Jump to content

Recommended Posts

I guess we can’t add videos to our posts?  Anyway, the default  setting FE and F2 is 2.  I set out a gold ring, old square I ron nail, and quarter. With FE or F2 set at defaults of 2, it seems to mask these targets.  Set to zero all is good.  (This is an EQ600). This seems to contradict the original videos that came out when the detector did.  Beach2 program.

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

14 hours ago, bklein said:

I guess we can’t add videos to our posts?  Anyway, the default  setting FE and F2 is 2.  I set out a gold ring, old square I ron nail, and quarter. With FE or F2 set at defaults of 2, it seems to mask these targets.  Set to zero all is good.  (This is an EQ600). This seems to contradict the original videos that came out when the detector did.  Beach2 program.

I believe you can post links of your videos from video hosting sites such as YouTube.


I would need more information on your particular setup, but I have really not seen the masking with F2 be as severe as it was with FE.  I have seen video tests that demonstrate that.  See this discussion and video by Steve Herschbach that goes into depth on the subject.  

 

To me, use of iron bias is not an either/or, all or nothing setting.  It is site and situation dependent.  I like to start with the recommended default setting (2 for 600, 6 for 800) and adjust from there.

I find that I am more likely to dig a falsing ferrous target without it than be surprised by a masked target with it engaged, in my experience.  I still generally dig the iron even with iron bias, when I have sufficient time on site to grid and take my time.  But when I am limited in time on site, like a one and done situation, I would rather play the odds with a rare masking situation than waste my time digging falsing nails and big iron the whole time at an iron infested site.  
 

Appropriate coil control and use of wiggle to zero in on adjacent targets is essential, as well as compensating by using the appropriate recovery speed to counter any severe masking effects.  Again, without seeing your video I have no idea what your setup was.  One drawback to the 600 is that the maximum selectable recovery speed is 3 which equates to an 800 recovery of 6.  I sometimes run recovery speed up to 7, if necessary.  

Also, I recommend running your tests in other modes and at IB 1 as well.  IB does a great job on falsing crown caps at the beach BTW (but there are other “tells” on those too).  HTH

 

 

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
10 hours ago, Chase Goldman said:

I find that I am more likely to dig a falsing ferrous target without it than be surprised by a masked target with it engaged, in my experience.  I still generally dig the iron even with iron bias, when I have sufficient time on site to grid and take my time.  But when I am limited in time on site, like a one and done situation, I would rather play the odds with a rare masking situation than waste my time digging falsing nails and big iron the whole time at an iron infested site.  

I just want to elaborate, some. 

I doubt many here have the experience with iron targets on a salt beach, as the Mexican 1-2 and 5 peso coin are ferrous. I can easily run into 70 of these a day. 

So here is what I have learned. The higher the sensitivity and lower the IB the more iron wrap around occurs. 

I have learned to hunt in one tone. I think there are multiple advantages [for another thread] But for this thread I will discuss one. 

One tone allows for the best way to identify iron. With the detector in beach 2, IB FE6,  and recovery 6. It is beyond easy to almost identify iron 100% down to depths I have never seen.  I repeat, down to depths I have never seen. 

I do hunt mostly in Discrimination but any kind of a tick gets investigated in the horseshoe mode.  Here looking at the target from all directions for ANY breakdown of the target or double sound will be your indication of Iron.  

For me the TID is only a small part, how the target sounds in horseshoe mode is the bigger part. ANYTHING and repeat anything that single rings is getting dug, PERIOD. A single ring is non-ferrous 99% of the time!   

I guess to the OP, never have I had a surprised masked target. Not saying it could not happen. But there are so many variables. Checking your targets from different angles can tell a story. 

  • Like 2
Link to post
Share on other sites
5 hours ago, Chase Goldman said:

I find that I am more likely to dig a falsing ferrous target without it than be surprised by a masked target with it engaged, in my experience.

Chase, I'm really having trouble figuring this sentence out.  Would you mind elaborating (or giving an example)?

