Jump to content

A Few Nuggets For The GPX 6000 And GPZ 7000


phrunt

Recommended Posts

19 hours ago, Norvic said:

Not very often I agree totally with JP but I do on this one, I believe the Z even with the 10" X coil doesn`t hold a candle to the 6K/11"Mono on those small scraps.

And three sets of eyeballs here in the U.S. have a more nuanced view on the subject based on our testing of said detectors and coils. It certainly was not a slam dunk. What I saw leads me to be cautious in telling a properly outfitted GPZ owner they need to ditch their Z for a 6000. Which is funny because I had to hold my own against the masses when advising that most U.S. operators overall are better off with a 6000. Seems that was not a very popular view at the time, but now it’s flipped the other way, and defense of GPZ is less popular? Hard to know which way the wind blows sometimes. But it’s a fine line when discussing the smallest gold, and which puts the most gold in your pouch by the end of the year, the smallest bits, or maybe something a bit more substantial. EMI also is not a factor to discount and ignore, but to factor in as to what machine might make the best choice for people. Especially one they already own and have a lot invested in. Buying new without owning either is another matter. All I know is people on their own ground running machines on their own gold can make their own choices and calls as to what works best for them, and deserve to have their choices respected, whether I agree absolutely or not. The 6000 is hands down the best machine for me on my ground and my gold, and better yet on my arm, but that’s just me. Others may come to different conclusions on their ground and gold, and I’m fine with that. Merry Christmas, Happy Holidays, or whatever else floats your boat. :smile:

  • Like 9
Link to comment
Share on other sites


I must say I'm in a very fortunate position with my mild ground conditions that when the going gets tough and I want the find the smallest bits of gold I can fire up my Garrett 24k, Gold Monster or Equinox 800, or even dust off my antique Gold Bug 2 and really show what finding small gold is, gold these mighty Minelabs have no hope of finding at all.  I understand in a lot of locations people can't use these detectors so effectively due to mineralisation but I can, and Aureous has proven he has been able to use his 24k in locations in Australia where others dismiss VLF's as not viable and he's done exceptionally well with his on small gold also by getting gold the high end Minelabs completely miss.

Unfortunately using them on ground like at this particular location they're like a machine gun going off all over the place on every swing with all of the pellets, the GPX 6000 and 7000 are not doing this, why? because they're missing a lot of the pellets, and a lot of the tiniest gold to go with it.

Next time I'm there I'll take my 24k and show just how many pellets are in the area, I'll basically just be able to turn on the camera, turn on the detector and swing the coil over the ground for a couple of swings to demonstrate what I'm talking about,  a large number of these pellets are being missed by both the high end Minelabs.  The thing that makes the VLF's not viable at this location is they're too sensitive to small targets.

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Aye, the Z vs PI vs VLF debate was muddied even more with the 6K (not negatively but delightfully positive) and I suspect it will be so even more as more coil options come for the 6K. Gold size is a top deciding factor I suspect for most as although multiozers are nice the sub grammers are the bread and butter for enthusiasts and I suspect Pros alike. Either way I am as I`ve stated before keeping my Z/X combos.

My age, expectations, back yard and level of experience has me at a point for the first time where I do not have a clear cut one main gold detector (always with a VLF on standby) even though my main deciding factor of this has not changed, it simply has to pay its way. It is a very fortunate place we all are at regardless of our individual circumstances having such a quality of choices. Does anyone want a super modded hardly used ergonomic SDC.........😉

  • Like 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Steve, that’s the beauty of this forum, it allows for polarised views and also provides the opportunity for people to become enlightened and then change their POV, me very much included. 😊 

As an example I’ve this past season taken on board your comments about running your machine flat out, something I have always discounted as nigh on crazy, because of that walleyed view I was missing a vital piece of information that you’d provided with your insane settings suggestions....... do you know what that is/was? Volume!! 🥴

I totally missed that you run your volume low. Well what a turn around that has been for some of my approaches to certain aspects of my detecting when the conditions allow for it, of course I’ve tweaked the concept to suit my particular tastes but the whole thing has coalesced out of your personal approach to detecting and willingness to share your ideas, so thanks mate. 😊 

JP

 

  • Like 8
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Jonathan Porter said:

 

As an example I’ve this past season taken on board your comments about running your machine flat out, something I have always discounted as nigh on crazy, because of that walleyed view I was missing a vital piece of information that you’d provided with your insane settings suggestions....... do you know what that is/was? Volume!! 🥴

I totally missed that you run your volume low. Well what a turn around that has been for some of my approaches to certain aspects of my detecting when the conditions allow for it, of course I’ve tweaked the concept to suit my particular tastes but the whole thing has coalesced out of your personal approach to detecting and willingness to share your ideas, so thanks mate. 😊 

JP

 

Hope I get this right(?)  You run hot but turn volume down way low and I assume that helps keep chatter down but allows targets to stand out better?  Interesting....

PS... I'm thinking 6000, not gpz

Thanks guys

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, oneguy said:

Hope I get this right(?)  You run hot but turn volume down way low and I assume that helps keep chatter down but allows targets to stand out better?  Interesting....

PS... I'm thinking 6000, not gpz

Thanks guys

I certainly do but that's with the GPZ, and that's where the benefits of things like the Steelphase SP01 help, the GPZ volume I have set is at 3 out of 20, and I have the Steelphase maxed out on it's volume to my speakers, I find it makes the detector more stable with the small targets standing out more, without the audio booster then I have to go the other way and turn up the GPZ volume.  It's a pain in the butt having to wear a harness just to use the SP01/Speakers and I'd rather just use the WM12 and no harness but the benefits I find are worth it, I don't always do it though as a harness is uncomfortable and annoying 😉  I found similar results with my older GPX.

