Jump to content

Simplex 2.68 Detector Coil Compatibility


Recommended Posts


  • Steve Herschbach changed the title to Simplex 2.68 Detector Coil Compatibility

Good mercy just got the message straight from NOKTA😲😥 Its all over ,but the scream Now what? So no other coil will help?For an old dude like me Going on 81 ,guess just ride it out with the 2.68.Is it that much difference besides depth?This Simplex is New old stock of 1.5 years and has not hit the dirt except for my coin garden! That's what happens when you spend to much time in Hospitals.Hmmmm,whats the next move keep it or sell it.

  • Oh my! 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, w.j.mccrary said:

Good mercy just got the message straight from NOKTA😲😥 Its all over ,but the scream Now what? So no other coil will help?For an old dude like me Going on 81 ,guess just ride it out with the 2.68.Is it that much difference besides depth?This Simplex is New old stock of 1.5 years and has not hit the dirt except for my coin garden! That's what happens when you spend to much time in Hospitals.Hmmmm,whats the next move keep it or sell it.

Wow, you appear to be overreacting a bit.  The update is free and can be performed by the user in a matter of minutes using a PC and the included charging cable that came with the detector. If you have the ability to post to this forum, you likely have the hardware and know how to handle the firmware upgrade process without much problem.  Garrett, Minelab, XP, and a number of other popular detector manufacturers have migrated to this approach to address performance and compatibility issues and to roll out new features without having to send detectors back to the manufacturer or to purchase an upgrade.  This is likely not the big deal you are making it out to be…. If you are concerned any number of people can help walk you through the process in detail, but Nokta’s instructions are straight forward and there are probably you tube videos showing you how to do it.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think there was probably a misunderstanding that its an older model Simplex and he needed the newer model to run the coils, the firmware is something you can upgrade yourself at home, you can turn your older firmware Simplex into the new one quite easily 🙂

This guy does a bit of a rundown on how to install the firmware from a Windows computer

Any questions just ask, a number of people here could help you with the process if you get stuck.

If you're really concerned you could take it back to where you bought it, it's likely the dealer will put the new firmware on for you in a few seconds.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

OOOPS,forgot to ask what happens if you chose to use a Nel or Cor's 9.5" x 5" instead nokta coils? I remember when I purchased the Simplex 2.68 at that time the Nels and  cor's coils were all ready out for the 2.68  The 9.5"coils were being sold by east coast forum.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Interesting question about the Nel coils, I've not tried a Nel on my Simplex,  I can't justify buying one for it as I don't use it much but I would guess Nel coils were made to original Simplex specifications so they'd probably just work without the firmware update, could be wrong of course.

I would say it's best you just upgrade the firmware anyway, the other benefits of the newer firmware aside from just the new coil options make it worth while.

Nokta even have their own update tutorial video showing you how to do it

 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Greetings Phrunt  thank you for your answers good mercy out of all those detectors which two are your favorite?Well,I am willing to try the 9.5" x 5" d.d. coil its on order . Will report the results as soon as it gets here I already have acor's 9.5" on my Fisher F-70 and works great and separates like it should.

  Can you tell me all the new advantages when you upgrade to 2.77 & 2.78. Thank you---William

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thanks William, my preference is the Equinox although it's obviously more expensive than the Simplex.   The Simplex will do the job nicely for you though.  Glad to hear you've got a coil on the way.

Here is a rundown of the firmware versions and their changes, personally I prefer 2.77, 2.78 gives no ID at all on deep targets when 2.77 gives a really jumpy messy ID on them, both give reasonable ID's on shallower targets. 

You'll see with all the changes below, it's a good thing there is the updates and you'll benefit greatly from installing the update.  The new Park 1 is vital too, Park 2 lacks depth, Park 1 is the standard mode I use on mine.

Sensitivity Level 7 has been added to provide extra depth
Please keep in mind that the device may run noisier at this level depending on conditions and that this is totally normal.

