Jump to content

Recommended Posts

I do not notice latency with LL headphones. However, I do notice it with regular aptx (not LL)--the sound sort of brackets the target on swings rather than being on top of the target.

I'm doubtful anyone can really see the latency at <40ms, which is what it is supposed to be with LL headphones. Now, there is always the possibility that latency is much greater than 40ms, because of some process in either the headphones or the Nox getting snarled up and inserting a delay that should not be there. If you notice latency with LL, I would power down both the headphones and the Nox and restart, to see if it goes away.

Link to comment
Share on other sites


As of yet, I haven't noticed any latency, even the few times I had the recovery all the way up to 8. If I ever do notice lag it will be in recovery speed of 7 or 8.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, relicmeister said:

As of yet, I haven't noticed any latency, even the few times I had the recovery all the way up to 8. If I ever do notice lag it will be in recovery speed of 7 or 8.

I would think the latency would only show up if your increase in recovery speed also caused you to swing significantly faster.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Latency should not have anything to do with recovery speed setting--unless, of course, the Nox is doing something wonky and needs to be reset. It's simply the delay between when the Nox tries to transmit the encoded sound and your headphone speakers/drivers turn the signal back into sound. Aptx low latency represent a huge improvement for bluetooth, but far from being the best wireless scheme. Actually, for lowest latency, don't use wireless; use wires :)  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

23 hours ago, parkgt said:

I would think the latency would only show up if your increase in recovery speed also caused you to swing significantly faster.

True but there is another possible, related factor that can come into play, see below.

31 minutes ago, Dubious said:

Latency should not have anything to do with recovery speed setting--unless, of course, the Nox is doing something wonky and needs to be reset. It's simply the delay between when the Nox tries to transmit the encoded sound and your headphone speakers/drivers turn the signal back into sound. Aptx low latency represent a huge improvement for bluetooth, but far from being the best wireless scheme. Actually, for lowest latency, don't use wireless; use wires :)  

In addition to the swing speed issue noted by parkgt above (where a quickly swung coil tends to "bracket" the target when subject to latency based delay) the higher recovery speed can also enable closely spaced targets to sound off in staccato fashion.  If the time delta between staccato hits approximates the latency delay, then the effect is similar to quickly scanning a single target above which will tend to show the entire group of targets as shifted right or left depending on the direction of the coil swing.  So in this respect, for either case (fast swing speed, or multiple, closely spaced targets) which are enabled by higher recovery speed, the latency effect becomes perceived as a lateral shift in target location with respect to the coil vs. actual position.  That being said, I think the single target bracketing due to high sweep speed will be the most noticeable to the detectorist.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...