Jump to content

Depth Of 6000 On "larger" Gold Gerry ?


Recommended Posts

Gerry, in June you did air tests on all the detectors present at Rye Patch including the just arrived 6000. Your memory is better than mine and you are in contact with lots of detectorists so you may be able to answer the depth question for me? While in Rye Patch in June , Paul, a former student stopped in and showed a pic of a "large" nugget found 30 inches deep with his 7000. The gold pic looked to be 3/4 wide by 1 1/2 inches long and flat. I have seen lots of pics of small gold found with the 6000 because most all gold found is small of course. Just curious about depth on larger pieces if you or anyone has any info ? Failing anyone sharing info I am curious on depth of the EQ800 on say a 3/4 piece of gold since that is what I bought from you. One of your instructors said that weekend that the EQ will detect maybe 14 inches on a "large" piece? I know, I know, a lot depends on density of gold, size, position in ground, ground conditions etc. etc. Seems the 6000 is going to pick up way better on "moderate" gold than the EQ from what I observed at Rye Patch..The EQ didn't "hear" some of the 6000 targets we all saw. I'm just wondering that if I am ever fortunate to swing over a 3/4 or 1 ounce nugget what my chances are of hearing it at what depth? Know you are a buy guy....any chance, downtime you get to answer is appreciated! 

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites


Hello Areospace,

   I will let Gerry answer the question more directly, but I will just toss in that any PI in my opinion will find a 3/4 to 1 ounce piece at a foot or better with no problem if you are paying attention.  It might not be a screaming target, but still something you would investigate and dig hopefully.  There are so many variables when it comes to depth and some like to use the "stretchy rulers."  :biggrin:

Wishing you much success out there and hopefully a nice whooper under your detector coil.

Rob

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Rob Allison said:

Hello Areospace,

   I will let Gerry answer the question more directly, but I will just toss in that any PI in my opinion will find a 3/4 to 1 ounce piece at a foot or better with no problem if you are paying attention.  It might not be a screaming target, but still something you would investigate and dig hopefully.  There are so many variables when it comes to depth and some like to use the "stretchy rulers."  :biggrin:

Wishing you much success out there and hopefully a nice whooper under your detector coil.

Rob

Thx!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Gerry in Idaho said:

Thanks for reaching out and asking questions on depth.  Rob is correct about the variables that change the outcome.

I and a few of my customers have dug many nuggets with VLF detectors at depth of 10" or more and a few closer to the 14-16" range.  This nice prize was found at the 14-16" range and the 15x12" coil is in the hole to show depth. 1165554642_1stNugJ(2).thumb.jpg.180311db6cc7a5529a296db88d3f8d06.jpg1stNugF.thumb.jpg.8b44eba1ffdec3008bd81494d9504f24.jpg

I'll be honest though, they are not small gold.  Even this year I have dug nice specimen gold at 12"+ so I'm good with those depths.  This one was found using stock 11" coil and found at 12-14"121087326_20191124_112815(2).thumb.jpg.14ee9e825849c19abc82a9269a58bdde.jpg20191124_121724.thumb.jpg.f50116a0a5f44fc605417dff82545eed.jpg

As for getting depths in virgin soils (undisturbed ground) like we hunt in much of North Nevada on small solid nuggets (Rye Patch type gold) I can get a VLF technology detector approx 4" to 5" on a 1 gram.  A 1/4 ozt approx 6 to 8" and a 1/2 ozt approx 10".  I dug a 3/4 otz nugget many years ago with a GB-2 and 10" coil at Rye Patch that was every bit of 10" in virgin soil.  Below are a few other nuggets I or I was with customers that were dug using VLF detectors at depths of 10"+.

Ganes8.thumb.JPG.4cb16f23ecb467914d6c967094d06bb2.JPGGanes9.thumb.JPG.881a2cc45d8ee0c2bdc3cd2418b346bd.JPGChuck4.thumb.JPG.759ea1aaacbbc66ace1627541104b9e2.JPGChuck4bbb.thumb.JPG.2d97909d904ac223d625e917f1dd7166.JPGP1010068.thumb.JPG.942a22a1aa68db3961d399ebe7916eba.JPGGanes7.thumb.JPG.cc1734590b4f907c6a3a33db00512f13.JPGaaua.JPG.ef27ae0b4adb5cc513f656df7814fbc1.JPGauaau.JPG.297abd110247471343780a1e6c8c763a.JPGPotato1.thumb.jpg.fe330f06531f2780732344459149f4f6.jpgPotatoe1.thumb.jpg.c56ac63b162bcdd41a2a48bc6ed34a7c.jpg

Now take those same size nuggets and go into tailing piles and your depth greatly increases.  Do you know why?  Less mineralized soil and or black sands that the VLF detector needs to get through.  That's why I enjoy hunting tailings more than virgin ground with a VLF.  Plus the VLF detector is lighter and faster than bigger PI's and has better iron identification.