An extra mode has been added – Park 1
The Park mode on the previous versions has been named as Park 2 on this update and a new Park 1 mode has been added.
Park 1 is relatively deeper but a bit slower than Park 2 mode.
In this mode, the device produces a low tone for ferrous targets with 0-15 IDs, a medium tone for gold and non-ferrous metals with IDs 16-69 and a high tone for non-ferrous metals with IDs 70-99 such as silver, brass and copper.

Changes have been made for the All Metal Mode
It has been removed from the first spot in the options and moved to the end.
Threshold setting has been added to this mode.
In the All Metal mode, the threshold setting for each sensitivity level is optimized to provide the best performance on different terrains.
You can adjust the threshold setting between -50 +50 based on ground conditions.

Mineralization bar has been added to the screen

Timeout lengths have been increased

BACK function (up arrow) has been added to exit from settings to go back to the main screen without waiting for the timeout

ID depth has been increased

4 levels have been added to Automatic Brightness shown as A1-A2-A3-A4 on screen

Audio for the pinpoint mode and wired headphones has been optimized

Manual Ground Balance function has been expanded
If the device receives a lot of noise and/or emits false signals and you cannot eliminate it by reducing the sensitivity, first set your sensitivity back to its original level. Then increase the ground balance value between 90.1 – 91.0 one by one until the noise is eliminated. As the ground balance value is increased, the device’s sensitivity to high conductive (silver, copper etc.) coins will decrease.

Mute Function has been added
Press the Pinpoint Button once to mute your detector without going into settings. This will help eliminate the interference noise from pinpointers that operate at the same frequency.

Audio levels for wired headphones
2 sets of audio levels have been added when the device is used with wired headphones. Choose between Low (L1-L4) or High (H1-H4).

There is also an optional update to 2.78 from 2.77, although my testing has shown performance is better in 2.77 than 2.78 so personally I'd stick with 2.77.

Firmware version 2.76 and 2.77 introduced a new search mode, Park 1, which increased the search depth. Users may experience jumpy Target ID's, which is a normal result when identifying targets at extreme depth and under certain conditions. Some novice users may find these jumpy ID's a bit confusing.

Firmware version 2.78 has been introduced in order to bring "stability" to the Target ID's when hitting deep targets. In short, it does this by not displaying a Target ID for deep targets. Don't worry, search depth is not affected!

If you don't mind jumpy Target ID's for deep targets, then we recommend you remain on Firmware v2.77. However, if you find jumpy target ID's on deep targets to be a bit disconcerting, then update your Firmware to v2.78.

Another option is to upgrade the Firmware to v2.78 and give it a swing. If you prefer v2.78 then great, if you prefer v2.77 you can always downgrade back to v2.77.

This software update will NOT affect the overall depth and sensitivity of the Nokta Makro Simplex+.

