Jump to content
Sign in to follow this  
Steve Herschbach

Minelab GPX 4800 Vs GPX 5000

Recommended Posts

The MInelab GPX 4800 was released at the same time as the GPX 5000. The Minelab 4800 was intended as the next release after the GPX 4500, but before it was released Minelab came up with a couple new refinements different enough to warrant yet another model, the GPX 5000. The 4800 therefore became a sort of "non-model" as most dealers and users focused on the GPX 5000 as the new top-of-the line detector. Most dealers do not stock the GPX 4800 and it may as well not exist for all the attention it gets.

The fact though is that a GPX 4800 is basically a GPX 5000 less a couple timings. Details can be found in the GPX 4800 / GPX 5000 Brochure (excerpt of spec sheet at end of this post) but what it boils down to is the GPX 4800 lacks the Fine Gold and Salt Gold timings.

Salt Gold is an improvement of the Salt Timing found on previous models that works better on salt flats and salt water beaches. Fine Gold is a bit misunderstood. Sensitive Extra is the best setting for pulling small gold out of most ground in the US. Fine Gold is intended for extremely mineralized ground. There are a lot of people who have decided Fine Gold is the magic setting but it really should not be used in milder ground where more powerful timings will do the job better.

It really all boils down to the Fine Gold timing, and most people just went ahead and ponied up for the GPX 5000 for the extra $800.

Steve's Guide to Differences Between the Minelab SD, GP, & GPX Detectors

post-1-0-62827100-1393953710_thumb.jpg

post-1-0-25471700-1394303948_thumb.jpg

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hey Steve,  I have a GPX 4500 and looking at the timing charts I don't see where a GPX 4800 has a advantage over what I already have?   Is there a advantage and if so in what way?  This lower price on the 4800 is sure to lower the cost and trade in value of the used 4500s.   Thanks for any light you shed on this subject........IdahoAl

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I will ask JP to chime in but not much to recommend replacing a GPX 4500 with a 4800 in my opinion. There is the new Coin/Relic Timing and an improved Enhance Timing, plus improved electronics for increased target sensitivity and ground balance performance. The Coin/Relic is of no use to most people so it boils down to better? electronics.

The Sensitive Smooth mode exists in the 4500, was removed in the 4800, and put back in the 5000. Audio type Boost exists in the 4500, was removed in the 4800, and put back in the 5000. It appears to me part of Minelabs plan was to widen the gap between the 4800 and 5000 by removing some 4500 features from the 4800.

I can't honestly tell you I think selling a 4500 to get a 4800 would get you much other than a new warranty.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The GPX 4800 is basically the same electronic platform as the GPX 5000 just with some features removed. By using the 4800 over the 4500 you would be able to take advantage of the smoother threshold, improved Enhance timings and improved Ground Balance. These are the main differences which you may or may-not be able to justify, in the end it will come down to your personal preference and level of experience. I personally could easily justify the change over (assuming there was no GPX 5000) as the improvements mentioned would give me an advantage even though it is not huge. 

Enhance is just about as sensitive as Fine Gold when a small coil such as the Commander 8" Mono or Nugget Finder Sadie coil is used in shallow ground, in fact in some cases it's actually better because there can be less ground noise (along with EMI) which is quite often closely associated with the highly mineralised shallow sections of gold bearing areas.

 

JP

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you for that JP!

The earlier the model the easier the decision gets. I upgraded at every new model, and for me the big difference was in going from SD to GP, and then from GP to GPX. But some steps along the way were incremental and harder to justify unless you are out prospecting a lot and finding substantial quantities of gold. If that is the case, any edge, no matter how small, is generally worth it.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Posted (edited)
On 3/4/2014 at 6:22 PM, Steve Herschbach said:

The fact though is that a GPX 4800 is basically a GPX 5000 less a couple timings. Details can be found in the GPX 4800 / GPX 5000 Brochure (excerpt of spec sheet at end of this post) but what it boils down to is the GPX 4800 lacks the Fine Gold and Salt Gold timings.

Salt Gold is an improvement of the Salt Timing found on previous models that works better on salt flats and salt water beaches. Fine Gold is a bit misunderstood. Sensitive Extra is the best setting for pulling small gold out of most ground in the US. Fine Gold is intended for extremely mineralized ground.

Hi Guys.

The soil in Tanzania will look like in the picture here. So i guess it will be highly mineralized ground.

What do you think - is a GPX 4800 a good option for searching there. Soon i will have the option to buy one like new. The guy just used it one time, even the second coil was nevere used.

Also is it not a big disadvantage to have no custom setting like the GPX5000?

What you can recommend me?

Any Ideas?

Thx for answers.

