Jump to content

So What Is Inside That DD Coil?


Recommended Posts

If you have been following my Garrett ATX rebuild thread at http://www.detectorprospector.com/forum/topic/462-garrett-atx-strip-down-rebuild/ you will have seen that I sacrificed a Minelab Commander 12' x 15" DD coil for the project.

 

So may as well get an education on what Minelab has in there! First the coil, then with top cut off. The inner portion is completely wrapped in conductive paper which creates the electrostatic shielding.

 

post-1-0-00461200-1417645421_thumb.jpgpost-1-0-97864900-1417645421_thumb.jpg

 

Tear that all off, and you see a foam oval. Flip it over, and incised into the bottom are the coil windings, with the distinctive back to back Ds. A bit of detector mythology has it that the DD refers to the initials of a guy named Donald Dykstra that supposedly had something to do with DD coil design, but I think that has been discredited. http://compass-metal-detector-forum.548136.n2.nabble.com/Compass-and-quot-THEIR-quot-own-DD-coil-information-td7598726.html

 

post-1-0-39367200-1417645423_thumb.jpg

 

I believe, and JP can correct me if I am wrong, that Commander coils always used Litz wiring http://www.globalspec.com/learnmore/electrical_electronic_components/wires_cables/litz_wire They never really touted it nearly as much as Nugget Finder later did, and now Coiltek with their recent coils offering Litz wiring. I think Commander coils in general have not gotten the attention they deserve, as people seem to assume aftermarket is always better. Something I am a bit doubtful of myself. The main problem with Commander coils really has always been that they are heavy by comparison to some aftermarket alternatives. That, and because Minelab has in general forbidden bundling Minelab product with Minelab coils dealers often promote other coils.

 

Anyway, now you have had a look under the hood!

Link to comment
Share on other sites


Hi Steve, your correct, in fact Minelab have always used Iitz wire in all their coils dating right back to the SD 2000.

I get a bit of a giggle sometimes when I read advertising about large nugget finds being found with X brand coil, at some stage people have to recognize that the box attached to the coil might have had something to do with the discovery too!!

The Commander coils are built like proverbial brick Outhouses (stand alone outside toilets for those who don't follow the Aussie vernacular:-) ), but they are VERY good coils, built by people who make VERY good metal detectors.

Very interesting thread Steve thanks for putting this up.

JP

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Them Minelab Coils are tough as nails! As you know with a metal detecting Wife, I have to have two of everything. I have 10 Minelab coils and two NuggetFinder Coils. My opinion, is Commander Coils hands down are the best and I don't treat mine easy. That big 12x15 DD coil is one of my Favs for patch hunting. Seems to skip right over small lead birdshot and I've found nuggets from sun bakers to well over 12" deep. Steve, hope you get that going on your ATX!

LuckyLundy

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hey Rick, no chance of getting that coil to work on the ATX. I am just stealing the top to make a lid and mounting bracket for the ATX coil. Sacrificed in the name of detector prototyping.

 

I agree the coils are very robust. Actually, I think they are waterproof, Minelab just does not want to say so. The inside of the rod mounting ears are filled with epoxy:

 

post-1-0-52444600-1417722864_thumb.jpg

 

The hole drilled through the ears to mount the rod with a bolt passes through the epoxy filled area. Impossible for water to get in that way, unless the epoxy separated from the housing somehow.

 

post-1-0-41498200-1417722955_thumb.jpg

 

The coil halves are sealed so well that after some effort trying to chisel my way around the seam I just resorted to cutting the top out with a Dremel tool. No water getting in that way. That only leaves the jam nut where the cable enters the coil. The top part is a rubber compression fitting that for sure will block water from entering.

 

The jam nut housing is fastened from the inside with a huge nut, and it was so tight I gave up trying to get it loose and just cut it off. I saw no sign of sealant at the base of the area where the black meets the white in the photo below. Not saying it was not there, but it was not obvious. This would appear to be the only place water MIGHT enter the coil. Personally, I would have no issue myself after seeing this to subjecting a Commander coil to a little light immersion. But just to be safe, a little silicone around the base of that jam nut - that baby is going to be 100% waterproof. No, I am not offering a warranty with that statement!

 

post-1-0-90168400-1417723315_thumb.jpg

 

Finally Fred, the windings are sunk into epoxy more to hold them into place than to make them waterproof per se, as there are thicker and thinner spots. In some places the wiring is more or less exposed on the bare windings. The other half is wrapped in some sort of fabric - fiberglass cloth? Anyway, pretty well sealed up.

 

The foam is dense but if compressed does not bounce back. Putting a very heavy weight on top of the coil or hitting the side really hard could permanently compress the foam, but it would take a real effort. Unlike some foam I have seen used in coils this stuff should not break down and crumble. A lot of coils made have used a urethane foam type of stuff that as the coil gets knocked around would crumble around the edges internally, allowing things to move around, and then the coils false a lot.

 

Good job Minelab.

 

post-1-0-90295500-1417723709_thumb.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thanks, Steve....I ride my detector/coils pretty easy but it is good to know what the inside is made of. I hate false signals from bumping a bush and most of my coiltek coils did that....

 

I wonder if a few small holes and some low-expansion foam would solve most falsing problems on coils that arenot already fully embedded???

