Jump to content

Equinox Gold Prospecting Yuma Az


Condor

Recommended Posts


It looks like the iffy numbers at depth on the equinox are no different than the Gold Monsters vague probability meter readings in mineralised ground , and it also suffers from some bump noise in the high frequency setting. So it’s probably going to suit the relic coin hunter who wants to dabble in s bit of prospecting more than someone who is concentrating on the gold. 

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Equinox is a terrific machine in nearly all ways but I agree it will not truly come into its own as a nugget detector until nugget specific coils are made for it. I will be persevering with mine looking for gold because of what I have seen so far. Once this crazy late winter arctic freeze is over here in Reno I will get back at it and will post more results myself.

Nearly all the nuggets I have found with Equinox so far registered a solid 1 - 3 reading and one a little higher at 6 if I recall correctly. But that is all really small stuff like a grain or less.

Thanks Steve for that great Yuma report!

  • Like 7
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yes John the lightly mineralised locations do wonders for the discrimination features , unfortunately the areas I work in make it almost mandatory to dig the material and lay it on the surface before using the discriminator , on my first outing with the  GM I found a 2 gram piece at 5 inches that showed as ferrous until it was placed right under the large coil. I’m very envious of you guys in the milder soil.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

58 minutes ago, kiwijw said:

That 11" open spoke/web design coil is not an ideal coil for gold......AHH..... & the dreaded bump falsing.........damn it!!!

Forgive my ignorance, but is this coil not deal for gold mostly because  (A) it is open spoke and therefore gets grabbed by impediments causing it to bump/false?  Or, is it more because of (B) its size being too big to navigate crevices?  Or, is it (C) something to do with the DD coil design vs. other configurations?  Or is it (D) mostly a combination of all of the above?  .... OR.. (E) mostly something I haven't mentioned that I don't know about?

I'm learning a lot from you guys,

Thanks

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Condor,  It was good to read your findings and hopefully some of this will help.

Yes I truly agree with JW. 

On all "Metered Identification Detectors", and especially digital readout units, the ID is not a given.  The use of ID is mostly for easy to find clear and clean signals near the surface.  The smaller the target, the deeper it is and the more the mineralized the soil, the less accurate the ID system is and that is why so many gold detectors in past either did not have them or if they did, it was a simple Ferrous or Non Ferrous (left or right) reading.  I too know for a fact that a tiny nugget at depth will not even move the ID on some machines, but you heard a break, tick or change on a machine with threshold.

Even a 1 ounce solid nugget will not read accurately any any detector when pushed to the outer limits.  Just as a 1 ounce nugget at 6" in extremely mineralized soil will not read accurately on some machines.  Using Identification...There is no 100% Guarantee, unless you dig it.

Now for the coil making sounds.  In most gold detectors if you bump the coil to a rock or even a bush on occasion you'll get a little noise.  1st thing I would recommend is to drop the GAIN or SENSITIVITY (same thing) a couple clicks and try it again.

Keep us posted of your progress.  And good luck.

  • Like 5
Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 hours ago, MarXthespot said:

Forgive my ignorance, but is this coil not deal for gold mostly because  (A) it is open spoke and therefore gets grabbed by impediments causing it to bump/false?  Or, is it more because of (B) its size being too big to navigate crevices?  Or, is it (C) something to do with the DD coil design vs. other configurations?  Or is it (D) mostly a combination of all of the above?  .... OR.. (E) mostly something I haven't mentioned that I don't know about?

I'm learning a lot from you guys,

Thanks

 

There is a reason so many VLF nugget detectors come with a solid 6” x 10” elliptical. Cover the same ground per sweep, but great for poking in nooks and crannies. The coil will not catch on rocks or brush. I have found the 11” Equinox coil in Gold Mode to be more bump resistant in theory than the 10” coil on my Gold Monster if both are cranked up to full gain, but it is all those edges catching that then evens it up a bit. It usually only takes a small drop in sensitivity on the Equinox while in Gold Mode to reduce the bump sensitivity issue. You can also go to my favorite alternative to Gold Mode which is Field 2 and the knock sensitivity generally goes away entirely. Anyone hunting gold in Field 2 needs to open up target id 1 and 2 which are blocked by default. I go farther myself usually opening up everything except -9 and -8 plus possibly -7 depending on the hot rocks.

I have an extremely good idea of what most experienced nugget hunters want in a VLF gold machine and the fact is Equinox is different. The coil alone being different would bug many people, and operationally it is a universe away from old favorites like the Gold Bug 2. So I am by no means going to get on some soapbox and tout the Equinox as something every prospector needs. On the other hand my confidence factor in Multi-IQ is pretty off the charts, and due to my faith in the technology I will be pursuing its use as a nugget detector personally. If for no other reason than to aid in further development and to try as always to push it the way I would like to see it go.

  • Like 7
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 minutes ago, Steve Herschbach said:

due to my faith in the technology I will be pursuing its use as a nugget detector personally.

Do you think coilmakers like Coiltek will eventually fill this rather large niche (when lots of Equinox are out there) for small elliptical "gold" coils if Minelab doesn't?  Or even if Minelab does make such "gold" coils?

 Or, has Minelab precluded that through smartcoil tech, i.e. they would have to licence it for coilmakers to be able to get the control unit to play nice with the coil?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...