DSC_0189.thumb.JPG.abac41028464ab0625687da8a03fbb17.JPG

Edited by Erik_in_Mission
Waiting for answer and specific question

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Can someone please give his oppinion to my upper post?

Is it true that the GPX 4500 had Deep, custom and Normal setting as the GPX 5000 and the GPX 4800 just have deep, Normal and Hi_Minaral?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

If it's a good price and a genuine product, it's worth snapping up, they worked fine in Australia, I'm sure they'll work there.

It's impossible for anyone not in the area using the detectors to tell you how well one would work there but I would think you'd be fine with the 4800.

This thread shows the timings on the 4500, 4800 and 5000

 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I use a GPX 4800 in Virginia, and it handles the mineralized soil here well.  A buddy of mine who uses the GPX5000 went into the fine gold settings and gave me what the settings in each value was for fine gold, so that i could go into the settings on the GPX 4800 and get a close approximation of the fine gold setting.   

Id snap it up if its a good price.  Thats what i did.  

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you very much for your answers.

What do you think can be a good price for a Gpx 4800 , really like New with mono and doubld coil. 

Would be 2000 Euro OK? 

Iam still waiting for an answer from the seller i think he went in holiday that's why I ask. 

 

@PG-Prospecting : can i get back to you if the time comes that i hold the detector in my hands?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  

  • Similar Content

    • By phrunt
      I'm a bit puzzled on timings, I've pretty much left mine in sensitive extra since getting it and it seems the go-to timing for around here.  I only use mono coils and I'm  basically chasing tiny gold in soils with very low mineralisation, 1 gram is huge for me so we are talking 0.0X to 0.3 gram bits on average that I am chasing.  I was looking at timings charts on this site here and found the two best options for me below, I think.  Sharp appears to be best if using a DD, does that mean I'd be best off sticking with my sensitive extra seeing I use a mono coil or is a DD coil worth considering?
      I'm trying to see if there is a way I can scratch out a bit more depth on these little nuggets.
      This chart is the one that throws me out the most, basically no timings are "Excellent" for mono coils except Fine Gold, Enhance and Sens Smooth which are more for mineralised soils, only DD coils seem to have Excellent for the timings I'm trying to use for the small gold in mild soils..... 😕

      And this chart below describes the two timings I think might be best for me.

       
    • By phrunt
      As many GPX owners may know the GPX has toggle switches, they're quick and easy to use, but they're also quick and easy to bump... you can spend half a day detecting in a mode you didn't mean to by accident unless you check them regularly.  It's happened to me all too often.
      I have a Steelphase SP01 audio enhancer for my GPX and on it's toggle switch is a handy little guard that stops you bumping it's on/off switch.
       

      I've decided I want to add something like this to my GPX to prevent me screwing up bumping the switches but I can't find where to buy them, I'll have to keep hunting around online and see, and also check electronics shops next time I'm in town. 
      Has anyone done something like this to their GPX or am I the only clumsy one bumping the switches all the time?  If so what switch guards were best?  There appears to be a lot of different designs.
    • By nobadges
      GPX 4500. Been detecting for a while in the hills in California (Sierras) where I got started in 1970 ish with my White 5000 D I purchased from Jimmy Sierra at his shop in San Rafael. We’re still in touch although he says he doesn’t get out anymore but loves to read about others adventures. 
      then moved to New Mexico. I decided recently I needed to try my hand with Minelab and purchased the GPX 4500. I’m finding it difficult to find reading material on settings or proper videos. I have a friend that suggested a setting for the area I prospect in. I got a mono Commander and a GP Series coil with it. Hopefully I’ll find good info on this site. 😎
      Cheers
      John

    • By Jasonj
      I’ve been hunting a good site using the Deus and Equinox which has nails and small iron mixed in with good targets, some good targets being deep, but near or in the iron. My question is, will a GPX with Iron Discrimination turned up and the smallest DD coil pull out the deeper, non-ferrous items amongst heavy iron? Has anyone had any experience with this? I think for shallow targets the Equinox or Deus works better for shallow targets in this “machine gun iron”, but would like to see what others may have insight on for using the GPX. I’m assuming the fast setting and special soil timing may need to be adjusted as well. Thank you in advance.
    • By Cleggy
      Can I reduce the sensitivity of my GPX 5000 but still keep good depth. 
      I'll show you the problems I'm getting in this video
       
       
    • By Cleggy
      I bought this GPX 5000 second-hand and when I first had it it worked fine, but now when I turn it on it doesn't seem to be able to detect any signals. If I wand it over a large piece of metal it just about detects it and if I turned the unit on and off it seems to improve it. Could it be the coil?
      I've made a video :
       
×
×
  • Create New...