Jump to content
phrunt

Recommended Size Classifier For Keene A52 Sluice

Recommended Posts

I could use some advice, I'm running my Keene A52 Sluice in a gravel creek, I've tried the Keene BLUE CLASSIFYING SIEVE NO. 002 MESH which is 11.5mm, it seems to let too much bigger stuff through to run directly through the sluice nicely but Keene's are stackable so I was thinking of getting a smaller size for under it.  I was wondering if anyone has a suggestion for the optimal sieve size for the A52? 1/4" seems like it could be the way to go? Do you recommend stacking the things? does it make much extra work or would I just be better off starting with the size I want to finish with? 

Thanks for any assistance.

 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Kinda depends on the size gold in your area.... If everything is smaller than a 1/4 inch no need to do the extra work of double classifying. 

If your working a bank you can set up a 3' x 4' frame with 1/4 hardware cloth and shovel onto it.

collect the classified material under it in a crate or on a tarp the bigger stuff rolls off onto the ground.

5a5569ba6a1e6_ScreenShot2018-01-09at5_16_14PM.png.9b42c3d1a21cdafb61c8baf5bae1cc97.png

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for the info, as far as I've found the area only has tiny gold, biggest pieces are a under 3mm in size so a 1/4" classifier is the way to go? 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Maybe even 1/8.

The golden rule is .... If everything is the same size, Gold rules.

So the closer you can get all the material to the size of the gold your after the easier it will be to catch the gold.

You may also have to change the riffles in the sluice to something that can deal with small heavy material... Standard riffle will clog and become ineffective.

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for the advice! very much appreciated.

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

No problem... Happy to help if I can.

Here is a thread that may give you some ideas ... 

 

  • Thanks 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Similar Content

    • By Creekboy
      Just finished this project, figured somebody might like it around here. 


    • By GB_Amateur
      My sister ran into a fossiker when out camping who was having an issue with tiny shot while finish panning.  He was sucking the shot into his snuffer bottle when trying to collect the gold.  Any suggestions?  I have a feeling he's not the first person to be annoyed by this.
    • By jasong
      Does any place still make and sell the rubber Knudsen bowl liner? Google seems to just lead to a bunch of spam pages. I acquired an old bowl and the previous owner thought there was a store in Reno that made or sold them but I haven't had any luck locating said store. 
      Also semi-related I am rebuilding an old jig, never used one before, and I was wondering what people use for shot? Do you just buy steel shot in bulk like from an ammo place or is there something cheaper and better to use specific to jigs? I see tungsten shot available for jigs but it's the same density as gold more or less so I'm having trouble seeing how that would work, especially if I want to save the black sands too. I'm curious what people use here?
    • By Condor
      I ran 2 Ozt of my -50 mesh, black sand concentrate through the Blue Bowl.  It came out to .5 gram.  This was 2 oz dry concentrate off the top of the container, I suspect the bottom my be richer after all the jarring around for the past 2 weeks.  I'll send the Blue Bowl tailings and about a couple lbs of concentrates to Rege in PA to see what his Miller Table can do.  If I could fill the back of my truck with this stuff it might be worth something, but as it stands not really a game changer.
      Still waiting on Rokon parts, then back to Gold Country.  I've got a new plan, of course.  118 degrees here in Sunny Yuma tomorrow, but it's a dry heat.  Yeah great!

    • By Jim in Idaho
      I've been trying to come up with a unit to recover gems dry, but finally realized that the "granular convection" problem can't be defeated. In the process of building and trying various ideas, I came up with this unit. While the dry recovery of gems requires some very tight classifying, and thus isn't practical, I tried it for gold, and was simply amazed at its abilities for heavy metals. I have tried it on all sorts of raw materials, running bank feed at roughly 2" minus, and have yet to find a material it doesn't work on to one extent or another.
       I ran it dry...no water, on damp material at the LDMA Blue Bucket outing near Baker, Oregon a few weeks ago, and recovered flour and black sand from old tailings from previous outings. Running wet, the day before, on new material I recovered very near 100% on black sand and gold in front of several witnesses. They suggested re-running the tails, and zero black sand, or gold was found. Last weekend I attended a local club outing at Salmon, Idaho. The material was a heavy clay with lots of rocks....not a fun material, at all. At the common dig, one of the guys next to me, running a highbanker, mentioned that my little unit was handling the clay really well. I was the only person running 2" minus directly into the machine, and the rocks were agitating the material so the clay broke down, and the rocks were mostly clean before they went out to tails. The day prior to the common dig I went down to the locale the common material had been hauled from, and ran the material dry. This was  a nasty, damp material. I expected nothing and was surprised to see both black sand and gold when I did the cleanup. Certainly I lost quite a bit, but any recovery working dry from damp material is an accomplishment. This unit works wet or dry. Very little dust running dry. Very low water requirement when running wet...roughly 50 gallons/hour.
       The full utility US Patent has been applied for.
       You can see the prototype running at Bonanza Bar on the Snake, along with pics of the recovery here:  
       
      Jim
    • By kiwijw
      Hi there RR, All this gadget is doing is mechanically classifying material into a gold pan. Nothing you couldn't do with a manual classifier over your gold pan which you could possibly get away with. I know with my sluice boxing I made & use a bucket classifier than can process a lot of material pretty quickly to feed down the box. 
       
       
       
       
       
       
       
      Clean up time
       

      Good luck out there
      JW 
×