 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Similar Content

    • By ls4s
      Does anyone know if other wireles headphones are compatable with the simplex metal detector
    • By phrunt
      I've struggled to like my Simplex since getting it, I guess it's totally my fault as I expected more from it than it should and could provide for a detector in it's price range I guess.  It's loaded with great features and build quality is fantastic but the performance of it was rather lacking for what I use detectors for and that's finding deep silver coins in mild soil, a situation where the Simplex really doesn't do well in it's standard setup., I admit I've not tried a bigger coil than the stock coil on it although other detectors with that same size coil do better by comparison and even older cheaper detectors do better than it with their stock setups at that task.
      I've heard a lot of people say where the Simplex does well is sorting out good stuff from trash, some saying it's better or equal to high end detectors at this task so I thought I'd try it out in a rather unusual situation of digging the trash (nails) and leaving everything else.
      I have another block of land behind my house that used to have an old house on it that was burnt down some time ago in a accidental fire before I bought the land, when I first started detecting I found a number of reasonably shallow old coins in this area, I suspect it was someones coin collection that lived in the house as they were unusual coins from all over the world and in good condition like they'd not been in the ground all that long, they cleaned up well.  These were mostly found with my T2 which I find amazingly similar to the Simplex in performance.
      I've recently killed all the grass off an area on that land and leveled it as it was a bit lumpy as it's only had sheep on it the past few years before I started clearing it and planting a bunch of fruit trees.  The idea was to use this part of the land that I've cleared off grass for a parking spot for a caravan which I believe Americans call a trailer? once I get gravel compressed down on it.
      I first marched out there and tried to use my CTX 3030 and the thing drove me nuts, I don't understand it enough to deal with the mess of targets in the area from the old house being demolished I guess.  I tried the Nox with Coiltek 10x5" coil and it was easier for me to understand as I've used it to death, although there is so much trash here I just wanted to get rid of any old nails that could give the caravan a puncture, so just shallow nails and the Nox was rather annoying with the various target ID's all over the place for many targets and nothing was a reliable dig me I'm a nail guaranteed.
      Then it hit me people talking about the Simplex in high trash.  So I fired it up, and to my surprise with the sensitivity on really low in the Park 1 I was able to cruise over the area and dig up nail after nail easily, no confusion as to what was a nail at all, the ID'd as 4 every single time.  Nice solid 4's.  It made it so easy to clear the area of nails.



      So the Simplex nailed it 😛  I left anything deeper in the ground only wanting to recover the shallow targets that were at risk of going into a tire.
      Unfortunately during the process I didn't hit any ID's that were exciting enough to think they were a good coin but I really found the Simplex really quick and easy to target the shallow depth nails with accuracy in among all the other junk in this area.  If I get bored I'll experiment more and dig other ID's of shallow targets and see what I've missed.
      I know it's a bit of a pointless post, but I just found it cool how easy and effective the Simplex was for the task and every single nail in that photo came up an ID 4 even though they're different size nails and some bent and some straight.  The big metal things I dug as I just wanted to see what they were 😛
      I must say the Simplex tones are horrible, on these nails it sounded like I was murdering a chicken.
    • By Rick N. MI
      Just wondering when the SMF comes out.
    • By abenson
      I recently picked up a Garrett Ace Apex with 3 coils for a very good price locally. This is the second one I have owned. I spent the last few weeks doing some indoor and outdoor tests as well as some park hunting to get reacquainted with it.
      I stated on the Garrett forum that I would give the Apex another chance and do some infield testing against the Equinox and Simplex and report back. I had a chance to spend about 5 hours at a relic site over the weekend and do just that.
      The site has had mixed usage since the late 1850’s and includes Military artifacts as well as more modern house site items. The site has been hammered over the last 6 decades and so I thought it would be the perfect test. Ground is 4-5 bars on the F75 and is for the most part loaded with iron except farther out where we will usually just find fired .58 cal bullets, shotgun and .22 brass.
      I started with the Apex 8.5 x 11 coil out where we usually just find bullets running MF, custom program where everything is accepted over 20 and sensitivity all the way up. My goal was to just see if I could find bullets, no comparisons were done. I quickly found out the sensitivity was too high as I got a lot of false signals and chased a few ghost signals. Once turned down 1 bar the Apex ran smooth. I managed to find 4 .58 cal bullets and a few .22 and shotgun brass. Deepest bullet was 6 inches and was a very jumpy signal. I’ve done a video in the past digging bullets with the Apex in this same area if you want to see it you can find it in the Garrett forum. It’s under 10 things I like and 5 I don’t like about the Apex. Unlike the Equinox in this same area, the Apex has a real hard time identifying deep large targets vs small .22 brass. The signals are jumpy in both regards and hard to determine depth.
      Next I moved to an area close by that has produced quite a few buttons and dropped bullets in the past. The area is very trashy in places with glass shards and square nails. I used the Equinox 800 with the 11” coil running Park 1, 50 tones, iron bias F2 0, recovery 4, Multi and sensitivity 22. The Equinox 600 can be setup exactly the same way. I proceeded to mark 8 targets that came in at as low as 1 up to the highest being 15 on the Equinox. All of these targets were located in the trashy areas. The Simplex 11” coil Park 2 was able to see all but 2 targets, one being a small pewter button about 3 inches deep the other being a fired percussion cap also about 3 inches deep. The Apex 8.5 x 11 coil unfortunately was only able to see 2 targets. The first being a large pewter button maybe and 1 inch deep the other being a fired percussion cap on the surface. A small Navy cuff button laying on the surface (that only read 1 on the Equinox) was surprising invisible to the Apex. Granted there were a lot of iron signals around it.
      Last area, the house site. This time I started with the Simplex 11” coil running park 2. Now I know what some of you are going to say. Why use the larger coils in trashy sites? I wanted to see what the stock coils would do, I consider the 8.5 x 11 the stock coil for the Garrett machines. Yes I may have gotten better results with the Apex using a smaller coil. Anyway, I located and marked 4 targets with the Simplex. The Equinox was able to see all 4 but did struggle with one, all explain in a minute. The Apex was able to see 3 out of the 4, but was totally blind to the one the Equinox struggled with. Target 1 was a modern penny about 1 inch deep and was not a problem for any of the detectors. Target 2 was a small piece of decorative brass about 2 inches deep which all the detectors saw. But the Apex numbers were all over the place where as the Equinox was a solid 14 and the Simplex a solid 44. Target 3 turned out to be a 1929 S wheat penny at 5 inches deep. The Simplex read 66-68 and could get the signal as I rotated all the way around it. The Equinox struggled, first direction I tried got nothing but iron grunts. But as I rotated around it, I started to get a choppy signal that would bounce up to about 17. The Apex got nothing but iron grunts no matter what I tried. Signal 4 turned out to be a 1946 dime at about 3 inches and was a good solid signal on all the detectors. I also located 2 old clay marbles while I was walking around the house site.
      In a relic hunting scenario, the Equinox and Simplex have a clear advantage over the Apex. The Apex likes round objects and does the best on them and has a fairly accurate ID. Odd shapes are not it’s strong point for sure. But for someone who only wants to dig coins, it could be great. I will also say that of the 3 the Apex was most comfortable to swing and I think I like the wireless headphones the best on the Apex.
      In the future I plan to take the same 3 machines to a ghost town and the beach to see how they stack up against each other. I will say that the more I use the Simplex the more I see just how great a value this machine is. For the money you can’t beat it.

