Jump to content

Recommended Posts

I’m wondering which Equinox ( 600 or 800 ) would be the better for my use for what I do here in So Calif... mostly Beaches....any thoughts ? ?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Check the differences and think about the type of hunting you might do now and in the future. I hunt mostly beaches in Florida and never use the gold modes (but would if in Cali). Then there is the User mode which many people like but I don’t use it. And finally the number of frequencies in multi mode. Also do you need the WM08 module for your existing headphones?

Others will be able to give you specifics and check the youtube videos on this question.

Finally, I have hearing loss and the sound of crashing surf can interfere with hearing the detector. I had the included 800 wireless phones but they did almost nothing to isolate the surf sounds. I found a wireless set made by PAWW that included noise canceling and it works very well to reduce surf sounds. Make sure if you buy headphones that they are compatible with the Equinox bluetooth version. Lots of discussion on that.

It has taken my 2 years to get a good grasp of how to set up (and trust) this detector. If you have a friend or detecting club there it may shorten the learning curve.

Enjoy the search

FDF214D9-7097-4A6C-9C10-8949E55549C9.jpeg

  • Like 9
Link to post
Share on other sites

I'd say if your only use will be to hunt beaches, go for the 600 and put the money you'll save from not going for the 800 toward a decent set of waterproof headphones.  If you hunt the wet sand and in the water you'll want waterproof headphones.  I have the 800 and hunt everywhere.  I bought the LS Pelso waterproof headphones for the saltwater and freshwater beaches.  They've worked well.  Also, consider buying a carbon fiber shaft if you'll be in the salt water.

  • Like 5
Link to post
Share on other sites

The 600 is all you need on the beach but the headphones that come with it aren't very good and look dorky. They also aren't wireless. Expect to buy better headphones.

If you are planning on only going knee deep or shallower, you might as well get wireless headphones. This is assuming that you are confident enough to walk in the water without falling and getting them wet.

If you expect that you'll be submerging the detector or hunting in the rain, get waterproof headphones.

IMO, the 800 is worth it if you do a lot of dirt hunting. Wireless headphones plus the WM08 module, wider Recovery Speed range, Gold modes, two extra frequencies (20 and 40 kHz), etc.

  • Like 3
Link to post
Share on other sites

Hm - I'd choose the 800 over the 600 anytime.

Hunting the beach doesn't necessarily mean waterhunting shoulderdeep - you don't need waterproof headphones for normal beach hunting or hunting with waders. But the threadowner didn't specify his style of hunting...

I love the WM08, because I can use the headphones I like (that's also possible with a bluetooth aptx-ll receiver), I especially love the variable Tonebreaks and I do use the Userprofile once in a while. Even the Gold mode saved my butt one time, but I wouldn't call that a killer feature for "me".

  • Like 5
Link to post
Share on other sites

The 800 is a lot of more detector, and it's always nice to have some more power than is needed at the moment. And I won't miss bluetooth anymore. (Very nice feature!)

  • Like 4
Link to post
Share on other sites

One of the differences is no longer different. The 600 backlight brightness adjustment is now the same as the 800 through the latest software upgrade. One additional difference however is the recovery speed settings. The 600 is 1-3, the 800 is 1-8. Not a big issue, but, it can help in some junk infested areas to have a bit more adjustment. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Similar Content

    • By mn90403
      This is quite a video ...
       
    • By Nik11
      2 metal detectors under 1000$€£ 
      Both have won many compliments and have been talked a lot  since they were released in the market! Which one would YOU choose...? 🤔
    • By Northeast
      Having just spent a few days at the beach using the Equinox in beach mode and it performing so well I wondered if people use them for detecting salt lakes looking for gold.  Maybe a silly question? 
      My disclaimer is that I have never done that sort of detecting but have read many comments over the past few years about salt lakes being notoriously hard for detectors to handle. 
      Although the Equinox is a VLF and might struggle against a PI in mineralised ground, would it possibly have a distinct advantage in a high salt environ.  
      Steve H - thanks for shifting my other thread about beach detecting. Again, wasn’t sure about this one - Gold forum or Equinox?
      Cheers, N.E.
    • By mn90403
      Late this afternoon I snuck in a beach hunt.  It was very disappointing in the beginning.  The conditions were just great with a low tide but there was nothing much down low.  I began following the advice I gave Adam about Zig Zagging and it was only producing odd targets.  Sometimes the beach just doesn't have much to give you I began to say.  When I reached one of my good beaches after about a mile walk and the conditions weren't right it was time to return on the high side.
      This I did and I worked my way into a few coins rather than just trash and by now I had 3 cheap rings which I would have been 'satisfied' with had I gotten back to my car then but it was a great sunset again.  This time I didn't have my phone so no pictures of it.  I worked the high side for a bit with a grid and then I heard a little 1.  When I say 'little' I mean it was not very loud.  It was consistent and I was hopeful.  I don't get many 1's so in my first scoop I could see something sandy hanging from it and it had knots.  It wasn't exactly balled up but I could tell it was a chain and I was hopeful.
      I could see it ... GOLD!

      And when I got it home I was able to measure it.  It is 30 inches (a delicate link) that weighs 8.4 grams.

      That gives me some pause but I'll get it checked and modify the post if it is a fake.
      Here it is with the other junk from the hunt.

      Here is a hunt from 4 days ago when there was a lot less than today.

      Mitchel
    • By BGRIVER
      So after returning the gold Kruzer to kellyco, I decided to go with an equanox 800 instead, thanks to Kellyco for hooking me up with a good deal! They took care of me! What coil is a good second coil? What do u use it for. I'll be in the river mostly and at the beach around 3 times a year. 
    • By longbow62
      In the last week I have found 12 silver coins at some incredible depths with the Equinox 800. Dimes, quarters, and wheat cents at up to 12". Both Park1 and Park2 have been used depending on the soil. I think Park1 may be a little deeper than Park2. Regardless of which Park program I use I run Iron Bias in F2-0-1, Multi 5 tones, Recovery 4, Sensitivity 22-24 if EMI is low, but even at 20 I have achieved some incredible depths. I've had buddies swing over these with Etrac's and CTX's with large coils and they can't touch some of these deep coins. One buddy used his Etrac, Deus, and Anfibio and was skunked on the deep silver at this place.   
×
×
  • Create New...