Jump to content

Recommended Posts

I guess we can’t add videos to our posts?  Anyway, the default  setting FE and F2 is 2.  I set out a gold ring, old square I ron nail, and quarter. With FE or F2 set at defaults of 2, it seems to mask these targets.  Set to zero all is good.  (This is an EQ600). This seems to contradict the original videos that came out when the detector did.  Beach2 program.

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

14 hours ago, bklein said:

I guess we can’t add videos to our posts?  Anyway, the default  setting FE and F2 is 2.  I set out a gold ring, old square I ron nail, and quarter. With FE or F2 set at defaults of 2, it seems to mask these targets.  Set to zero all is good.  (This is an EQ600). This seems to contradict the original videos that came out when the detector did.  Beach2 program.

I believe you can post links of your videos from video hosting sites such as YouTube.


I would need more information on your particular setup, but I have really not seen the masking with F2 be as severe as it was with FE.  I have seen video tests that demonstrate that.  See this discussion and video by Steve Herschbach that goes into depth on the subject.  

 

To me, use of iron bias is not an either/or, all or nothing setting.  It is site and situation dependent.  I like to start with the recommended default setting (2 for 600, 6 for 800) and adjust from there.

I find that I am more likely to dig a falsing ferrous target without it than be surprised by a masked target with it engaged, in my experience.  I still generally dig the iron even with iron bias, when I have sufficient time on site to grid and take my time.  But when I am limited in time on site, like a one and done situation, I would rather play the odds with a rare masking situation than waste my time digging falsing nails and big iron the whole time at an iron infested site.  
 

Appropriate coil control and use of wiggle to zero in on adjacent targets is essential, as well as compensating by using the appropriate recovery speed to counter any severe masking effects.  Again, without seeing your video I have no idea what your setup was.  One drawback to the 600 is that the maximum selectable recovery speed is 3 which equates to an 800 recovery of 6.  I sometimes run recovery speed up to 7, if necessary.  

Also, I recommend running your tests in other modes and at IB 1 as well.  IB does a great job on falsing crown caps at the beach BTW (but there are other “tells” on those too).  HTH

 

 

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
10 hours ago, Chase Goldman said:

I find that I am more likely to dig a falsing ferrous target without it than be surprised by a masked target with it engaged, in my experience.  I still generally dig the iron even with iron bias, when I have sufficient time on site to grid and take my time.  But when I am limited in time on site, like a one and done situation, I would rather play the odds with a rare masking situation than waste my time digging falsing nails and big iron the whole time at an iron infested site.  

I just want to elaborate, some. 

I doubt many here have the experience with iron targets on a salt beach, as the Mexican 1-2 and 5 peso coin are ferrous. I can easily run into 70 of these a day. 

So here is what I have learned. The higher the sensitivity and lower the IB the more iron wrap around occurs. 

I have learned to hunt in one tone. I think there are multiple advantages [for another thread] But for this thread I will discuss one. 

One tone allows for the best way to identify iron. With the detector in beach 2, IB FE6,  and recovery 6. It is beyond easy to almost identify iron 100% down to depths I have never seen.  I repeat, down to depths I have never seen. 

I do hunt mostly in Discrimination but any kind of a tick gets investigated in the horseshoe mode.  Here looking at the target from all directions for ANY breakdown of the target or double sound will be your indication of Iron.  

For me the TID is only a small part, how the target sounds in horseshoe mode is the bigger part. ANYTHING and repeat anything that single rings is getting dug, PERIOD. A single ring is non-ferrous 99% of the time!   

I guess to the OP, never have I had a surprised masked target. Not saying it could not happen. But there are so many variables. Checking your targets from different angles can tell a story. 

  • Like 2
Link to post
Share on other sites
5 hours ago, Chase Goldman said:

I find that I am more likely to dig a falsing ferrous target without it than be surprised by a masked target with it engaged, in my experience.

Chase, I'm really having trouble figuring this sentence out.  Would you mind elaborating (or giving an example)?

 

Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, GB_Amateur said:

Chase, I'm really having trouble figuring this sentence out.  Would you mind elaborating (or giving an example)?

 

It simply means that even if the target is indicating fully ferrous with IB applied, if I have the time to dig it all, I’m going to dig it.  When I do do that, I have not encountered a completely masked non-ferrous target in the hole ever.  Yes, I have not dug every pure ferrous target signal I’ve encountered, but all my “surprise” situations where I’ve pulled both ferrous and non-ferrous out of a hole have been iffy mixed ferrous/non-ferrous target signals with IB applied.

