Jump to content

GPZ 7000: Threshold Vs Sensitivity Vs Volume Vs Volume Limit (with Discussion On Audio Smoothing, Coil Control, Range Of Motion And Manual Ground Balance)


Recommended Posts


Also, I will add that when you look at what the 6000 is doing, near as I can tell anyways, it's emulating this sort of setting philosophy. Which is what almost all serious, successful detectorists I've ever met do automatically on their own.

First - find the best timing. Second, find the highest stable sensitivity for the ground, EMI, and timing. Third, adjust (or potentially eliminate in the case of the 6000) the threshold. You are the "computer" adjusting these settings as needed with the GPZ though. Adjust as needed through the day as your environment changes.

The user can adjust audio as they see fit, but that makes little difference as to what the detector itself hears. The most important thing is to adjust the detector such that it hears the maximum number of target signals while still being stable (emphasis on the stable part). Audio adjustment comes after that to process the cacophony into something easier for the human brain to process, which varies greatly from 1 detectorist to the next.

Edit: I am writing this all with the caveat that 95% of my detecting is in Normal. JP has posted many times that Difficult is inherently high gain built into the timing. So results may be different there. So, Australian or other very hot ground users this may not apply to, I am not sure since I don't have enough field experience in Difficult to say one way or another.

  • Like 7
Link to comment
Share on other sites

40 minutes ago, jasong said:

Normal loves high sensitivities. When the ground thaws, do your own testing on test nuggets rather than taking my word for it. The difference between 18 Sensitivity and 10 Sensitivity is huge. There is no ground, and no part of the USA which I have found any place necessary to run below 12 gain where you can't get better performance by instead running higher Sensitivity and using audio to process the boosted signal isntead. RX Sensitivity is the first thing you want to maximize because if it's too low then your detector will simply miss entirely a lot of deeper nuggets. 

This is a matter of opinion. I prefer to run sensitivity in more conservative ranges but keep all filtering off, whenever possible, and make adjustments to volume/treshold if needed. Works great for me.  An to quote the "man with the ring":

" High Yield Normal has oodles of sensitivity even with sensitivity set to 9. Do not be afraid to lower the Volume right down to 4 or 5." (JP)

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, afreakofnature said:

 

Yes, I have read the manual.  Over and over. Plus I have also done what Northeast has done and basically inserted a lot of DP, Knowledge Base and TreasureTalk articles based on a couple months of research.  I have used the Z for about 3 years now too.  I plan on posting this "revised" manual in the future for everyone to have.  I am hoping it will be kind of like a wiki that others would want to add to so all the content is in one PDF.  But before I do that I want to have a good "grasp" on how to adjust these controls for ZVT perfection (based on the ground you are in).

Hopefully some videos will roll in. Fingers crossed.

Great conversation and info. One of the reasons I contacted ML USA was because of all the manual "vagueness/weakness" on Ground Balance, which was the #1 issue for me...if you don't have excellent GB, you will miss alot of gold! I asked the ML experts on the phone in Australia to send out a Knowledge Based article on GB and nothing, nothing, nothing has been sent to GPZ customers! But not for JP, we would be totally lost & frustrated.😕

This is the #1 reason (totally frustrated) I sold my GPZ and "on the list" for the GPX-6000.

Bill  

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

jasonG and Gold Catcher:  Lets stick to these "standard" settings that I first listed just so when talking about the 4 controls of the topic we don't get side tracked, because "Yes" when changing Gold Mode or Ground Type or Adding filters this will affect the 4 controls we are discussing and need to be adjusted accordingly.  Just don't want to get off topic is all and go down the wrong rabbit hole.  

Noise Canceled.  Gold Mode: High Yield.  Ground Type: Normal.  Ground Balanced with Semi Auto.  No filters - Audio nor Ground Smoothing.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, jasong said:

Sensitivity seems to be the thing that you and other new people I see posting in other threads not entirely undertstanding, but I think I can help you there.

Sensitivity is the amount of gain the RX circuitry applies to the signals which the RX coil lobes detect from the ground. These are not audio signals, these are electromagnetic signals. Sensitivity is controlled by an EM frequency amplifier while audio is controlled by an audio frequency amplifier. Two completely seperate things. Think of a radio and an antenna, very similar thing happening. An FM radio has both an FM frequency amplifier and an audio (volume) amplifier. Does turning up your volume do anything at all to a weak FM radio signal? No, because the audio amplifier is not amplifying the actual radio signal, it only amplifies the demodulated audio signal. So increasing the volume without increasing the FM amplifier gain will only amplify static noise (EMI) and not the radio station you are trying to hear (the nugget). To pick up more distant or weak radio signals (nuggets) you either need a better antenna (different coil) or a stronger radio frequency amplifier (more gain/sensitivity).

