Jump to content

Part 2 - Dig, Shovel, Rake & Metal Detecting For Gold Nuggets - Video


Recommended Posts

I like your last comment Rob as it shows so many more options at a better budgeted approach.

Glad you are coming around to the GPX-6000.  I knew you would, as it's hard to push a 7000 sale to a new customer when we know the 6000 finds more of what's left out there.

Great vids.

 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites


One of life's most satisfying pleasures is digging a nugget out of bedrock...  Great job Rob, hope to see more..

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Rob Allison said:

Many think you need to invest thousands of dollars to find nuggets, when actually if you have a plan and some areas in mind, you might just surprise yourself.  

   Great advice.   Thanks for the video. 

 

 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

This dig, detect, rake method is what I call the layering technique or layering method, and yes it can work virtually anywhere. I was up at Libby Creek in Montana and detecting on the hill many years ago and the excavator operator kept telling me you can't detect there because I would be in the way. I moved and was was again told you can't detect there. A third time moving and I was again told you can't detect there. I got annoyed at this, looked around and saw a spot on the slope edge of the road leading up to where the club was digging material out of a hole for the trommels to run, and asked him is this spot ok, or do I need to move from here too? He said that spot is ok. I picked a spot of the slope and gridded off a 6 foot wide by 7 foot long  spot and started detecting slowly and when I had it covered, I raked a layer back towards the bottom. I repeated this process about 7 times and finally got a signal and it was a small nugget. So, yes you can apply this anywhere. It works! I speak heavily of this strategy in my book.

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hey Goldseeker5000 and all,

   Thanks for all the continued comments.  

This method, whatever you want to call it, can be used in many locations like you mentioned.  At one point in my metal detecting for gold phase, I concentrated in mine dumps.  The same method is used, but mostly just raking as that tailings are normally on a slope and gravity can be a real help.  Using this method on mine dump can be rewarding, but you have to understand how they dumped the material and what is where.  Majority of all mine dumps is waste rock, wall rock/country rock and low grade ore.  Normally the best, high grade ore would be placed into high grade piles, not tossed into the dumps.  However, when they would hand steel or blast and muck the ore into carts or whatever they used to moved the material at that site, high grade ore could be missed in with waste rock.  Normally, they would dump the material in layers, so if you get into a good layer, which is normally where there was some high grade stuff missed with waste, you can do well.  

I would only target "free milling, coarse gold" locations.  I didn't mess much with sulphide ores or complex ores that required chemicals, but rather in locations where it was above the zone of oxidation and Mother nature done most of the work for you (physical and chemical weathering) and left the good stuff behind, GOLD. 

Most of these locations were shallow, free mining gold mines, primary commodity being Gold, secondary could be Silver, Copper or whatever in any order.  Keep in mind, some good gold mines gold listed in the databases as Silver or Copper as Primary and Gold like the secondary or third listing.  

High end VLF's normally 50-71khz worked best.  This is where the Fisher Gold Bug 2 really stood out in my opinion, the ability to find very small particles of gold within quartz, ironstone and ore.  

One of the last ventures on a dump was one of my best, finding many pounds of small gold laced ore right on the outer, surface of the dump.  I'm thinking they got sloppy or something happened.  All I had to do is detect the surface and rake a few inches to stay within the best layer, once I got beyond that, it was nil.  I did find another layer on the other side of the dump that was about a foot or so deep, but much smaller and didn't last very long.  

Hope this helps a bit,

Rob

  • Like 9
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hey Guys,

  I don't want to get too far away from the placering mostly in a gulch, but a few bits of advice for any new mine dump hunters-

  • If the dump is a good slope, it's always best to dig a small shelf below the target area, as I have chased targets all the way down the hill, even lost a few.  
  • Only dig a tiny bit at a time, small targets and fragments of gold will easily fall down deeper into the dump, so try not to get too crazy when you dig.  I've dropped small fragments of gold, very crystalline out of my hand and never recovered them due to it working deeper into the dumps rocks.
  • I normally always started at the bottom of the dump, as a lot of times Gravity and Mother Nature has worked some of the best gold down near the bottom edge, kind of like dredge tailing piles (top and bottoms seem to be best).  

Just a few pointers from experience and lost gold. :blush:

  • Like 8
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Similar Content

    • By Joe Beechnut OBN
      My first time out in a month, a lot has happened and now I am back to being a fulltime pirate. Water was was warm..70F with the 3mm wetsuit but the winds were up in the Chesapeake Bay this weekend............ Air temps were 54F so the wind chill was bad.
      Four hours hunt time, 7 Silver Washington's, 1 Mercury dime. One 7.49 gram 10k gold Class ring. Silver count is fairly good this year considering it's been a real down year.. (153)
      Next trip out will be with the drysuit.. getting to old for the cold.
       


    • By Reno Chris
      The Fisher Gold Bug 2 has been around for decades and is well known as one of the most sensitive metal detectors on the market. It has been the gold nugget detector of choice for many over the years. There really has never been a Gold Bug 3 - though some have asked for it. Fisher has now updated the user interface of the GB2. However the features and the guts of the detector remain the same but the user will now have an easier time of operating the machine. It is still a manual ground balance machine, but I think its a good step forward toward making it easier to use.
      Don't ask me why all Fisher gold oriented detectors are called the Gold Bug. I have no idea. These new versions of the GB 2 are supposed to be available to dealers now. If you have any questions on it, I'll try and answer as best as I can.
      Anyway, I recently had one in the field and got to try it out. I did a video on it if you are interested in learning more. You can see the video at:
       
       
    • By Jennifer
      If any of my fellow "pee sitting down'ers" are looking for a GREAT Youtuber to watch, this gal is incredible, her pin pointing and target acquisition is mind blowing (demonstrated better in some of her earlier videos)... she's a star.. check her out.. (and anyone that swings a NF Z Search and dual speaker setup is golden in my book).
      Jen
    • By JCR
      I watched a couple of nice relic hunt videos last evening on Larry Hogston"s channel. It did well on some deep bullets in some bad ground.
    • By mn90403
      There is just something I like about this video in addition to some things I don't.  I do think it is worth a watch in this new world of small gold.
       
       
×
×
  • Create New...