    • By oldcoinhunter
      Been using the Simplex with the SP 24 for a year now and have done really well with it, especially in trashy areas. Just won an xp orx which came with the hf elliptical coil and I just ordered a 9 inch x 35 coil. Detected a couple of places with the orx and it doesn’t seem to separate out the trash that is close to a coin like the Simplex. I’m wondering if the x35 coil I’m getting  can be setup to do as well as the simplex in trashy areas. Thank, Jim
    • By ☠ Cipher
      This may require some out of the box thinking. In a relatively recent interview with DetectorShop Italia Dilek said there are future plans for the Simplex that she couldn’t discuss right now. Sounds pretty intriguing given that NM is an innovative company. What are your guesses about what the future might hold for the Simplex given that we know they have no desire to make it any more complex. This should tell us the plans aren’t necessarily feature driven. Then again…I do believe it was Dilek who had also discussed the idea that high end machines could be made more affordable by breaking them down into a series of software packages. For a beginner, once you outgrow a startup package you could buy progressively more advanced packages, growing with the machine and paying for it in more affordable increments. The Simplex may also be powerful enough to run as a two box attachment similar to that of the Garrett GTI-2500. What do you think might be the possible future of the Simplex? I know it doesn’t get us anywhere to speculate, but I think it’s fun to think about and see what people come up with. Over time we see how it ages. 
×
×
  • Create New...