Jump to content
Steve Herschbach

Metal Detector Discrimination Really Sucks

Recommended Posts


Very good and important write up Steve. Looking forward to your results with the Deus.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Steve.  I'm slowly making my way through the links you put up to my other question.  They have all been interesting and I am learning!! 

So, your thoughts above were disheartening for you. Has that ALL changed with the Equinox or is it just a decent step in the right direction?  

Thanks :wink:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

All VLF detectors suffer the same problem when trying to employ discrimination. In simple terms it is a target signal to ground signal ratio thing. You want to find a tiny item in the middle of a large volume of ground the detector is seeing. The ground reads ferrous and the desired target non-ferrous. In bad ground, it is easy for the ground signal to overwhelm the target signal causing it to be detected but to read ferrous.

All Equinox does is improve on that situation, but it only does so by pushing the depth at which these changes occur back a little further. But if the target is deep enough, or the ground bad enough, Equinox can still make a wrong call. This is the number one reason I prefer to hunt with tones identifying ferrous items instead of blocking out ferrous items entirely.

An old tip from my White's MXT page (edited)...

"There are four things to know. 1. Target ID numbers increase as the nugget size increases. So a 1/4 oz nugget may read around 25 whereas a 1 oz nugget may read around 40 and a 2 oz nugget may read around 50 on the meter. 2. The larger a nugget, the deeper you can detect it. 3. Certain steel items can give positive target ID numbers and 4. Target id numbers are pulled down the deeper the nugget is buried. A 1/4 oz nugget near the surface will read 25, but at depth might read 10, and at max depth may finally read at 0 or lower and actually be identified as iron.

This last point is very important, for if you run a Fisher Gold Bug 2, or Tesoro Lobo, or Troy X5 in disc mode to tune out iron, as is common, deep nuggets may read as iron. If they are, the machines will reject them; you will get no signal, and walk past the nugget. You will never know it is there. Or at best you have to search in all metal mode, then constantly switch to the discriminate mode to check the target. With the MXT employing tones to separate ferrous from non-ferrous, there is no switching and you hunt completely by ear.

With the MXT I like to run the detector in relic mode, with the disc set precisely at 2. Non-ferrous items will give a high tone, and ferrous junk a low tone. If you get a faint low tone, the first thing you do is kick and inch or two off the surface until you get a honk or a chirp. Now dig a little deeper. If the VDI number rises, keep digging. Targets that read iron initially and rise will often turn into non-ferrous readings, hopefully gold. If the VDI number stays the same or goes even lower, you have an iron target."

  • Like 3
  • Thanks 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I started using 0 discrimination with the XTERRA 705 while living in Ohio I always felt when in 0 discrimination and prospecting mode I gained quite a bit of depth with the 705 I also would run with 4 tones or 2 tone when I would run in coin mode I always had a feeling that when you ran in the 99 tones the 705 also lost depth but I don't know if that is true or just my own thoughts and the 99 tones always drove me nuts so I would always end up switching back to 2 or 4 tones,one thing that convinced me to run with 0 discrim was while in my back yard in Ohio I had went over an area next to a big oak tree with discrim and 99 tones set and was getting no signals what so ever so I stopped and set discrim to zero and went to 4 tones re scanned the same area again around the tree and ended up getting a signal which ended up being a 1941 merc down about 10 inches so since then I always run with zero discrim and 2 or 4 tones set    

  • Like 4
  • Thanks 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks Steve, I needed to read this, it clears a lot of my questions up being new to it all and I most definitely won't be relying on discrimination like I once was, it seems silly now but if it said ferrous at all, I just kept walking thinking well my detector must be right or they wouldn't put that "feature" on there plus I did some very basic air tests, my gold ring.... good, a nail... bad, so that confirmed my belief the discrimination was working well.

