Jump to content

Basics Of Ground Penetrating Radar


Recommended Posts

Greetings to all!

My name is Alexander, I am from Ukraine (Eastern Europe).

I represent myself and my friends, we developed a portable type GPR many years ago and gave it the name EasyRad.

We have developed a georadar and software for it. We would like to get in touch (get contact) with those people or organizations who need to search for gold in the United States and Alaska.

To my regret, on forums of gold prospectors and forums of archaeologists there are no sections "georadars", there are only metal detectors. I would like to convey to the searchers the information that GPR is not expensive and it allows you to explore underground spaces quickly and with great interest 🙂

We produce this GPR equipment, so we can answer all your questions. Our radar has a very affordable price for individual use, unlike other radars.

See the web link below for examples.

EasyRad GPR is a portable multi-purpose scanning ground penetrating radar of sub-surface probing for the problems of engineering geology, hydrogeology, archeology, ecology, field engineering as well as for search and rescue operations.


  • Like 5
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Welcome to the forum!

I have long been intrigued by ground penetrating radar for prospecting. They are generally useless for finding individual gold nuggets unfortunately, as these items are too small to stand out on a GPR screen.

My interest was in Alaska where stream channels are buried and hidden deep below tundra and organic materials. GPR is good at picking up dramatic changes, and in this case the goal would be to simply trace and map buried channels. Depth to bedrock and in particular looking for drop offs or bends in the channel that might be a good drilling or pit excavation sample sites.

A few links....




  • Like 7
Link to comment
Share on other sites


I would like to start by presenting our technology of work.

Start over.

I will be oversimplifying complex things so that ordinary readers (not engineers with higher education) can understand "how it works". There are radars on the market that work according to a primitive method: sending a signal and receiving a reflection. This method is described in most "scientific manuals". As a result of this work, the simplest radarograms are obtained. For example, you see such pictures on echo sounders that see fish:


As you can see, each fish is seen as a small hyperbola (math curve).

The more hyperbole, the bigger the fish.

But what if we don't have fish underground? 🙂 If what we are looking for does not give a clear response-reflection?

This is where an unusual theory comes to our rescue, which is called "Spiral Wave Geometry" (SVG). I will not overload you with mathematics, I will explain it simply.

The main postulate of the theory: "Everything is a wave." Any micro or macro object interacts with the World at certain frequencies.

Let's say you have a closet with opaque doors at home. You do not know what is inside it. Maybe there are dishes for guests? maybe there are glass glasses? How to find out ? You walk up to the closet and hit it with a sharp, quick blow. The entire contents of the cabinet are hit and begin to ring (make sounds). Every plate, every glass, every shelf is making sounds. The human ear receives these sounds, and the human brain decodes them. You can tell for sure after hitting: there are dishes in this cabinet! And it stands on the top shelf, and on the shelf in the middle there is glass, and at the bottom of the cabinet there are iron pans. What changed ? The approach to understanding has changed. I could take an ultrasonic emitter in my hand and separately receive a response-reflection from each part of the plate, from each pan. I would be able to see the reflection of the signal, but I will never understand from the reflection what exactly was the reflection? glass? metal? Spiral Wave Geometry gives us mathematical methods for processing the signal of reflected and excited vibrations from various objects in the earth below us.

Our Ukrainian engineers decided to use the SVG for the operation of the GPR. This required a lot of mathematical processing, a lot of experiments on real objects. Ukrainian engineers do not receive $ 250,000 a year like Silicon Valley engineers 🙂 we do not have such salaries in Ukraine ... But this does not mean at all that our engineers do not have encyclopedic knowledge and thirty years of experience in radio and radio electronics 🙂 Equipment for georadar surveying in the world costs a lot of money, and software costs hundreds of thousands of dollars. This makes it inaccessible to ordinary people. Starting work on our radar, we wanted to make a tool accessible to an ordinary person, which would allow working with a GPR as with a conventional metal detector, i.e. visualize very complex signals in a simple and accessible way. We did it. And we managed to create an inexpensive solution.


  • Like 5
Link to comment
Share on other sites

The principle of operation of the GPR.

The device belongs to the class of monopulse ground-penetrating radars (GRLPZ) of the category of ultra-wideband devices (UWB) and is one of the tools for sounding the soil structure to a depth of several tens of meters in order to detect and determine the spatial boundaries of the occurrence of various subsurface inhomogeneities (objects that differ from the surrounding environment electrical characteristics: dielectric constant and conductivity, for example, areas of high humidity, soil decompaction - voids, inclusions of less / more dense substance, etc.).

The principle of operation of the GRLPZ is based on sensing the physical environment with electromagnetic pulses with an amplitude of 5-10 KV and a duration of about 2-8 nanoseconds and recording the amplitude and time delay of reflected signals from the interfaces between media with different dielectric permittivities.

