Jump to content
Sign in to follow this  
Steve Herschbach

Detailed Review Of White's New Goldmaster 24K

Recommended Posts


Thanks Steve, a good review! Sounds like a decent machine, especially for the price.  I've never had a detector that can use a concentric coil but sounds great.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank You Steve for "making" the time to do a quick evaluation on this newcomer.
I myself have been waiting "years" for Whites to upgrade the GMT line !
I used a GMT for quite a few seasons and did very well in nuggets and meteorites with it.
Truth being over 60 small nuggets from 1 patch alone.
Next thing will be getting my hands on one to try out.
Its also very satisfiying to me to see a new "Made in the U.S.A"  entry in the Gold Specific detector field.
Hope to see you somewhere in the field this season.
Hapy Huntn.

GOLD 003 (2014_12_19 01_20_22 UTC).jpg

gold 009.jpg

  • Like 9

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Great Review Steve! Lot of detail information and honest evaluation on the new 24K,  White's should put you on the payroll!

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Informative write-up Steve.  Thank you.

Question.  Is there a noticable difference/enhancement in performance with the extra voltage put to the coil with the 24k, compared to the lesser voltage of ther GMT?  

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I did not have a GMT to compare directly, and so can’t answer that question with any degree of confidence. Things get real hair splitting when detecting 1/10th grain nuggets. I still know people who think the Goldmaster 3 is better than the GMT.

I have been getting lots of messages from people who seem to think I have secret private information regarding which over 30 kHz detector is best. The truth is not much has changed since the 50 kHz Goldmaster II came out around 1990. I can drag a half dozen of these “over 30 kHz” nugget detectors out and spend hours trying to figure out which one I like best. They basically all get the job done, and none so well as to make the others not worth consideration.

It very much does boil down to what feels best on my arm and sounds best to my ear. Most importantly, which machine is best depends a lot on the exact mix of ground, hot rocks, size and type of gold, the amount of trash, and level of operator expertise. This being true I might prefer one model at one location, and a different one someplace else. This is actually almost guaranteed.

I just don’t see how anyone can make decisions like this based on anything other than getting and using the detectors in question. Sure, I could pick one for you, but you might hate it for reasons that matter not at all to me.

I think the 24K is a fine machine but my gut feeling based on memory is no, it does not automatically blow the GMT away. It’s just different, that’s all, and I have no idea whether a die hard GMT user would consider this an upgrade or not. From my perspective going from one 48 kHz detector to another 48 kHz detector is a side step. To really add capability you need machines to be as different as possible, not the same as possible. Will switching from a GMT to a 24K make a giant difference in gold getting capability? Not really. Would adding a TDI SL to a GMT extend a prospectors capability in a significant way? Much more likely.

So if I was going nugget detecting tomorrow and had to pick one, the GMT or 24K, which would it be? I honestly do not have a preference. I tend to trust the GMT more as being the “old reliable” but I did like the concentric on the 24K. Yet I have never used that coil on the GMT and it might do just as well. Gun to head I would probably go with the 24K just because it’s new and I do like the new toys. But if a GMT owner gets a 24K and says they prefer the GMT I am not going to argue with them either. If I can barely decide which machine of four I like best when they are sitting in front of me then I have to really, really sympathize with those trying to make these decisions just based on reading reviews.

  • Like 7
  • Thanks 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for the reply Steve.

Most of the changes/upgrades on the 24k are pretty clear, or understood with your hands on explanation, e.g. the different threshold system.

I guess I'm trying to wrap my head around the end result, or performance enhancement caused by the increase in voltage to the coil, if any?   Whites has made a point to prominently mention it as an improvement over the GMT, yet with no explanation of any benefits to be derived.

Perhaps tboykin can chime in?

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Well, I have a partial answer. I just volunteered to help Tom at the Rye Patch event on Saturday. I am sure GMTs and 24K models will both be present and so inquiring minds will have the ability to find out more this weekend!

https://www.detectorprospector.com/forums/topic/7513-rye-patch-nugget-shoot-2018-come-see-the-elephant/?do=findComment&comment=76385

 

  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I really appreciate your honesty in your reviews Steve.   A manufacturer has to be pretty confident in their product to pass one onto you to review so I guess Whites are feeling pretty happy and confident with the 24k, and it does seem a decent machine but it was just released in a time when there are many choices it makes it hard to any one machine to stand out.  I really hope Whites get a good amount of sales and we start seeing a good run of finds from users of it as I'm sure it's very capable and we need new detectors to be a success, we want more competition, not less...  I can't even consider owning one with White's no longer having an NZ dealer and importing makes it not viable price wise and I guess It would have to be significantly better than what I have already to suffer the importing costs.

