Jump to content

Depth Of 6000 On "larger" Gold Gerry ?


Recommended Posts

Gerry, in June you did air tests on all the detectors present at Rye Patch including the just arrived 6000. Your memory is better than mine and you are in contact with lots of detectorists so you may be able to answer the depth question for me? While in Rye Patch in June , Paul, a former student stopped in and showed a pic of a "large" nugget found 30 inches deep with his 7000. The gold pic looked to be 3/4 wide by 1 1/2 inches long and flat. I have seen lots of pics of small gold found with the 6000 because most all gold found is small of course. Just curious about depth on larger pieces if you or anyone has any info ? Failing anyone sharing info I am curious on depth of the EQ800 on say a 3/4 piece of gold since that is what I bought from you. One of your instructors said that weekend that the EQ will detect maybe 14 inches on a "large" piece? I know, I know, a lot depends on density of gold, size, position in ground, ground conditions etc. etc. Seems the 6000 is going to pick up way better on "moderate" gold than the EQ from what I observed at Rye Patch..The EQ didn't "hear" some of the 6000 targets we all saw. I'm just wondering that if I am ever fortunate to swing over a 3/4 or 1 ounce nugget what my chances are of hearing it at what depth? Know you are a buy guy....any chance, downtime you get to answer is appreciated! 

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites


Hello Areospace,

   I will let Gerry answer the question more directly, but I will just toss in that any PI in my opinion will find a 3/4 to 1 ounce piece at a foot or better with no problem if you are paying attention.  It might not be a screaming target, but still something you would investigate and dig hopefully.  There are so many variables when it comes to depth and some like to use the "stretchy rulers."  :biggrin:

Wishing you much success out there and hopefully a nice whooper under your detector coil.

Rob

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Rob Allison said:

Hello Areospace,

   I will let Gerry answer the question more directly, but I will just toss in that any PI in my opinion will find a 3/4 to 1 ounce piece at a foot or better with no problem if you are paying attention.  It might not be a screaming target, but still something you would investigate and dig hopefully.  There are so many variables when it comes to depth and some like to use the "stretchy rulers."  :biggrin:

Wishing you much success out there and hopefully a nice whooper under your detector coil.

Rob

Thx!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Gerry in Idaho said:

Thanks for reaching out and asking questions on depth.  Rob is correct about the variables that change the outcome.

I and a few of my customers have dug many nuggets with VLF detectors at depth of 10" or more and a few closer to the 14-16" range.  This nice prize was found at the 14-16" range and the 15x12" coil is in the hole to show depth. 1165554642_1stNugJ(2).thumb.jpg.180311db6cc7a5529a296db88d3f8d06.jpg1stNugF.thumb.jpg.8b44eba1ffdec3008bd81494d9504f24.jpg

I'll be honest though, they are not small gold.  Even this year I have dug nice specimen gold at 12"+ so I'm good with those depths.  This one was found using stock 11" coil and found at 12-14"121087326_20191124_112815(2).thumb.jpg.14ee9e825849c19abc82a9269a58bdde.jpg20191124_121724.thumb.jpg.f50116a0a5f44fc605417dff82545eed.jpg

As for getting depths in virgin soils (undisturbed ground) like we hunt in much of North Nevada on small solid nuggets (Rye Patch type gold) I can get a VLF technology detector approx 4" to 5" on a 1 gram.  A 1/4 ozt approx 6 to 8" and a 1/2 ozt approx 10".  I dug a 3/4 otz nugget many years ago with a GB-2 and 10" coil at Rye Patch that was every bit of 10" in virgin soil.  Below are a few other nuggets I or I was with customers that were dug using VLF detectors at depths of 10"+.

Ganes8.thumb.JPG.4cb16f23ecb467914d6c967094d06bb2.JPGGanes9.thumb.JPG.881a2cc45d8ee0c2bdc3cd2418b346bd.JPGChuck4.thumb.JPG.759ea1aaacbbc66ace1627541104b9e2.JPGChuck4bbb.thumb.JPG.2d97909d904ac223d625e917f1dd7166.JPGP1010068.thumb.JPG.942a22a1aa68db3961d399ebe7916eba.JPGGanes7.thumb.JPG.cc1734590b4f907c6a3a33db00512f13.JPGaaua.JPG.ef27ae0b4adb5cc513f656df7814fbc1.JPGauaau.JPG.297abd110247471343780a1e6c8c763a.JPGPotato1.thumb.jpg.fe330f06531f2780732344459149f4f6.jpgPotatoe1.thumb.jpg.c56ac63b162bcdd41a2a48bc6ed34a7c.jpg

Now take those same size nuggets and go into tailing piles and your depth greatly increases.  Do you know why?  Less mineralized soil and or black sands that the VLF detector needs to get through.  That's why I enjoy hunting tailings more than virgin ground with a VLF.  Plus the VLF detector is lighter and faster than bigger PI's and has better iron identification.