The GRLPZ is capable of sounding the ground to a depth of 15 (30-50, Pro version) meters. The sounding signal emitted by the GRLPZ antenna propagates under the earth's surface, attenuating as it propagates, and, encountering an inhomogeneity, is partially reflected in different directions, including in the direction of the receiving antenna.

The level of received signals depends on the reflection coefficient of the signal from the subsurface heterogeneity. The reflection coefficient depends on how much the electrical parameters of the inhomogeneities differ from the parameters of the environment. The larger the difference, the larger the reflected signal. Part of the signal goes further and is reflected from the next discontinuity, etc., until the signal is completely attenuated.

The GRLPZ can be equipped with various types of antennas for solving various problems.

Dipole antennas are the simplest in a low-budget configuration. As a radiating system for professionals, a specialized antenna (option, version -Pro) has been developed, which has less radiation into the upper half-space and lowered lobes of the radiation pattern along the earth's surface. The antenna is based on a magnetic slot antenna based on an open resonator structure. The directional pattern of the GRLPZ antenna has a width not exceeding 25 degrees.

The use of this type of probing signal made it possible to relatively easily apply methods that lead to a gain in the signal-to-noise ratio and, ultimately, achieve a much greater sounding depth.

The radar software allows us to visualize a picture of what is below us. It is possible to build a 3D picture.

For example, here is a 3D picture of a river bed:



  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

a little fun 🙂

Here in the photo - a man walks with our radar in his hand.

Please note, it comes without shoes 🙂 The metal parts of the boots add unnecessary signals to the profile of the shoot, and on this expedition we could not find shoes without metal parts.



  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Technique for sounding the GRLPZ.

The sounding technique is as follows. The operator moves the device along the surface of the earth along the selected profile, based on the required resolution in the horizontal direction. At each discrete point, a probe signal is emitted, and signals reflected by the inhomogeneities of the subsurface structure are received, which are processed and stored in the computer memory.

The main form of presentation of the results is the construction of radar images of soil sections along the profiles of the device movement, in which the depth is plotted along the Y-axis, and the distance in meters along the selected profile along the X-axis.

When constructing radar images, special signal processing algorithms are used to display the result on the screen. When displaying an image on a monitor screen, the degree of darkening and the color gamut of image areas corresponding to the inhomogeneities of the subsurface structure is directly proportional to the amplitude of the radar signals reflected from these objects. Since the amplitude of the radar signals reflected from subsurface objects is proportional to the reflection coefficients from the boundaries of these objects, and the reflection coefficients themselves are determined by the degree of difference in the physical properties of these objects from the environment, then in this case we can observe the degree of difference between the observed objects and the environment. The greater the indicated difference (the larger the radar signals), the greater the degree of difference between the image areas corresponding to the indicated objects. Thus, the degree of reflectivity of the boundaries of subsurface objects (for example, the boundaries of layers of different soil) is represented by a color gamut and darkening (blackening) or color saturation of the areas of the picture corresponding to inhomogeneities. Weakly contrasting boundaries of some objects or layers in this case are suppressed by reflections from objects with strongly pronounced differences in their physical properties from the environment.


In fig. Figure 1.5 shows the mechanism for the formation of radar images of soil cross-sections using the example of a small section of a profile where reflected signals from two pipelines are observed.

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Several examples of work.


Search for underground passages.

The primary readings on the radar profile look like this:


Left and right - two pictures with different processing (primary simple processing).

On the left, an envelope of the hyperbola is automatically drawn (blue line) over the intended object.

Well, now - mathematical processing using our visualization program:


Left and right - two pictures with different processing (more complex mathematical filters).

Well, in conclusion, this is what the object itself looks like after archaeologists unearthed it:


I draw your attention: there is no metal inside the object!

Only stones, emptiness (air) and earth rocks (clay).

  • Like 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Math can work wonders.

Here in the picture on the left is the "primary radar screen".

and the second part (on the right) is the result of mathematical processing.

The object is visible - it is a cavity-decompaction under the ground (on the right).



  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Technogenic (human) objects.

in the picture below, a pit filled with earth and a ditch dug and then covered with earth (the radarogram was filmed across the ditch).

The pit on the left is surrounded by a white oval, the moat on the right is surrounded by a white oval.

The radar allows you to distinguish "mixed land" from untouched land.


  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

We have a test site where we test radars.

Look at the photo.

this is a long hole, inside which we placed a plastic bottle wrapped in aluminum foil.

As a result of our mathematical processing, the hole itself (voids) and the metal object inside are visible.