 

Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, GB_Amateur said:

Chase, I'm really having trouble figuring this sentence out.  Would you mind elaborating (or giving an example)?

 

It simply means that even if the target is indicating fully ferrous with IB applied, if I have the time to dig it all, I’m going to dig it.  When I do do that, I have not encountered a completely masked non-ferrous target in the hole ever.  Yes, I have not dug every pure ferrous target signal I’ve encountered, but all my “surprise” situations where I’ve pulled both ferrous and non-ferrous out of a hole have been iffy mixed ferrous/non-ferrous target signals with IB applied.

Setting IB=0 is a complete waste of my time in thick iron.  Guaranteed to be chasing numerous false signals which I am then willing to quiet down with IB and confidently play the odds that it will be highly unlikely that I will walk over a completely masked target.

 

  • Like 2
Link to post
Share on other sites

This is a great thread, and I am reading it intently.  The old site near my home is a mix of modern aluminum trash at more shallow depths, and old iron at deeper locations.  Running F2+0 this past weekend, here are a few of the high tone "iffy" signals I dug (clad quarter added for size reference).  I didn't try increasing the F2 reading as outlined above and in Steve's thread/video... but will do some testing along those line next weekend.  I was hoping for a surprise deep silver.. but instead... deep iron... all at 10"+.

 20210301_185747.thumb.jpg.e3e489d561a419d1783ca5cef575d9a0.jpg

So I'm torn... in one case... passing these signals up as iron would be nice (and especially on Chase's comments that he hasn't yet been surprised by an iron false being a coin - if I am reading his comment correctly - and even if they exist, they are rare).  But on the other hand... I could see how a nearby coin would be completely over-shadowed by iron of this size (and rust) at those depths... so passing on the iron might completely mask a smaller high conductive target at similar or more depth.  

Technically, I'm not anywhere near where you Chase, or you GBA are... but your comments - as well as all the comments on the linked post started by Steve... while drinking from a firehose in some cases... some of the "water" is getting in.... if nothing else, by sheer force.  ;).  

Thanks for the detailed and on-going education!

Tim.

Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, Chase Goldman said:

Setting IB=0....

Since you are one of the most precise posters here (maybe more than I :biggrin:), have I caught you in an ambiguous statement?  Or are FE=0 and F2=0 identical?  (We could assume that, but assuming metal detecting companies are logical is one of the biggest erroneous assumptions one can make, IMO.  At least no one's life is at stake making such an assumption, though.)

One thing I've learned from this thread is that I need to experiment more with Iron Bias.  My testing so far has either been (checked both FE and F2) at full max (= 9) vs. full min (= 0) on my Eqx 800.  I was looking for clear differences (max setting vs. min setting) and seldom found anything significant, the exception being partially rusted crown caps which particularly in F2 showed pronounced differences.  But I don't get many crown caps (and note I said 'rusted' since for my sites' recent drops are particularly unusual -- one every couple hours?).  Where I could be aided by iron biasing would be either for nails falsing in coin zones (those devils are everywhere) and probably sheet metal falsing in certain sites.

Fortunately for me the winter weather we've had the last couple weeks has turned to early spring!  Tomorrow, tomorrow, I love you, tomorrow.  Detecting is only a day away!!

  • Like 3
Link to post
Share on other sites
18 minutes ago, Tiftaaft said:

I was hoping for a surprise deep silver.. but instead... deep iron... all at 10"+.

Upper right looks like copper wire.  I find that a lot.  (But photos can fool.)  I make a groove with a triangular file to check for copper and its alloys on otherwise junk pieces that aren't attracted to a magnet.  What is that piece next to the quarter, some kind of weed eater head?  Looks pretty scary if it rotates!

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
49 minutes ago, GB_Amateur said:

Upper right looks like copper wire.  I find that a lot.  (But photos can fool.)

Yes, definitely copper wire, not.much you can do about that, especially at depth and coiled... that one sounded pretty sweet.  I just threw it in the picture.  Not iron for sure.  

49 minutes ago, GB_Amateur said:

What is that piece next to the quarter, some kind of weed eater head?  Looks pretty scary if it rotates!