I hope more info comes to hand about the boosted power to the coil as with time it could prove to be the feature that makes me want one even more! 

Upon looking at the Whites 24k I notice it has a feature I do like, it sits stable on the ground.  I get really annoyed with my detectors falling over all the time.

  • Like 4

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
20 hours ago, phrunt said:

Upon looking at the Whites 24k I notice it has a feature I do like, it sits stable on the ground.  I get really annoyed with my detectors falling over all the time.

You stole my thunder. I was going to say that. 👍

Steve: Great review. Unbiased, straight up & honest....as always. White's got there 10 cents worth. Even more so with you going to front up on Saturday :biggrin: Good on you. Enjoy the day. Only wish I could be there.

JW :smile: 

  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Sign in to follow this  

  • Similar Content

    • By Aureous
      Hi, I just had to register and reply to this thread. I own a Fisher Gold Bug 2, a Gold Monster 1000 and now a Whites Goldmaster 24K. Ive also owned a Goldmaster Vsat, Goldmaster III and a GMT. Having used all of these, I have to say that the 24K isnt the most sensitive of the high frequency VLF's out there. Right now, the old Gold Bug 2 with the 6.5x3" is still king of the heap and the GM1000 is able to beat that under some circumstances. BUT, the 24K has the smoothest ground balance Ive ever used and rock-stable threshold. It finds deeper sub-gram gold than all of them using that 6.5" concentric coil. I had the opportunity to run side by side with a friend using a GM1000 and although he got 6 bits of gold to my 2, all but one of them was under .05, whereas my 2 weighed .4gm. I also found 22 bits of junk, versus his 4. All of this was from a patch that has been completely hammered over 3 decades. Last few times I used a GB2 there, I got nothing. Methinks the higher coil power and the matched concentric coil along with the XGB tracking make for a very powerful new machine for small gold. I am very keen to try the upcoming 6x3 shooter DD coil soon as the 10x5 seems pretty good on hotter ground here in Victoria. I'll keep you all posted with my finds. One thing I MUST say about the GM1000 in comparison though....some guys here are using them to great effect by ignoring the basic rule of reducing sensitivity to allow proper ground balance. They run them flat out at manual 10 sensitivity and then cannot even ground balance....but on quiet or mild ground, the digital audio of the Monster eliminates much of the noise and the tiniest gold can be 'plucked' from the pops, clicks and farts of the SAT adjustments and hot rock re-tunes.....but only by those people who have their 'ears tuned' to the sounds properly. Me personally, these noises are maddening and I rush back to the smoothness of the 24K and listen for the bigger, weightier targets. Stay tuned for results here folks!
    • By Mike Hillis
      I've been looking hard at what to pair up to my F75 for jewelry hunting, specifically Micro jewelry hunting.   The Whites 24K is under consideration for this.  I like the audio boost features, the iron cancel, hot rock cancel and the non-normalized TID number spread.  I also like that it has a concentric coil offering.    I guess the main question is, will it actually detect micro jewelry good enough to make me choose it over the Goldbug II.     
      My Micro jewelry measurement target is a 3mm 4-prong 10k White Gold earring post.   
      Any feedback is helpful. 
      HH
      Mike 
       
    • By Steve Herschbach
      Update January 2019 - I started reviewing detectors on the internet over twenty years ago. At the time it seemed I was providing a service since good information was hard to find. I enjoyed reviewing machines in detail for those who were interested. The internet was more friendly back in those days.
      Times have changed, and these days everyone with a video camera is a metal detector expert. In particular there is a trend where industry insiders like me are considered tainted sources of information, not to be trusted. Personally, I don’t need people questioning my integrity. I was doing this for fun and that sucked all the fun out of it. I am therefore no longer accepting invitations to test or review metal detecting equipment.
      That said, my thanks to those of you who have expressed your appreciation for my efforts over the years. You can find my collected detector reports here. The focus on this website going forward will be individual user reviews as part of the new Metal Detector Database with User Reviews. Check it out! 

       
    • By Steve Herschbach
      White's Goldmaster 24K Advanced Guide, 5.73 MB pdf file, 32 pages
      White's Goldmaster 24K Data & Reviews
      White's Metal Detector Forum
    • By Steve Herschbach
      White's Goldmaster 24K Owner's Guide, 1.53 MB pdf file, 6 pages
      White's Goldmaster 24K Data & Reviews
      White's Metal Detector Forum
    • By Steve Herschbach
      White's Goldmaster 24K Brochure, 2.91 MB pdf file, 2 pages
      White's Goldmaster 24K Data & Reviews
      White's Metal Detector Forum
×
×
  • Create New...