Sensitivity (aka Gain) determines how sensitive your machine is to weak signals. All the audio (volume) amplification in the world won't make a signal appear which the RX circuitry is not strong enough to amplify. More Sensitivity however will allow the detector (and thus the audio circuitry, and eventually your ear) to hear signals which it cannot hear at all at lower Sensitivities.

But! RX gain/sensitivity also amplifies any signal the coil is picking up, including EMI. Which is why people like myself use the audio controls to adjust for and control the amount of noise you hear. I always, always, always run as much Sensitivity as possible for the conditions, then use the audio controls to compensate for noise. When you read the manual, this is exactly why those controls exist, and how the GPZ appears to be designed to be used.

And this is why I have said since 2015 that it's better to run in as high of Sensitivity as you can, and then to tamp it all down and control the mess with the audio controls. Even in high EMI environments like we have often in the USA. Because running low gains means you are eliminating a ton of signals that will never be heard at all by the detector, and thus will never be heard by you no matter how much you fiddle with the volume controls. The speed and method you swing a coil can often be used to differentiate target signals from EMI too. The biggest mistake I see new detectorists make is running low gains then thinking they are compensating by boosting volume controls up and then thinking they are gaining something more by boosting audio even further with an audio booster. All the volume boosting in the world will not amplify a signal that isn't in the detector to begin with because you are running Sensitivity/Gain too low.

That said, my experience (and I recently met another very experienced individual who independently has the same experience) is that past a certain level of Sensitivity, you will tend to boost more EMI than target response. In my experience, this level is at 18 Sensitivity. Going to 19 and 20 seems to exponentially increase the EMI while only linearly increasing target response. That's why in noisier parts of the US I find 18 Sensitivity to be the sweet spot, and you will see since 2015 this is what I've posted here. I can run 20 gain with some benefit in quieter parts of the country.

Normal loves high sensitivities. When the ground thaws, do your own testing on test nuggets rather than taking my word for it. The difference between 18 Sensitivity and 10 Sensitivity is huge when it comes to a nugget you can just barely hear at 10 or just beyond 10's detection range, it will be a sweet target at 18 often. There is no ground, and no part of the USA which I have found any place necessary to run below 12 gain where you can't get better performance by instead running higher Sensitivity (wet salt ground being the only single exception I've encountered, but this varies) and using audio to process the RX boosted signal isntead. RX Sensitivity is the first thing you want to maximize because if it's too low then your detector will simply miss entirely a lot of deeper nuggets. 

more on Sensitivity: See jasong's post above

Hey jasong.  That is an excellent way of describing it and I believe we are spot on with each other just described a little different.  Yours is much more accurate in the technical jargon, mine probably not so much, but I am nearly sure your FM radio analogy is the exact same.  Gain controls the INPUT (antenna strength) and volume controls the OUTPUT (overall loudness).  

jasong you have made some excellent videos in the past on US Miner (YouTube).  Care to make a quick one in regards to these 4 settings? 😉

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I suggest to go into JP's posts and read what he has written over the years on this topic. There is such a wealth of information in his posts and I highly recommend to read it. I don't think many questions will remain about GPZ settings after reading through his posts. He is by far the most qualified to speak on this topic. 🙂

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Gold Catcher said:

I suggest to go into JP's posts and read what he has posted over the years on this topic. There is such a wealth of information in his posts and I highly recommend to read it. I don't think many questions will remain after reading through his posts :). 

I have read them all, believe it or not.  It took a hell of a lot of time and I have read them more than once.  First when they were posted and then again doing all this research to make a complete GPZ manual.  As well as many others posts from this forum too.  It was a huge community effort to put all this out and then to take all that and for me to try to summarize it all up.  I will have most if not all of JP's posts in that PDF manual that I will eventually share.  This has been my winter time goal.  To become "completely" knowledgeable in ZVT and GPZ functions so when spring hits I can begin testing all of this and see what I might have missed because of my prior ignorance.

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, afreakofnature said:

I have read them all, believe it or not.  It took a hell of a lot of time and I have read them more than once.  First when they were posted and then again doing all this research to make a complete GPZ manual.  As well as many others posts from this forum too.  It was a huge community effort to put all this out and then to take all that and for me to try to summarize it all up.  I will have most if not all of JP's posts in that PDF manual that I will eventually share.  This has been my winter time goal.  To become "completely" knowledgeable in ZVT and GPZ functions so when spring hits I can begin testing all of this and see what I might have missed because of my prior ignorance.