That is some kind of lid I think.  It says "do not re-use" and "safety guard required" around the edge, and the mesh appears to be reinforcement to the part of the lid that has been broken away.  I haven't handled it much, as I think it may be asbestos mesh.  But no clue what it was in its original life.  

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Similar Content

    • By Gerry in Idaho
      I like detecting for a variety of gold and really enjoy finding the stuff many higher end detectors can't see.  I don't know yet, but feel the extra capabilities of the GPX-6000 will open up some of these areas I hunt with the VLF's to get even more of the gold and at greater depths or in worse soil conditions.  As long as I am getting more gold, I'm happy.  Will the new GPX-6000 see this kind of gold or act like all other PI's and the ZED and not see at all?
      I recently recovered this 4.2 gram speci with the EQ-800 while running the new CoilTek NOX 15" round.  My goal was to find a piece of gold with the 15" and I met that goal.
      Part of some other testing back at base proved why I still like to take 2 detector technologies in the field.  This particular beauty was found right in the middle of a GPZ-7000 grid area, along with 4 others while using different coils on the EQ-800.  All 5 pieces specimens have visible gold and a couple how quite a bit, but to the point.
      The reason I found them in that gridded area, is because the GPZ-7000 does not respond or on a couple right near 1" and that's it.  I teach folks this in my classes, as well as try to educate others on the goods and the bads of different detectors and technologies.  Sometimes I get detectorists who are good hunters with their detectors and have success, tell me I'm full of BS and their detector will find it.
      I made a post on my FB (Gerry McMullen) and shared a pic of the find along with the true comments of, the GPZ will not see it.  Between the private messages and or public posts, I was immediately informed by a few of BS and even told how I must not know the GPZ-7000.  One well known GP-3500 hunter even said he guaranteed his 3500 would hear it.  
      I know gold detectors and I know how to find gold with a variety of gold machines.  No I am not the best, but I most certainly can hold my own and I learn to adapt really fast to a new area.  Traveling to different states and countries to hunt for and find many different kinds of gold has helped elevate my detector knowledge and skill of many models of detectors and the differing Au rocks I have collected. 
      So here is hoping the GPX-6000 with it's GeoSensing can respond to this little beauty.  If it does, I know of some areas I'll be swinging the 6000.  If it is like the GP-3500, the GPX-5000 and the GPZ-7000 and misses it, that fine too, I know what they can't see and realize it,  I will also know where not to use the 6000.
      Bottom line for everyone.  Please learn the kinds of gold your detector is good at finding and what it is not, so you aren't wasting time  in those areas.  Or be sure you have at least 2 different detector technologies.

    • By dogodog
      My day started by taking my wife to breakfast and a trip to a local greenhouse. On our way back we drove by a place I have wanted to hunt for a while and couldn't because the owners were just not to friendly. But low and behold I noticed some new house development signs. I did a quick title search and found out it was sold and being developed very soon. So I grabbed my stuff and headed back to this 1830's house. Today was the first day since I got the 800 I could spend more than an hour and a half detecting. My first two hours were a pretty much a bust except a cool silver plate spoon and my wife texting me to see if I found anymore jewelry? (NO) I was getting a little frustrated and decided to focus on a small strip of grass (three feet wide) next to the driveway and an overgrown pasture. After five feet  I got an OK 28-29 signal that was kind of bouncy. First good coin popped out a 1905 barber quarter (yes) Things were looking up. I jumped across the driveway and hunted near a rather young pine tree. Two swings and boom a 24-26 and out comes a 1919 mercury. Things are getting interesting. I stood up after digging the merc, swung again got 23-24 at 9 inches out comes a coin that had me wondering what the hell is that. after a little quick cleaning I realized I had a 1832 classic head 1/2 cent. But this was no ordinary 1832 this has an over stamp with a cross and the initials FZ. It seems that it was stamped early in its life. I'm wanting to know if anyone has ever found a coin with stampings? I have found a lot of good coins, but this has now become my favorite. The day came to an end and I had to go and enjoy some burgers on the grill. 
      Almost forgot the spoon, Its an american airlines made in the 1930's with the shape of a dc-3 and the words flagship on it.