Here is the issue with many that hunt for gold with a VLF detector at such sites like Rye Patch, Quartzsite and other well know nugget producers.   If you go where others who have hunted using big PI's and or GPZ's in the mentioned sites, you are best not to use a big coil on the VLF detector.  You're better off using a small coil to get the best results on tiny nuggets.  Bigger machines, especially SD/GP and early GPX models miss many small nuggets as that is one of their weaknesses.  So you need to take that knowledge, get your VLF and put in the smallest coil you can get and then go find the tiny ones they missed.  Below a prime example of using a VLF detector with small coil to find a tiny nuggetDSCN9243.thumb.jpg.c0db5e03d4e7799d5bbf53435cb1986c.jpg

Trying to put a big coil on a VLF detector so you can match the depth of a PI is just plain ridiculous for most (not all) known nugget producing grounds.  VLF's can not handle the soils and will not perform near as well as a big PI machine.  BUT...if you use the VLF in tailing piles with no soils or mixed, then your depth of the VLF will go up and you actually could use the stock coil or on a rare occasion go big.  Not saying the bigger PI's are not good in these situations, but the weight of the bigger detectors are excessive and their Iron ID capabilities are not as good as todays VLF's

If I was on a budget of $3000 to find as many kinds of gold possible, here is a good setup I would consider.

My #1 selection for VLF (at this time) is the Equinox 800 with stock coil and a small 6" round coil.  Cost for both detector and extra small coil approx $1100.  1Ge.jpg.ac3755e70eb0be158606c7f81dddedb8.jpg

The other detector would be a used (from a dealer who knows how to test it properly) GP-3000, GP-3500 or GPX-4000 detector.  This is your power detector to get nice nuggets at depth in most all soils.  These detectors can be picked up for $1000 to $2000 and are proven winners when it comes to 2 gram nuggets and up at depth (better than a VLF).

1699300984_BA2s.thumb.jpg.cd5c7902e418675110f11f6a4aa31b41.jpgdeep2.JPG.bd49e7001abdc0f2c029e35a87b56058.JPGdeep1.JPG.ffca437935d81a0746bf464890d88582.JPGDSCN0176.JPG.e53e79537b870882e40e8ff105670c49.JPGDSCN4210c.thumb.JPG.de4a516b5426886e03b8efaf3cae4e3c.JPGsGusGolda.JPG.e792346121713aa7d7e85e0844d28117.JPGV0000183.thumb.JPG.811cdef5e8c76e6e1963594645159e1e.JPG

Hope this helps and if anyone else wants to add, please feel free.

Thx Gerry!

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Similar Content

    • By Northeast
      Morning everyone, 
      Had a search of the forum and although there are a few mentions of the 14" DD in various thread content I couldn't find a specific thread for discussion around it. 
      Did a video a few days ago getting a few small pieces of gold and small rubbish at a location I've found lots of small gold in a small area.  
      I know that I like watching videos and many of us often encourage others to do a video of this or that.  I figure that rather than asking everyone else to do it I should probably do some of the hard yards myself!  This is certainly not an advertisement of a Youtube channel and I have no illusions that my production quality or information provided is any better than fairly average  🤣
      Something for you Northern Hemisphere folk to watch during the cold months.  
      Happy for anyone to add to the discussion, link a video, show some DD finds or provide some tips on the thread.   
      The thing I found interesting about this was that the target shown at 3.55 mins was quite bright in Normal ground mode.  It ended up being no target at all and just a small pocket of really wet clay.  The fact that it brightened up with the DD surprises me.  The fact that it then brightened up quite a bit more in Normal maybe should have alerted me to the fact that it was ground noise and not a genuine target as the difference in signal on small pieces of gold swapping between Difficult and Normal has been quite small.
      Cheers, N.E.  
       
