Jump to content

Recommended Posts

On 4/14/2021 at 1:48 PM, Jonathan Porter said:

My lad (Josh) having a play with the GPX6000. 

 

 

Awesome thanks JP 🙂 Thats just the 6000 speaker? Sounds nice and loud!

Did you experiment with your booster at all or wasnt one needed?

I use your B&Z boosters with my 7000 and love them.....find I get better control of the audio by using the booster. I actually run the 7000 directly to the booster via cable 🙂

I never detect with headphones due to fear of wild dogs.....would rather hear them before the pounce on my back 😉

I will probably end up trying the 6000 via 1/8 to 1/4 inch cable directly to the booster, then dual speakers :)....unless the speaker is that good that I dont need a booster.

  • Like 1
  • Oh my! 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 316
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Posts

The 6000 does what the 5000 can do depth wise on larger gold even slightly better, but what’s the point of providing it that way to the market when there is already something much better out there for

Minelab is basically just trying to create their own social media. That's what "detexperts" are, and that's why they are choosing their own no-name relic hunting channels to give exclusive looks into

I think these pictures sum up the GPX 6000 very concisely and also how I feel about those people who continue to suggest my input is biased or just marketing hype!! Tiny piece at stupid depth for

Posted Images

Well maybe not one video but maybe say 3 on the functionality of the 6000 cutting out the spin, gloss and actors then having some regional highly experienced experts give their take on the 6000 with some tips on what to expect for their particular region without a dictated script.

I would love to see Minelabs marketing plan (not to be confused with advertising plan) - if they have one -to understand their rational behind their fairly disjointed product launch of what is a extremely important product for the company. I'm guessing their prime focus is technology and product development with marketing possibly being a bit of a poor cousin afterthought.

Anyway can't wait to pick up my 6000 on Monday - hopefully it will turn out to be as good as the girl of my dreams.

Beach detecting I always get asked what has been my best find - I always say my wife - it gets a laugh from the ladies.

 

  • Like 2
Link to post
Share on other sites
3 hours ago, VicR said:

Well maybe not one video but maybe say 3 on the functionality of the 6000 cutting out the spin, gloss and actors then having some regional highly experienced experts give their take on the 6000 with some tips on what to expect for their particular region without a dictated script.

I would love to see Minelabs marketing plan (not to be confused with advertising plan) - if they have one -to understand their rational behind their fairly disjointed product launch of what is a extremely important product for the company. I'm guessing their prime focus is technology and product development with marketing possibly being a bit of a poor cousin afterthought.

Anyway can't wait to pick up my 6000 on Monday - hopefully it will turn out to be as good as the girl of my dreams.

Beach detecting I always get asked what has been my best find - I always say my wife - it gets a laugh from the ladies.

 

ha ha wife and anchor in one beach find ........🤪🤪   👩‍🦳 🤿

  • Like 1
  • Haha 3
Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm happy to say the 6000 really does exist.

I picked one up yesterday from JP's shop, The Outback Prospector in Clermont.

First impressions, well packed but not ridiculously entombed in plastic, nice and light.

It takes a few hours to give the battery full initial charge so allow for that when you purchase one.

Bluetooth headphones are nice quality and charged fairly quickly by USB from my laptop.

Looking forward to using it in the paddock but need to wait a couple of days till my knee fixes itself.

  • Like 7
Link to post
Share on other sites

Well I have a 6000 in my hot little hands :)...technically its back in the box..

Wont get a chance to get out until next weekend but very excited!

So light, oh so light!!

cant wait to take it out and see how it goes.

I can actually hear my shoulders thanking me :)

  • Like 4
Link to post
Share on other sites

I suspect that most prospectors who actually just hold a GPX 6000, and give it a few swings.... are going to want one.

minelab-gpx-6000-gold-nugget-detector-gpx11-coil.jpg

  • Like 3
Link to post
Share on other sites

 

Looks like the GPX 6000 can find the tiny gold and the large gold in Australia!

https://www.prospectingaustralia.com.au/forum/viewtopic.php?id=34961&p=23

 

Hey mate 8 nuggets today from a patch i've been flogging since 2002.Thought there would be bugger all left but there they were, nice bright signals.
Amazing machine quiet in hot ground,light and if it's metallic you'll hear it.I found a 1.34g nugget nearly 11 measured inches in depth and the signal was loud and clear.Have fun with it when it arrives.

image.png.b3c1739b70f49807885a24ddd14852dd.png

Edited by cobill
  • Like 3
  • Oh my! 2
Link to post
Share on other sites
On 4/11/2021 at 9:13 PM, jasong said:

Cracks me up how they say outright (accurately) that almost no one bothered to learn how to use their prior machines correctly:

"For a product with multiple ground balance timings, multiple coils, and various other settings, it is usually assumed that the user fully understands the behaviour or characteristics of various timings, coils and other settings and has knowledge about the soil he/she is interrogating, and selects the proper timing, the proper coil, and other proper settings. The assumption is incorrect for most users.:laugh: 

Salty, Minelab! But true. Just gave me a chuckle.

Also: further evidence of this being for gold machines even though they used coins as a test is their depth result on an Australia dime was 18"+! Pretty sure the EQ/CTX range can't do that.

Jason,

I've thought about this quote a while since I've read it.  Now I am reading some of the expert testers such as JP and Nenad show their results and tell of their feedback provided to Minelab to make this detector as good as it can be and also simple.

Based upon their results as experts I would say that there is not anyone who has been able to tame their detectors completely.  These experts are now finding nuggets in patches long flogged by all other detectors and detectorists before.  No matter how many passes and how many timing adjustments and settings adjustments are made there is still unseen gold.

