Jump to content

Recommended Posts

I have an easy and maybe stupid question to present now...

Observing my TDI Bh, with both of the coils I own (the original 12" and the aftermarket Detech 8"), I can clearly see way too long wire around the shaft and I'm forced to make several loops up to the control box near the handle.

Supposing to measure the right lenght for the maximum extended shaft, and to cut away the hipmount mile long cable.....Am I doing a disaster or not?

I actually can't remember the technical cable's specs in the amazing pdf Steve posted time ago, but if I'm correct it talked about to reduce some current resistance with a slight performance improvement too...Have I seen a mirage or what?...

I'm not kidding 😜...

It's just me, looking for something to play with, suffering for a missed AQ. 

  • Like 2
Link to post
Share on other sites

As long as you make the connections properly and get a good seal on the finished item you will have no problems. Most coils will have extra wire on them so that they will fit what ever shaft it is on.

 

  • Thanks 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
8 hours ago, Skullgolddiver said:

I have an easy and maybe stupid question to present now...

Observing my TDI Bh, with both of the coils I own (the original 12" and the aftermarket Detech 8"), I can clearly see way too long wire around the shaft and I'm forced to make several loops up to the control box near the handle.

...

And it is the opposite with the Garrett Apex , their coil cables are too small for tall guys ...Just at the limit for me hopefully ... More testing from the manufacturers before delivering to the customers would probably be a good thing ... 🙂

  • Like 2
Link to post
Share on other sites

I have chopped off about 12” of my TDIBH cable.......no problems at all.

  • Like 2
  • Thanks 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
On 4/7/2021 at 6:00 PM, Skullgolddiver said:

current resistance with a slight performance improvement

I've tested, No performance gain due to the small amount cut off....18 inches a VLF and if I remember correct a subject over on (Findmall) Technology forum many years ago  .......

Only gain I have found .......  less chance of the cable moving or exposure to the conditions, with I have tried several different things, one was running the coil cable thru the shaft.. .. and exact length needed. (both pictured)

I love going thru and reading the old Findmall post with Eric, Wire Chief, Mr Bill, Reg...etc..

The capacitance and the resistance of the coil cable has to be taken into consideration as a total value of the coil.

Depending on the exact particulars, chopping off a lot of cable would change the way the electronics looks at the coil. Adding length would affect it also.

Now in reality I have chopped fairly good sized amounts off of cables in order to permanently pole mount the electronics box. The need to get rid of excess cable length was there. I have not noticed a drop off in performance, although it could happen depending on the unit.

Mr. Bill

 

Re: Coil Cable - straight or spiralled?
Frank Hamill
Date: August 19, 2002 08:43AM
 
One addition thing. In the other two PI's I owned in the water the currents of the ocean along with swinging against the resistance of the water cause the coil wire to move...when the coil wire would move the units would give target signals which were not there. After Terry told me about running the wire straight up it still moved in the currents. So I split malt straws and put them one by one around the straight up coil wire and taped them lightly...Falsing of that "type" stopped. A users answer to the problem. However this coil on the Goldquest SS does not need the straws as you put the connection next to the rod connection and straight up is no problem as the distance between the rod and the connection is mere nothing. On my other PI's the distance between connection and rod was several inches and allowed the movement of the coil which caused falsing. From a users standpoint who goes in the water this is a great feature that is needed to be put into coils that are used underwater.
Thank you again....Frank
Coil Cable - straight or spiralled?
Eric Foster
Date: August 19, 2002 04:19AM
 
Hi Frank and Larry,
Good to hear reports of the units performing well. There are always some surprises that come back from the field, though. Why running the coil wire straight up the pole rather than spiralled around, should make a difference to the field pattern has me puzzled. One of the properties of coax cable is that there is no external field generated by the cable. Does winding the cable clockwise give a different result to it being anti-clockwise?
How is this change in field pattern manifested?
Do other detectors show this problem?
Eric.

 

Re: Shorter coil cable question.
Eric Foster
Date: May 10, 2005 05:34PM
 
Hi Tommy,
Shouldn't affect it at all, as the capacitance of the coil/cable circuit will be reduced.
Eric.

gpro (3).jpg

Frankensovereign (3).jpg

  • Like 4
  • Thanks 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
On 4/10/2021 at 7:51 AM, Joe Beechnut OBN said:

I've tested, No performance gain due to the small amount cut off....18 inches a VLF and if I remember correct a subject over on (Findmall) Technology forum many years ago  .......