    • By Rob Allison
      Hello All,
          The new Minelab 17" Elliptical Searchcoils for the Minelab GPX 6000 have been flying off the shelves, definitely high demand.   Due to the high demand, I haven't had much time to use one, everyone ends of taking mine ... LOL
      I haven't seen much larger gold being found at depth yet, but I'm sure it is.  Curious how people and past customers are doing with this new 17" Searchcoil beyond covering more ground quicker?  
      We still have a few left in stock from the last large shipment and more on the way if anyone is still searching for a new "Christmas present.!"  Hahaha 
      Would love to see some pictures or at least hear about any success with the new searchcoil.  
      Wishing you all much success on the goldfield.
      17" Searchcoil available here - https://www.robsdetectors.com/minelab-gpx-6000-17-searchcoil/
      Rob
    • By Aureous
      Seeing how this topic has numerous mentions across the internet, what are the range of faults exhibited? My nearest dealer is over an hour from me so I don't want to travel back and forth after picking mine up if I get a faulty one. So I know what to look for after collection and field test. 
    • By oldcoinhunter
      My first 6000 was faulty out of the box which they replaced with a new one. I've had the new one for 21 days and probably used it 8 days before it went bad.  When i was boxing it up to ship back i heard something rattling inside of it, not good. In researching i found that they've known them to have major issues since March or April, yet they have refused to address the issue with a production stop or at least look at the different production runs and recall those units. I think when it's all said and done there will be a substantial number of them that are faulty worldwide. As it stands now, Detector Center states that there is a" temporary" 10- 14 day time frame for repairing them. My bet is that it's not going to be temporary. If this failure rate continues there may be grounds for a worldwide class action lawsuit, who knows. Oh, and i owned a business for 40 years. Not a very smart way to run a business. JMO.
    • By Gerry in Idaho
      Well my staff/I just finished the season and wrap up of field training for 2021 and our customers...and boy did it go out with a bang and big belly's thanks to Chef Rusty Bucket.  Smoked ribs, Bourbon shrimp in garlic sauce, berry pie and ice cream, smoked Brisket, bacon wrapped stuffed jalapenos and more.  Wish I would have taken more pics of the food.  As I have said before, the food/drinks/people are part of why I enjoy these trips, as I know the gold will eventually come.
      As many know, Gerry’s Detectors has been training out there at the burn barrel with a few different staff members since the 90’s.   We have been using just about every model of gold detector from the top manufactures as well as coils to see what the best results are.  The comparisons of customers detectors continue to see the improvements of technologies and capabilities which is what we want.  Yes there are times a more expensive detector may not produce the best signal response on that particular targets, but it’s what it is and part of learning.
      Some of what we found most amazing and it’s exactly what I expected would happen during the training at RP.  The gold nuggets being found during the 3 days of class was the most of any session in at least 5+ yrs.  More people went home with actual Rye Patch gold than what my staff/I have witnessed in quite a long time.  The knowledge shared was the same stuff we always go over, but the knowledge retained was higher.  The class size is usually around the same, but the amount of golden smiles of success was better than many yrs prior.  We know the VLF detectors when fit with small coils are going to find a few pickers, but to see the bigger PI machines perform so well and produce such higher %’s of beautiful NV gold was most impressive.
      So lets go over it again to see what my Staff/I observed, in no particular order.  Knowledge of customers detectors was actually retained, smiles of happy customers making the right choice of detectors, the amount of successful customers who went home with gold and the overall numbers of gold nuggets dug by the students.  There is one thing that I corollate all these positives and it’s the new GPX-6000, period.
      Yes we had SDC-2300’s, GPZ-7000, GPX-5000’s and the usual VLF’s in the class being learned by the students and those who were there with the GPX-6000 had the most Success.  But the success of gold nugget finds was just part of the fun.  Ease of operation and simplicity we’ve never seen from a PI Minelab was also most impressive.  The customers were actually not afraid of their detectors.  They didn’t worry if the timing and or sequence of adjustments was correct, as the GPX-6000 is pretty much a turn on and go.  The old way, a big multi page instruction manual (is missing) and now we get a 3 step Quick Start…and it’s true.  1) Turn On.  2) Raise/Lower Coil for 10s, 3) Begin Detecting.  Are you kidding me, no way that can’t be true.  We just paid $6000 for one of the latest technology fine tuned gold detectors in the world and all we get in the box to help learn, is 3 short steps with a combined total of 10 words?  
       
      Well folks,  it’s all true and so is the amount of happy customers who invested in our training and the new GPX-6000.
      If anyone thinks there was some other reason for the above, please chime in as all indicators are bulls eyed at the GPX-6000.  Overall the trip went exceptionally well consider the 100 yr rain storm that came through while we were down there.  I still love the natural beauty of Northern NV in the fall and the colors on the gold nuggets we dug.
      Hopefully the Spring/Summer class will be just as productive with a group of new enthusiastic customers and more gold being unearthed.









    • By billdean
      Each time I try and ground balance my 6000 there is no detectable change. While holding the GB button I pump the coil then move it side to side. It’s like it don’t work. I friend of mine says his does not either. What am I missing? I run in manual mode with the threshold on. The noise cancel works very well. 
×
×
  • Create New...