Without all the information this forum has provided I could of been a detecting casualty, giving up on it all by now as detectors aren't like TV's, you can't press the change channel button knowing your channel will change and then it changes, everything has so many variables, difficult for a beginner without the wealth of information provided here.

So thanks everyone for contributing, you may not know it but all the little bits of information you talk about really help someone new.

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks phrunt, I am glad the information is helping people.

On 1/3/2018 at 3:45 AM, Northeast said:

So, your thoughts above were disheartening for you. Has that ALL changed with the Equinox or is it just a decent step in the right direction?  

Thanks :wink:

Sorry, I missed this bit earlier. No, Equinox changes nothing. The issues appear to be inherent in the basic technology itself. There are clearly good targets, clearly bad targets... and then the mess in the middle where everything overlaps. No matter how you slice it, discrimination is unreliable at best, and robs machines of significant depth.

Yet I use discrimination quite often! :smile: The trick is understanding the trades that are made when doing so.

  • Like 5
  • Thanks 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Similar Content

    • By mn90403
      We've spent a lot of time here lately on whether to X or whether to CoilTek. 
      We don't know if we should Z or Q. 
      We have so many choices we don't know what to do.
      Make life simple and get the app:
      This might be easier.  Forget the coils and forget the manufacturer.  😁
      https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=com.gamma.metaldetector&hl=en_US
    • By uncle Scrooge
      The black stone is pure magnetite. The purpose of this prototype is discrimination that can indicates very deep targets such as for digging . So far all very deep targets were missed , as well as non-magnetic targets are indicated by discrimination like magnetic (iron ) . The prototype was tested on sand of pure magnetite and can be used to search for golden nuggets , while at the same time rejects the shallow iron objects . In tests on different soils shows very low soil noises , and almost complete absence of false signals . There is a video with the same prototype in youtube , from October 2018 .
    • By Jasonj
      I’ve been hunting a good site using the Deus and Equinox which has nails and small iron mixed in with good targets, some good targets being deep, but near or in the iron. My question is, will a GPX with Iron Discrimination turned up and the smallest DD coil pull out the deeper, non-ferrous items amongst heavy iron? Has anyone had any experience with this? I think for shallow targets the Equinox or Deus works better for shallow targets in this “machine gun iron”, but would like to see what others may have insight on for using the GPX. I’m assuming the fast setting and special soil timing may need to be adjusted as well. Thank you in advance.
    • By Keith Southern
      Here's a video i did of the X Steve 
      Sorry its so long but tried to get in the attributes in under a hour LOL.
      50 gain and threshold 40 all potentiometers go zero to 50..disc point is where it just drops out

      AIRTEST DEPTH
      Nickle 14.5" 
      Indian Head 13" 
      Z Penny 13" 
      Copper Penny 12.5" 
      Clad Dime 12.25" 
      Silver Dime 12.25" 
      Silver Quarter 14" 
      Half Dollar 15.25" 
      Silver Dollar 16.5" 
      .58 Cal. 3 Ringer 13.5 
      C.S.A. Rectangle 23" 
      U.S. Oval 25" 
      Breast Plate 23"

      DISC POINTS WHERE JUST GONE 

      Nickle 34 
      Indian Head 38.5 
      Z Penny 39 
      Copper Penny 43 
      Clad Dime 44.5 
      Silver Dime 45 
      Silver Quarter 46 
      Half Dollar 48 
      Silver Dollar 50 still solid 
      Coke Can flat 45 
      Square tab 34 

      The X has very good Disc actually a sweet disc its gone when its gone on the dial just today I set my second disc on 38.5 to low/high tone a .58 caliber three ringer and hunted in a trashy area and picked some deep 3 ringers out by checking on second disc and if the tone was flip flopping I almost KNEW it was a bullet!! 

      You can set the 2nd disc to break up (flip flop from low to high tone) on a target which I like for exactness or silence the target or accept etc.. 

      If you dont want to hear a low tone for disc'ed items just turn the iron volume to zero.then its a single tone with full disc on either first or second disc. 

