Jump to content

Recommended Posts

I have been working on this for a couple weeks.  It's a collapsible, customizable, self-contained, super light, 3D printed sluice box!  I know there are other folding sluice boxes, but none of them actually fit in a backpack, or are light enough to carry in one hand.  This solution would be EXTREMELY helpful!

I'm on my phone trying this, so when I get to my laptop, I'll write in a bit more.

 

 

So I'm currently in the CAD stage.  I have a guy that does 3D printing for me, and his machine is limited to 12"x12"x15" so I might have to shrink the size of the project down to fit, as I don't have access to, or can even afford, a larger 3D printer.

I have this up on Patreon to attempt to raise some funding to start getting prototypes printed, and boost this project towards the finish line!

This is my Patreon page:

https://www.patreon.com/M1dn1ghtN1nj4

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Not really a folding sluice.... more like a "recirculating sluice" setup with two sluices.   3 1/2" wide is really tiny.  Why so small?

Since there will be no recovery riffle/mats/screens, how do you propose a person hold their recovery setup to the bottom of the box?

Keep at it........get it right.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
26 minutes ago, LipCa said:

Not really a folding sluice.... more like a "recirculating sluice" setup with two sluices.   3 1/2" wide is really tiny.  Why so small?

Since there will be no recovery riffle/mats/screens, how do you propose a person hold their recovery setup to the bottom of the box?

Keep at it........get it right.

The user can use whatever mat they want.  I'll make little tabs on the side that will hold the mat down.  This is meant to be hand fed, after you've classified your material.

 

The reason for the size is three fold.  1, it'll fit into a backpack.  2, it costs less to make.  3, the only printer I have access to has a limited print area.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Any feedback?  I'm looking at a 3D printer for $150, but of course, you get what you pay for.  I could probably make the sluice slides 6" wide.  I don't want to go TOO wide, or the whole thing becomes larger than it needs to be.  Plus, the bigger it is, the more it will cost the buyer, and I'm trying to keep the cost down.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

My thought that 1/4" thick plastic is heavier and, maybe more expensive than aluminum?  Have you compared weight and cost? Aluminum is a lot thinner.

Once you have classified your material, you can pan it down in just a few minutes.  A pan is a lot lighter than a recirculating sluice.... You still have to pan it after it goes through your setup.

Have you considered that?

Sorry if my comments seem towards the negative side.   But, you need to think about all aspects.

  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, LipCa said:

My thought that 1/4" thick plastic is heavier and, maybe more expensive than aluminum?  Have you compared weight and cost? Aluminum is a lot thinner.

Once you have classified your material, you can pan it down in just a few minutes.  A pan is a lot lighter than a recirculating sluice.... You still have to pan it after it goes through your setup.

Have you considered that?

Sorry if my comments seem towards the negative side.   But, you need to think about all aspects.

I'll take all constructive criticism. 😎

 

This will take trowels full of dirt, and separate black sand and gold from the rest of the larger and lighter materials.  It just won't take boulders the size of your fist.  lol

 

I COULD design it to handle even larger material.  But this is meant as a second stage kind of thing.  It was never designed to have shovels full of dirt just crammed into it.

 

Basically, classify your dirt first, using at least 1/4" mesh.  Everything smaller than that can be fed into this sluice.  Classifying only takes a few seconds, so it's not really a burden.

 

I thought about making an aluminum version, but if I were to sell them publicly, I MIGHT be able to make one a week.  Not even a halfway decent return for the amount of time it would take.

 

But 3D printing it would allow me to make drop-in upgrades, digitally design upgrades, etc.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

My misunderstanding.....   I thought that being so small (3.5"), you were classifying your concentrates.

"This will take trowels full of dirt, and separate black sand and gold from the rest of the larger and lighter materials."  This is assuming that someone installs the correct recovery system.

My thought is that you should design the recovery system(s) also.  Seems incomplete without it.

"Classifying only takes a few seconds, so it's not really a burden".    That would be assuming that you have a classifier(and sprayer if material is wet) attached to the sluice to spoon feed one scoop at a time.    Classifying is time consuming and a burden.  I've classified many cubic yards of material to "scoop feed" a Gold Cube.   

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I print using PLA, so the end result is actually much lighter than aluminum.  Plus, it's not technically "solid" plastic.  Where it would be 1/4" thick, I add in some internal ribbing to make it stronger, while using less material because of the air space.

I COULD add in a classification system but remember, this will never be designed to run massive cubic yards of dirt through.  You want that, you'll have to stick to the man-size metal systems.  This is for trowel feeding, sort of like a blue bowl, spiral wheel, or something like that.  I just don't have the time or resources to make this out of metal, wood, or anything else.  I'm poor (my job is about to disappear when my company gets absorbed by another, in a couple weeks).

