Jump to content
  • ×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

      Only 75 emoji are allowed.

    ×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

    ×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

    ×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Similar Content

    • By idahogold
      Davs scores again!ūüí™ Enjoy" Ig
    • By davsgold
      Minelab now have updated the Xchange2 software for the GPZ7000, and it's now compatible with the 7000 upgraded software from 18 months ago.
      I have just done a download of stored data that was on the 7000 and it worked just like it used to, and it still kept all the find points and stuff from the original xchange2 which was great.
      Also I was able to restore all the MLX file data that I have been saving on the desktop for the last 18 months as well, this was a bit of a challenge to begin with.  What you do is when the 7000 is plugged into the computer, the MLX file that is there, (provided you have saved it) delete that one and copy and paste one of the saved ones from your PC, if you have renamed them just change the name back to GPZ7000.MLX and then just do the normal download form the 7000 to the exchange2 like before, then keep deleting and pasting and downloading till all your files that were save on the PC have been uploaded.
      Job done.  Thanks minelab, I just don't know what took so long.
      cheers dave

    • By Iain
      I recently lost sound whilst detecting. The detector was working just fine. I turned it off after finding 3 small pieces of gold to have some lunch. After i turned it back on and went through the quick start process it just dropped sound. Only noise i got was turning the wireless off and on. Then the detector would shut down without removing the battery. I tried to reset, also didn't work. Very frustrating as i was on a good area and had driven 560km. Please advise as im at a loss. The detector hasn't been used more than 20 times, ie brand new. 
    • By Steve Herschbach
      Published on Sep 30, 2018 by Nuggethunting (Rob Allison). ‚ÄúHere is a series of 3 short videos filmed in Arizona. Not all targets are gold, but at least one was a small gold nugget. I was using the Minelab GPZ 7000 Metal Detector.‚ÄĚ
    • By Aadii
      Good afternoon!
      would you help me regarding  minelab Gpz 7000, whether it can detect other metals like silver, bronze, iron, relics, coins antiques other than gold?
    • By phrunt
      So lately I've been noticing when out detecting with Kiwijw his GPZ will find tiny bits of gold quite deep, that weigh less than a shotgun pellet and after often smaller in size, but appears to miss a majority of the pellets very close to the surface, where most pellets call home but not much of the gold calls home.  
      At this one particular spot we went to the other day I decided I'd just use my Equinox and 6" coil, and he used his GPZ with it's 14x13" coil. 
      I had at least 60 pellets by the end of the day, he had about 15 or so, there was no exact counting but the difference was obvious.  We were both on the exact same ground, a patch about 20 meters by 20 meters at most as a guess.  We both covered a majority of the same ground, starting at one side each and worked our way over to the other person's side.  When I got to his side I was digging pellets like mad, even in his dig holes where he managed to get bits of gold out of like the GPZ hardly noticed the pellets.  I was puzzled by this as I was wondering how he found the bit of gold no bigger than a pellet in amongst the 6 pellets I got out of his dig hole.  John did mention he often scapes away the surface soil and if the signal continues down he'll dig it thinking it's possibly gold, is this the reason he doesn't get as many pellets or does the quirk go deeper?
      This has had me stumped for some time and John wasn't sure why he digs less pellets as he is getting gold smaller than a pellet very often with the GPZ but we both put it down to the HF VLF sensitivity.   It was seeming like the GPZ just loves gold.
      I've come to the conclusion from my research this afternoon it's due to coil size more than anything.  I found a Treasure Talk on the Minelab site that had the information I had been searching for.
      Here are the key statements from it that make sense to my dilemma and in red are the key points, 
      We all basically know that large coils detect deeper than small coils. Why is that? The relationship between the size of a coil and the detection depth depends on a number of factors related to both the construction of the coil and the particular target itself. Starting with the coil itself, to compare the relative sensitivity of a large coil to that of a smaller coil, we need to determine the strength of their respective transmitted magnetic fields and the receiver sensitivities. These can be calculated by applying the Biot-Savart law, which describes the magnetic field produced by an electric current.
      For this, we need the exact geometry of each winding, the number of turns and the size of the wire. Once we chose a shape, the number of turns and the wire size depend upon the constraints we apply to the design. For example, we usually require the inductance and the resistance of the transmit winding to be the same regardless of the size of the coil, such that the transmitter electronics operates optimally with any size coil. This leads to a reduction in the number of turns as a coil gets larger or conversely an increase in turns as a coil gets smaller. Based on this, we can understand that a small coil with more turns creates stronger localised fields, while a large coil creates a field that is weaker in the immediate vicinity of the coil, but decays more slowly with the distance from the coil. Thus, further away from the coils, a larger coil has a stronger field.
      We now need to consider the target, for example a particular nugget: if we use one coil as a reference, at what depth can we just detect the nugget with it? Once we know this, we can utilise the previously calculated relative sensitivity to determine at what depth we can detect the same nugget with the other coil. Doing this for a range of nuggets, we find that small coils are better suited for very small nuggets near the surface, while the larger coils are better for intermediate and deep nuggets.
      Is this the reason the GPZ is missing the tiny pellets near the surface but getting bits of gold amazingly deep that are smaller and lighter than a pellet?  I have noticed a similar quirk on my GPX 4500 with it's 14x9 EVO coil where it will miss a lot of shotgun pellets but find tiny gold deeper but it doesn't seem as pronounced as the GPZ but again that's an amateur operator vs a professional.  I will try emulate this on an air test when I get the chance but I can't run my GPX around my property as there are power lines nearby that it really doesn't like.  Are the pellets KiwiJW is getting the ones that have somehow made their way deeper and he's missing the more shallow pellets?   I understand John's a very skilled GPZ operator and it could just come down to operator skill levels but if I am getting multiple signals with 4 shotgun pellets and 1 bit of gold all under my coil at once I'd just be confused and dig all 5 things, meaning I'd end up with all the pellets in my pocket also.  John seems to manage High Frequency VLF performance out of his GPZ but misses a lot of the downsides of using a HF VLF, the tiny nuggets he can find on that thing and the depth they come from are just mind boggling.  It has to be seen to be believed.
      Any help on clearing up this mind boggling quirk would be appreciated.
      A big thanks to Phil Beck for the info I've quoted from his Treasure Talk for this post.  Here is a link to the entire Treasuretalk https://www.minelab.com/anz/accessories-1/gpz-19-1