What a great motivation and attitude. The more you know about your detector the better you will use all available settings to your advantage! I find the GPZ to be an incredible versatile machine. Although each of us have their own to go settings, no settings are universally applicable for all situations. Knowing the underlying principles for each function and how they relate to each other will make you an expert. Alot of gold is waiting for you 🙂 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, jasong said:

Sensitivity seems to be the thing that you and other new people I see posting in other threads not entirely undertstanding, but I think I can help you there.

Sensitivity is the amount of gain the RX circuitry applies to the signals which the RX coil lobes detect from the ground. These are not audio signals, these are electromagnetic signals. Sensitivity is controlled by an EM frequency amplifier while audio is controlled by an audio frequency amplifier. Two completely seperate things. Think of a radio and an antenna, very similar thing happening. An FM radio has both an FM frequency amplifier and an audio (volume) amplifier. Does turning up your volume do anything at all to a weak FM radio signal? No, because the audio amplifier is not amplifying the actual radio signal, it only amplifies the demodulated audio signal. So increasing the volume without increasing the FM amplifier gain will only amplify static noise (EMI) and not the radio station you are trying to hear (the nugget). To pick up more distant or weak radio signals (nuggets) you either need a better antenna (different coil) or a stronger radio frequency amplifier (more gain/sensitivity).

Sensitivity (aka Gain) determines how sensitive your machine is to weak signals. All the audio (volume) amplification in the world won't make a signal appear which the RX circuitry is not strong enough to amplify. More Sensitivity however will allow the detector (and thus the audio circuitry, and eventually your ear) to hear signals which it cannot hear at all at lower Sensitivities.

But! RX gain/sensitivity also amplifies any signal the coil is picking up, including EMI. Which is why people like myself use the audio controls to adjust for and control the amount of noise you hear. I always, always, always run as much Sensitivity as possible for the conditions, then use the audio controls to compensate for noise. When you read the manual, this is exactly why those controls exist, and how the GPZ appears to be designed to be used.

And this is why I have said since 2015 that it's better to run in as high of Sensitivity as you can, and then to tamp it all down and control the mess with the audio controls. Even in high EMI environments like we have often in the USA. Because running low gains means you are eliminating a ton of signals that will never be heard at all by the detector, and thus will never be heard by you no matter how much you fiddle with the volume controls. The speed and method you swing a coil can often be used to differentiate target signals from EMI too. The biggest mistake I see new detectorists make is running low gains then thinking they are compensating by boosting volume controls up and then thinking they are gaining something more by boosting audio even further with an audio booster. All the volume boosting in the world will not amplify a signal that isn't in the detector to begin with because you are running Sensitivity/Gain too low.

That said, my experience (and I recently met another very experienced individual who independently has the same experience) is that past a certain level of Sensitivity, you will tend to boost more EMI than target response. In my experience, this level is at 18 Sensitivity. Going to 19 and 20 seems to exponentially increase the EMI while only linearly increasing target response. That's why in noisier parts of the US I find 18 Sensitivity to be the sweet spot, and you will see since 2015 this is what I've posted here. I can run 20 gain with some benefit in quieter parts of the country.

Normal loves high sensitivities. When the ground thaws, do your own testing on test nuggets rather than taking my word for it. The difference between 18 Sensitivity and 10 Sensitivity is huge when it comes to a nugget you can just barely hear at 10 or just beyond 10's detection range, it will be a sweet target at 18 often. There is no ground, and no part of the USA which I have found any place necessary to run below 12 gain where you can't get better performance by instead running higher Sensitivity (wet salt ground being the only single exception I've encountered, but this varies) and using audio to process the RX boosted signal isntead. RX Sensitivity is the first thing you want to maximize because if it's too low then your detector will simply miss entirely a lot of deeper nuggets. 

I havent lowerd the sensitivity/gain below 20 for years😉

I adjust my swing speed to compensate for ground noise and emi is just music to my ears. If you watch my mountain goat gold vid or any vid of me detecting youll hear how noisy I run my detetctor.

My philosopy is that since I own a ferrari Im going to drive a ferrari... and drive it HARD and push it to its limits and test mine 😍

  • Like 8
  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • The title was changed to GPZ 7000: Threshold Vs Sensitivity Vs Volume Vs Volume Limit (with Discussion On Audio Smoothing, Coil Control, Range Of Motion And Manual Ground Balance)

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...