Here is the issue with many that hunt for gold with a VLF detector at such sites like Rye Patch, Quartzsite and other well know nugget producers.   If you go where others who have hunted using big PI's and or GPZ's in the mentioned sites, you are best not to use a big coil on the VLF detector.  You're better off using a small coil to get the best results on tiny nuggets.  Bigger machines, especially SD/GP and early GPX models miss many small nuggets as that is one of their weaknesses.  So you need to take that knowledge, get your VLF and put in the smallest coil you can get and then go find the tiny ones they missed.  Below a prime example of using a VLF detector with small coil to find a tiny nuggetDSCN9243.thumb.jpg.c0db5e03d4e7799d5bbf53435cb1986c.jpg

Trying to put a big coil on a VLF detector so you can match the depth of a PI is just plain ridiculous for most (not all) known nugget producing grounds.  VLF's can not handle the soils and will not perform near as well as a big PI machine.  BUT...if you use the VLF in tailing piles with no soils or mixed, then your depth of the VLF will go up and you actually could use the stock coil or on a rare occasion go big.  Not saying the bigger PI's are not good in these situations, but the weight of the bigger detectors are excessive and their Iron ID capabilities are not as good as todays VLF's

If I was on a budget of $3000 to find as many kinds of gold possible, here is a good setup I would consider.

My #1 selection for VLF (at this time) is the Equinox 800 with stock coil and a small 6" round coil.  Cost for both detector and extra small coil approx $1100.  1Ge.jpg.ac3755e70eb0be158606c7f81dddedb8.jpg

The other detector would be a used (from a dealer who knows how to test it properly) GP-3000, GP-3500 or GPX-4000 detector.  This is your power detector to get nice nuggets at depth in most all soils.  These detectors can be picked up for $1000 to $2000 and are proven winners when it comes to 2 gram nuggets and up at depth (better than a VLF).

1699300984_BA2s.thumb.jpg.cd5c7902e418675110f11f6a4aa31b41.jpgdeep2.JPG.bd49e7001abdc0f2c029e35a87b56058.JPGdeep1.JPG.ffca437935d81a0746bf464890d88582.JPGDSCN0176.JPG.e53e79537b870882e40e8ff105670c49.JPGDSCN4210c.thumb.JPG.de4a516b5426886e03b8efaf3cae4e3c.JPGsGusGolda.JPG.e792346121713aa7d7e85e0844d28117.JPGV0000183.thumb.JPG.811cdef5e8c76e6e1963594645159e1e.JPG

Hope this helps and if anyone else wants to add, please feel free.

Thx Gerry!

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Similar Content

    • By LuckyLundy
      Early wet Weather in Northern Nevada, sure messed up a few of my hunts!  But, this last Hunt was called Rain or Shine!  Be there or miss out with the original hunting party.  We had half the amount of coils on the ground during this hunt and managed to find a few sweet spots of dinks to add to our pokes.  Rain on us with snow in the ground 200’ above us all 4-Days!  6000, Retune Button got a workout.  I kept the 11” Mono on.  Tried the DD for a few hours with no luck, don’t know if the ground and line I took was bad, but the guys behind me where finding nuggets…so back to the 11”.  My truck is out in the drive way in the wet Weather still loaded up with me gear!  Getting wet again to unload it, I can’t wait 🤨
      Until the next Hunt!
      LuckyLundy

    • By NvAuMiner
      Is there or has there been any comparison testing done in the field on depth with the 6000 vs the 7000 using the NF 12" Z-search coil.
      Thanks . . .
    • By Skookum
      I had something strange happen, today. I had my GPX 6000 battery fully charged and fresh off the charger.  It had completed its charge cycle and then trickle charged overnight.  I popped it in the detector and started detecting. Within five minutes the battery meter dropped from three bars to two bars.  If I turned off the detector and let it sit for a 5-10 minutes and then turned it back on, it would go back up to three bars for a short period of time before then going back to two bars. Has anyone else noticed this with theirs?
    • By Luis
      as I already put in another post, I just bought a second-hand gpx 5000.  It comes with the comander 11 DD and 11Mono coils.  I would like if it is possible for a colleague to recommend a coil to complement the ones it brings.  Its use would be to search for coins.  I've been looking at the detech 15 inch DD ultra sensing.  If anyone has used it, what can you tell me about it?
    • By Reno bob
      Hey all, still have a gpx 4000 I bought from AK M&D. Guess it's time for an upgrade. My Question is does the 4500 have enough improvements to justify the upgrade
    • By The_Stalker
      After reading all items available I am confused.  It's probably just me so I apologize if this is a dumb question.  In soil that has low mineralization which coil will go deeper and is more suitable, a DD coil or a mono coil of equal size?  Or in low mineralization does it not matter if you use a DD or a mono coil?
       
      Bill
×
×
  • Create New...