Jump to content
Sign in to follow this  
Steve Herschbach

Some Gold Nugget Vdi Numbers

Recommended Posts


That was a lot of work!

Still looks like you can't be sure until you dig it...

I presume the DFX is the detector used?  Maybe you could do that again with the CTX...just kidding

fred

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I wonder what your nice specimen from last summer would show?  A foil VDI is what I would expect. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  • When using my ctx I mostly go by vdi numbers. Nugget shooting with a goldbug pro it's sound, and my gpz is a dig everything machine.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

a great little tutorial Steve.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

steve, send me those nuggets and I'll test my mx sport.   maybe:ph34r:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
17 hours ago, Reno Chris said:

I wonder what your nice specimen from last summer would show?  A foil VDI is what I would expect. 

Yea been waiting a while to see that one...pretty please?

strick

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Stick, I noticed in your interests you like Water Boarding. Did you work for the CIA? I know sorry off topic but could not resist.

Steve, Great comparison. Thanks for the time you put into all of this. 

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Great chart Steve.  I have a 18k ring that rings higher then my other gold rings and I always wondered if it was because of the purity. I'm gonna test it today to make sure it's not a fake.  I've read that if I keep digging zinc penny numbers with the ctx (12.35 range) I might eventually get a big gold ring. It has not happened yet. Just for fun I ran my biggest gold nugget over the ctx and it did ring way up there.

Fish- classified info...maybe around the campfire one day.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  

  • Similar Content

    • By Alluminati
      Deep in the depths of winter here, I found myself partaking in some serious speculating.
      With all the controversy of whether or not the Equinox is multi frequency or not, I figure I'd bring some wood to keep warm lol.
      Some of you may recall in one of those threads I was trying to explain that the waveform we see can actually be comprised of more then one, two, three or more frequencies. Additionally I pondered if the multi frequency processing could just be done on the receive side using typical sinusoidal waves that are actually doing the work. Nonetheless here is the transmit side, the side that actually excites the target.
      Below you will see a FFT (Fast Fourier Transform) of the Equinox in Gold2. The scale goes from DC to 125 kHz. (Left to right)
      If you consider the advertised range of Multi-IQ frequencies as being 5 kHz to 40 kHz, you might be satisfied by this as the left half of this 125kHz graph is filled out nicely. There is even a couple little peaks up around 100 kHz, whether or not that is utilized I don't know.
      I'm way off base as to how MIneslab actually does this, but I just wanted to show the kind of information that can be extracted from these signals. I am not trying to prove anything specific other then to say I don't think Minelab is being misleading IMO. Assume something is a little off with my measuring, still that looks like multi-something.
      The approximate frequency peaks of interest measured from left to right are:
      -2.5 kHz
      -8 kHz
      -13 kHz
      -18 kHz
      -23.5 kHz
      -28.5 kHz
      -33.5 kHz
      -39 kHz
      -44 kHz
      -50 kHz
      -54 kHz
      -59.5 kHz
      That covers the advertised range of frequencies which exist on the left hand side of the graph, (Midpoint is 62.5 kHz) I wont bother with the higher frequency stuff as it may not be relevant.
      It doesn't really hit any of the single frequencies, on the other hand Minelab does not explicitly say what frequencies are used in Multi-IQ. (That I know of.) I am happy to see that low frequency response. I was thinking the Equinox was going to be all 8 kHz and higher, which it basically is, but I'm glad to see the 2.5 kHz peak right beside it and of almost equal strength.

    • By Steve Herschbach
      Metal Detector Basics And Theory by Bruce Candy, Minelab
      1.42 MB pdf file, 24 pages
      Bruce is a co-founder of Minelab and the man behind their most advanced designs. This information delves into much greater detail than the above link and has many more illustrations and diagrams.
    • By Steve Herschbach
      Gold Prospecting With A VLF Metal Detector by Dave Johnson, First Texas
      10 Mar 2010 Edition, 2.93 MB pdf file, 56 pages
      Dave is the Chief Designer for First Texas Products and has been involved in designing most of the VLF gold prospecting detectors sold over the last 30 years. This is an excellent primer on using VLF detectors to prospect for gold.
    • By Steve Herschbach
      Advanced Nugget Hunting With the Fisher Gold Bug Metal Detector by Pieter Heydelaar & Dave Johnson, Fisher Labs
      3rd Printing Jan 1993, 2.36 MB pdf file, 46 pages
      This out-of-print book is a good basic text on gold nugget detecting. Although it uses the original Fisher Gold Bug as an example the information applies to most nugget detectors. Part 2 by David Johnson is an excellent primer on hot rocks.
    • By Steve Herschbach
      Fisher Intelligence - Advancing the Hobby of Metal Detecting by Thomas J. Dankowski, Fisher Labs
      5th Edition 04/2006, 6 MB pdf file, 48 pages
      Thought provoking articles on aspects of metal detecting not often talked about.
    • By Steve Herschbach
      A nice summary quote from Tom Dankowski about why Simultaneous Multi Frequency (SMF) is worth consideration over single frequency options...
      “SMF's punch through bad dirt better. Hold on to accurate ID's at depth....and in bad dirt....better. Handle EMI better. Genuinely handle wet-salt better..... to include more accurate ID at depth.,.,.,.,.,.,.,., and a host of other rationale/justifications.”
      Fisher Intelligence (5th Edition) by Thomas J. Dankowski
×