Jump to content

Closing Out The Season In Sunny Yuma


Recommended Posts

Did the heat run you out of Yuma up to Lucky Land and the Gerry and Lunk patches?

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, mn90403 said:

Did the heat run you out of Yuma up to Lucky Land and the Gerry and Lunk patches?

Summers here really suck and last summer we spent all our time on the road prospecting anyway.  There's no way I could be cooped up in the heat.   I only moved back to Yuma to provide logistics and support for my son to finish his college degree at the NAU extension.  He's finished, got a great job and his own place, so my work here is done.  I'll come back in the winter, my girlfriend and I both have family and friends here. 

When I get up there I'm going to put one of those trackers on Lundy and plot his movements by satellite to find all those secret patches.  

  • Like 3
  • Haha 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Steve,

He switches vehicles often so you are going to have to get more than one.

Good luck up there.  I think there is another guy up that way who is on the forum by the name of Steve.

Mitchel

Link to post
Share on other sites

Steve,

i just got home from Rye Patch area!  Yesterday, it was overcast and cold.  Today it was Sunny and Windy!  Wind won, went home...but, got some color

Rick

Link to post
Share on other sites

How wet is the soil out there now Rick? I want to jet out there for a week here soon.

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

“When I get up there I'm going to put one of those trackers on Lundy and plot his movements by satellite to find all those secret patches.”

Steve, where ever you live at give me a shout!  I’m always out and need more coils on the ground to find them patches!

Jason,  ground is Good!  High Yield/Normal is working fine with low sensitivity.  As it dries out more, back to my regular setting of 9.  Found a few dink’s on last trip, which I didn’t find any the week before.  So ground is shaping up nice!  But, chilly bring heavy fleece for morning chill.

Rick

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Similar Content

    • By Gerry in Idaho
      I like detecting for a variety of gold and really enjoy finding the stuff many higher end detectors can't see.  I don't know yet, but feel the extra capabilities of the GPX-6000 will open up some of these areas I hunt with the VLF's to get even more of the gold and at greater depths or in worse soil conditions.  As long as I am getting more gold, I'm happy.  Will the new GPX-6000 see this kind of gold or act like all other PI's and the ZED and not see at all?
      I recently recovered this 4.2 gram speci with the EQ-800 while running the new CoilTek NOX 15" round.  My goal was to find a piece of gold with the 15" and I met that goal.
      Part of some other testing back at base proved why I still like to take 2 detector technologies in the field.  This particular beauty was found right in the middle of a GPZ-7000 grid area, along with 4 others while using different coils on the EQ-800.  All 5 pieces specimens have visible gold and a couple how quite a bit, but to the point.
      The reason I found them in that gridded area, is because the GPZ-7000 does not respond or on a couple right near 1" and that's it.  I teach folks this in my classes, as well as try to educate others on the goods and the bads of different detectors and technologies.  Sometimes I get detectorists who are good hunters with their detectors and have success, tell me I'm full of BS and their detector will find it.
      I made a post on my FB (Gerry McMullen) and shared a pic of the find along with the true comments of, the GPZ will not see it.  Between the private messages and or public posts, I was immediately informed by a few of BS and even told how I must not know the GPZ-7000.  One well known GP-3500 hunter even said he guaranteed his 3500 would hear it.  
      I know gold detectors and I know how to find gold with a variety of gold machines.  No I am not the best, but I most certainly can hold my own and I learn to adapt really fast to a new area.  Traveling to different states and countries to hunt for and find many different kinds of gold has helped elevate my detector knowledge and skill of many models of detectors and the differing Au rocks I have collected. 
      So here is hoping the GPX-6000 with it's GeoSensing can respond to this little beauty.  If it does, I know of some areas I'll be swinging the 6000.  If it is like the GP-3500, the GPX-5000 and the GPZ-7000 and misses it, that fine too, I know what they can't see and realize it,  I will also know where not to use the 6000.
      Bottom line for everyone.  Please learn the kinds of gold your detector is good at finding and what it is not, so you aren't wasting time  in those areas.  Or be sure you have at least 2 different detector technologies.

    • By Lunk
      Well I'm laying over in northern Nevada for some detecting before heading back to Idaho and my summer job, and decided to go revisit an old dink patch with the GPZ 7000 this afternoon. Since I've hit this place pretty hard, I figured I better use a higher sensitivity setting to see if it would light up some bits that were missed last time using a lower sensitivity that helped keep the alkali rich ground feedback under control. Needless to say, I had to move the coil painfully slow over the really noisy areas, but the extra sensitivity started working its magic right away, as I got a faint but repeatable little wobble. Digging down about 3 inches or so revealed the first little bit of yellow. 🙂

       

      Soon there was another signal a few yards upslope; another shiny golden bit, this time a little deeper.


      I couldn't help but wonder at this point how much deeper the new GPX 6000 will be able to snag dinks like these, and how many the Zed is leaving behind. 🤔 Guess I'll find out when I finally get mine. Just then I was awakened from my wonderings by a sharp response from the Zed; sounding pretty shallow, the tiny target was out from under a bush with just a boot scrape. And I mean tiny!


      One more golden goodie sitting on bedrock ended a splendid, sunny afternoon in the goldfields.


      Total weight of todays finds, zero point six of a gram.
      Good luck out there!

       
    • By Smithsgold
      Hillside Detecting for Placer Gold Nuggets 
      Armed with a Minelab SDC 2300 and a White's Gold Master V-Sat Jeff and Gary (Two Toe's) try some Hillside detecting for Placer Gold Nuggets. High bench gold in the morning and River deposited gold in the afternoon. We moved a lot of rocks and brush looking for those elusive Nuggets and didnt go home empty handed !!!
      Our Hawaiian buddy Tim ( Blue Lead Gold Productions ) likes to send me pictures and video of what we are missing on the island during the winter months so I've included a few clips from him in the video. Hope you enjoy the video.
      SG 038
       
       
    • By afreakofnature
      Had to hike in last weekend to get the tiniest piece I have ever detected.  Packed up the SDC and off we went!  Atleast it was not a skunk day but dang, if you like small gold the SDC can hit it at 3” with an obvious signal.  Took me longer to get it in the scoop than dig it out of the hole 😂.  Also added to my square nail collection 😂.
      Dinks!  Its what the world is made of 😂😂.
       




    • By AU_Solitude
      I hear that an individual in Northern California recently stumbled upon a nugget weighing over 16oz troy - anyone have any photos or the story of this find yet? This is the largest CA find I am aware of since the Butte nugget.
×
×
  • Create New...