Steve explains his settings here again for the GPZ  https://www.minelab.com/treasure-talk/steve-s-insanely-hot-gpz-7000-settings

How that translates to the GPX 6000 I don't know but I'd like to, I haven't really heard of people bothering so much with audio boosting on the GPX so maybe just turning the volume down and relying on the headphones and the volume they can produce and amplify which you virtually have to wear anyway does the same?   Hopefully someone who knows comments.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, phrunt said:

How that translates to the GPX 6000 I don't know but I'd like to, I haven't really heard of people bothering so much with audio boosting on the GPX so maybe just turning the volume down and relying on the headphones

Righto somewhere back in another thread mentioned using the volume control on the 6K in conjunction with the volume control on the Aventree Torus speaker band, as no one commented I did not elaborate. Although this is not using a 3rd party booster perhaps my further "playing" with these 2 volume controls is of some interest to others, using such does indeed boost the 6Ks signal plus with an added bonus controls to a certain extent what has been called EMI on the 6K. I say what has been called EMI as I consider  in some cases it is not EMI as Steve has also voiced back in another thread but I believe simply overdriving the audio. Further this "approach" improves the no threshold capabilities of the 6K.

A 3rd party booster may even assist such more but my days of using Boosters are probably over.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thats funny cause I too was messing around with the volume on the unit vs volume in the headphones to crank up the sensitivity but tone down EMI or threshold.  Completely by accident as I thought one would control the other like when wearing BT headphones with an iPad but not the case at all.  Too independent volume controls which give gives unique versatility.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 hours ago, Jonathan Porter said:

Steve, that’s the beauty of this forum, it allows for polarised views and also provides the opportunity for people to become enlightened and then change their POV, me very much included. 😊 

As an example I’ve this past season taken on board your comments about running your machine flat out, something I have always discounted as nigh on crazy, because of that walleyed view I was missing a vital piece of information that you’d provided with your insane settings suggestions....... do you know what that is/was? Volume!! 🥴

I totally missed that you run your volume low. Well what a turn around that has been for some of my approaches to certain aspects of my detecting when the conditions allow for it, of course I’ve tweaked the concept to suit my particular tastes but the whole thing has coalesced out of your personal approach to detecting and willingness to share your ideas, so thanks mate. 😊 

JP

I have for many years, decades, run detectors very hot, but with low volume settings. First, to protect my hearing. But also to modify the hot signal output, which is of course “noisy.” It would and does drive most people crazy to listen to that all day. By setting the volume lower, the “noise” becomes a sort of threshold level, but then targets “pop” above this level due to the detector being “overcharged” with hot settings.

It probably all started with me running my Gold Bug 2 full out at all times. I could have glued my controls in position as they never varied. For me the way I vary the “settings” is coil control. Faster, slower, closer to the ground, higher…. It’s all about hot settings, low volume, and most of all, coil control.

Perhaps you’d remember, that in Australia, you once took a listen to my machine, and commented how low the volume level was. So yes, even then. As long as I can hear the threshold, and more importantly, variations in the threshold, I do not need and actually do not want excess volume. To what end? If I can hear it I can hear it, and after 50 years my ear and brain is tuned for it. Detectors talk to me… I don’t need them to yell at me!

So yes, that was the basis for my GPZ insane setting, the real “secret”; getting the volume right. I run my 6000 the same way, Equinox also. I guess it’s just the way I run detectors, a one trick pony. :smile:
 

P.S. a little more thought and I had to add this. I think there is a brain and hearing thing going on with this. I very often start with a certain volume setting running headphones. After maybe 15 minutes, it will now seem too loud, so I turn it down. And maybe again 30 minutes after that. My hearing varies and everything seems to be getting louder, so I adjust downwards. I want my brain to like, and be sort of reaching for what it’s hearing.

Conversely, I think running volume too loud, my brain shuts down, tunes out. Like listening to an annoying sound, or voice. People working in a loud environment don’t hear it after a while. The brain simply tunes it out.

I know I hear signals others miss, always have. I think this is part of it, part of my personal detecting secret. I have the audio set to where my brain never tires, never tunes it out. I think other some people do the opposite, set it way too loud, so they think they can’t miss signals, as it’s just bashing their ears when it happens. I just can’t detect like that. For me it’s more like having this nice, quiet conversation with somebody I find really engaging, who has a wonderful, soft voice, that has me straining to hear every word, every bit of nuance. I don’t like loud detectors any more than I like loud people. :laugh:

  • Like 7
Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 hours ago, afreakofnature said:

Thats funny cause I too was messing around with the volume on the unit vs volume in the headphones to crank up the sensitivity but tone down EMI or threshold.  Completely by accident as I thought one would control the other like when wearing BT headphones with an iPad but not the case at all.  Too independent volume controls which give gives unique versatility.

Yup, I do wish the 6000 had more audio control, and get it with the headphones providing a more nuanced volume control than the settings on the machine itself, which can at one setting be too low, and the next up too high. For me it’s critical it be “just right”, and the headphones really help with that.

It’s probably also why I don’t hear the “EMI” or whatever it is with the external speaker as much as other people. I almost never max the external speaker volume out.

 

Sorry, highjacking the thread, back to your regularly scheduled program. :smile:

  • Like 4
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...