Only gain I have found .......  less chance of the cable moving or exposure to the conditions, with I have tried several different things, one was running the coil cable thru the shaft.. .. and exact length needed. (both pictured)

I love going thru and reading the old Findmall post with Eric, Wire Chief, Mr Bill, Reg...etc..

The capacitance and the resistance of the coil cable has to be taken into consideration as a total value of the coil.

Depending on the exact particulars, chopping off a lot of cable would change the way the electronics looks at the coil. Adding length would affect it also.

Now in reality I have chopped fairly good sized amounts off of cables in order to permanently pole mount the electronics box. The need to get rid of excess cable length was there. I have not noticed a drop off in performance, although it could happen depending on the unit.

Mr. Bill

 

Re: Coil Cable - straight or spiralled?
Frank Hamill
Date: August 19, 2002 08:43AM
 
One addition thing. In the other two PI's I owned in the water the currents of the ocean along with swinging against the resistance of the water cause the coil wire to move...when the coil wire would move the units would give target signals which were not there. After Terry told me about running the wire straight up it still moved in the currents. So I split malt straws and put them one by one around the straight up coil wire and taped them lightly...Falsing of that "type" stopped. A users answer to the problem. However this coil on the Goldquest SS does not need the straws as you put the connection next to the rod connection and straight up is no problem as the distance between the rod and the connection is mere nothing. On my other PI's the distance between connection and rod was several inches and allowed the movement of the coil which caused falsing. From a users standpoint who goes in the water this is a great feature that is needed to be put into coils that are used underwater.
Thank you again....Frank
Coil Cable - straight or spiralled?
Eric Foster
Date: August 19, 2002 04:19AM
 
Hi Frank and Larry,
Good to hear reports of the units performing well. There are always some surprises that come back from the field, though. Why running the coil wire straight up the pole rather than spiralled around, should make a difference to the field pattern has me puzzled. One of the properties of coax cable is that there is no external field generated by the cable. Does winding the cable clockwise give a different result to it being anti-clockwise?
How is this change in field pattern manifested?
Do other detectors show this problem?
Eric.

 

Re: Shorter coil cable question.
Eric Foster
Date: May 10, 2005 05:34PM
 
Hi Tommy,
Shouldn't affect it at all, as the capacitance of the coil/cable circuit will be reduced.
Eric.

Thanks a loro Joe!And Sorry for late reply!

 

 

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
On 4/8/2021 at 12:00 AM, Skullgolddiver said:

...

Observing my TDI Bh, ... and the aftermarket Detech 8")..

Speaking on 8" detech coil. Any problems with water leaking inside of the coil housing?

I have mine somewhere. Not tested yet. Waiting for new fancy TDI like this one:

 

 

ei_1607203758379-removebg-preview.png

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
4 minutes ago, pjrough said:

Speaking on 8" detech coil. Any problems with water leaking inside of the coil housing?

I have mine somewhere. Not tested yet. Waiting for new fancy TDI like this one:

 

 

ei_1607203758379-removebg-preview.png

The machine to have would be the TDI Pro in that box...SEA GHOST has really done some nice mods over the last 2 years.

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
5 hours ago, pjrough said:

Speaking on 8" detech coil. Any problems with water leaking inside of the coil housing?

I have mine somewhere. Not tested yet. Waiting for new fancy TDI like this one:

 

 

ei_1607203758379-removebg-preview.png

No leakage for now, but trust me, You might want to open the shell and create a slim open design One...Otherwise Is terribly buoyant and Empty for 95%I Guess.

Excellent work there!

Another One of Yours!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Similar Content

    • By Kaolin washer
      trying to decide , 11inch coil x35 or the 11x13 x35 anyone have experience with both 
    • By Earth sweeper
      Why do the 11” and 15” coils have a small arrow pointed toward you at the top of the coil?
    • By Steve Herschbach
      This is for novices and the things covered are basic, but very important. I even need to remind myself of this stuff now and then.  We all take it so much for granted, that things like loose cable near coil rarely are mentioned on the forum. And coil control? Probably one of the most important factors in success for successful detectorists. People obsess over a detector getting another inch, when so many people could get that just with better coil control.
       