 

fred

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Similar Content

    • By diggindaboot
      THIS !! All the people boo hooing will be in line to get one at that price point. It will also force the hand of ML with their price structure. ML raised their price on the 800 and NM absolutely crushed that price point. The Legend doesn't have to be better, just equal to turn the fortunes in their favor. ML and their arrogant "obsolete" charge is foolish. Obsolete by definition means no longer produced or used. Many detectorist and their single frequency machines are still out there making great finds and having fun. Furthermore, single frequency detectors are still being made and sold. NM build quality is far and away superior to the Nox detectors. 
       
       
    • By Gerry in Idaho
      I thought I was pretty damn good, but this technology has me beat.
      https://www.nbcnews.com/science/environment/mining-gap-companies-push-find-raw-materials-electric-vehicle-boom-rcna5077
      Might be time to invest?
    • By mcjtom
      Metal detectors often seem to have a 'Depth Gauge'.  How is it calculated? Is it the strength (or inverse of it) of the amplitude of the return signal?  So, for instance, everything else being equal, the 'deep' target would mean either a stronger target at greater depth or a weaker shallow target?
    • By GB_Amateur
      While we're all abuzz with the announcement and advertised feature and performance characteristics of the XP Deus II, I'm wondering about tests that distinguish between detectors' target separation abilities.  'Word on the street' is that in trashy iron sites, the original Deus is still the best available.  Presumably those reports are based upon in-field testing, which of course is the real proof.  But the downside is, (AFAIK) these are qualitative observations, not quantitative.  Subjectivity involved?  Unfortunately, yes.
      We do have Monte's Nail Board Test for a special case -- iron nails near a single coin, all in the same plane and typically all on the surface of the ground.  Add depth combined with some mineralization (burying the MNB) and you've included another real world dimension.  But in the field, multiple nearby targets are seldom in the same plane.
      So you hopefully see the purpose of this post.  Has anyone seen/tried other methods to better simulate actual in-field conditions to differentiate between competing detectors to best be able to handle trashy sites?
    • By Rick N. MI
      I mostly hunt in lakes and the bottoms are mostly all sand. A test on a sandy beach with the Equinox 800 and Xp Orx, both hit hard on a 14k 3.7 gram gold ring buried at 14". For mild ground I don't see a need for multi frequency. I do like the multiple frequencies on the Orx.
      Is there an advantage to multi frequency in mild ground?
    • By Steve Herschbach
      We have the Deus 2 just announced, Nokta/Makro Multi on the way, possibly the next generation Equinox from Minelab, and maybe even another Garrett multifrequency model to follow Apex, all coming in 2022. I guess we should even toss First Texas in there, as they just officially discontinued the CZ-3D, with the possibility something new will replace it soon. If this does not mean we are moving past single frequency, I don’t know what does. Or are we? There will no doubt always be a place for a finely tuned single frequency detector. However, if you consider Deus as selectable frequency, and Equinox as selectable/multi, then very many of us have already moved past a simple single frequency detector as our primary detectors.
      This is the thread to speculate on what is coming, where we are, and where we are headed. 2022 is shaping up as the year SMF (simultaneous multifrequency) finally takes off for real. In some detectors, it’s just companies chasing the latest marketing catchword. Multifrequency is only as good as the way it is implemented, otherwise we’d all have been swinging White’s DFX ages ago. It’s not enough to make a SMF detector, it also has to have genuine performance advantages. About the only given is that any multifrequency machine will outperform a single frequency on a saltwater beach. The rest, however, is very much up in the air.
      For some detailed explanation of the technology, and a history of past selectable and simultaneous multifrequency detectors, see my write up on Selectable Frequency And Multiple Frequency
      Where it all started, Fisher CZ-6 and Minelab Sovereign, both released in 1991. I think Fisher wins claim to being first, since Minelab takes a swipe at them in their Sovereign introduction. Notice how the misdirection on transmitted versus received and processed started on day one. 

      Fisher CZ-6 Quicksilver. The technology: Dual frequency Fourier Domain Signal Analysis. Patented state-of-the-art analog/digital electronics transmit two VLF signals (one 5 kHz, one at 15 kHz) deep into mineralized soil. The receiver circuitry had two ground compensated target signals to analyze, compare and identify. The result? Deeper targets, more accurate target identification. Wet sand is no problem for the CZ-6, it compensates for salt and ground mineralization simultaneously! Source Fisher CZ-6 Datasheet
       
       

      "The Sovereign" is the first of the latest generation of metal detectors from Minelab featuring Minelab's new technology called Broad Band Spectrum or BBS for short. This revolutionary new technology which is unique to Minelab has already been awarded patents in the USA, Canada and Australia and has several pending. Unlike other metal detectors which operate at just one frequency, or even the "newest" two frequency machines, "The Sovereign" actually transmits over a wide spectrum of frequencies. The resulting signal that is received from a target buried in the ground is processed by a microprocessor that removes interference caused by ground mineralization which limits the depth at which targets can be found, and often results in inaccurate target identification. The remaining signal can then be analysed to determine the actual composition of targets even if they are deeply buried, or if the ground is mineralized or salt water is present. Thus it is the only detector that can simultaneously reject both salt and mineralization while at the same time accurately discriminating the target, making it ideal for black sand beaches and many desert areas. In many areas that are highly mineralized and have been heavily searched in the past, "The Sovereign" will prove that many of the valuable targets are still there waiting for a Treasure Hunter with the proper detector to locate them. Source Minelab Sovereign Instruction Manual
×
×
  • Create New...