Jump to content

Going On First Hunt With Nox 800

Recommended Posts

I will be going out into the real world detecting this morning, going to a freshwater beach....not and old beach but busy on the weekends. I have seen other detectors out there but nothing too fancy.

We will see how the Nox does...I know lots of bottle caps.

Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites

Good luck

  • Thanks 1

Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just got back, was surprised as the river was running high.....one place I have been before almost had no beach at all.

The other beach I went to there was 3 folks fishing and 4 others detecting......they was leaving as I got there , was told that they had been there for about 2 or 3 hours before I got there.

  Well , I found a sinker , a nickle , 6 pennies.....we won't count the bottle caps or pull tabs.

But I am learning......going to take some doing compared to my MXT or MX Sport.

Looking forward to my next hunt.

  • Like 1

Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites

I didn't do much better today unless you count 2 junk toe rings.

  • Like 2

Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Similar Content

    • By cjc
      18/ How to Run “10 kHz” as a Cap / Iron Identifier
      A lower frequency like “10 kHz” is what can be called a “plodder.”  It responds slowly, makes sure its reporting accurately and only shows a couple of numbers to describe what it sees.  When you run “10 kHz,” make sure to give it the time it needs to do the task.  Switch over, wait for the threshold to return and make a slow, even coil pass.  Just as with “Multi” the first numbers that appear may be cap or gold-range indications--in the teens.  However, when you go to the cross sweep (or even a slight angle) the ground becomes apparent in the forum of a  ”20 plus” reading. This change will be a lot more definite than with “Multi.”  So go slow to let the slower frequency process, use the cross sweep and watch for the “wild” high number indicating a cap or iron.  “10 kHz” produces a more defined, more “general” meter response.  This response takes into account more of the ground’s signal--making “10 kHz” a great cap identifier. (This is also a great illustration of the dichotomy between what the high and low frequencies actually do).
      The idea though is to work on your coil and meter recognition skills so that having to make the change-over is a last resort for only those caps that display a very narrow band of numbers in “Multi.”  These are in the minority.  I especially go to “10 kHz” where the indication shows “14”--again--a good gold number.  
      (Note: If you are using the 800, in “5 Tone” a high “Tone Break” of around “19” or “20” will produce an intermittent high tone on caps with this test.
      Another interesting lesson to be observed when running “10 kHz” is that if you make multiple passes of a target sometimes the slowed response speed will cause the meter response to “double up”--that is it gives a “cumulative” high number.  This is something to watch for in that a response can be falsely “ID’ed” as higher than it is--in this case a worse signal.  Referring back to our “coil control pass types” above, this kind of a response comes from making “keep in” passes--instead of letting the target leave the detection field each swing (so as to “reset” the meter).  Both have value in identifying responses but it’s good to be aware of the difference. 
      It’s important to recognise the parallels between this machine and the CTX.  With the CTX this “grounded” number comes in the form of a “1” or “30” “off screen” response--indicating iron or steel (non-constancy).  I’ve heard these referred to as “cross-feeds” In that they initially sound good as the two parts of the response “connect” on the first pass--but this electrical “join” is then rapidly processed out with subsequent coil passes.
      With the Equinox these indications are more centered on the meter--"10” for rusted caps or “20” plus for steel caps.  It’s more like where you have a coin next to iron--pulling the response down (or up towards the “wrap” zone).  With an analog detector--either of these (CTX or Equinox “outlying” numbers) would be the low tone (or “nulls)” of iron mixed in to the audio response, or a high “sound off” or “false.” 
       From: "The Minelab Equinox: An Advanced Guide" (2018)
    • By Steve Herschbach
      without the 80 gram scuff cover and 660 grams with scuff cover. The 11" coil weighs 524 grams with scuff cover. Added weight to front of Equinox 136 grams or 4.86 ounces. Equinox total weight with 15" coil 3.26 lbs.
      The CTX 17” x 13.5” coil weighs 901.5 grams / 31.8 oz with scuff cover.

      Minelab Equinox 12" x 15" DD coil

    • By Tnsharpshooter
      Put this together this morning for folks.
      Btw hot program used on Deus version 5.2,TX power remained at level 2.
      Equinox using Park 2sensitivity  24.
    • By Tnsharpshooter
      These experiments done over medium mineralized soil.
    • By Mark Gillespie
      Well I can say for sure the wireless headphones that come with the 800 model are the best I've found so far.  I've been experimenting with different wireless brands of headphones and I've yet to find a single pair that comes close to the performance and minimal lag time compared to the stock phones.  Amazing machine.
      Congrats Minelab.

      Minelab Bluetooth / Apt-X Low Latency Wireless Headphones for Equinox 3011-0370
    • By Boogness
      I’m looking for input about these three machines on what you like vs dislike on each of these detectors. 
      Me, personally since I do not own or even seen any of these detectors will even give my own likes vs dislikes.
      GM1000 - I like how it is a very hot machine capable of finding small stuff and how I hear it is a turn on and go detector with only a ferrous/nonferrous indicator. I don’t know how it reacts to hot rocks or if there is away you can avoid them. The best part about these three is I hear it’s the simplest to use(thinking about my dad who is interested but doesn’t have the patience to learn machines if he ever wants to use one of mine)
      Equinox - again I like how it is hot on small gold and even more with the new 6” coil. I hear it’s water proof? I don’t know how complicated it can be to learn this machine or if it can read the ground for search a good spot to run a sluice.
      Whites 24k - pretty much if it is hot on small gold I like the idea. What I really like about this machine is it’s ability to track black sand for a possible prospect. I like the option to cancel out the iron on both the low reading numbers and the high reading numbers. I’m thinking this might be a little complicated for a newbie with all the functions but I really like the controls the machine has. 
      Bottom line is I am trying to decide which new detector I am gonna buy next year and want to hear your likes and dislikes about each of these machines.
      Minelab Gold Monster 1000 Information page
      White's Goldmaster 24K Information page
      Minelab Equinox 800 Information page

      Minelab Gold Monster 1000 vs White's Goldmaster 24K vs Minelab Equinox