    • By Dmnz
      Hi guys
      so the “new to me” atx arrived - mint condition which is great.  I have several older ATX coils with various cable faults and wanted to rewire one onto a straight cable.   (Do I need a 4 wire and screen cable?)
      I wonder if anyone has a wiring diagram at all, or failing that - the original cable has 4 wires and a unshielded screen on the DD coil.  Is the screen Actually connected to any of the 4 wires?  
      I can’t seem to get the “iron check” feature to work on my salvaged coil and guess this may be due to the screen cable?
      i know the windings are circa 9ohms and 1.3 ohms
      any help appreciated on the DD and Mono wiring.  
       
      fyi / had a swing with the atx today - it’s still a great machine!
    • By GB_Amateur
      I've been experiencing lower yields due to sites being detected, by me for sure and there are also signs by others previously.  SchoolofHardNox's success on a beach using the Minelab GPX 5000 reminded me to re-read Steve's treatise on using the (in his case original big box Pulsescan) TDI for coin detecting.
      I just a few days ago stumbled upon a promising site where extra depth could be key.  It's a schoolyard going back at least to 1955.  Unfortunately as is the case in many of my public sites, it has a history of backfilling.  From aerial photos I see than in the 50's it was grass/sod covered but in the early 60's they put down gravel.  The person who told me about the site (a person who walked up to talk when he saw me hunting a nearby park) said he was a student there 45-50 years ago and at that time it was (again) grass/sod.  I did a one hour survey hunt with the Minelab Equinox (11" coil) and encountered a couple inch thick gravel layer about 5" down.  I did find one Wheatie below the gravel, but 7" is getting deep for my detector + soil mineralization combination so if coins remain from the 50's (pre- gravel layering) then I expect I will do better with extra depth (and that may even be required).
      One thing I've found in my detecting of these older sites -- there are always nails present.  So even if my TDI/SPP can deliver in the coin category it's going to be signalling on a lot of nails.  One of the tricks Steve used was to set the conductivity switch to high conductors (low tones) but the TDI/SPP doesn't have that feature -- I will be hearing both high and low tones.  This is a dual disadvantage -- extra tones to have to mentally tune out but also extra threshold noise since both parts of the signal spectrum will be contributing to that as compared to only half when the conductivity-low switch selection is made (on all TDI's except the SPP version).
      Here are some specific concerns:
      1) Am I fooling myself thinking I can get extra depth with the TDI/SPP, particularly when it comes at the expense of a noisier threshold?
      2) Which coil(s) should I be using (choices I'm considering are 6"x8" Nugget Finder Sadie mono, 7"x14" NF mono, and 12" round White's 'Aussie' mono)?
      3) Should I flag the promising targets but double check with the Eqx 800 (and if so, should I use the 11" or 12"x15" coil on the 800)?  (Note, even if I choose this route I will likely at first dig, regardless of what the 800 says, just to get an idea of what is giving the signal and how deep the targets are.)
      Any other advice (from anyone) is appreciated.
       
       
    • By SteveInIdaho
      I live in Northern Idaho (Moscow) and bought a gold monster 1000. I can't really complain that it is hard to find gold, as I was warned by the Chris Ralph Fists Full of Gold book to not invest in a metal detector right away without prospecting experience. Frankly it was a bit of an impulse buy as the activity just looked like so much fun, and I read books you can detect outside of the desert I really want to make it work. I haven't had any luck so far despite being out roughly ten times. Went out for the first time this season to a placer mine dump.
      This time of year there is still snow in the mountains and the rivers and creeks are overflowing with snowmelt. So I think it is better to wait for awhile before hitting creeks and streams and just target old gold mines which have mine dumps. To research I use the site https://www.idahogeology.org/webmap to give me specific gps coordinates.  I also use sites like thediggings.com to see if there is any mining activity in the area to make sure I don't go on someone's claim, but also that the area is known to have some gold.
      I haven't been able to find too many guys doing detecting in a heavily wooded area with a VLF. Which makes sense because VLF's can't get through the mulch and heavy vegetation layer.  Today I went to a lode mine dump and although there were huge piles of dirt I wondered if I would be able to detect any missed nuggets in there unless I was to get the bottom of that huge pile as the heaviness of gold would sink to the bottom. My question is about the application of VLF's in heavily wooded areas. Is it limited to Creeks and Streams? How can the limited depth of VLF's deal with this heavy mulch layer in these placer/load mine dumps in the forest? I'm also curious if my approach is really bad in general. Thanks.
×
×
  • Create New...