Jump to content

Recommended Posts

The views expressed can be taken different than those expressed by others, but it does show that the right combination of detector and location can achieve results that can exceed those of a bad choice of equipment. Most of my gold could of been found with a second rate equipment, but correct for the specific condition that existed in that location. When will people relies that it is experience that prospectors have gained that beats equipment by a big margin.  

  • Like 8
Link to post
Share on other sites

10 hours ago, Norvic said:

Paul, believe or not the 5000 was a top machine in its day but is way behind the ball now. The Z knocked it down the 6000 has buried it. You seen the Z come up with the goods, with I suspect the biggest piece in your OZ experience in one of the most flogged patches in FNQ OZ. Believe or not your option but I know. 

I agree with the ZEDs capabilities Vic... I wasn’t questioning its place In the pecking order. 
And yes I “may” have seen a big old rib bone of gold once in FNQ😀

 All I am saying is I would like to see the 5 and 6, side by side, on some off those patches in  the Taskmasters area.
Then I would be able to make an informed buying decision. I don’t think anyone here who knows me could ever accuse me of not being an early adopter😂

But if Taskmaster gets his 6000 then there is no need for us both to have one ......

and whenever they let me back in to WA—-(I’m thinking OZ may have started Covid just to keep me from finding a scrap or two 🤠) Lolol

Anyway, I digress..., the style of hunting we were doing, was basically scraping to the cap and then giving  it a a thorough go. 
While doing this in 2018 we noticed my zed was erratic and very noisy once we first uncovered the cap on an area. 
Taskmaster made a 5000 believer out of me then when he showed me the 5000 picking up gold that I  couldn’t clearly hear ...(due to the moaning and groaning of the 7—- ) —-I think it was a 4.5 grammer!

 I attribute the noise  to the sensitivity of the 7...and my lack of experience running  it. Trent tried but couldn’t get it to settle down either.

That doesn’t make the 7 less of a machine, it just made it harder to use in that one specific application.

Note: Once the sun hit the newly exposed ground for a week it would quieten down considerably. 

So yeah, I’m not knockin the 6...I can’t wait to use them side by side....5/6

Since I’m a pensioner now I will let the young lad get his and then I will nick it ..if it is that good.

 All good Vic✔️

Keep swinging!


BTW :That’s the year I traded  my 7000 to a patch hunter for a brand new 5000 and brand new 2300.... with about 7 coils.

  • Haha 2
Link to post
Share on other sites

Heh you just keep flying over the gold Paul and leave it to us, I`ve 10:1 odds Trent will find the 6000s the go for his push and detect operation. Crikey he wont even realize he`s still got it in hand when he hops on the CAT.

  • Haha 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm not an expert by any means, but wouldn't it make more sense to put the 11" mono that goes with the 5000 on to compare it with the 6000 with its 11"? Just doesn't seem quite apples to apples to me to say the 5000 is better when you are using a different style coil.

  • Like 3
Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Similar Content

    • By Papasmurph
      Has anyone had any issues with their coil chip failing?
      l bought a second hand 19” coil for my GPZ and it worked fine for several months and then out of the blue, it failed.
      Minelab suggested that I buy a new coil. After a bit of research I decided to have a dongle made up from my 14” coil and now 12 or so months later the chip in the dongle has failed. Am I doing something wrong? Is there a problem with the detector or am I just very unlucky?
    • By Elijah
      Hello gentlemen, finally someone from the Australian guys made an honest comparison
    • By schoolofhardNox
      Made it out for a day at the beach. It seems like ages since I been out. The crowds were starting to gather since the weather was perfect that day. I was able to hit my favorite stretch of the beach for the most part. I started out trying for silver but decided to concentrate on low conductors, hoping for some gold. Total of 40 nickels that hunt, counting the war nickel. I ended the afternoon digging for high conductors as well, and was rewarded with yet another half dollar. Using a PI, you cannot get away from digging the deep, rounder shaped big iron since it could be a deep half, so I dig it. Some of longer iron items and shallow smaller nails, I could have avoided if I wanted to. I did manage to find a nice 10K tiny gold ring, so that made for a great day. Average depth was about 14” on most items. The ring was fairly shallow, probably around 7”. Total coins I believe was 100, so a high coin count. The usual copper and lead bits also found. Most items were resting on the clay layer or near it. Great to get out and enjoy the day.