  • Like 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Steve Herschbach changed the title to Basics Of Ground Penetrating Radar

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Similar Content

    • By diggindaboot
      THIS !! All the people boo hooing will be in line to get one at that price point. It will also force the hand of ML with their price structure. ML raised their price on the 800 and NM absolutely crushed that price point. The Legend doesn't have to be better, just equal to turn the fortunes in their favor. ML and their arrogant "obsolete" charge is foolish. Obsolete by definition means no longer produced or used. Many detectorist and their single frequency machines are still out there making great finds and having fun. Furthermore, single frequency detectors are still being made and sold. NM build quality is far and away superior to the Nox detectors. 
    • By Gerry in Idaho
      I thought I was pretty damn good, but this technology has me beat.
      Might be time to invest?
    • By mcjtom
      Metal detectors often seem to have a 'Depth Gauge'.  How is it calculated? Is it the strength (or inverse of it) of the amplitude of the return signal?  So, for instance, everything else being equal, the 'deep' target would mean either a stronger target at greater depth or a weaker shallow target?
    • By GB_Amateur
      While we're all abuzz with the announcement and advertised feature and performance characteristics of the XP Deus II, I'm wondering about tests that distinguish between detectors' target separation abilities.  'Word on the street' is that in trashy iron sites, the original Deus is still the best available.  Presumably those reports are based upon in-field testing, which of course is the real proof.  But the downside is, (AFAIK) these are qualitative observations, not quantitative.  Subjectivity involved?  Unfortunately, yes.
      We do have Monte's Nail Board Test for a special case -- iron nails near a single coin, all in the same plane and typically all on the surface of the ground.  Add depth combined with some mineralization (burying the MNB) and you've included another real world dimension.  But in the field, multiple nearby targets are seldom in the same plane.
      So you hopefully see the purpose of this post.  Has anyone seen/tried other methods to better simulate actual in-field conditions to differentiate between competing detectors to best be able to handle trashy sites?
    • By Rick N. MI
      I mostly hunt in lakes and the bottoms are mostly all sand. A test on a sandy beach with the Equinox 800 and Xp Orx, both hit hard on a 14k 3.7 gram gold ring buried at 14". For mild ground I don't see a need for multi frequency. I do like the multiple frequencies on the Orx.
      Is there an advantage to multi frequency in mild ground?
    • By Steve Herschbach
      We have the Deus 2 just announced, Nokta/Makro Multi on the way, possibly the next generation Equinox from Minelab, and maybe even another Garrett multifrequency model to follow Apex, all coming in 2022. I guess we should even toss First Texas in there, as they just officially discontinued the CZ-3D, with the possibility something new will replace it soon. If this does not mean we are moving past single frequency, I don’t know what does. Or are we? There will no doubt always be a place for a finely tuned single frequency detector. However, if you consider Deus as selectable frequency, and Equinox as selectable/multi, then very many of us have already moved past a simple single frequency detector as our primary detectors.
      This is the thread to speculate on what is coming, where we are, and where we are headed. 2022 is shaping up as the year SMF (simultaneous multifrequency) finally takes off for real. In some detectors, it’s just companies chasing the latest marketing catchword. Multifrequency is only as good as the way it is implemented, otherwise we’d all have been swinging White’s DFX ages ago. It’s not enough to make a SMF detector, it also has to have genuine performance advantages. About the only given is that any multifrequency machine will outperform a single frequency on a saltwater beach. The rest, however, is very much up in the air.
      For some detailed explanation of the technology, and a history of past selectable and simultaneous multifrequency detectors, see my write up on Selectable Frequency And Multiple Frequency
      Where it all started, Fisher CZ-6 and Minelab Sovereign, both released in 1991. I think Fisher wins claim to being first, since Minelab takes a swipe at them in their Sovereign introduction. Notice how the misdirection on transmitted versus received and processed started on day one. 

      Fisher CZ-6 Quicksilver. The technology: Dual frequency Fourier Domain Signal Analysis. Patented state-of-the-art analog/digital electronics transmit two VLF signals (one 5 kHz, one at 15 kHz) deep into mineralized soil. The receiver circuitry had two ground compensated target signals to analyze, compare and identify. The result? Deeper targets, more accurate target identification. Wet sand is no problem for the CZ-6, it compensates for salt and ground mineralization simultaneously! Source Fisher CZ-6 Datasheet

      "The Sovereign" is the first of the latest generation of metal detectors from Minelab featuring Minelab's new technology called Broad Band Spectrum or BBS for short. This revolutionary new technology which is unique to Minelab has already been awarded patents in the USA, Canada and Australia and has several pending. Unlike other metal detectors which operate at just one frequency, or even the "newest" two frequency machines, "The Sovereign" actually transmits over a wide spectrum of frequencies. The resulting signal that is received from a target buried in the ground is processed by a microprocessor that removes interference caused by ground mineralization which limits the depth at which targets can be found, and often results in inaccurate target identification. The remaining signal can then be analysed to determine the actual composition of targets even if they are deeply buried, or if the ground is mineralized or salt water is present. Thus it is the only detector that can simultaneously reject both salt and mineralization while at the same time accurately discriminating the target, making it ideal for black sand beaches and many desert areas. In many areas that are highly mineralized and have been heavily searched in the past, "The Sovereign" will prove that many of the valuable targets are still there waiting for a Treasure Hunter with the proper detector to locate them. Source Minelab Sovereign Instruction Manual
  • Create New...