Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Normally I run the equinox in multi-frequency mode, but yesterday I tried to use it at 5Kz in field mode 1. Lately I am hunting with the Iron filters at 0, but I did not like it in the single frequency mode so I went to modify it and what was my surprise  it wouldn't let me enter the submenu to upload iron rejection.  I tried it with the partner's equinox in case it was a failure of mine and the same thing happened.  In single frequency mode it does not let you enter the iron rejection submenu.  Do you know what the reason is?

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes, the lack of Iron Bias in single frequency is described in the manual (p. 52) and has been discussed previously on the forum.  Iron Bias is implemented as part of Multi IQ signal processing and requires a multi frequency signal to get the required real-time, frequency dependent response information from the target for Iron Bias to do its thing.  Therefore, it is disabled in single frequency.

 

  • Like 3
Link to post
Share on other sites

In Multi IQ the I, In-Phase multiple signals which are more sensitive to iron signals from iron targets and especially iron mineralization are ignored and the  multiple quadrature signals which are mostly non-ferrous target signals are used to identify the target. The Iron Bias settings help provide user customizable iron identification adjustments when needed. 

In single frequency detection with the Equinox the ratio between both the I and Q signal are used to identify the target so no Iron Bias is necessary. 

  • Like 5
Link to post
Share on other sites
6 minutes ago, Jeff McClendon said:

In single frequency detection with the Equinox the ratio between both the I and Q signal are used to identify the target so no Iron Bias is necessary. 

Jeff I know you know this, but for the benefit of others, that last phrase (I.e., “no Iron Bias is necessary”) could be misinterpreted by folks to imply single frequency and use of I/Q ratio to ID targets is a superior ferrous target identifier, but actually the opposite is true.  It gets fooled frequently by wraparound and other single frequency limitations such that falsing is a significant issue in SF.  IMO if you are never using IB while operating in Multi (i.e., always leaving it at 0) you are leaving a significant, available tool on the sidelines. The ability to dial in F2 bias as necessary is a great feature.

  • Like 3
Link to post
Share on other sites

I totally agree.

Iron bias enhances the identification of iron signals using Multi.

The use of both I and Q signals in single frequency does not make the Equinox detect iron more accurately in my opinion or from experience. Others who use Equinox in single frequency in mild ground conditions may disagree. 

I rarely use the single frequency choice on the Equinox unless it is absolutely necessary due to EMI or if I want to experiment a little. My Equinox detectors stay in Multi frequency for all detecting with F2=0 or 1 for gold prospecting and F2= whatever I want to set it on for other detecting.

  • Like 4
Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Similar Content

    • By bklein
      I am not liking my EQ600 with 15” coil and am wondering if it’s just my brain is too attached to my CTX, or if something is wrong with the coil or detector. I am noticing that the coil cable is being sensed if moved when I’m detecting so I did this little video test that uses my car as a ferrous background/target. If I move the cable with it in the background it senses the movement. But if I do it in air, no detection of the cable.  I’ve never seen this discussed or tried before so don’t know what to think about it.
       
    • By longbow62
      I posted this on another forum other than Detector Prospector also. I feel Detector Prospector tends to be a bit more technical oriented than the other forum so I posted it here also.
      I am 100% all in on the Equinox. I like it so much I have 2 800's. My biggest gripe is how susceptible it is to EMI. Some of my best spots have EMI so bad I have to turn the Nox down to like 15 or below. I used to run a Nokta Impact in 14kHz as my main detector before I got the Nox and it had EMI issues also, but I don't remember it being quite as bad. I think the Nox is a much hotter detector than the Impact is. It's sure a lot deeper than the Impact. I don't have the problem everywhere so I know it's not a detector problem. Running a smaller coil helps some, but not a lot.
      So I've had an Etrac and never once did I have any audible EMI issues. Is it Multi-IQ that is susceptible or what?
      Do power companies check for EMI issues like bad connections or transformers that may be the culprit? Most of my issues have been in the older parts of towns where the power infrastructure tends to be much older.
      How many other people with the Equinox notice EMI is worse on it more than other detectors they use?  
    • By aerospace guy
      After following EQ's progression I decided to buy the 800 hoping for a "simpler" detector than the GPX5000 which I sold. Part of that decision was based on one of Gerry's posts along the lines of "I've found more with a sub $1000 machine than all the more expensive ones ". My 1st time out proved to substantiate the claims made that the EQ will find small gold and larger as I found what I classify when dry washing as a -20 and found a 4.29 gram nugget! This while not fully understanding how to operate the detector! Using the "quick start' and owners full manual I was able to succeed. I hope there are some comprehensive videos out now that I can access?
    • By F350Platinum
      Got a 600, been taking it to the beach every day. About 3-4 hours in with the sun beating down on it, the LCD display becomes hard to read. Should I get a hat for it? 😀 Seriously, is this a common issue? When I turn around and it's shaded somewhat or of I let it cool down for a bit the screen comes back, but it's annoying.
    • By Earth sweeper
      I have not done any updates to my Equinox 800 until tonight. I could only find 2 updates - 2.0 and 3.0. I did both updates. I thought there was an earlier update as well. Did they combine the earlier one with 2.0?
    • By 67GTA
      My brain has been programmed over the years by all the VLF detectors I've used, and their default operation. You had notch (absence of audio) and discrimination (absence of detection). Then with the Deus, I had to introduce the silencer paradigm into my brain. No problem, kind of a hybrid discrim/audio filter to keep you from hearing "iffy" signals. A higher silencer setting will only let strong/confident signals through. When I started using the Equinox, I only quickly skimmed through the manual and started using it. My brain automatically associated iron bias with iron discrimination, and the horseshoe button with a preset audio notch. Apparently I've been using it wrong. According to the manual, the iron bias is more like the Deus silencer setting, and the horseshoe button is a preset iron discrimination pattern. My brain started smoking while I was testing stuff in my yard. With the horseshoe button on and iron bias F2@9, I was still hearing an iron nail next to a dime. I was expecting the nail to be discriminated out because of the iron bias setting. It was just the opposite. The nail doesn't get detected with the horseshoe button off and doesn't even register on the screen because it's being discriminated out. Hopefully this helps some new or even old detectorists understand the Equinox better. Minelab and their manual are very vague about the Equinox technology. I assume this would also apply to the Vanquish series.
×
×
  • Create New...