    • By Rob Allison
      Hey Guys,
          I figured we can stir the pot just a little while we wait out the release of the Minelab GPX 6000, right?  
      That being said, Minelab still claims the GPZ 7000 can get "up to 40% more depth" over previous GPX detectors.  We can all question, does the GPX 6000 still fit in this category, as Minelab stated GPX detectors.  The upcoming Minelab GPX 6000 is still a GPX series detector, but primarily using GeoSense Technology.  I don't see where GeoSense really talks about any more depth ability over the previous GPX 5000, but it does mention about better ground response/clarity, maybe allowing you to hear something in higher mineralized ground over previous GPX series.  
      I don't claim to be an expert electronic prospector, but my specialty is in detecting for gold nuggets with the best detectors available.  We call all talk about how much gold we found, years of experience, regions we hunted and such ..... 
      The bottom line is I still feel the Minelab GPZ 7000 is the KING of detectors when it comes to depth.  Many Australian, African and US prospecting friends still feel the same.  I personally have found many large gold nuggets and specimens at max depth where I doubt any detector with a similar sized searchcoil would have found.  I also know that probably 1% or less of those large gold nuggets/specimens are out there still and the ones at max depth range of the current detector technology.  
      Does this justify the purchase of a Minelab GPZ 7000 over the upcoming GPX 6000, or should GPZ 7000 owners dump their units now?  These are questions I personally can't advise anyone on, but it's something to consider when you make a purchase of a metal detector in the thousands of dollar range.  
      What I can leave you with is my personal experience over the last 25 years chasing gold nuggets .... If you are in areas where there has been historically large gold nuggets, overburden to bedrock/paylayer/caliche/false bedrock that can be several feet and deeper in depth, you might seriously consider either holding your current GPZ 7000 or consider a purchase of one at some point.  
      I personally will not be parting with my trusty GPZ 7000, we have a 5+ year personal relationship.  We have been through tough times, bad weather, I even yelled at her and dropped her a few times!  Like Steve mentioned before, you could actually fall in love with your detector. 
      Wishing you all much success with whatever detector(s) you swing. 
      P.S.  Below is a recent GPZ 7000 find, max depth, just a break in the threshold (yes the GPZ 7000 has one). Nearly a pound in weight (uncleaned in picture) 

    • By Gerry in Idaho
      I've read a few posts from those who have both and their input is pretty much what I expected.
      Having fun (especially with others) is the majority of why I enjoy detecting.  Only a select few actually do it for a living and do well.  The rest of us (me included), enjoy the hunt, adventures, comradery with like minded friends, and getting some gold on occasion. It's looking like the GPX-6000 is getting the majority of gold better than the GPZ-7000.  So, is the extra weight worth the rare occasional big nugget?  Lets go a step farther.  Say the ZED hits a 4 ounce nugget at 34".  Will the 6000 hit that same nugget at 30", 32" 33" or 34".  Say it's 2" less and only gets the chunk at 32".  It's still near 3' deep which is deeper than most folks enjoy digging and or most other detectors out there.  
      So the reality for most folks, the GPX-6000 at a cost savings of $2000 and over 2 pounds lighter, better ergonomics, no more tethered into a harness, more user friendly, real wireless Bluetooth phones, is the best option for most.
      Like I said in another post.  There should be a convoy of GPZ users heading down the highway to get the new GPX-6000 and having more fun, more gold more often.  I can help make that smile happen.
      Anyone have a point I am missing or totally off, please chime in.
      Pic of the nugget will probably only be a few inches in depth difference between the 6 and 7.  But the majority of us would probably hear if with both machines at 30 or more.

    • By Purplehays69
      I totally understand that our Aussie brother's n sisters always get the jumpstart on the newest Minelab gold detector but our wait in the USA is getting totally ridiculous......
  • Create New...