      You can use both disc to create a notch window if you like to your exact requirements say nickles.Set first disc right below nickle and second disc right above or on edge of breaking then you have a user defined notch to check a target with . 

      You push trigger forward to use second disc and pull for a all metal no tone accept all mode like a pinpoint.theres 2 triggers for either right or left hand operation. 

      Machine is on 12 Volts with Drop in battery holder like say a Infinium with quarter turn door. 

      The Gain control is the receive gain.A amplifier for the returned signal and can be tweaked for hot ground or more benign ground 

      The Threshold is the depth/target size control and decides how weak a signal you can hear the lower you set it the more signal it takes to break though the higher you set it up to a point of say 45 the less signal it takes to over come it.even in deep woods EMI free areas you will overdrive it into instability as a sizzling chatter..Im running it right on edge of sizzle for best depth and even smallest of targets. 

      The I've dug no big iron with the X since running it now about 25 hours.Even in my big iron sites.I hear it but know its iron by the way the tones sound even n just nail reject.of 20.And picked brass out of the sites of all shapes and sizes. 

      Crown caps also sound ratty. 

      The knobs are very tight and you can set them and wont bump them out of tuning..One thing to show the exactness of the disc is I can cancel a flattened beer can and still hit a Quarter Clean 

      Keith
    • By Skookum
      Good evening,
      I’m venturing into the spotlight here with my first post to ask what likely amounts to a novice’s question.  
      It stems from an experience I had about a year ago with finding my largest nugget. The location was in a small creek bed, which had been conveniently cleared of cobbles and overburden down to a small patch of bedrock surrounded by smooth, silty clay by a dredger.
      Using a GM 1000, I had detected out several small nuggets from within the bedrock cracks that had been exposed, but not properly crevassed by the prior prospector.  However, the thick clay surrounding the exposed bedrock had pockets of varying degrees of moisture.
      This was providing me a bit of challenge since the wetter spots seemed to be behaving just like hot spots. After an extended wrestling match with the wetter signals and the available settings, I gave up.  
      However, by the time the next weekend came around, I just couldn’t get those wet spots out of my mind.  With the heat of the summer and record drought conditions, I guessed those spots may have dried just enough to deserve one final pass.
      Within minutes of returning, I had found a solid, repeatable, 2 bar non-ferrous signal in the deepest clay pocket on the upstream side of the rock. (This exact spot had seemed masked the week before.)  Digging 4-5 inches down into the smooth clay I found a “rock” that made my detector sing.  Cleaning it off revealed a beautiful 1/3 ozt. nugget. Call it beginner’s luck—because I do. 
      Now for my question. Were those wet spots of clay giving me fits because of greater relative mineralization, heterogeneity of moisture, or VLF technology?  Perhaps it was some of each?  
      Part of my curiosity stems from never having used a PI detector.  For those of you with plenty of PI experience, do you also struggle with wet spots or mud spots for lack of a better term?  And, if so, are certain PI detectors more resistant to the struggle?
      Thanks for any input you might spare.
    • By Steve Herschbach
      Update January 2019 - I started reviewing detectors on the internet over twenty years ago. At the time it seemed I was providing a service since good information was hard to find. I enjoyed reviewing machines in detail for those who were interested. The internet was more friendly back in those days.
      Times have changed, and these days everyone with a video camera is a metal detector expert. In particular there is a trend where industry insiders like me are considered tainted sources of information, not to be trusted. Personally, I don’t need people questioning my integrity. I was doing this for fun and that sucked all the fun out of it. I am therefore no longer accepting invitations to test or review metal detecting equipment.
      That said, my thanks to those of you who have expressed your appreciation for my efforts over the years. You can find my collected detector reports here. The focus on this website going forward will be individual user reviews as part of the new Metal Detector Database with User Reviews. Check it out! 

       
×
×
  • Create New...