. Dont get me wrong the Deus is the best iron machine made but it needs a lower setting on the iron volume . A lower iron volume where you can just hear the hum of the iron and a non ferrous would blast above it.

    • By Tnsharpshooter
      Alright,
      Thought I would share a few experiences I had today while detecting in the wild.
      A 3 hour hunt with split time between round and elliptical HF coils.
      Made a few finds using both coils.
      I ran the hot program while actually hunting.  But used gold field program to check some targets.  Glad I did too. Payed off.
      Here is pic.

      Notice the bracelet with the name on it.  Gent is still a kicking and in his 80s now, bracelet likely lost back in late50s early 60s.  I showed it to his sister actually.
      What about this bracelet portion?
      I hope folks don't laugh here, what I am going to say, but it is true.
      I was when I found this, in the same area where cut Spanish bit and half dime came from back in the summer.  I'll bet I have swung a Deus detector, others too over this bracelet buried over 300 times.  And I heard it likely every time but didn't dig.
      Why?
      Probably the same reason why is the same reason I wouldn't have dug again today except for the mighty gold field program.
      I swept this bracelet (not knowing) with hot program and the signal I got, I would have bet the farm it was relic iron.  A very tight super high short blaring signal.  I actually remember getting this same tone here previously many times before.  Remember this place does infact have old relic iron smaller, medium sized and bigger all over.  
      So in the past I was writing this target off as iron.
      Today after I hit the target, I toggled over to gold field same freq run as my hot program Reactivty 2.5.  When Iistened to this target using gold field, a nice sounding signal smooth on the edges, usually a good giveaway it is infact nonferrous.  And sure enough it was.
      One more target I dug  today I will discuss, and again using gold field gave me some additional Intel to actually recover find.
      The old button in the pic.
      I located it with round HF coil but the tone signature was crippled big time, with multiple tones being had as I swept.  I repeated sweep several times and I would have gave < 15 % chance of nonferrous even existing beneath my coil.  But checking target with gold field even even running 1 level lower (slower) Reactivty (level 2.5) I got more to go on vs the disc mode hot program, meaning now my odds went up to >50 % chance of being nonferous based on what I heard.
      To conclude here.
      I won't BS folks here.
      Using the HF coils running 28.8khz they can be sharper in iron vs the LF coils.  A person will get used to if they apply themselves.  One thing I will mention here and this too is a good weapon (using gold field to check suspect targets) is using disc program sometimes Deus audio will get caught, trying to sound off extremely close to iron range, and a user may be thinking is what I hear nonferrous or is it iron.  When you get these, if you hit them with gold field and you hear nothing, or you hear a signal more corrupt vs what you heard using disc mode program, you can almost bet the farm what you are hearing is iron.  Now this applies moreso to shallow and middepth targets.
      Cheers.
    • By bigtim1973
      I have been forcing my self to use my Deus more here lately. I am finding that I like the Deus very much. For the most part I am using Gold Maxx and deus fast. I have a custom deep program I use as well. 
      What I am getting at is i am not really using as many of the programs and settings. I fiddle between 2 for the most part and some times 3. And that is Deus fast and either gold Maxx or the deep Custom one I made. 
      I have been thinking of selling either my Deus remote set up and keeping the ORX or selling the ORX remote set up.
      I like the ORX for the large easy to see screen and iron probability bar. Plus I only fiddle with the coin programs anyway. 
      I  actually favor the ORX to tell you the truth.  
      They are slightly different animals. And each has their own strong points. But target and depth between the 2 are equal. 
      Who else has the same delima??
×
×
  • Create New...