    • By dogodog
      Went to a local park today after work. Only had a couple of hours to detect and test out my new home made arm cuff. I wasn't a big fan of the plastic, and it was a little too wide and flexy for me. At this point I only have about 5 hours on the 800. The first hour today netted me a handful of clad and some misc. corroded zinc. The next hour was the same thing clad and junk. With only 15 minutes to chicken parm, I got a really nice 28-29, not expecting anything great, I proceeded to find out what it was. For a split second I thought it was another odd piece of stainless, But I quickly saw Tiffany and co. Wooooo Hoooooo. Now I had a good excuse for being a little late for dinner. My wife would never get mad for a Tiffany ring. It is about 6.16 grams and polished to like new. Oh and the cuff was a winner too. fits my arm and no slop. I made it out of an old no parking sign and the factory bottom section. It took me a few hours to create, but I'm happy with it. Have to give a shout out to Kac for the hand digger, Still works great and hasn't failed me yet.






    • By dogodog
      Well after a long frustrating wait for Nokta's  multi frequency machine, I could no longer wait or hold out. I received my new equinox 800 on the 19th and did some air tests and made a list of the VDI's and played with flipping the tones for my liking. After thinking the machine was just OK with some of my basic testing, It was time to run across the street to give it a run. I will tell you all that I have hunted this area to death with my MK. ( or so I thought) I only had 90 minutes to give its first test.  I decided to dig every target with an 18 or higher VDI.  Just trying to decifer my new sounds. First 5 min. netted some clad, but the next 85 broke all my records. first 3 coins after the clad were large cents, the next was a draped bust 1/2 cent (bucket 1) The next was a paper thin copper with a shield, could it be? Yes it was a New Jersey copper. I have been chasing this coin for years (bucket 2). Then a single button and an Israeli 1/2 shekel (not sure how that got there). I only had a few minutes left to hunt when I got a faint 18 on the nox and hit a button at 10 inches, But that wasn't all this hole had to give. It was like a button slot machine, 12 in all and total of 15 inches down. My wonderful wife called and I had to leave for dinner. I have to say the most impressive feature on the nox is the noise cancel, It made the site come back to life. As for settings, Park 1, sensitivity 17, and custom tone breaks and t1 - 1  t2- 25  t3 - 15  t4 - 10  t5 - 5  Tone sounds, I run them to get low tones on copper targets. Sounds odd I know, but it works for me. Have to say I'm impressed with the first 90 minutes I've run the 800.









    • By GB_Amateur
      Apparently these kinds of interviews have been occurring for a couple months with various detector experts (and dealers) around the world.  Except for a post buried in a thread (credit to Dances with Doves for calling my attention to these), which I didn't figure would reach the full audience, I think this is the first post of these four episodes with Gerry which were uploaded to YouTube on the 18th & 19th of April.  Basically each of the first three episodes covers the one of the new coils separately and sequentially:  5"x10" (~19 minutes), 9"x14" (~22 minutes), 15" round (~44 minutes) and a wrapup segment (~11 minutes).  I'm posting just the first one as each successive one is linked by Trevor at the end of the previous.  E.g. to see part 2 (9"x14" discussion) just move the video's scroll cursor to the end of part 1.  I watched episodes 1,2, and 4 in their entirety and the first 15 minutes of episode 3.  A lot of the general info is second nature to seasoned detectorists.  But there were a couple tidbits and I like being reminded now and then of the basic principles.
       
    • By bklein
      I am not liking my EQ600 with 15” coil and am wondering if it’s just my brain is too attached to my CTX, or if something is wrong with the coil or detector. I am noticing that the coil cable is being sensed if moved when I’m detecting so I did this little video test that uses my car as a ferrous background/target. If I move the cable with it in the background it senses the movement. But if I do it in air, no detection of the cable.  I’ve never seen this discussed or tried before so don’t know what to think about it.
       
×
×
  • Create New...