Jump to content

Pulse Induction Discrimination 20 Plus Years And No New Breakthroughs


Recommended Posts


I had an occasion where on a well-known big nugget patch at Bendigo back in the late 90's, I got a soft Ch1 signal and I got instantly excited. I knew it was deep...... I swapped my 11" mono on the SD2200 to the old stock 11"DD once I got down a foot or so just to see if discrim knocked it out. Nope, it was still 'boinging' away and getting louder. I widened the hole until I was 2ft down and had half a wheelbarrow load of dirt around the hole. The ground got damned hard and I was sweating profusely and puffing like a busted train....I remembered my backup Tesoro ElDorado and pry-bar in the 4x4 and walked the 15 minutes back to retrieve them so I could properly use 'REAL' discrim to determine if it was still worth digging any further. I was very happy to hear the signal still zapping away after dialing in the max iron setting on the Tesoro. With the aid of the pry bar, I got 2.5 ft down and hit a soft patch of dirt, right in the middle of my hole...my heart sank, it was disturbed soil. A further inch or two and out popped a huge copper spoon. I'm sure the nearest seismometer would've registered at least 3 or 4 on the Richter scale after my tirade of abuse at the gold gods. After back-filling the hole, I drove home.....

Just because you've got iron discrimination of ANY sort, doesn't mean ALL your big, deep signals are gonna be gold.......

  • Like 5
  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

A basic mono coil itself can be turned into a magnetometer already without adding an actual "magnetometer" (fluxgate, PPM, etc), technically speaking. Any iron inside or near the loop is going to change it's inductance, this is a quantity that can be measured, the change in both field strength and direction can be determined, and that's what a magnetometer does. Further, a coil like a DD could be even more useful than a mono loop, by turning it into something like magnetic gradiometer, which might provide enough resolution/information to be useful. I've posted about this gradiometer idea in the past. 

If anything, a magnetic gradiometer would be the more useful tool at the iron nail/metal detector scale, not a simple magnetometer. Even those though, I believe, are not high enough resolution to really be of use on a metal detector in the way people want them to be when thinking in terms of traditional discrim. 

One problem as you swing over variable ground is that it doesn't do you any good if you have no way to tell the difference between slight ground variations in magnetism (pockets of magnetite, hotrocks, variable soils, etc), or a small ferrous target like a nail buried deep. The deeper the iron, the less accurate the magnetometer will be because the more it will sound just like faint, variable soil (vs a massive local field variation near surface). Your discriminator would need a discriminator itself, because to magnetometers, anything ferrous is going to alter the magnetic field present wether it's magnetite soils, a nail, etc. I'm not a detector engineer, but if I were looking at incorporating discrim with magnetometers, that would be the first problem I would see in terms of usefulness and accuracy, and probably why we don't have magnetometers in detectors already since it's not really something hard to build. 

Magnetometers and gradiometers are great for larger targets though. Especially for exploration and larger scale prospecting work. 

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 3/14/2023 at 7:41 AM, Steve Herschbach said:

Even with the SDC, 6000 and 7000 I cherry pick targets based on tone, so I am using discrimination - my ear and brain.

I'm hoping the engineers can someday add a visual target ID for tone changes on PI and ZVT for better refining of what I'm hearing.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's part of the job of these engineers, working out how to do things that currently can't be done, so I guess all we can do is wait and see where development takes us although I think major investment in gold detectors may start to dwindle with sales slowing and models not meeting sales expectations along with the demise of the African gold rush and ceasing sales to Russia which was a pretty big gold detector market, add to that competition entering the market taking away some of the sales and it's not looking promising.

Manufacturers follow the money, if the money is all in the coin and jewellery detector market that's where the focus will be, I think the Equinox took Minelab by surprise and demonstrated to them a market they can make big money, and they certainly did that, so now if you look at their detector lineup it's rather dominated by treasure detectors and that's where most the new activity has been.

detectors.thumb.jpg.373dd7ace49a04649d3c6b62284a4a45.jpg

 

 

  • Like 5
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 3/14/2023 at 8:37 AM, klunker said:

But Sir! You know how much I love a good Joke.

 So Here's an idea for the jeenyuses.  Induction in iron produces a much stronger field than in non-ferrous metals with the same mass.  Also iron likes to polarize with the magnetic poles of the planet. Also, as Steve said, we all tend to mentally discriminate targets so why can't computer processing do the same while measuring the strength and polarization of a field?

 I'm working on it. Does anyone here have two JJ6LGCC7 vacuum tubes and a 12KV transformer?

you need a flu Flux-capacitor

image.jpeg.f6852e606b85b734dabda9095894d112.jpeg

  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 3/14/2023 at 12:37 PM, klunker said:

But Sir! You know how much I love a good Joke.

 So Here's an idea for the jeenyuses.  Induction in iron produces a much stronger field than in non-ferrous metals with the same mass.  Also iron likes to polarize with the magnetic poles of the planet. Also, as Steve said, we all tend to mentally discriminate targets so why can't computer processing do the same while measuring the strength and polarization of a field?

 I'm working on it. Does anyone here have two JJ6LGCC7 vacuum tubes and a 12KV transformer?

We could use a strong magnet to suck any ferrous object out of the ground before we look for treasure. However we may change the earths magnetic field in the process. Tisk,tisk.

  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...