Jump to content

Recommended Posts

So I have had two very experienced older prospectors tell me that they don't like the 2300 because the threshold warbles. In other words it is not stable. It does not really matter which setting you use it still has a slight warble to it. Since I am new to prospecting I just kinda figured this was normal for the Minelab PI's They tell me that their 4500 and 5000 have a nice stable threshold which allows them to hear the faint signal's better. Therefore they don't have to use as much gray matter trying to figure out a target.  I have sometimes wondered  if I am missing small pieces of gold because of this. But then again I have found some very small pieces with the 2300. So my question is....is this normal for the SDC 2300 or is something wrong with both of my machines?   I'm guessing normal.  A few nuggets found during the last couple weeks. Biggest is .52 grams

strick

post-351-0-70385300-1420923315_thumb.jpg

post-351-0-22751600-1420923336_thumb.jpg

post-351-0-11142300-1420923352_thumb.jpg

post-351-0-34604600-1420923366_thumb.jpg

  • Like 2
Link to post
Share on other sites

The 5000 threshold is stable by comparison because you have access to both the Stabilizer control and also the Motion control, Stabilizer is pre-set in the SDC and is fixed MUCH higher than FP on the 5000, Motion is also pre-set on the SDC and is a lot faster than the FP of the 5K. If you want to listen to a 5K set similarly to the SDC put the Stabilizer on 20 and the Motion on Medium, then cross compare the thresholds. 

There is a lot of extra performance made available by having both those settings ramped up for the SDC, however thanks to new circuit designs the SDC can handle them quite well.

JP

Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm one of the old farts that was using one of strick's  SDC2300's a few days ago  I did find some gold with it but after so many years of GPX use that threshold drove me nuts and was pretty tiring on the old brain cells and the ergonomics leave much to be desired.  Jonathan, I do understand what you are saying but it's just not for me. Prior to using it, I was genuinely thinking about getting one.  I'm glad I got to try before I bought one.

Link to post
Share on other sites

So Im not the only one.......

I thought I was going crazy when I ran this baby,,,,

I could only compare it to running my old 2100 when i was just getting started out while I was down with BorderBoy in AZ....

I finally learned to listed to it like a radio blaring and just basically learned which sounds to listen too---when my brain got ahold of the right "note" i was better------

but there is no doubt if you crank up the SDC to 5 and try to run a low threshold , it can be maddening after an hour or so.....

I almost always try to run at 5 because I think it gives more depth---- is this a fair observation???

There was no doubt when i hit a nugget---- but i did have to listen to a lot of iffy targets/mineralized ground and see if they repeat, all the while trying not to track them out.

I need more time on mine and I am interested in hitting some tailing piles/creeks this spring.

All just what I am learning-- please keep posting so i may pick up a few ideas...

paul

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

So Im not the only one.......

but there is no doubt if you crank up the SDC to 5 and try to run a low threshold , it can be maddening after an hour or so.....

I almost always try to run at 5 because I think it gives more depth---- is this a fair observation???

paul

All I can say is you have to love detectorists! The gain control exists to let you choose between a quieter more stable machine or a hotter, noisy machine. You are choosing to make the detector noisy, then going crazy from the noise!

Minelab made the right choice with the SD designation. The SD units were famous for the "Minelab warble" that was always present. The threshold was improved in the GP models and finally made near perfect in the GPX models.

I love a smooth threshold. If you do also, stick with the GPX. The SDC is a throwback because to get it hot some noise has been reintroduced into the unit.

Any VLF you can run quiet or you can run hot. You do not get both at once. Good Gold Bug 2 operators learn to run hot and noisy when they have to. It is simply a choice you get to make.

Increasing gain does not really add much depth on larger nuggets on the SDC but it does make tiny bits bang harder. But if it is driving you crazy, turn it down. Otherwise you are choosing to be crazy. It is the same as taking the GPX and cranking it up extra hot - you can make it noisy also. I usually run the SDC at 4 and only go to 5 if I am on a patch because - wait for it - it is quieter running.

An external speaker with B&Z booster and running even lower gain can make for a pleasant experience.

Minelab has left room to further fine tune future SDC models with advanced signal processing to achieve those quieter threshold levels we desire. Once again the multiple settings on the GPX show why it remains the top Minelab model and the SDC is designated as a mid-range model.

