Jump to content

Minelab Equinox Update Released


Tnsharpshooter

Recommended Posts

50 minutes ago, TerryinHawaii said:

On my newest Equinox, I had no problems installing the update.  But on my original Equinox, it kept saying that it did  not recognize it.  I then used a rubber eraser to clean the 4 contacts on the control pod.  Problem solved.  I did a little air testing and my newest unit is now more stable with possible more depth too.

And where do I get an eraser at this time of night?  LOL!!!!  

Looks like I'm gonna have to go to a school yard and find that aluminum eraser tip of a pencil.....

Thanks for the tip!!!!

  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites


8 minutes ago, LoyalistDigger said:

When did you purchase you detector? Gonna try your method tomorrow.

I got my detector around 12 Feb.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Johnnysalami1957 said:

I had some "not responding" issue also so I ran it in Windows compatibility mode and it worked fine. Win 7 64 . Ran Win XP compatibility mode and worked.

SUCCESS!!!!

Seeing as I had no pencil eraser to clean the contacts, I turned the machine on and plugged it in. I ran the MUU in WinXP compatibility mode also. Started updating in seconds.

Why it works like that is beyond me.....

Thanks everyone for the ideas and hints. JohnnySalami, I salute you!!! ? 

WinXPMode.png

MUUSuccess.png

  • Like 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well, my Nox 600 would not update at first--app just kept telling me to connect the detector.  But, I noticed that when I went to close the app, it had stopped running; so it seemed it was a problem of the app not being compatible with my Windows 7 system. I right clicked on the .exe file and selected "Troubleshoot compatibility" and then allowed it to run using the resulting compatibility mode, which was Windows XP (service pack 2). This worked.  Not sure what flavor of Windows Minelab tested the app under, but they should test it with a wider selection.

The Nox seems to work as before the update, with a coin on my floor, but not yet tested in the field.  So far, so good :)

BTW, the app is an .exe file, and once you've downloaded the app successfully, the browser type should no longer matter.

  • Like 2
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Worked well for me using Win 10. The only issue I saw was that the documentation said the detector must stay on during the update. When mine updated, I turned it on like it said to do, but then it shut itself off and did the update. I unplugged the cable when the software said that the update was complete.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I was connected but didn't turn on my detector.  As soon as it went on the software recognized it was attached and updated almost automatically.

Mitchel

I'll be using it later tonight.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, Walter S. Fowler said:

Also having problem even downloading the Minelab Update Utility to my computer.  Computer is a Apple MacBook Pro with all the minimum system requirements present.  Couldn't download MUU using Safari so tried Chrome and that didn't work either.  I typed in the long Utility address and comes up not found.  Am i going to have to send back my Equinox back to the factory to get new update??? Very frustrating to say the least. 

Walt, bring it by my office, I'll upload it for you.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I guess I'll have to be the unlucky one here today. Cannot update for the life of me and I've tried all angles that I can think of... and the suggestions in this thread. 

Installed/uninstalled 4 updates, changed windows compatability mode, disabled anti virus, connected with power on both ways for laptop & machine, took the eraser to the connections, plugged it in with power on, power off, plug in, plug out.... all to no avail.

Will be calling Minelab on Thursday morning. 

  • Sad 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Similar Content

    • By ColonelDan
      I've read several threads on the soon-to-be-fielded Deus 2 and how it will compare to the Equinox. There have been many good views on this topic so I thought I'd share mine. As you read this, keep in mind the views expressed here are worth just as much as you've paid for them. 😁

      1. Wireless vs Wired: I'm 99% a salt water beach hunter with my EQX 800 and the way I grid a beach, I often go from the damp sand to the wet sand and then into the surf (only about 1 foot deep due to concerns over water intrusion so I keep the control box dry). Given that, a Deus II for me would have to be constantly wired from coil to control box in order to work in the surf. For that reason, a totally wireless capability would not be that enticing since the wire from coil to box would be a permanent configuration.

      2. Waterproof: I owned a Deus and found it to be a solidly engineered machine so I'm not a skeptic where XP claims of being waterproof are concerned. Were I to make a wager, I'd bet on much better waterproof performance in the Deus II than was the original ML waterproof claim for the EQX. Being truly waterproof is important for me and not because I hunt deeper than 1 foot in salt water these days because I don't. Ours is an outdoor hobby so I think all detectors should be waterproof...at the very least, reliably weatherproof. How many times have you been caught in the rain or dropped your detector in a puddle of water? Even if you are a land hunter and never go near any water, replacing a damaged or inop machine due to moisture intrusion isn't a trivial thing.