Setting IB=0 is a complete waste of my time in thick iron.  Guaranteed to be chasing numerous false signals which I am then willing to quiet down with IB and confidently play the odds that it will be highly unlikely that I will walk over a completely masked target.

 

  • Like 2
Link to post
Share on other sites

This is a great thread, and I am reading it intently.  The old site near my home is a mix of modern aluminum trash at more shallow depths, and old iron at deeper locations.  Running F2+0 this past weekend, here are a few of the high tone "iffy" signals I dug (clad quarter added for size reference).  I didn't try increasing the F2 reading as outlined above and in Steve's thread/video... but will do some testing along those line next weekend.  I was hoping for a surprise deep silver.. but instead... deep iron... all at 10"+.

 20210301_185747.thumb.jpg.e3e489d561a419d1783ca5cef575d9a0.jpg

So I'm torn... in one case... passing these signals up as iron would be nice (and especially on Chase's comments that he hasn't yet been surprised by an iron false being a coin - if I am reading his comment correctly - and even if they exist, they are rare).  But on the other hand... I could see how a nearby coin would be completely over-shadowed by iron of this size (and rust) at those depths... so passing on the iron might completely mask a smaller high conductive target at similar or more depth.  

Technically, I'm not anywhere near where you Chase, or you GBA are... but your comments - as well as all the comments on the linked post started by Steve... while drinking from a firehose in some cases... some of the "water" is getting in.... if nothing else, by sheer force.  ;).  

Thanks for the detailed and on-going education!

Tim.

Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, Chase Goldman said:

Setting IB=0....

Since you are one of the most precise posters here (maybe more than I :biggrin:), have I caught you in an ambiguous statement?  Or are FE=0 and F2=0 identical?  (We could assume that, but assuming metal detecting companies are logical is one of the biggest erroneous assumptions one can make, IMO.  At least no one's life is at stake making such an assumption, though.)

One thing I've learned from this thread is that I need to experiment more with Iron Bias.  My testing so far has either been (checked both FE and F2) at full max (= 9) vs. full min (= 0) on my Eqx 800.  I was looking for clear differences (max setting vs. min setting) and seldom found anything significant, the exception being partially rusted crown caps which particularly in F2 showed pronounced differences.  But I don't get many crown caps (and note I said 'rusted' since for my sites' recent drops are particularly unusual -- one every couple hours?).  Where I could be aided by iron biasing would be either for nails falsing in coin zones (those devils are everywhere) and probably sheet metal falsing in certain sites.

Fortunately for me the winter weather we've had the last couple weeks has turned to early spring!  Tomorrow, tomorrow, I love you, tomorrow.  Detecting is only a day away!!

  • Like 3
Link to post
Share on other sites
18 minutes ago, Tiftaaft said:

I was hoping for a surprise deep silver.. but instead... deep iron... all at 10"+.

Upper right looks like copper wire.  I find that a lot.  (But photos can fool.)  I make a groove with a triangular file to check for copper and its alloys on otherwise junk pieces that aren't attracted to a magnet.  What is that piece next to the quarter, some kind of weed eater head?  Looks pretty scary if it rotates!

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
49 minutes ago, GB_Amateur said:

Upper right looks like copper wire.  I find that a lot.  (But photos can fool.)

Yes, definitely copper wire, not.much you can do about that, especially at depth and coiled... that one sounded pretty sweet.  I just threw it in the picture.  Not iron for sure.  

49 minutes ago, GB_Amateur said:

What is that piece next to the quarter, some kind of weed eater head?  Looks pretty scary if it rotates!

That is some kind of lid I think.  It says "do not re-use" and "safety guard required" around the edge, and the mesh appears to be reinforcement to the part of the lid that has been broken away.  I haven't handled it much, as I think it may be asbestos mesh.  But no clue what it was in its original life.  

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Similar Content

    • By Tnsharpshooter
      My battery in my Nox  is fine.  I pursued ordering a battery.  Just for a spare and to seek out the process so I could share with folks.
      First I called number 1-877-767-6522 (Minelab customer service) and talked to lady named Julie.  Julie referred to the following number in PA - 814-283-4270 (Minelab repair center).  I called this number and spoke with gent named Dan Diehl.  He stated I was actually the first to buy Nox battery. He while I had him on phone had just realized the batteries were at their facility for sale.  Price is $30 USD.  He said total price including shipping was $39 for a nonsignature required usps delivery.  I used a credit card.  And that’s it.  So the number above for Dan is the number to call to buy battery for Equinox.
      As a side note I inquired about their repair backlog.  He said they were in good shape.  With only about a week of backlog repairs on hand.  I asked this due to possible lasting effects of Covid 19, plus I wanted to be able to share with folks accurate info.  In case some were not sending in their units for repairs fearing long wait times.
      Cheers
      David
       