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

My SD-2100’s threshold is very slightly smoother than my SDC s, but target signals are crisp and clear with the SDC, a bit more distinct than the SD.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have ran my sdc very little but the warble doesn't seem to bother me anymore than running a TDI,actuallyto me its kind a soothing sound. It is easier for me to hear the slight change of tone with target with sdc than it is with TDI,just my opinion

Link to post
Share on other sites

I run mine on 4 sensitivity and it's a bit noisy, but thats the way I like it... the small bits scream a bit harder. KInda like a mildly noisy VLF, but not as bad. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Similar Content

    • By rob baum
      I bought a house in meadview about 4 years ago.  Every couple months when I go there I try to get over to gold basin to do some detecting or drywashing.  It took me a couple years to find my first nugget out there and its been a couple of years since then and I havent found another.  I swing an SDC and I've read people have done pretty good out there with that model.  I find plenty of lead and boot tacks a inch or two down but not much deeper than that.   What settings are people using out there?  How deep down are people finding the gold?  Would I be better off with a  different model that can go deeper?  I'm not very confident in my abilities since I learned this machine on my own and have only found 2 pieces in the 4 years and dozens of times I've used it.  Any advice would be appreciated. 
    • By Gerry in Idaho
      Here's the 1st video Minelab USA did for TV.  You might know the English sounding dude from FL.
      What's interesting is we were able to see Minelab Mine Detector as it turned into a gold detector.
      The comments towards the end about seeing what's in the ground before you dig it, I'm still waiting.
      Do you feel, we'll see a detector that can actually see the item or at least the shape of it with any accuracy and if so how long out?
       
       
    • By PPP
      Hi!
      Another classic question,but i have a ctx3030 with 17inch coil and do mostly detecting in the saltwater.It goes deep and thats what i'm looking for,depth,,I know that SDC2300 is a PI machine and very sensitive to gold.But when it comes to depth comparison in saltwater and knowing the SDC2300 has 8 inch coil,then the question is which detector goes deeper?is it worth buying that expensive unit just for saltwater beahhunting? 
    • By Bear
      Glad to see Simon is back.
      I know there are previous posts about SDC battery compartment seal, I had problems with mine this summer.  
       
      Here is the background that I have posted about before.
      I dredge in an old cut that wasn’t cleaned that good into the bedrock.  The bedrock is a quartz muscovite schist that through frost shattering and dissolution is deeply weathered making it easy to dredge into for a couple of feet.  Because it is a cut the water is always murky and work is done by feel.  A couple of years ago I dug a big section that I thought was cleaned up.  Previously I seen a guy use an Excalibur to check where he had dredged so I took the SDC in.  There was targets so dredged deeper and recovered a couple more nuggets.  Now this has become standard practice.  
      This summer while changing the batteries there was water in the battery compartment.  I cleaned and dried the compartment.  Also cleaned the seal and the machine worked fine but I would like to change it.  Through a search nobody sells replacements?
    • By Lunk
      With the fantastic weather in the Rye Patch region during the month of October, I was chomping at the bit to get down there, but my summer job didn't end until the 30th. It still took me a few days afterward to get everything wrapped up, so I finally hit the road and met up with Gerry and friends at Rye Patch the following Tuesday. The detector training class we were scheduled to give that weekend ended up being cancelled, thanks to a winter storm that was forecast to move into the area on Friday. Needless to say, having only two days of optimal detecting conditions before being snowed out and forced to move on to Arizona was a total bummer.😞 Intent on finding a few bits of gold in-spite of the looming storm system and armed with our trusty Minelab GPZ 7000 gold detectors (and one SDC 2300 - also quite trusty, btw), we hit an old patch in hopes of digging up some previously overlooked yellow metal. Only two small nuggets were found after a couple of hours searching with four coils on the ground - not a very good start. It was then that I remembered another old patch nearby that I had completely forgotten about, it had been so long since I had been there. It wasn't a very good producer back in the day, but perhaps we would be able to find a few nuggets that the VLF and early PI machines may have left behind. Within minutes of hitting the ground, my good friend Chef Rusty and I both popped a shallow sub-gram nugget; not a bad start. Soon, everyone was digging good gold! My second target gave an obvious yet deep sounding signal response from the GPZ's stock 14” coil. I imagined it to be a three or four gram piece at a depth of 12” to 18”. Gerry noticed me digging quite an excavation and came over to capture the action on video. At a measured depth of 20”, the target was finally out of the hole, and as I held it aloft there was an audible gasp from the audience that had gathered to watch, followed by cheers and fist-bumps:

       
      After a thorough cleaning, the specimen weighed in at a whopping 40 grams - a totally unexpected and pleasant surprise! The nuggets kept biting sporadically for everyone the rest of the day, and the same was repeated the following day. Just goes to show that sometimes the ZVT tech can really ignite an old burned-out nugget patch. Much fun was had by all, and it really made up for such a short two-day detecting trip. Pictured below are my finds, including the 40 gram chunk, a couple nuggets at over 8 grams, and all the small bits, with a total combined weight of over 66 grams.
       

    • By Steve Herschbach
      Four used ones advertised on The Classifieds in the last couple days, one sold already. Seems like Gerry’s circle of people... you know something the rest of us do not know Gerry?

×
×
  • Create New...