This was proven to me quite conclusively at one of Gerry's metal detecting classes.  He took several different detectors, gold nuggets and specimens and passed them over the different coils in AIR TESTS and not all the nuggets could be seen.  You can only imagine what is not seen by even the best detectorists with some salt and mineralization.

Minelab is 'blaming' its customers for 'holes' in its previous detecting technology.  When you take the new technology and place it in the hands of experts and they find gold where no gold could be found with the old technology then it is not operator error.

I'm glad for their improvements because they are not making any new gold nugget patches.  You can go out and recover gold from old patches and because of its light weight maybe get to an unswung piece of ground with some virgin nuggets.

Mitchel

  • Like 2
Link to post
Share on other sites
47 minutes ago, mn90403 said:

You can only imagine what is not seen by even the best detectorists with some salt and mineralization.

That there is exactly why I'm still looking at how the 6000 does in the field. I could care less about a thousand tiny dinks, my GPZ and 8"/10" finds them smaller than I care to hassle with already. It's truly a waste of time in my mind to spend all that effort recovering a 0.02 grammer that I can barely see, unless I'm just looking for patch leads. And my GB2 and GM1000 are lighter and just as sensitive for hard rock stuff (plus have discrim) when I need that.

I think the bulk of what's left for decent finds in old patches are going to be pulled out of places where salt and heavy mineralization are masking them (and trash, but we aren't there yet with discrim). I really can't believe there is no salt performance data at all on the 6000, or that I seem to be the only person on this forum asking for it or interested in it! 1000 dinks, bleh. 5" deeper on a 2 grammer in NNV alkali? I'd have been 1st on the waiting list with whatever dealer could get it in my hands first if I knew there was some performance like that to be had.

Anyways, I think the 6000 will recover a metric ton of tiny dinks in the major goldfields, I know they are there because I was recovering them with my 8" in pretty much every patch I revisted. But 1000 0.03 gram dinks is only 30 grams, not even a troy oz. So, I think the 6000 will definitely be great for those who struggle to find stuff or just want a bit of color on weekend trips, but I'm still waiting to see the money with regards to the improvements in salt and bad ground where the paying finds are likely at.

  • Like 3
Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, mn90403 said:

When you take the new technology and place it in the hands of experts and they find gold where no gold could be found with the old technology then it is not operator error.

That’s what is expected of the experts, since they understand the controls, and are getting close to best performance out of each machine. Minelab is not “blaming” anyone; they are simply stating a fact I’ve observed countless times watching other operators. The number of people who own GPX machines, and have very little clue as to how to use them properly is quite high, and this despite people like JP putting out training tapes. The fact is the machines are complex, and it should not surprise anyone that skilled operators are the minority. From what I’ve seen, a lot of people learn just as much as it takes to get them going halfway well, then it’s off to the races. Making machines that will eliminate this complex learning can only help the majority of people be better detectorists. 

  • Like 4
Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Similar Content

    • By Steve Herschbach
      ....... is that they lack any Geosense!  Sorry, could not resist, just having too much fun with this.

    • By 1515Art
      If this has been posted here already I missed it, sorry.
      But, wow... 
       
    • By mn90403
      Get a GPX 6000 to use on your old patches before someone else does!  You will be glad you did.
    • By Steve Herschbach
      I was on the team, as were Nenad and JP. Any others here? In any case, if you have specific questions about the GPX 6000, ask away, and get straight answers. If it violates our NDA expect to be told so. In general, Minelab simply does not want how they make the sausage advertised to one and all. So don’t ask about how the sausage got made, or why it tastes like it does. That part is done, and we can’t talk about it anyway. Is the machine perfect? No. But I’ll tell you what, it’s a sweetie for sure. I smell a detector classic, simple, to the point, powerful, gets the job done. That being the case, everyone who took part in it is pretty proud of the final effort. My part was modest, I’m sure, but I for one will be bragging about it for as long as I’m around. Congratulations to Minelab and the entire team. My special thanks to Eng and Simon. 👍🏼
      So any questions about the best little detector ever (just go with it)?  Yes, I do think that if a person can afford it, then this machine is the machine to have right now for the U.S. If you are like me, you can ditch everything else, use the GPX 6000 exclusively, and be a nugget slayer. Add a Gold Monster or Equinox 800 with discrimination for nugget detecting perfection.
       


      Minelab GPX 6000 Data & Reviews
      Minelab GPX 6000 Accessories and Spare Parts
      Minelab GPX 6000 Owner’s Manual
    • By Steve Herschbach
      More on coils. The tops are just to shed debris and attach to detector.
      GPX11 mono, exactly 11" diameter, 562 grams coil and cable only (no scuff cover or coil bolt)

      Minelab GPX11 mono coil underside
      GPX14 DD, exactly 14" diameter, 892 grams coil and cable only

      Minelab GPX14 coil underside
      GPX17 mono, exactly 17" x 13", 802 grams coil and cable only

      Minelab GPX17 coil underside
      GPX 6000 lower rod
      21.5" long, 17.7 mm (0.70 in) diameter tube, 1 mm wall thickness, end 0.90 in width, round washer part# 4005-0117

      I've suggested to steveg that a 24" rod would be a nice option. Have to take care of the tall people! 
      Minelab GPX 6000 Data & Reviews
      Minelab GPX 6000 Accessories and Spare Parts
      Minelab GPX 6000 Owner’s Manual
×
×
  • Create New...