    • By phrunt
      The 24k was relatively short lived by comparison of other US made detectors that seem to hang about on the market for 10 to 25 years, being a US detector it was a bit difficult for me to ever get my hands on one and I guess I was just too slow at making the move on one.  So I'm considering an alternative.  I like my Gold Monster but it is a bit simplified and I prefer more options so I just use it as a pinpointer, at the moment my primary prospecting VLF is the Equinox, I rarely use anything else.  I have a Gold Bug 2 but find it a bit primitive especially with features and I'd prefer a detector with Target ID's and the tiny gold improvement over the Nox I find is very minimal, the Nox has a great range of features and does a pretty good job but I'm wondering If I'd get a bit more out of a dedicated prospecting VLF with a higher frequency.  Am I losing much not using a 24k and sticking with my Equinox?
      The Nokta Gold Kruzer seems a viable choice, it's extremely cheap and sitting in stock at my local dealer, it has Nel coil support which I absolutely think is a major bonus, the Nel snake coil is made for it, and to me this seems the ultimate prospecting coil. I have it for my Fisher Gold Bug Pro but that detector just doesn't cut it for depth on small gold for me as I live in a place with a majority of the gold being very small.   I need a the best VLF for hot rocks possible.
      Why is it that Nokta detectors just aren't as popular, they seem to make a great range.  The Gold Kruzer and Gold Racer are what people have wanted in VLF prospecting detectors, aftermarket coil support, features dripping off them, quality builds and water proof and so on yet you don't see them as detectors people are using.  Why is this?  Steve H had a Gold Kruzer, Gold Monster etc, etc.... yet ended up settling on the 24k instead.  Is the 24k that much better than the Nokta?  What made the 24k the keeper and the Nokta the one to go.
      Would I be better off waiting to see what Garrett come out with, with any luck Nel will make coils for Garrett's version of a 24k.
      I've never owned a Notka, I am a bit puzzled why they make such feature packed and on paper great looking detectors yet people aren't using them. 
    • By Luis
      Acabo de ver estos auriculares en aliexpres. No estoy seguro de lo que valen, pero lo comparto por si le interesa un compañero. La verdad es que se ven bien
      Translation from Google Translate: 
      I just saw these headphones in aliexpress. I'm not sure what they're worth, but I'll share it in case you're interested in a partner. The truth is that they look good
       
      Plufy deportes auricular Bluetooth csr4.1 banda para el cuello auriculares apt-x estéreo Auriculares con micrófono piel Orejeras
      (Plufy Sports Bluetooth Headset CSR4.1 Neckband Headset apt-x Stereo Headset with Microphone Skin Earmuffs)
    • By Dan(NM)
      I spoke with Martha at Minelab this morning. The reason I called is, my machine is out of warranty and has been replaced three times since I bought it. I wanted to know how much it was going to cost to replace the pod and if the replacement was going to have a warranty. She told me it would cost $350 for a new replacement, or $225 for a refurbished unit. What she meant by refurbished, if someone returned a whole detector because of a faulty coil, shaft etc, they would send out that control pod if there are any available. I am still waiting to hear back from her on the amount of warranty that will come with the replacement pod. She wanted to double check on the amount of time before she gave me an answer. I have her permission to share this information on the internet forums.   
         
       
    • By Erik Oostra
      Some folk believe that their prayers are rewarded, others claim that if you ask the Universe for anything it’ll respond.. But when you need a new battery for your Foxy Noxy, these methods don't work anywhere near as good as keeping an eye out on Ebay..
      Since that awful day last month when the battery on my Nox 800 stopped charging I’ve considered many options, including an external power-pack (expensive), soldering the plug-in cable to other lithium batteries (deadly), and to keep on swapping with the battery from my Nox 600 (pain in ass)..
      This afternoon I searched on Ebay and scored two new Equinox batteries for just $50 (plus $10 postage).. That’s a new battery for Foxy Noxy and a spare for the unlikely event I ever need another one! Gotta love them win/win days..
       

    • By phrunt
      I stumbled across this video of the F75 finding a silver coin deeper than the Equinox, and then he goes on to show the F75 performing better finding a coin between iron.
      What are your thoughts on this one? I never did bother buying a F75 even though a SE edition came up for sale extraordinary cheap nearby to me, my experience with my T2 had me thinking my Nox was better in almost all situations, was I wrong?    I'm a bit puzzled by this video and I guess it could be soil conditions or something but I've found my Nox far better on deep silver than my T2 and I sure have experimented a lot on untouched in ground silvers.
×
×
  • Create New...