      3. Build quality: The Deus I had was quality built, rugged and reliable. No coil ear issues, wobbly shafts or arm cuff breakage. In my view, it was a much more rugged detector than Minelab products in certain areas. XP doesn't seem to pinch pennies as did Minelab on simple things. Recall the original skimpy gaskets they put in the CTX 3030 that caused flooding of the battery box. The issue was solved when they came out with merely a little thicker gasket! Their use of cheap coil ears, arm cuffs and wobbly shafts on the EQX series is another example. For a few pennies more per unit, they would have saved untold thousands in warranty replacement costs in both the CTX and EQX series machines. Although they are among the very best where software technology is concerned, I never understood that "penny wise pound foolish" approach in their physical build design.

      4. Overall Performance: This is where the EQX was superior to my original Deus. The multi-frequency/multi IQ of the EQX vs the selectable single frequency of the Deus was an obvious choice in my salt water beach hunting environment. I eventually sold my Deus for that reason. Now, if XP has really overcome that limitation in the Deus II with their FMF feature, I'll be happily impressed.

      5. Final Thoughts: I'm with the others who will take a "wait and see" approach. But, given my past experience with XP engineering, I have no doubt the Deus II will be a very capable salt water beach detector. Will it generally outperform the Minelabs? TBD. Will it be found that XP pinched pennies on their build quality? I say no. It will be a well built unit. Will it be more comfortable to use than the Minelabs? Yes. Will it be more complex in its settings options than the Minelabs? Yes. Will it's overall performance justify the higher price tag compared to the current EQX? TBD but that will be determined solely by and in the eye of the beholder as the saying goes.

      Just a few thoughts from my foxhole...  
    • By UT Dave
      I'd like to increase my knowledge and skill in tuning my Nox 800 for specific conditions.
      Those of you who tune your machines off the factory defaults, please share what you have!  Not what your settings are, but how you arrive at those settings.
      For instance, is there a relationship between different settings, such, that a preferred order of operations is suggested for optimal results?  I noise cancel, then ground grab, then adjust sensitivity.  FE2, Recovery, Threshold, is there a best practice for the order in which they are set?
      How do you know when you should increase or decrease FE2 or Recovery?  What factors or indicators go into that decision?
      I've arrived at my current default beginning state, by trying to make things first "worse" in my test garden.  By adjusting each setting individually up and down though the full range of adjustment, noting whether signal got better or worse at each step, to get what I considered the best signal on a deep silver coin.  But doing so in a controlled situation with a known target like that is one thing, knowing how to read variable conditions and how to tune accordingly is quite another.
      How do you make your tuning decisions in the field?  What are the settings you most frequently find need adjusted to accommodate search conditions?
      - Dave
    • By Veisal
      Here are some improvements to the ergonomics of the minelab equinox 600/800 made with a 3D printer 
       
       






    • By Momokahn
      Just like the college sports transfer portal, I too have decided to change my mind.😁  I was set on buying the new NM Legend.  Instead I visited a local MD dealer today and had a chance to test drive the dealers Equinox 800. The Equinox 800 checked every box and then some.  It will get me where I want to be in metal detecting.  The dealer was pretty impressed on how I was able to navigate through the controllers menus and settings. It is on order and will be here next week.  Now for the "goodies" getting thrown in for free.  Both editions of Andy Sabisch's Handbooks on the Equinox 600/800, a Minelab Hat (I love hats), and any magazine, current or past editions that are in stock.  And there are a lot in stock.  Excited is an understatement.
    • By Dan(NM)
      I had a very productive day hunting a city park in a nearby town. Took me 7 1/2 hours to round up all these keepers. The v nickel is the fifth one I've taken out of this park in the last 2 weeks. Ended up with a nickel trifecta to boot.  I think I'm going to get the 5x10 coil due to the amount of iron and debris in the places that are producing the coins. I did pretty good by going nice and slow and digging all iffy tones. I was very surprised to see the Canadian quarter come out, that's the second one I've found this year.
      Nox 800
      Park 1
      Recovery 3
      Iron Bias 0
      Sens 23
      Manual GB 30
      2 Tones
      Tone break at 10
      No Disc-wide open


    • By Dan(NM)
      I went back to a park that's been producing some good finds. Today was a very unusual nickel day. Ended up with 3 silver war nickels, a v nickel, an unidentified coin, 4 Wheaties and a religious medallion. I didn't really have a goal this year for silver coins but with today's finds that puts me at 112 for the year. Running park 1...2 tones..no disc...manual gb at 30..recovery speed 3..iron bias at F2-0.. tone break at 10...sens 23.  All war nickels hit at 15, the V hit 12-13, the unidentified coin(?) hits at 12.

×
×
  • Create New...