I think at this point that I'm just going to build one for myself, and call it quits.  As many parts and small details as are in this, it would take ages to make just one from metal.  It wouldn't be feasible to make it a public item.  Yes, it's expensive using PLA (sort of), and I can't justify making this thing any more expensive than it will already be.  I can't keep making it bigger and bigger to accept baseball size rocks to be fed into it.  It's just PLA, not aluminum.  This was never designed as a competitor to the 4' tall, Gold Hog setups or anything that you just throw in shovel fulls of dirt.  It's meant to go through stuff like this:  maxresdefault.jpg

Not trying to be negative here.  This is why I came to a forum first, before I spent any money on a physical model.  If it didn't pan out (haha, nice pun), then I'd abandon it.  It's very possible that this is just another one of my failed ideas.  It happens.  Suck it up (another stupid pun.  lol) and move on. 😄

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, Sourdoughmoe said:

id buy it if it could fit in a backpack bring it into those stealthy areas 

That's the idea.  In addition to the video, what features would you like to see added to it?  Remember, I don't know what the final cost will be yet.  Material is the biggest factor.  Then there is the pump, battery, hose, mats, etc.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Similar Content

    • By Creekboy
      Just finished this project, figured somebody might like it around here. 


    • By GB_Amateur
      My sister ran into a fossiker when out camping who was having an issue with tiny shot while finish panning.  He was sucking the shot into his snuffer bottle when trying to collect the gold.  Any suggestions?  I have a feeling he's not the first person to be annoyed by this.
    • By jasong
      Does any place still make and sell the rubber Knudsen bowl liner? Google seems to just lead to a bunch of spam pages. I acquired an old bowl and the previous owner thought there was a store in Reno that made or sold them but I haven't had any luck locating said store. 
      Also semi-related I am rebuilding an old jig, never used one before, and I was wondering what people use for shot? Do you just buy steel shot in bulk like from an ammo place or is there something cheaper and better to use specific to jigs? I see tungsten shot available for jigs but it's the same density as gold more or less so I'm having trouble seeing how that would work, especially if I want to save the black sands too. I'm curious what people use here?
    • By Condor
      I ran 2 Ozt of my -50 mesh, black sand concentrate through the Blue Bowl.  It came out to .5 gram.  This was 2 oz dry concentrate off the top of the container, I suspect the bottom my be richer after all the jarring around for the past 2 weeks.  I'll send the Blue Bowl tailings and about a couple lbs of concentrates to Rege in PA to see what his Miller Table can do.  If I could fill the back of my truck with this stuff it might be worth something, but as it stands not really a game changer.
      Still waiting on Rokon parts, then back to Gold Country.  I've got a new plan, of course.  118 degrees here in Sunny Yuma tomorrow, but it's a dry heat.  Yeah great!

    • By Jim in Idaho
      I've been trying to come up with a unit to recover gems dry, but finally realized that the "granular convection" problem can't be defeated. In the process of building and trying various ideas, I came up with this unit. While the dry recovery of gems requires some very tight classifying, and thus isn't practical, I tried it for gold, and was simply amazed at its abilities for heavy metals. I have tried it on all sorts of raw materials, running bank feed at roughly 2" minus, and have yet to find a material it doesn't work on to one extent or another.
       I ran it dry...no water, on damp material at the LDMA Blue Bucket outing near Baker, Oregon a few weeks ago, and recovered flour and black sand from old tailings from previous outings. Running wet, the day before, on new material I recovered very near 100% on black sand and gold in front of several witnesses. They suggested re-running the tails, and zero black sand, or gold was found. Last weekend I attended a local club outing at Salmon, Idaho. The material was a heavy clay with lots of rocks....not a fun material, at all. At the common dig, one of the guys next to me, running a highbanker, mentioned that my little unit was handling the clay really well. I was the only person running 2" minus directly into the machine, and the rocks were agitating the material so the clay broke down, and the rocks were mostly clean before they went out to tails. The day prior to the common dig I went down to the locale the common material had been hauled from, and ran the material dry. This was  a nasty, damp material. I expected nothing and was surprised to see both black sand and gold when I did the cleanup. Certainly I lost quite a bit, but any recovery working dry from damp material is an accomplishment. This unit works wet or dry. Very little dust running dry. Very low water requirement when running wet...roughly 50 gallons/hour.
       The full utility US Patent has been applied for.
       You can see the prototype running at Bonanza Bar on the Snake, along with pics of the recovery here:  
       
      Jim
    • By kiwijw
      Hi there RR, All this gadget is doing is mechanically classifying material into a gold pan. Nothing you couldn't do with a manual classifier over your gold pan which you could possibly get away with. I know with my sluice boxing I made & use a bucket classifier than can process a lot of material pretty quickly to feed down the box. 
       
       
       
       
       
       
       
      Clean up time
       

      Good luck out there
      JW 
×